• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.33 no.6
• /
• pp.21-36
• /
• 2023

2023년 10월, 공통 취약점 평가체계의 신규 버전이 8년 만에 출시되었다. 공통 취약점 평가체계는 취약점의 심각도 점수 및 특성 정보를 제공하는 시스템으로, 취약점 관리활동의 바로미터로 활용되고 있다. 그러나 기존 공통 취약점 평가체계의 점수는 기반 시설에서의 실제 취약점 악용 가능성과의 불일치 및 운영 환경의 특성을 반영하지 못하는 한계점이 존재한다. 본 연구에서는 미국 등을 비롯한 국외 기반시설의 취약점 정량화 평가체계 선행 연구 및 적용 현황등을 분석하고, 이번에 신규 출시된 공통취약점 평가체계의 주요한 변경사항을 다룬다. 더불어 국내 원자력 시설의 운영 특성을 반영하여 개발되고 있는 취약점 정량화 평가시스템에 대해 소개한다.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1999.10e
• /
• pp.242-248
• /
• 1999

이 논문은 지역적 동사구 분할에 바탕을 두고 서술어가 문말에 위치하는 언어에 특성에서 기인하는 속성을 반영하는 부분적 그러나 빠른 구문분석에 관해 논한다. 즉 완벽성 보다는 신속함 그리고 신뢰에 바탕을 둔 새로운 한국어 구문분석에 대해 논의한다. 기존의 문법이론 대신 한국어의 형태적 통사적 특성에 기인한, 성분들의 분할(partitions)에 의한 단위 (chunks) 분석방법을 제안한다. 근간은 동사구 장벽(VP-barrier) 알고리즘이며, 이 알고리즘은 한 문장안에서의 다양한 동사의 파생접사에 의해 형성되는 관형화, 명사화, 부사화 등의 파생구조와 내포된 동사구(인용문, 종속문 등)에 의해 형성되는 지역적 동사구내에서 그 성분들의 논리적인 분할을 구성하고 다시 그 다음 요소와 체계적으로 결합하는 관계로 확장하여 가능한 구조들을 생성한다. 다시 언어의존적인 발견적 규칙(heuristics)들을 점수화하여 가장 높은 점수의 단위구조를 적격한 구조로 선택한다. 이 방법은 하위범주화 및 의미정보를 사용하지 않는, 빠른 구문분석이 요구되는 시스템을 위해 고안되었으며, 집단적인 노력이 아닌 개인적인 노력 및 최소의 자원으로도 최대의 효과를 얻을 수 있다는데 그 의의가 있다.

• Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
• /
• v.53 no.2
• /
• pp.136-147
• /
• 2002

Background : Interstitial lung disease has various manifestations that are differentiated by their pathology, progress and treatment. However, all manifestations eventually progresses to pulmonary fibrosis. Recent studies have shown that apoptosis of pulmonary epithelial cells might be related to pulmonary fibrosis. The correlation of the apoptotic index with the clinical manifestations, pathological findings, HRCT findings and the response to treatment were examined. Materials and Methods : Twenty subjects (14 men, 16 women), who had been diagnosed with interstitial lung disease through an open lung biopsy, were enrolled in this study. The subtypes were one AIP, two NIP, eight BOOP, and seven UIP cases. The apoptotic index was scaled from 0-2 depending on the fraction of positive staining cells by TUNEL method. The clinical severity was assessed by a modification of a previously developed CRP scoring system. The pathologic scores were based on 4 components: fibrosis, cellularity, desquamation, and granulation. In the HRCT study, each lobe was scored by the radiologists on a scale for both fibrosis and ground-glass attenuation. The treatment response was assessed by an increase in more than 10% of the CRP score, and comparing the results 3 months before and after treatment. Results : The apoptotic index showed no correlation with the CRP and HRCT scoring system. The apoptotic index correlated with the pathologic elements including fibrosis, cellularity and the desquamation score (p<0.05). Of the 16 patients who received corticosteroid therapy, 9 patients (56.3%) responded to therapy. There was no correlation between the response to corticosteroid and the apoptotic index. In the case of patients with acute and subacute ILD, the apoptotic index showed a correlation with the cellularity, desquamation, and the total histological score (p<0.05). In the case of patients with chronic ILD, the apoptotic index correlated with the fibrosis and cellularity score (p<0.05). Conclusion : Apoptosis of the pulmonary epithelial cells is implicated in the pathogenesis of interstitial lung disease particularly on a pathological basis.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.22 no.8
• /
• pp.15-20
• /
• 2012

최근 고도의 지능적인 대량 공격이 지속적으로 발생하고 있으며, 다형성 악성코드 공격 증가로 인하여 개인과 기업 및 국가 기반시설까지 사이버위협에 노출되고 있다. 현재, 국가차원의 대응센터에서는 이러한 위협 대응을 위해 공격 위험도를 CVSS(Common Vulnerability Scoring System) 취약점 등급시스템으로 점수화하여 단계적으로 경보를 발령한다. 하지만 현재의 경보발령 체계가 공격이 이루어진 후 사후 대책으로 제공되고 있어, 공격발생 전에 공격 징후를 포착하거나 공격량 예측과 같은 전역 네트워크 차원의 위협에 대한 대응 기술은 미비하다. 본 논문에서는 최근 봇넷 기반의 공격들이 많아지고 있는 상황에서 봇넷을 네트워크 위협 전조증상으로 정의하고, NCSC(National Cyber Security Center), KrCERT와 같은 국가기관의 경보등급 산정체계를 기반으로 전역차원의 예 경보 발령 및 공격량 예측 시스템에 대해 연구한다.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.46 no.1
• /
• pp.86-95
• /
• 2018

The lack of research on the suitability of park green spaces as a form of earthquake shelter leads to difficultiesin highlighting the functions of these shelters. In this study, the weight value and priority of 27 indexes derived from previous studies are calculated by the AHP method and then a score table was established via a transformed score method. The final evaluation grade is divided into five levels: very inadequate, inadequate, general, adequate, highly adequate. Finally, indexes that were difficult to judge were explained. Based on this, the suitability evaluation of park green spaces as a form of earthquake shelter can be performed. The evaluation results can reflect the advantages and disadvantages of park green space as a form of earthquake shelter and indicate directionsfor construction in the future.

• Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.51-61
• /
• 2013

In order to answer the research question of 'how the listed World Cultural Heritage is being managed now?' the indicators of management effectiveness evaluation were set up based on international principles on the basis of the preceding research. The weights and priorities of each evaluation indicators were worked out through the Analytic Network Process(ANP) Technique. Therefore, the evaluation system to evaluate the management status of the World Heritage Sites have been established. Also, through calculate the converted score of 100 points based on the relative importance of these evaluation indicators among the World Heritage Site management effectiveness evaluation index for scoring and the score table was created. When evaluated for the management status of World Heritage Sites to set five rating of the final evaluation score: very deficiency, deficiency, general, good, excellent. According to the results the follow-up study will be carried out in the future.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2021.06a
• /
• pp.464-464
• /
• 2021

우리나라는 최근 도시지역의 광역화로 인해 시가화 지역이 지속적으로 증가하고 있으며, 이로 인해 증가한 불투수면적은 이수 및 치수 측면에서 다양한 문제를 야기하여 유역의 물순환 체계를 왜곡하고 있다. 더불어 하천의 건천화에 따른 하천 유지유량의 감소 및 공공수역으로 방출되는 오염물질의 증가는 하천의 다양한 환경적, 생태학적 문제를 야기하고 있다. 따라서 최근에는 유역 물순환 관리가 국가 물관리 정책의 핵심 전략으로 부각되고 있으며, 적절한 물순환 관리를 위해서는 물순환 건전성이 취약한 우선관리 유역을 도출하고, 해당 유역을 중심으로 보다 체계적이고 통합적인 유역관리 기술이 필요하다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 유역 물순환에 영향을 미치는 주요 요소들을 기후, 수문, 수질 및 사회·경제적 요인 측면으로 구분하고, Pressure-State-Response (PSR) framework를 적용하여 각 요소 별 주요 평가 지표들을 압력 (Pressure), 상태 (State) 및 반응(Reponse) 요인으로 분류하였다. 또한 전국 소권역 단위에 대하여 각 지표들을 분석하여 기후, 수문, 수질 및 사회·경제적요인 별 물순환 건강성 점수를 산정하였다. 한편, 지역 및 요인별 물순환 건강성 점수를 기반으로 핫스팟 분석 (Hot Spot Analysis)을 수행하여, 통계적으로 유의미한 패턴을 나타내는 지역을 중심으로 우선관리가 필요한 지역을 도출하였다. 본 연구에서 도출한 물순환 건강성 평가 요소별 점수 및 핫스팟 분석 결과는 향후 물순환 우선관리 지역 선정에 있어 기초자료로 활용될 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.201-207
• /
• 2019

This study has evaluated whether the method of using the combination of different risk group, according to K-TIRADS classification and K-TIRADS classification in thyroid ultrasonography is useful in a differential diagnosis of benign and malignant nodules. The subject was patients underwent thyroid ultrasonography and retrospective analysis were performed based on the results of fine needle aspiration cytology. A chi-square test was performed for the difference analysis of the score system in K-TIRADS and different risk group according to the benign and malignant of thyroid nodule. The optimized cut off value was determined by the K-TIRADS score and different risk group to predict malignant nodule through ROC curve analysis. In the differential verification result of K-TIRADS and different risk group, according to the classification of benign and malignant nodule group each showed significant difference statistically(p=.001). In the point classification according to K-TIRADS for the prediction of benign and malignant in ROC curve analysis showed AUC 0.786, Cut-off value>2(p=.001), and in the different risk group, it was decided as AUC 0.640, Cut-off value>2(p=.001). When discovering the nodule in thyroid ultrasound, it is considered that the K-TIRADAS which helps in identifying benign and malignant thyroid nodules, it is considered to be helpful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, than the classification system according to Different risk group, and when applying the classification system according to K-TIRADS, it is considered that it can reduce unnecessary fine needle aspiration cytology and could be helpful in finding the malignant nodules early.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.27 no.5
• /
• pp.1285-1291
• /
• 2016

To quantify an concept we often use Likert summated rating scale of original or standardized variables in case the variables are relatively less. When variables have different scales, standardized values tends to be used rather than the original values. This is also true in evaluating systems. For example, we may use standardized values of local tax levy, population, and etc. and use the summed value of the standardized values to access the degrees of development. In this paper, we propose using a data-driven weighted sum for a scoring system and the way how to obtain the weights. We apply the proposed method to a real data set and find that proposed method is better than the usual summated rating scale.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.15 no.1
• /
• pp.264-275
• /
• 2015

While the method of prioritization has been practicing in the community needs-based programs to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of community health planning, it has not been systematically used. This study aims to suggest more sophisticated method of prioritizing. Based on the analysis of 81 community health plans which adopt prioritizing method, this study tried to examine their methods and criteria and evaluate their adequacy. In the prioritization process, projects themselves, rather than health problems, were commonly adopted for the subject of the analysis. The most used was the Basic priority rating, followed by the Prioritization matrix. Looking at the size of health problem among the prioritization criteria, the prevalence for chronic diseases and the proportion of people with health problems for health behaviors, mainly were used as indicators. Along with the size of health problem, other factors such as the degree of seriousness of health problem, and the effectiveness of intervention have been used as the criteria of prioritizing, not fully supported by objective data base and the clear standard of scoring. In the prioritization, the analysis need to be limited only to health problems, and the scoring criteria for each health problem area be presented.