• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.56-59
• /
• 2004

The hamstring tendons are popular for autografts in a variety of reconstructive procedures. The hamstring autografts are used widely for its potential advantages over the patella bone-tendon-bone(BTB) autograft, including lower graft site morbidity and easier harvesting technique. However, the use of hamstrings has potential disadvantages such as the damage of infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve, premature tendon amputation, and tendon split following inadequate hamstring identifications. In our studies, we used modified technique for harvesting the hamstring to decrease potential disadvantages. Reflected hamstring flap method seems to be easy and safe in avoiding nerve damage and tendon splitting. We recommend the reflected hamstring flap method for harvesting hamstring tendons.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.85-91
• /
• 2007

Purpose: To analyze the clinical results and second look arthroscopic findings of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction with a tibialis anterior tendon allograft and a hamstring tendon autograft. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the cases of athroscopic ACL reconstructions using allogenous tibialis anterior(TA) tendon and autogenous hamstring tendon done from March, 2002 to August, 2005 and followed-up more than 1 year. The 250 cases were included in this study and allogenous TA tendon was used in 150 cases and autogenous hamstring tendon in 100 cases. The mean follow-up period was 15 months and 14 months, respectively. The clinical evaluation was done by Lachman test, Pivot shift test, KT-1000 arthrometer and International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) knee score. Graft tension, synovial coverage were observed in cases of second look arthroscopy. Results: At final follow-up, there was no significance between the two groups in clinical examination. On second look arthroscopy, synovial coverage was better in autogenous hamstring tendon group than allogenous TA tendon group(p=0.005). But no difference was found in graft tension(p>0.05). Conclusion: There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical results. But autogenous hamstring tendon group had better synovial coverage than allogenous TA tendon group in second look arthroscopy.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.19-25
• /
• 2004

Purpose: To compare the results of two different autografts used to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament(ACL): bone-patellar tendon-bone and quadruple hamstring tendon. Materials and Methods: Forty one cases (20 bone-patellar tendon-bone cases and 21 quadruple hamstring tendon cases) were followed up more than 2 years postoperatively. Patellar tendons were fixed with interference screws and hamstring tendons were fixed with cross pins and intrafix sheaths and screws. Follow-up results were evaluated with KT-2000 arthrometer, International knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) evaluation form and follow up X-ray Donor site morbidity was analysed. Results: Final IKDC) scores more than B grade and side to side differences of manual maximum test using KT-2000 arthrometer showed insignificant differences(p>) between the two groups. Plain radiographs of hamstring group showed marked widening of the femoral and tibial tunnels at postoperative 2 years. Patellar tendon group showed 30% rate of anterior knee complications. Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring graft with new fixation method showed comparable clinical results to using autogenous patellar tendon graft with fewer anterior knee symptoms.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.7-11
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction using autogenous hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis tendon. Materials and Methods: Between March 2002 and March 2005, We performed 30 ACL reconstuructions using hamstring autograft and 20 ACL reconstuructions using tibialis tendon allograft. The average follow up period was 22 months in auto-hamstring tendon and 18 months in allo-tibialis tendon. For the clinical evaluation, we measured the Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC) score and anterior laxity by KT-2000 arthrometer at final follow up and compare the results between two groups. Results: The Lysholm score improved from 69.5 preoperatively, to 95.3 at final follow-up in the hamstring autograft groups and from 69.0 to 90.4 in the tibialis allograft groups. According to the IKDC evaluation form, 80% of autogenous hamstring tendon group and 73% of allograft group were good results, higher than B(almost normal)(p>0.05). The average KT-2000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, decreased from 7.1mm preoperatively, to 1.8mm at final follow-up in the hamstring autograft groups and from 7.4 mm to 2.4mm in the tibialis allograft groups. Conclusion: The clinical results of ACL reconstruction using auto-hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis tendon showed no significant differences. The allo-tibialis tendon is an acceptable substitute for auto-hamstring tendon in ACL reconstruction.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.18-26
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study is to compare the clinical results of ACL reconstruction between three groups using hamstring tendon autograft, mixed and tibialis tendon allograft. Materials and Methods: Between August 2003 and August 2008, we analyzed 169 cases of ACL reconstruction, 66 cases used hamstring tendon autograft, 42 cases used mixed graft and 61 cases used tibialis tendon allograft, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. For the clinical evaluation, we evaluated the Lysholm score, Telos stress test device and IKDC score. Results: The average side to side difference in Telos stress test decreased from $7.5{\pm}1.0$ mm to $1.6{\pm}1.0$ mm in autograft group, from $7.6{\pm}1.1$ mm to $1.4{\pm}1.1$ mm in mixed graft group and from $7.4{\pm}1.3$ mm to $2.5{\pm}1.3$ mm in allograft group. The average Lysholm knee score improved from 58.6 to 92.3 in autograft group, from 60.6 to 92.6 in mixed graft group and from 55.3 to 91.5 in allograft group. There was no significant difference between three groups in clinical results. At second look arthroscopy, tension of ligament and synovial coverage were good result in autograft and mixed graft than allograft group. Conclusion: All hamstring tendon autograft, mixed graft and tibialis tendon allograft groups showed satisfactory clinical results, with no significant difference in outcomes between the groups. Both hamstring tendon autograft and mixed graft showed good synovial coverage in second look arthroscopy. So mixed graft will be considered as good alternative in case of shorter or thin harvested hamstring tendon.

• Journal of the Korean Arthroscopy Society
• /
• v.11 no.2
• /
• pp.104-110
• /
• 2007

Purpose: The purpose of this study is comparison of clinical outcomes in ACL reconstruction between auto-hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis anterior tendon. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, we included 60 subjects who underwent ACL reconstruction using 30 hamstring autograft(mainly, national health insurance) and 30 tibialis anterior allograft(including MVA and industrial injuries) between May 2003 and June 2005 by a single surgeon, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Outcome measurements were the range of motion, the Lachman test, the IKDC score, the Lysholm score, KT-1000 arthrometer and one-leg hop test. Results: For all the cases, the range of motion was above 135 degrees. The Lachman test, KT-1000 arthrometer and one-leg hop test showed no significant difference between two groups. The IKDC score of auto-hamstring group($87.840{\pm}2.106$) was significantly higher than that of allo-tibialis anterior group($85.273{\pm}2.782$). The Lysholm score of auto-hamstring group($88.067{\pm}2.586$) was also significantly higher than that of allo-tibialis anterior group($85.300{\pm}3.030$). Conclusion: The results of ACL reconstruction using the auto-hamstring tendon and allo-tibialis anterior tendon showed no significant difference in objective items but auto-hamstring group showed better results in subjective scoring. This difference may result from individual factors such as economic problem, secondary gain.

• Journal of Korean Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
• /
• v.5 no.1
• /
• pp.45-49
• /
• 2006

목적: 자가 골-슬개건-골과 슬괵건을 이용한 전방 십자 인대 재건술의 5년 중기 추시 결과를 비교 분석하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 전방 십자 인대 재건술을 시행한 후 5년 이상 추시 관찰이 가능한 65예를 대상으로 하였고, 골-슬개건-골이 38예, 슬괵건이 27예였다. 술 후 평가는 Lysholm 점수, 관절 운동 범위, 대퇴부 중간 부위 둘레 길이, Lachman 검사, 축 이동 검사, KT 2000 관절 계측기를 시행하였고, 술 후 합병증을 평가하였다. 결과: Lysholm 점수는 골-슬개건-골군과 슬괵건국에서 각각 평균 91점, 94.2점으로 슬괵건군이 우수하였고, 대퇴부 중간 부위 둘레 길이는 건측에 비해 각각 평균 1.7cm, 1.3cm의 차이를 보였다. 양 군간에 관절 운동 범위, Lachman 검사, 축 이동 검사 및 KT 2000 관절 계측 결과는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었으나, 술 후 합병증은 과도한 보행이나 운동 후 슬관절 동통이 골-슬개건-골군에서 7예, 슬괵건 군에서 4예 관찰되었고, 전방 슬관절 동통이 골-슬개건-골군에서 4예 관찰되어, 골-슬개건-골군에서 더 많이 발생하였다. 결론: 5년 중기 추시에서 자가 슬괵건군이 우수한 슬관절 기능, 적은 합병증 등 임상적으로 우수하였으나 장기 추시가 요할 것으로 사료된다.

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.04a
• /
• pp.9-10
• /
• 2007

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.10a
• /
• pp.22-22
• /
• 2007

• 대한관절경학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.87-88
• /
• 2006