• The Korean Journal of Financial Studies
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.177-203
• /
• 1998

기존의 최초공모주 발행제도하에서는 일반투자자의 공모주식수요에 대한 의사가 공모가 결정과정에 반영될 수 있는 기회가 없음으로 인해 최초공모주의 심각한 저가발행 현상이 나타나고 있다. 이에 대한 문제점을 보완 개선하기 위하여 본 연구는 기업공개시 주식매각의 한 방안으로 경쟁입찰방식을 제시하였으며, 우리 나라 실정에 맞는 입찰모형의 설정을 위한 제반요인들을 조사 분석하였다. 또한, 경쟁입찰방식을 통한 최초공모주 발행의 장점과 경쟁입찰방식과 관련하여 예상되는 경제적 제 문제들을 공개입찰을 통한 장외등록기업 사레와 공기업민영화 사례를 통해 간접적으로 유추 검토하였다. 경쟁입찰방식하에서는 발행기업의 진실된 가치와 시장투자자들의 최초공모주에 대한 수요의사가 입찰과정을 통해 최적공모가격 결정에 적절히 반영되어 기존의 발행방식과 비교해 저평가율도 낮아질 것으로 기대되며, 심각한 문제가 없을 것이라는 판단하에 본 논문은 경쟁입찰방식을 통한 최초공모주발행이 기존의 발행방식에 대한 하나의 경제적 대안으로 선호될 수 있음을 보여 주었다.

• Asia Marketing Journal
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.6.1-6.16
• /
• 1998

입찰계약방식은 발주기업인 구매자가 최선의 공급자를 결정하기 위해 선택 가능한 하나의 전략적 도구로서 매우 중요한 의의를 지니고 있다. 본연구는 대리이론과 거래비용분석에 의해 발주기업의 입찰계약방식결정에 영향을 미치는 요인을 이론적으로 제시하고 있다. 본 연구는 입찰계약방식이 거래의 관계지향성과 계약의 명시성의 두가지 차원을 본질로 하고 있으며, 이들 두가지 차원에 영향을 미치는 요인으로 정보의 비대칭성, 지각된 위험의 크기, 성과측정 및 감시의 필요성, 응찰기업에 대한 신뢰와 몰입수준, 발주기업의 상대적 의존도의 다섯 가지 요인을 들고 있다. 본연구는 입찰계약방식이 이들 요인에 의해 어떻게 결정되는가를 명제의 형태로 제시하고 있으며, 실증분석을 위한 몇 가지 제언도 함께 제시하고 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean DIstribution Association Conference
• /
• 1997.07a
• /
• pp.163-185
• /
• 1997

기업의 의사결정에 있어 중요한 요소 중의 하나는 입찰계약방식을 결정하는 것이다. 개별기업의 입장에서 볼 때 입찰계약방식은 구매계약의 법적 효력을 발생시키는 법률적 의미뿐만 아니라 구매자가 자신의 이익을 극대화할 수 있는 공급자의 선택을 가능하게 해주는 경제적 도구로서의 의미도 지닌다. 또한 산업정책 측면에서 입찰계약방식의 효과적 운영은 응찰기업간의 공정한 경쟁을 유도하고, 기술개발을 촉진하며, 장ㆍ단기적으로 비용을 절감하게 함으로써 산업 전체의 발전을 꾀하게 하는 유효한 수단이 되기도 한다. (중략)

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.6 no.4 s.26
• /
• pp.91-100
• /
• 2005

Design-build that a single entity performs whole construction process under singular responsibility is one of the project delivery system comes to take expectation effects of time savings, cost saving, and quality assurance. On the other hand, a current domestic method for selecting a design-build contractor is difficult to reflect the purpose of owner and the project characteristics when owner selects the design-build contractor. The purpose of this research is to suggest a model for deciding evaluation weights in design-build which can reflect the purpose of owner and the project characteristics. This research can help owner to select the best suitable design-build contractor for the project.

• Proceedings of the KAIS Fall Conference
• /
• 2008.11a
• /
• pp.117-120
• /
• 2008

주요 방산물자의 경우 최저가 입찰 방식의 채택은 방산업체들 간 물량부족에 따른 과다 수주 경쟁으로 인해 터무니없는 낮은 가격으로 업체가 결정되는 경우가 발생되고 있다. 이러한 제도 운영은 방산 물자의 기술 개발 촉진에 장애요인으로 작용할 뿐만 아니라 방위력 증강은 물론 방위산업 육성에도 많은 지장을 초래할 우려가 있다. 본 논문에서는 실천 가능한 방위산업 입찰제도를 도출하고 입찰제도를 개선하기 위해서, 현재 방산청에서 실시하고 있는 최저 입찰제도의 문제점을 알아보고, 미국, 유럽과 일본의 정부조달제도와 방위산업에서의 입찰방식을 살펴본다. 그리고 협상에 의한 계약 체결시 적용하는 회계예규의 평가산식 불합리성 및 문제점을 고찰하고, 국내 방산업체가 느끼는 입찰제도의 문제점을 설문을 통해 파악/분석함으로 방위사업청 제안서 평가 지침에 대한 적절한 방식을 제안하고자 한다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.24 no.5
• /
• pp.44-51
• /
• 2023

Selecting appropriate bidding system in construction projects considering the characteristic of project can be a make-or-break element, so the understanding for bidding system of public construction projects is ever more important from the perspective of both the owner and the contractor. The design-build bidding is commonly referred to as turnkey in Korea, and is a bidding method that is often applied to large public construction projects because it allows new technologies to be applied to the design and facilitates risk management for the owner. In this bidding method, there are only two factors (design score and price score) that affect the selection of the winning bidder, so it is important to understand the influence of each factor, but there is little research on the subject. This study aims to provide a basis for establishing bidding strategies for understanding the influence between design score and price score by analyzing various design-build bidding data of public construction projects. The results of the study show that design score is the factor that has more influence on the ranking of bidders in all three weighted evaluation methods: design-emphasized, price-emphasized, and equalized evaluation. In addition, we found that the correlation between design and price scores was not significant due to the unique bid evaluation structure in Korea.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.3
• /
• pp.164-174
• /
• 2008

It is crucial In decision making to select a project delivery system (PDS) adjusted accordingly to the project characteristics. Furthermore, selecting a tendering system is the kernel in the process of selecting PDS. In October 2007, the Ministry of Finance and the Economy of Korea launched two new project delivery systems, "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contracts (Design-Build)" by revising enforcement ordinances of "Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party" to provoke the tendering systems. In order to support the proposed purpose, this research developed a selection model for suitable tendering system, which helps a public owner select a tendering system appropriate to the project characteristics. First, the framework of the model was set throughout analyzing previous researches and interviewing relevant experts. Additionally, by analyzing the survey result from 265 experts engaged in architectural and civil engineering business, the relative weights of the selection factors and the effectiveness values of the alternatives were suggested as the quantitative evaluation references. Finally, the practical guideline was suggested to apply this model to three public projects scheduled to be delivered. The result of applying the model to three case projects showed that further researches were needed to make the selection process logical and to suggest the standard weights and effectiveness values according to project type.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.33 no.2
• /
• pp.771-780
• /
• 2013

Inspection system which was performed in the past selected the final winning bidder by separating Pre-Qualification, the basic design evaluation and price evaluation. However, turnkey and alternative bidding construction has selected way to determine the successful bidder as the best design and the most low cost method, comprehensive evaluation method (bid price adjustment, design score adjustments, weights standard), the best design and the fixed amount method from january 1, 2010 to the present. Due to these institutional problems, orders institutions were often a way to determine the successful bidder to apply differently for identical or similar construction. Therefore this study winning bidder selection criteria through analysis of construction the number and construction order performance, order performance by work division and institutional orders, the weights bidder order performance and orders status of turnkey alternative tendering construction to civil part performed in domestic.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• autumn
• /
• pp.410-413
• /
• 2003

In order to build up competitive power in construction market and to cope with international policy, Design-Build bidding is one of the viable bidding system, encouraging collaboration between design office and building construction firm. Design-Build is a promising delivery system to help expediting schedules, saving costs, and improving Quality. However, the problems of Design-Build project in the domestic construction industry are not to be able to take advantages of fast-tracking and value engineering process, because of the problems of inappropriate system and participants' inexperience. The purpose of this study is to suggest alternatives for Design-Build bidding of public sector in the domestic construction industry in the costs, quality and time aspect.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.136-145
• /
• 2008

Recently the Ministry of Finance and Economy of Korea launched two new project delivery systems called "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contract (Design-Build)" in October of 2007 by revising enforcement ordinances of "Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party". These project delivery systems require the bidders to submit technical proposal adjusted to the project characteristics and objectives for selecting the contractor by evaluating technical proposals. This research aimed to suggest guideline to effectively operate the project delivery systems described above. To reach the goal of the research, the framework of the operation model was developed, which includes the four categories: the standard bidding process, the technical proposal requirements, the technical proposal evaluation criteria, and the award methods. The contents of the four categories above were fulfilled throughout conferring with the advisory experts. In particular, the award methods, which are the important decision-making factor in the perspective of the owner, consist of four types: Low Bid-Fully Qualified, Weighted Criteria, Adjusted Bid, and Adjusted Score. The quantitative features and application criteria of these four types of award methods were suggested throughout the simulation using the virtual case.