• Tunnel and Underground Space
• /
• v.21 no.5
• /
• pp.377-385
• /
• 2011

In order to prove the applicability of rock bolts with compressible spacers, laboratory model tests and large scale model tests were conducted. Laboratory model tests were performed in various distance of compressible spacers to determine the optimal distance of compressible spacers. The optimal distance of compressible spacers was found that is 1/4 of rock bolts unit length. Large scale model tests that the size was 0.6 m (diameter) ${\times}$ 4.45 m (length) were conducted. Test results showed that pull out resistance could be increased up to 15% larger than that of unused case by using compressible spacers.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.13 no.6
• /
• pp.2797-2803
• /
• 2012

This paper presents the pull-out behaviors of headed glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) rebar embedded in mortar under tension loading. Five specimens with headed GFRP rebars that were anchored in the center of mortar bases were constructed and the pull-out test was conducted. To verify the test results, the finite element analysis was conducted and the results were compared with the FE analysis using ANSYS software package. Based on the test results it was indicated that the CCD(concrete capacity design) failure theory should be adopted and not to use the 45o cone failure theory as the breakout capacity in the headed GFRP rebar embedded in mortar.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.33 no.11
• /
• pp.35-43
• /
• 2017

In this study, the pull-out resistance behavior of the anchor with the bump type resistors at the anchor body was experimentally investigated. In the model tests, the pull-out resistance was measured by pulling out the anchor at a constant speed. Anchor body was installed in the center of the circular sand tank. Pull-out tests were conducted for 10 conditions. The anchor type (existence of the resistor), the friction conditions of the anchor body surface ($1/3{\phi}$, $2/3{\phi}$, ${\phi}$), the bump type resistor set number (1set, 2set, 4set), and the height of resistors (0.05d, 0.10d, 0.20d) were varied. The load-displacement relationship for each conditions was measured during the pull-out tests at a constant speed (1 mm/min). Maximum pull-out length was 80 mm. As a result, the pull-out behavior of the friction type anchor and the expansion type anchor was different. As the number of resistor increased, the maximum pull-out resistance increased and the residual pull-out resistance ratio increased significantly, which were at 171~591 percent larger than that of the friction type anchor.

• Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.11-19
• /
• 2017

A series of pullout tests to compression type anchors is conducted. The test is carried out on a couple of steel cables installed in sandy soil with 60% of relative density. The test is performed with 6 different bonded lengths, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 times longer than the initial bonded length (Lc =30 mm). A numerical analysis with the same condition as the test is also performed to compare each other. Finally, those results are compared with theoretical result by Oosterbaan and Gifford (1972). The result shows that the ultimate pullout capacity appears to increase with an increase of bonded length, and that the results of test, numerical analysis and theoretical approach have a good agreement in the ultimate pullout capacity at failure.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.24 no.8
• /
• pp.89-97
• /
• 2008

A series of field tests were performed to investigate the behavior of jacket anchor and to evaluate the ultimate bond stress of jacket anchor. From twelve sets of field tests on the jacket anchor and general type ground anchor, it was observed that the pullout resistance of jacket anchor is significantly larger than that of the ground anchor and that the plastic deformation of jacket anchor is significantly smaller than that of general ground anchor at the same loading cycle. Especially in gravel layers, the jacket anchor provides more than 250% increase in ultimate resistance and more than 600% reduction in plastic deformation, compared with the general ground anchor. Finally, the relationship between the injection pressure and overburden pressure is proposed to determine the optimum injection pressure, based on additional field test results.

• Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.113-123
• /
• 2007

In order to ensure the stability of reinforced structures backfilled with low permeability soil, it is very important to determine the change in undrained pullout capacity compared to drained pullout capacity prior to design. In this research, a series of numerical analyses on laboratory pullout tests have been performed on different materials (clean sand, 5, 10, and 15% silty sand), different overburden pressures (30, 100 and 200 kPa), and different drainage conditions (drained and undrained) in order to compare drained pullout capacity with undrained pullout capacity. The results of numerical analysis also have been compared with the results of the laboratory pullout tests. The analysis results show that both drained and undrained pullout capacity are influenced by silt contents and increase with increase of friction angle of the soil and overburden pressure. In undrained condition, the effective stresses acting on the reinforcement decrease as excessive pore pressures are generated, resulting in decrease in pullout capacity; 57% for 30 kPa, and 70% for 100 and 200 kPa. These results show a good agreement with the results of the laboratory pullout tests performed under the same condition.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2000.11b
• /
• pp.243-248
• /
• 2000

현재로서는 인발저항 메카니즘에 많은 불확실성들 즉, 구속된조건에서의 다일레이션, 인발저항영역, Transition zone의 존재, Debonding 메카니즘, Boundary condition등 이 내포되어있어, 아직까지 확립된 이론이 존재하지 않는다. 인발저항력 추정을 위해 그 동안 수많은 시도와 노력이 있었음에도 불구하고, 현장 인발시험이 현재 지반설계에 가장 적합한 방법으로 지금까지 통용되고 있는 실정이다. 쏘일네일설계시 요구되는 몇가지 중요한 문제들을 제기하고 그에 대한 나름대로의 해석과 결론을 제시하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Geophysical Society
• /
• v.8 no.4
• /
• pp.195-199
• /
• 2005

현재로서는 인발저항 메카니즘에 많은 불확실성들 즉, 구속된 조건에서의 다일레이션, 인발저항영역, Transition zone의 존재, Debonding 메카니즘, Boundary condition등 이 내포되어있어, 아직까지 확립된 이론이 존재하지 않는다. 인발저항력 추정을 위해 그 동안 수많은 시도와 노력이 있었음에도 불구하고, 현장 인발시험이 현재 지반설계에 가장 적합한 방법으로 지금까지 통용되고 있는 실정이다. 쏘일네일설계시 요구되는 몇가지 중요한 문제들을 제기하고 그에 대한 나름대로의 해석과 결론을 제시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Geotechical Society Conference
• /
• 2001.10b
• /
• pp.31-42
• /
• 2001

다양한 방식으로 제작된 유리섬유 강화 플라스틱관(FRP pipe)의 인장 및 휨강도 시험 결과로부터 제작방식에 따른 FRP관의 강도 특성을 비교 검토하였다. 또한, 사면보강대책으로서 FRP 그라우팅 공법의 현장 적용성을 평가하기 위하여, FRP 그라우팅에 따른 지반강도의 증진효과 및 보강재의 인발저항력을 산정하였다. 이를 위하여, 지반의 상대밀도 및 구속압에 따른 보강재 인발저항력의 변화 및 압력주입에 의한 확공효과 평가를 위하여 실내모형실험이 이루어졌다. 또한, FRP 그라우팅이 시공된 현장에서 공내재하시험, 투수시험, 그리고 시추공전단시험 등을 실시하여 FRP 그라우팅에 의한 지반보강 효과 및 차수효과를 정량적으로 산정하였다.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.29 no.6C
• /
• pp.313-319
• /
• 2009

In this study, field pull-out test and 3-D FEM analysis have been performed for examining and reflecting the behavior of steel pipe nailing installed foldable wedge. Field pull-out test was performed under various conditions. As a result, the steel pipe nailing installed foldable wedge has an effect of pull-out resistance increased about 30% in comparison with non-wedge type steel pipe nailing. Through back analysis in 3-D FEM for behavior of non-wedge type steel pipe nailing, friction characteristics between nail to soil was analyzed and obtained first consistent with field pull-out behavior. Then, the frictional characteristic was used for analyzing the behavior of the steel pipe nailing installed foldable wedge. The result was compared with the test results. Consequently, friction coefficient (${\mu}$) of about 1.2 between grout to soil leads to good agreement with analysis results and test results. And a limited pull-out resistance, $$T_L{\sim_=}32$$ tonf is similar to field pull-out test result which is improved about 33% in comparison with non-wedge type steel pipe nailing's $$T_L{\sim_=}24$$ tonf.