• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 1994.11a
• /
• pp.3-22
• /
• 1994

한국어의 이해와 산출의 심리적 과정에 대한 인지심리학적 연구들을 개관하였다. 한국어의 통사적 구분분석처리 과정, 대용어 참조 해결 과정, 덩이글 이해와 지식구조의 활용 과정, 말실수와 글쓰기의 언어 산출 과정 등에 대한 심리학적 연구를 개관하여 주요 실험적 결과와 이론적 의의를 논하고, 이들이 앞으로의 한국어 이해와 산출 과정에 대한 인지과학적 연구에 시사하는 바를 논의하였다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.107-126
• /
• 2001

우리는 흔히 21C를 정보화 시대라고 하며 우리에게 주어지는 정보들 또한 일기예보와 같은 일상적인 분야에서 여론 조사와 같은 전문적인 분야에 이르기까지 아주 다양하다. 이런 정보들은 통계영역과 아주 밀접하며 이런 정보들을 통계적으로 바르게 해석하고 추론하여 일반화하는 등 일련의 과정들을 요구한다. 이런 상황아래 본 연구에서는 6차 초등학교 수학 교과서에서 여러 통계학 영역 중 그래프 형태로 가장 먼저 도입되는 막대그래프에 중점을 두어 현행 교과서에서 학습 내용과 학습 과정의 문제점에는 어떤 것이 있으며 아울러 그래프 이해력에 필요한 요소나 인지적 사고 능력, 그래프 이해력의 수준을 알아보고, 이를 바탕으로 여러 문헌을 통해 본 연구자가 나름대로 구안한 통계적 기법을 사용한 교수 ${\cdot}$ 학습 과정을 실험반에 적용한 후 그래프 이해력 사전 ${\cdot}$ 사후 검사를 비교함으로써 통계적 기법을 사용한 교수 ${\cdot}$ 학습 과정이 그래프 이해력에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지 알아보고자 한다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.40 no.3
• /
• pp.307-320
• /
• 2020

This study explores how the positioning of two pre-service science teachers (PSTs) is reflected in their different epistemic understandings of inquiry-based lessons. We collected the PSTs' products during their design and enactment of an inquiry-based lesson and recorded their practices in the enacted lesson. Interviews were recorded and transcribed for analysis. The results indicate that one PST, Dohyung was positioned as a subject of evaluation throughout the course and the other, Jinwoo, was positioned as a preservice teacher and a subject of evaluation. Their positions were reflected in their epistemic understandings of inquiry-based lessons, which were developed when designing these lessons. During lesson design, both PSTs showed a shared understanding; they explained inquiry-based lessons as students setting and evaluating hypotheses under teachers' guidance. However, as they faced unexpected situations during lesson enactment, they developed different epistemic understandings. To receive a good grade, Dohyung showed a strong preference for anticipating situations that could occur in class and planning responses to them. He understood inquiry-based lessons as ones in which students conduct experiments to produce results expected by the teacher. On the other hand, Jinwoo emphasized the reasoning process based on students' prior knowledge and explained inquiry-based lessons as ones in which students construct new knowledge through a scientific reasoning process based on their knowledge. The findings of this study will contribute to developing strategies to support PSTs' development of their epistemic understandings of knowledge construction in inquiry-based lessons.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Intelligent Systems Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.33-38
• /
• 2006

인공지능 분야에서는 합의된 개념을 정의하고, 개념과 개념사이의 관계를 표현하여 인간과 시스템이 지식을 공유하는 것으로 온톨로지를 정의하고 있다. 현재까지 영상이해를 위해 온톨로지를 설계하고 이용하는 연구가 진행되어 왔다. 그러나 기존의 영상이해에 관한 연구는 개념적인 연구에 그칠 뿐 구체적인 방법을 제시하지는 못하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 온톨로지로 표현한 지식에 근거하여 영상의 처리, 분석 해석 과정을 통해 영상을 이해하는 영상이해 시스템의 프레임워크를 제안한다. 영상이해 과정은 i)특정 부야의 지식을 온톨로지로 표현하고, ii)영상 처리 및 분석 과정을 통해 영상을 구성하는 객체들의 속성을 추출하며, iii)온톨로지 추론을 통해 객체의 속성으로부터 객체를 정의하여 영상을 해석한다. 그리고 제안한 프로세스에 기반 하여 영상이해 시스템을 구축하고 특정 분야에서의 실험을 통하여 제안된 시스템의 효용성을 확인한다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.81-97
• /
• 2004

This paper is a study on the understanding process of「Matrix and Graph」on discrete mathematics using TI-92 calculator. For this purpose, we investigated the understanding process of two middle school students learning the concepts of matrix and graph using TI-92 calculator. In this process, we collected qualitative data using recorder and video camera. Then we categorized these data as follows: students' attitude related to using technology, understanding process of meaning, expression and operation of matrix and graph, mathematical communication, etc. From this, we have the following conclusions: First, students inquired out the meaning and role of matrix by themselves using calculator. We could see that calculator can do the role of good learning partner to them. Second, students realized their own mistakes when they used calculator on the process of learning matrix. So we found that calculator could form the self-leading learning circumstance on learning matrix. Third, calculators reinforce the mathematical communication in learning matrix and graph. That is, calculator could be a good mediator to reinforce mathematical communication between teacher and students, among students on learning matrix and graph.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.43-64
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to analyze the progress of children's abstraction and to investigate how elementary students understand through mathematical modeling approach in the sixth grader's learning of surface area. Each small group showed their own level on abstraction in mathematical modeling progress. The participants showed improvements in understanding regarding to surface area context.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.43 no.6
• /
• pp.495-507
• /
• 2023

Teachers often encounter challenges in supporting students with question generation and the development of investigation plans in sensemaking activities. A primary challenge stems from the ambiguity surrounding how students apply their conceptual understandings in this process. This study aims to explore how students apply their conceptual understandings to generate questions and design investigation processes in a sensemaking activity. Two types of student group activities were identified and examined for comparison: One focused on designing a process to achieve the goal of sensemaking, and the other focused on following the step-by-step scientific inquiry procedures. The design of investigation process in each group was concretized with epistemic criteria used for evaluating the designs. The students' use of conceptual understandings in discussions around each was then examined. The findings reveal three epistemic criteria employed in generating questions and designing investigation processes. First, the students examined the interestingness of natural phenomena, using their conceptual understandings of the structure and function of entities within natural phenomena to identify a target phenomenon. This process involved verifying their existing knowledge to determine the need for new understanding. The second criterion was the feasibility of investigating specific variables with the given resources. Here, the students relied on their conceptual understandings of the structure and function of entities corresponding to each variable to assess whether each variable could be investigated. The third epistemic criterion involved examining whether the factors of target phenomena expressed in everyday terms could be translated into observable variables capable of explaining the phenomena. Conceptual understandings related to the function of entities were used to translate everyday expressions into observable variables and vice versa. The students' conceptual understanding of a comprehensive mechanism was used to connect the elements of the phenomenon and use the elements as potential factors to explain the target phenomenon. In the case where the students focused on carrying out step-by-step procedures, data collection feasibility was the sole epistemic criterion guiding the design. This study contributes to elucidating how the process of a sensemaking activity can be developed in the science classroom and developing conceptual supports for designing sensemaking activities that align with students' perspectives.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.19 no.1
• /
• pp.143-161
• /
• 2009

This study was designed to gain insights into students' visualization process in geometric problem solving. The visualization model for analysing visual process for geometric problem solving was developed on the base of Duval's study. The subjects of this research are two Grade 9 students and six Grade 10 students. They were given 2D-geometric problems. Their written solutions were analyzed problem is research depicted characteristics of process of visualization of individually. The findings on the students' geometric problem solving process are as follows: In geometric problem solving, visualization provided a significant insight by improving the students' figural apprehension. In particular, the discoursive apprehension and the operative apprehension contributed to recognize relation between the constituent of figures and grasp structure of figure.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.517-531
• /
• 2013

In this study, from the viewpoint that there should be no inconsistencies in stating the learning-content achievement standards of elementary mathematics curriculum, non-consistent use of the verb 'understand', 'know' and the noun 'meaning' which are used very frequently in the learning -content achievement standards of the Korean 2011 elementary mathematics curriculum are discussed. To this end, the modes that appear inconsistently in the 2011 curriculum, the 1997 curriculum, and the 2006 curriculum are investigated and analyzed. The result is that it is difficult to see that the verb 'understand', 'know' and the noun 'meaning' in the 2011 curriculum are used on the base of some principles. Based on this result, the following three suggestions are presented as the conclusions for the development of the future curriculum. First, it is necessary to restrict the contexts in which the verb 'understand' is used in stating the learning-content achievement standards. Second, it is necessary to clarify the difference between the verb 'know' and the verb 'understand'. Third, when 'the meaning of ~ ' is used, it is necessary to clarify what the meaning implies.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.33 no.4
• /
• pp.718-734
• /
• 2013

The purpose of the study is to investigate high school students' perception and understanding of old metaphorical science terminologies and new metaphorical science terminologies (highly metaphorical science terminologies). For the study, three old metaphorical terminologies and three new metaphorical terminologies have been chosen from the old and new Korean science curricula respectively, and 176 high school students who learned physics based on 7th science curriculum developed in 1997 and 175 highschool students who learned physics based on the science curriculum revised in 2009 were sampled from two high schools in a big city in Korea. The research results are as follows: First, for the old metaphorical terminologies, there are more students who give explanations using scientific terms than those who use the meaning of the metaphors that terminologies had. Second, for the new metaphorical terminologies, there are much less students who give explanations using scientific terms than those who explained using the meaning of the metaphors that the terminologies had. Therefore, it should be emphasized that, for the new metaphorical terminologies, the metaphorical meaning of the terminologies do not mean the concepts themselves in teaching science.