• Title/Summary/Keyword: 윤리적 판단 기준

Search Result 33, Processing Time 0.032 seconds

정보통신윤리정립에 대한 이론적 고찰

  • Jeong, Gyeong-Su
    • 정보화사회
    • /
    • s.91
    • /
    • pp.24-30
    • /
    • 1995
  • 윤리란 행위의 옳고 그름이나 선과 악 또는 도덕적인 것과 비도덕적인 것에 관한 판단기준의 체계 혹은 이를 대상으로 하는 학문을 말한다. 또한 윤리는 그 적용대상이 무엇인가에 따라 가정윤리, 사회윤리, 직업윤리, 기업윤리, 정보윤리 등 여러가지로 나누어 볼 수 있다. 여기서 정보통신윤리란 윤리의 문제를 정보통신 또는 정보화사회의 관점에서 조명한 것이라 볼 수 있으며 정보를 다루는데 있어 개인이나 사회구성원들의 행동이나 규범체계로서 그들의 행동이나 태도의 옳고 그름, 좋고 나쁨, 그리고 윤리적인 것과 비윤리적인 것을 판단하게 해주는 기준체계라 할 수 있다.

  • PDF

A Study of Cognitive Warfare and Ethical Issues: Focusing on Just War Theory (인지전과 윤리적 문제에 대한 연구: 정의전쟁론을 중심으로)

  • Sangsu Kim;Youngsam Yoon
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.9 no.3
    • /
    • pp.451-459
    • /
    • 2023
  • The purpose of this paper is to show the limitations of Just War Theory in evaluating ethical issues that can be raised in cognitive warfare, which is emerging as a new area of war. To this end, we will provide the background of cognitive warfare, derive the features of cognitive warfare based on conceptual analysis of cognitive warfare, and clarify the differences between cognitive warfare and traditional warfare. Afterwards, we will turn the discussion and take a look at the background and areas of Just War Theory as a theory that evaluates comprehensive ethical issues related to war. Then, we will elaborate what Just War Theory is and apply the ethical judgment criteria presented in the three areas of this theory, jus ad bellum, jus in bello, and jus post bellum, to cognitive warfare. Finally, we will evaluate the appropriateness of ethical judgment in cognitive warfare by applying criteria for each area and specify the limitations, thereby showing that Just War Theory has limitations as an ethical judgment criteria in cognitive warfare.

Individualism and collectivism in ethical decision making (문화성향은 윤리적 의사결정의 과정에 영향을 주는가?)

  • Hong Im Shin
    • Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issue
    • /
    • v.21 no.1
    • /
    • pp.67-96
    • /
    • 2015
  • Do cultural differences affect moral decisions? Two studies were conducted to investigate whether attitudes of individualism vs. collectivism have an impact on ethical decision making. Study 1 (N=92) showed that utilitarianism was preferred in a situation, in which an intervention resulted in the best outcome (i.e., saving more people's lives), while deontology was preferred in a situation, in which the focus was on negative consequences of the intervention (i.e. personal sacrifices). Additionally, there were differences between the idiocentrics and the allocentrics groups regarding morality aspects. In the idiocentrics group, harm and fairness were regarded as more important than other moral aspects, while in the allocentrics group, not only harm and fairness, but also ingroup and authority were perceived as critical moral aspects. In Study 2 (N=30), after lexical decision tasks were conducted for culture priming, the mouse tracking method was used to explore response dynamics of moral decision processes, while judging appropriateness of interventions in moral dilemmas. In Study 2, in a condition, in which the small number of victims were focused upon, there were more maximal deviations and higher Xflips in the individualism priming group than in the collectivism priming group, which showed that the participants in the individualism condition had more deliberative processes before choosing their answers between utilitarianism and deontology. In addition, the participants in the individualism priming condition showed more maximal deviations in the mouse trajectories regarding ingroup related interventions in moral dilemmas than those in the collectivism priming condition. These results implicated the possibilities that the automatic emotional process and the controlled deliberative process in moral decision making might interact with cultural dispositions of the individuals and the focus of situations.

  • PDF

Case study : Appication of PBL to Business Ethics Education in International Trade Curriculum (무역학 교육과정에서 PBL(문제중심학습)의 기업윤리 수업 적용 사례연구)

  • Tae-Hyung Oh
    • Korea Trade Review
    • /
    • v.48 no.2
    • /
    • pp.95-110
    • /
    • 2023
  • This paper presents an example of the introduction and operation of the PBL so that students can have the ability to apply the problems of corporate social responsibility and ethical values that must be considered by exporting companies or multinational companies, which are the main research subjects of business dynamics. As a result, students were able to broaden their views through self-directed classes and presentations, listen to and share opinions of other students through discussions, and were able to take a logical approach to judgment standards involved in specific corporate activities, showing that the PBL teaching method is effectively applied to business ethics classes.

A Critical Review and Assessment of 10 Years of New Product Awards from 10 Major Newspapers (히트 상품 선정 10년의 현황 및 수렴 타당성 분석 :10개 주요 일간지들을 대상으로)

  • 박찬수;이준석
    • Asia Marketing Journal
    • /
    • v.4 no.4
    • /
    • pp.97-119
    • /
    • 2002
  • 본 연구는 우리나라의 주요 일간지들이 실시해 온 히트상품 선정행사의 현황을 집계하고, 그 타당성을 분석하며, 이러한 선정 결과의 공신력과 타당성을 높이기 위한 방안을 제시하기 위하여 수행되었다. 이를 위하여, 본 논문에서는 지난 10년간 10개 주요 일간지들이 실시한 히트상품 선정행사와 여기에서 선정된 5269개의 히트상품들을 연구대상으로 삼았다. 연구대상 일간지들 중에서는 '히트상품'으로 선정되기 위한 요건을 규정하지 않은 경우와 선정 기준들을 연도별로 변경하는 경우가 많았다. 또한, 전적으로 객관적인 데이터에 의존하거나 전적으로 심사위원들의 판단에 의존하는 방식이 대부분이었다. 선정된 히트상품들의 수렴타당성에 있어서는, 일간지들간에 적지 않은 차이가 나타났으며, 특히 상위권의 일간지들과 하위권의 일간지들간에는 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 발견되었다. 위와 같은 분석 결과들을 토대로, 일간지들의 히트상품 선정행사의 타당성과 공신력을 높이기 위한 몇 가지 방안들을 제시하고 있다. 첫째, 선정 기준들을 핵심기준과 확장기준으로 이원화하여 선정 기준의 일관성과 융통성 사이의 조화를 이루어야 한다. 둘째, 히트상품의 대상을 출시 후 1년 이상 2년 미만의 상품으로 한정하여야 한다. 셋째, 상품의 상업적 성공여부와 함께 상품의 윤리성에 대해서도 충분한 고려를 하여야 한다. 넷째, 같은 카테고리에서 경합하는 경쟁 상품들을 동시에 선정하는 경우는 최대한 지양되어야 한다. 다섯째, 전문가들의 판단과 객관적인 데이터를 효과적으로 결합하는 방법에 대해서 보다 많은 연구가 필요하다.

  • PDF

Developing and Utilizing of a Social Workers' Ethical Sensitivity Test(SWEST) (사회복지사 윤리적 민감성 검사도구(SWEST) 개발 및 활용에 관한 연구)

  • Choi, Myung-Min
    • Korean Journal of Social Welfare
    • /
    • v.60 no.2
    • /
    • pp.5-28
    • /
    • 2008
  • This study tried to develop an test tool of social workers' ethical sensitivity(SWEST) on base of realization about the importance of ethical sensitivity of social worker who are required more ethicalities than the other professionals. Nevertheless, there has been no tool that can measure ethical sensitivity of social workers in our country up to now. Through analysis of existing ethical sensitivity tests in other professions, a paper and pencil method about unstructured question with cases including ethical issues and structured scoring system was chosen as an appropriate method for the SWEST. This study progressed in order : 1st collecting cases, 2nd composing cases, 3rd consulting cases, 4th pilot study, 5th making scoring standards, 6th determining case examples and scoring standards. With the result, the tool consists of 3 case examples with ethical issues : 1) self-determination and confidentiality, 2) equality and double relationship, 3) informed consent and conflict interest. And ethical sensitivities of social work major students and social workers were measured with the SWEST, to see practical utility of this test. The agreement degrees between two independent raters were above 90%. And respondent's ethical sensitivity displayed the most definite difference according to taking or not taking a course 'Social work values and ethics'. Through these results, it can be drawn that the SWEST is reliable and valid to test relevant differences in Korean social workers' ethical sensitivity. The SWEST is expected to activate studying, educating, and practicing ethics in social work.

  • PDF

Research on ESG management rationality through comparison of Aristotle's concept of 'citizen' and 'corporate citizenship' (아리스토텔레스의 '시민' 개념과 '기업시민' 개념의 비교를 통한 ESG 경영 합리성 연구)

  • YUN JIN PARK
    • The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.333-341
    • /
    • 2024
  • So far, the rationality of management decisions has been limited to the economic rationality of maximizing self-interest. However, management rationality in the ESG era, which pursues the interests of the environment, society, and the company from the perspective of harmony and balance, requires new judgment standards. The goal of ESG management is sustainable development. Sustainable development goes beyond the accumulation of wealth, which was the goal of the past economy, and aims for the happiness of the entire society, including coexistence and fair development that develops together with the entire society. From Aristotle's perspective, the happiness of the entire society promoted by sustainable development is no different from the highest good of citizens, members of the community. Accordingly, this paper attempted to explore the new management rationality required for managers in the ESG era by comparing Aristotle's concept of citizenship with the concept of 'corporate citizenship', one of the main concepts of ESG management. Through this, we sought to show that companies are essentially communal entities and that the company's pursuit of profit requires rationality of balance and harmony with environmental and social interests.

An analysis of Empirical Studies of Musical Literary Work Plagiarism Standard : The Popular Music (음악저작물 표절 기준에 관한 고찰 : 대중음악을 중심으로)

  • Jo, Jin-Wan;Shin, Mi-Hae;Park, Areum;Kim, Young-Chul
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.14 no.3
    • /
    • pp.176-185
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study deals with the precedents regarding music works among 'The suits to claim an infringement of copyright' and 'Suits to claim indemnification for damage' that have been filed in Korea up so far in order to establish clear criteria to judge plagiarism based on the ground of legal judgment and judge the similarity of two works that have been in controversy previously. The study has been performed through literature review and also precedents. According to the study result, 'criteria to judge music works on plagiarism' are largely classified into (1) creativity, (2) access, and (3) substantial similarity. It is almost the same to judge creativity and substantial similarity. With the components of music works, say, melody, harmony, and rhythm, comparative analysis is conducted. About creativity, the original composer's song is analyzed with another object to be compared whereas about substantial similarity, two songs in controversy get to be analyzed. Regarding the current criteria to judge creativity, it is needed to set the number of objects to be compared which have been regarded similar. And access has limitations in setting up objective criteria for it. Lastly, we should develop digitized criteria for substantial similarity based on the preliminary review system of the Committee on Performance Ethics in the past.

Analysis on the Sexual Expression in related to Children's Social Development (<만화로 보는 그리스 로마 신화> 속 아동의 사회학습과 연관된 만화의 윤리적 표현 분석)

  • Park, Keong-Cheol;Jung, Sun-Jin;Jeong, Sun-Mee
    • Cartoon and Animation Studies
    • /
    • s.30
    • /
    • pp.113-137
    • /
    • 2013
  • The accessibility and effect of cartoon on children are very significant. Since cartoon is a medium of conveying information through text and pictures, it has a characteristic of being easily approached by children than any other medium. Its accessibility to children is inevitably more exceptional than any other medium in the sense that it is a method of not only telling or reading stories but also showing stories. The main audience of is children. It has a characteristic of being easily accepted by children since it's mythology seen in cartoon than read in text. However, gods conducts are full of unethical expressions. Sexual expressions of intermarriages between mother and son, between brother and sister and between uncle and niece, as well as extramarital intercourse are very unethical that could have negative effects on children. This study analyzed the unethical expressions of gods that could have negative effects on children at current point in time. Zeus was often unfaithful to his wife with many stories about the children of Zeus that were created from extramarital intercourse. Standard of value on rational decision has been established for adult readers, but children can readily accept things since they lack their own rational decision on what's right and wrong. As an alternative to children's uncritical observatory study, there is a need for author's intervention to help children form desirable values. The purpose of this study is to analyze the sexual expressions of Zeus and gods in that could affect children's social study.

Analysis of the 'Scandal' News Frame : Based on the Social Construction of Reality (국내 신문의 '스캔들' 보도 프레임 분석 : 실재의 사회적 구성 논의를 중심으로)

  • Choi, Mideum;Tae, Bora
    • The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
    • /
    • v.17 no.8
    • /
    • pp.98-109
    • /
    • 2017
  • According to Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, people do not live understanding the objective existence, but live defining the reality that is socially constructed. This study analyzed the frame of news report dealing with public figures to inquire into the following subjects: Which group is defined as a public figure? Which role and obligation are required for a public figure? Which standard can be set to judge right and wrong of behavior of a public figure? The research result shows that the press mentioned with most frequency politicians and broadcasting-related people as public figures. In case of politicians, the press focuses most on scandals related to their duties and qualities, while in case of broadcasting-related people, the press focuses most on scandals relevant to ethical problems.