• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.17 no.1
• /
• pp.109-136
• /
• 2014

Every (semantic) antirealist accepts one or another form of verification principle. The principle has strong and weak forms, the strong form being highly counterintuitive but the weak one being more plausible. Understandably, antirealists have preferred the weak form of verification principle. Unfortunately, the socalled knowability paradox shows that those two forms are indeed equivalent. To solve this problem, Edgington suggests a yet new form of verification principle. Unfortunately, her new principle has its own difficulty. To overcome this difficulty, Edgington provides a new model of knowledge, according to which every true proposition is somehow associated with a known counterfactual conditional. In this paper, I shall argue that even this new model of knowledge confronts with an insurmountable problem. It is a well-known fact that, in the microscopic levels, some facts manage to occur despite very low physical chances. I will argue that the counterfactuals linked with those facts cannot be known due to the existence of epistemic defeaters. Hence, Edgington's knowledge model does not work in all cases.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.12 no.7
• /
• pp.156-168
• /
• 2012

As the increase of violent crimes such as robbery, murder, and rape has become a social problem, the government is considering institutionalizing the identification of criminals to prevent crime and to guarantee people's right to know. Such an atmosphere led to the approval of the revision of 'Special Law On the Punishment of Specific violent Crimes' in the National Assembly in April 2010. The revision allows the revelation of the profiles of crime suspects including the pictures of their faces at the investigation stage. However, whether the revision had been effective in preventing crime has not been demonstrated empirically. Moreover, identity revelation is a grave intrusion into privacy and an abuse of human rights such as personal rights and the right to a fair trial, since personal information of criminal suspects would be released to the media prior to the court's final judgements. Also it violates the principle of presumption of innocence, the principles of due process, the principle of double jeopardy, the principle of prohibition against excessive, the principles of clarity, and the principle of liability.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2010.05a
• /
• pp.430-434
• /
• 2010

OECD등 국제기구와 현재 국회에 계류 중인 물 관리기본법 제정(안)등에서 물 이용자에 대한 수익자 부담 원칙을 요구하고 있어, 농업용수의 대부분을 관리하고 있는 한국농어촌공사 관리지역의 농업용수 이용료(구 조합비) 면제에 대한 문제점이 제기되고 일부 전문가들 사이에서도 농업용수 이용료 부과의 필요성이 지속적으로 제기되고 있는 실정이다. 이러한 시점에서 과거 농업용수 이용료(구 조합비) 부과 및 면제의 역사를 살펴보고, 농업용수 및 농업 농촌의 특성을 고려한 농업용수 이용에 따른 수익자 부담원칙에 대하여 검토하였다. 농업용수 이용료는 1908년 수리조합이 시작된 이후 1999년까지 조합비 형태로 부과하다가 2000년 농업용 수관련 3개 기관이 공사로 통합하면서 면제가 되었고, 지난 10년 동안 외부(OECD 등)의 요구뿐만 아니라 내부적으로도 농업용수관리 비용증가로 인한 이용료 부과가 필요하다는 주장이 제기되었다. 한편 이용료 부과시 농업인 경제적 부담증가, 농업용수관리 정책의 혼선, 농업인 반발로 인한 사회문제화, 이용료 징수의 실효성 및 실익성에 대한 문제가 발생될 수 있다. 따라서 농업용수이용에 대하여 단순히 수익자 부담원칙 준수를 요구만 할 것이 아니라 면제에 대한 역사적, 사회경제적인 배경과 농업 농촌의 특성을 이해하고 국내외적으로 대두되는 수익자 부담원칙에 대하여 어떻게 합리적인 방법과 사회적인 합의를 이끌어 낼 것인가 장기적인 연구와 검토가 필요하다. 또한 비용부담측면만이 아니라 농업인의 물 관리 참여(PIM, Participatory Irrigation Management)등을 통한 수익자부담 원칙 달성 및 비용절감을 유도할 수 있는 제 3의 방안을 찾아야 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.11 no.8
• /
• pp.2899-2905
• /
• 2010

To be applicable under electronic health record system in order to ensure semantic interoperability of clinical information, the development principle for clinical information model to reflect objective and function is required. The aim of this study is to develop the development principles for clinical information model and evaluate the Clinical Contents Model. In order to develop the principle, from November 2008 to March 2009, the surveys about 1) definition, 2) function and 3) quality criteria were done, and 4) the components of advanced model were analyzed. The study was processed in 3 levels. Firstly in the development level, key words and key words-paragraph were driven from the references, and the principles were drawn based on the clinical or functional importance and frequency. In the application level, the 3 experts of clinical information model assessed 30 Clinical Contents Models by applying it. In the feedback level, the Clinical Contents Model in which errors were found was modified. As the results, 18 development principles were derived with 3 categories which were structure, process and contents. The Clinical Contents Models were assessed with the principles, and the 17 models were found that they did not follow it. During the feedback process, the necessity of the advanced education of the principle and the establishment of the regular quality improvement strategy to use it is raised. The proposed development principle supports the consistent model-development between clinical information model developers, and could be used as evaluation criteria.

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.105
• /
• pp.2-24
• /
• 2004

미국 독점금지법상 수직적 거래가격 또는 비가격제한만큼 확립된 원칙에 대한 여러 번의 재검토가 행해지고 법원 판례와 학설간에 견해가 불일치 하는 분야도 없다. 다른 분야의 관행들과 마찬가지로 수직적 제한에 대해서도 그 위법성 판단에 있어서 당연위법, 합리성의 원칙 분석 또는 당연적법성 등의 세 가지 가능한 법원칙에 의하여 규율될 수 있는데, 한 두 가지 원칙의 적용여부가 문제되는 다른 대부분의 관행들과 다리 수직적 제한 분야에서는 이 세 가지 원칙 모두에 대하여 각각 채택을 주장하는 견해가 나왔다.

• KLA journal
• /
• v.31 no.4 s.263
• /
• pp.20-25
• /
• 1990

단위카드(Unit Card)를 복사하기가 쉬워지고 복수표목목록에 있어서 각 표목이 이용자에게 똑같은 가치를 지니게 될 경우에는, 기본표목원칙은 더이상 필요가 없어지게 된다. 이 글은 일본내에서 무기본표목원칙의 역사적 발전에 관해 고찰한 것이다. 일반적으로 서명표목은 동양의 전통인 것으로 생각된다. 그러나 일본의 편목 담당자들은 새로운 일본목록규칙에 입각한 규칙을 사용해 왔다. 무기본표목원칙이 채택된 일본목록규칙 1977년판(NCR 1977)의 "기술단위카드 시스템"은 컴퓨터목록시대에 필요로 되는 것중의 하나로 여겨진다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2015.07a
• /
• pp.333-334
• /
• 2015

해상교통관제 업무에 있어 선박의 안전운항을 위하여 해상교통관제사와 선박운항자간의 신뢰를 정의 할 필요성이 있다. 이에 육상교통에서 널리 적용되어 있는 '신뢰의 원칙'을 통해 해상교통관제업무에서의 신뢰의 원칙 적용여부를 알아보고자 한다.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.52 no.2
• /
• pp.106-121
• /
• 2019

Sustainable development in society has become the center of focus in many fields such as industry, environment, health, culture, etc. Considering that the concept of heritage involves understanding it as a 'resource' to improve the quality of people's lives, sustainability is an important goal that heritage policy has to achieve. Adopting the definition of sustainability in the 1987 Brundtland Report, this paper defines the concept of sustainability with respect to heritage, as well as their respective roles. Following that, three action principles are presented: value-based conservation, rational decision-making, and community involvement. Two cases demonstrating how the three principles should be practiced in managing change are then illustrated. Considering that heritage can play its role as a resource once its significance is protected, this paper argues that value-based rational decision-making is of paramount importance and the first principle. Conservation aims to manage change by practicing a cyclic process of value identification, value sustaining, and value dissemination. Therefore, this paper argues that all processes should be connected in the context of heritage values. A rational decision-making process practicing value-based conservation is then suggested. This paper argues that rational decision-making can only be practiced once values are identified by objective criteria and managed by rational judgment upon impact assessment. Community involvement, the third principle, is necessary to realize value-based conservation and rational decision-making. Recognizing that a community is a beneficiary of heritage and a creator of a beneficial process at the same time, it discusses the role of community and the importance of this role in policies for the sustainability of heritage. This paper concludes with a set of recommendations to improve policies after examining the two decision-making cases.

• Korea Trade Review
• /
• v.41 no.5
• /
• pp.15-39
• /
• 2016

Over the past couple of decades, we can see the emergence of a new lex mercatoria. It consists of international conventions or treaty, model laws and international principles. And such new lex mercatoria is driven by the international institutions such as UNCITRAL, UNIDROIT and ICC. The international convention and international principles in the field of international commercial transaction are considered : UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods(CISG) and The UNIDROIT Principles(PICC Principles). The former is the statue law for the latter, and the latter sometimes supports the former as an interpretation and supplementation of CISG. So, the purpose of this article is to evaluate and investigate the current status of CISG and PICC Principles in terms of application and interpretation principles. The results are as follows. First, PICC are used for the interpretation and supplementation of international law such as CISG, but CISG is a law, not a rule. Second, CISG and PICC Principles are not often chosen when parties chose the law governing their contract. The parties very often chose a national law ; the number of the parties choosing CISG and PICC Principles as a governing law was very low.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.23 no.8 s.269
• /
• pp.28-34
• /
• 1998