• 제목/요약/키워드: 온라인중재규칙

검색결과 4건 처리시간 0.016초

중국 온라인중재규칙에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Online Arbitration Rules in China)

  • 최석범
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제21권2호
    • /
    • pp.47-64
    • /
    • 2011
  • The China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) released online arbitration rules which apply the resolution of disputes over electronic commerce transactions, as well as other economic and trade disputes in which the parties agree to do. The evidence submitted by the parties may be electronic evidence created, sent, received or stored by electronic, optical or magnetic means. Electronic evidence with a reliable electronic signature shall carry the same effect and probative force as a document with a hand-written signature. Where a case is tried in a tribunal, the arbitration tribunal shall conduct an online trial hearing using internet video conference or other electronic or computer communication means. Unless the parties have another agreement, summary procedure shall apply to cases where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 100,000 but no more than RMB 1 million, or where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 1 million and a party submits a written application for summary procedure after obtaining the written consent of the other party. Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, fast-track procedure shall apply to cases where the amount in dispute does not exceed RMB 100,000 or where the amount in dispute exceeds RMB 100,000 and a party submits a written application for fast-track procedure after obtaining the written consent of the other party. Notable features of the Online Rules are as follows; first, there is not detailed consideration for online arbitration. Second, communications between the parties and the tribunal are allowed only through the Secretariat. Third, elaborate provisions regarding the electronic submission and transmission of documents is provided for. Forth, various factors must be considered by the tribunal in deciding the evidence's reliability. Fifth, reasonable endeavours is levied on CIETAC to keep data communications secure and encrypted. Sixth, the tribunal has the right to investigate and collect relevant evidence. And finally different procedures are provided for in consideration of the various types of E-commerce.

  • PDF

중국의 온라인중재 운용과 법적문제에 관한 연구 - CIETAC의 온라인중재를 중심으로 (Practices and Legal Issues of Online Arbitration in China - focused on Online Arbitration of CIETAC)

  • 차경자;최성일
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제20권2호
    • /
    • pp.131-149
    • /
    • 2010
  • Since the Arbitration Law of China took effect in 1995, arbitration has grown with the economy. At the end of 2009, there were 202 arbitration institutions in China. Among them, China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission(CIETAC) has adopted online arbitration and has settled internet domain name disputes since 2001. CIETAC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Center(DNDRC) has accumulated abundant experiences of online arbitration in the field of domain name disputes. Based on those experiences, on 1 May 2009, CIETAC implemented the CIETAC Online Arbitration Rules(Rules') to regulate the resolution of e-business disputes as well as other business disputes. With this background, this article aims to study the status quo, practices and issues of online arbitration conducted by CIETAC. For the purpose of the article, a general picture of online arbitration is outlined first, followed by introducing the steps of the online arbitration procedure. According to the 'Rules', the entire arbitration process is conducted using online communication methods which are cost-effective and efficient. To facilitate the development of online arbitration, legal barriers need to be removed. This article considers main legal issues of online arbitration in China and proposes amendment to Chinese Arbitration Law, in particular, the recognition of the validity of electronic arbitration agreements and awards.

  • PDF

자녀들의 온라인 게임 이용에 대한 부모 중재 전략 (Parental Mediation Strategies on Online Gaming)

  • 김지연;도영임
    • 한국게임학회 논문지
    • /
    • 제15권3호
    • /
    • pp.63-78
    • /
    • 2015
  • 셧다운제 시행 이후, 자녀들의 온라인 게임 이용에 대한 부모 중재 역할의 중요성이 부각되면서 자녀들의 과몰입 예방을 위해 부모들이 선택할 수 있는 효과적인 중재 전략이 무엇인지 구체적인 탐색이 필요하게 되었다. 본 연구는 우리나라 부모들이 자녀들의 온라인 게임 이용을 중재하기 위해 어떠한 중재 전략을 사용하는지, 그리고 이에 영향을 미치는 요인은 무엇인지를 확인하기 위해 수행하였다. 이를 위해 초등학생부터 대학생 자녀를 둔 부모를 대상으로 설문조사를 실시했고, 총 379명의 자료를 분석하였다. 그 결과, 자녀들의 온라인 게임 이용에 대한 부모 중재 전략은 설명형 중재, 공동 놀이형 중재, 규칙형 중재, 제한형 중재, 기술 활용형 중재, 정부규제 의존형 중재, 적극 안내형 중재의 7개 요인으로 구분되었다. 또한 부모 중재 전략과 부모의 특성, 자녀의 특성 변인 간에는 밀접한 관련성이 있었다. 본 연구는 다른 미디어의 속성과 구분되는 온라인 게임의 특수성과 우리나라의 사회, 문화적 맥락을 반영한 부모 중재 전략들을 확인했다는데 의의가 있다.

국제전자상거래 분쟁해결을 위한 절차 규칙에 관한 UNCITRAL의 논의와 그 평가 - 제26차 실무작업반의 논의를 중심으로 - (Discussion and Evaluation in UNCITRAL Regarding Procedural Rules for Disputes in International e-Commerce - Focused on the Discussion in the 26th Session of Working Group III -)

  • 이병준
    • 한국중재학회지:중재연구
    • /
    • 제23권1호
    • /
    • pp.133-152
    • /
    • 2013
  • Recently, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has made progress toward resolving low value, high volume disputes in international e-commerce. At the Working Group's 26th session, two draft procedural rules were addressed. The first discussed the draft of Article 9, entitled "Decision by a neutral party." This is based on the suggestion in 26th session to have a "two track" system of ODR, one including negotiation, facilitated settlement, and arbitration phrases, and the other not including an arbitration phase. The second draft procedural rule, draft Article 10, regards the language of proceedings. In most cases of international e-commerce, the decision of language of an ODR proceeding is a matter of importance, for the language parties could differ from each other. This paper examines several implications of UNCITRAL for Korea, which has unstable ODR system.

  • PDF