국제전자상거래 분쟁해결을 위한 절차 규칙에 관한 UNCITRAL의 논의와 그 평가 - 제26차 실무작업반의 논의를 중심으로 -

Discussion and Evaluation in UNCITRAL Regarding Procedural Rules for Disputes in International e-Commerce - Focused on the Discussion in the 26th Session of Working Group III -

  • 이병준 (한국외국어대학교 법학전문대학원)
  • 투고 : 2013.02.14
  • 심사 : 2013.02.28
  • 발행 : 2013.03.02

초록

Recently, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has made progress toward resolving low value, high volume disputes in international e-commerce. At the Working Group's 26th session, two draft procedural rules were addressed. The first discussed the draft of Article 9, entitled "Decision by a neutral party." This is based on the suggestion in 26th session to have a "two track" system of ODR, one including negotiation, facilitated settlement, and arbitration phrases, and the other not including an arbitration phase. The second draft procedural rule, draft Article 10, regards the language of proceedings. In most cases of international e-commerce, the decision of language of an ODR proceeding is a matter of importance, for the language parties could differ from each other. This paper examines several implications of UNCITRAL for Korea, which has unstable ODR system.

키워드