• Title/Summary/Keyword: 영재교육 체제

Search Result 45, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Research on Follow-up Management Systems for Scientifically Gifted: Focusing on the Case of the Nation-level Institutes for Gifted and Talented Education (과학영재 추수관리체제 모델 개발 예비연구: 국가수준 과학영재교육기관 사례를 중심으로)

  • Kang, Jungha;Heo, Namyoung;Baek, Minjung;Han, Kisoon
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.24 no.6
    • /
    • pp.975-1000
    • /
    • 2014
  • This study is a case study about the status of science gifted follow-up management systems for nation-level institutes for gifted and talented education. The aim of the study is to develop the theoretical model that establishes the basis of follow-up management systems for scientifically gifted to support in order to grow the beneficiaries of nation- level scientifically gifted education into globally competitive talented. Specifically, this study says the components of the systematic and efficient structure for nation-level gifted follow-up management. For this, we collect the experts' opinions on gifted education for follow-up management of the beneficiaries on national level science gifted, and gifted and talented education institutions conducted the case study for follow-up management. The collecting of experts' opinion have participated 11 persons, and 6 institutes were involved in the case study of follow-up management institutes. As a result, it reports for scientifically gifted follow-up management systems to be made by forming of the upper systems and each lower systems. Resources system was found to be composed of human information system and education information system. Operating system was found to be composed of input system, analysis system, and management system. Application system was found to be composed of prediction system, verification system and improvement system.

과학영재교육 체제 정립

  • 이군현;김하진;박찬웅;이용수
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.121-144
    • /
    • 1995
  • 과학영재교육이란 수학 과학 분야에 창조적 사고를 가지고 탁월한 학문적 성취를 보일 가능성 있는 학생을 육성하는 것을 말한다. 현재 세계 각국에서는 다양한 방법으로 과학영재를 육성하고 있다. 본 논문은 과학영재 육성이 왜 필요한가를 살펴보고 국내외의 과학영재 교육현황을 분석한 후 한국의 과학영재교육 체제를 정립하는 것이 목적이다.

  • PDF

A Systemic Model for the Gifted Education (체제적인 영재교육을 위한 Renzulli의 전교 심화학습 모형(SEM)의 개성방안)

  • Park, Eun-Young
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.1-23
    • /
    • 2000
  • The Schoolwide Enrichment Model(SEM) is a representative model for the gifted education. As the model seems to be more conceptual in nature, it is hard to respond to the different interests and changing needs of the gifted learners. Also it does not provide specific procedures and prescriptions in teaching-learning processes for the teachers. Therefore, SEM needs to be modified into a Systemic Model that is more flexible and procedural. The paper proposes an Instructional Systems Design(ISD) model for SEM. The Systemic Model for SEM consists of 5 major steps. These are as follows: Planning, Diagnosis, Prescription, Implementation, Evaluation. In Planning step, there is a six-stage procedure for initiating the implementation of the SEM. In Diagnosis step, there are two-phases in identifying students for participation in the SEM and assessing strengths, interests, and talents of the learners and recording in The Total Talent Portfolio(TTP). In Prescription step, Curriculum Compacting is administered as a systematic procedure for modifying thecurriculum for above-average ability students. In Implementation step, Enrichment Learning and Teaching is an instructional strategy designed to promote active engagement in learning for teachers and students. Whenever each step has completed, Evaluation step should be followed. These 5 steps are repetitive, cycling and interactive. That is, each one becomes input for the next step, process for itself, and output for the previous step. Each step is monitored through the process of Review and Revision step. In conclusion, the paper suggests six strengths of the Systemic Model for SEM; The Model (1) provides the specific procedure in teaching-learning process; 92) has interactive relations with each component; (3) can be revised continuously for creation of the most effective system; (4) can be implemented more flexibly; (5) can be developed as an unique system for each school; (6) facilitates communications between teachers and students.

  • PDF

고등학생 대상의 정보과학 영재교육을 위한 차별화된 원격교육시스템

  • Kim, Ji-Seon;Park, Hyo-Hun
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society for the Gifted Conference
    • /
    • 2005.05a
    • /
    • pp.151-163
    • /
    • 2005
  • 정보화 기술의 눈부신 발전에 따라 정보과학 영재교육의 필요성이 대두되면서, 정보과학 영재 판별 및 프로그램 연구가 활발히 진행되고 있다. 그러나 그 대상이 대체로 초${\cdot$중등 학생들을 대상으로 하고 있어, 정보과학에 잠재성이 있고 전공 선택에 목전을 두고 있는 고등학생을 대상으로 한 정보과학 영재교육은 부재한 실정이다. 본 논문에서는 고등학생 대상의 정보과학 영재교육의 필요성과 효과적으로 시행할 수 있는 교육 방법의 한 형태인 원격 교육, 특별히 웹을 통한 정보과학 영재교육 프로그램과 원격 정보과학 영재교육에 필요한 교육 체제를 제시하고자 한다.

  • PDF

Analysis on the Current Status and Improvement Plan of Gifted Computer Science Education in Elementary Schools (초등정보영재교육의 실태 분석 및 개선 방안)

  • Park, Jin-Sik;Yang, Chang-Mo
    • 한국정보교육학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2006.08a
    • /
    • pp.179-185
    • /
    • 2006
  • 본 연구는 초등정보영재교육에 대한 설문조사를 통해 실태를 파악하고 그 개선 방안을 찾고자 하였다. 설문조사는 초등 정보영재교육 대상자의 판별 및 선발, 초등 정보영재의 교육 방법 및 교육 형태, 초등 정보영재를 위한 교육과정의 운영, 초등 정보영재 교육을 위한 지원체제의 4개영역에서 이루어졌고 실태 조사 결과를 바탕으로 초등정보영재 교육의 개선방안을 제시하였다.

  • PDF

"과학영재교육 체제정립"에 대한 토론

  • 김하진
    • Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
    • /
    • v.5 no.1
    • /
    • pp.145-146
    • /
    • 1995
  • 주제발표자의 발표내용에 대하여 의견이 일치하는 부분에 대해서는 언급을 피하고 그렇지 않은 것들에 대하여 몇가지 소견을 개조식으로 적기로 한다.

  • PDF