• 한국가정간호학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.06a
• /
• pp.1-7
• /
• 2007

• 유체기계공업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1997.02a
• /
• pp.166-172
• /
• 1997

• 유체기계공업학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1997.02a
• /
• pp.173-177
• /
• 1997

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Embryo Transfer Conference
• /
• 1997.10a
• /
• pp.26-27
• /
• 1997

• Journal of Power System Engineering
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.5-9
• /
• 1998

• Journal of Advanced Marine Engineering and Technology
• /
• v.22 no.4
• /
• pp.419-428
• /
• 1998

• Journal of KSNVE
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.5-10
• /
• 2004

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Language and Information Conference
• /
• 2004.06a
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2004

• Language and Information
• /
• v.6 no.2
• /
• pp.15-32
• /
• 2002

These analyses can be roughly classified into two groups: the first argue that the delimiter -to is polysemous so that it delivers either additive or concessive meaning; the second contend that it is monosemous and only conveys emphatic or concessive meaning. The current analysis mainly focuses on its two roles with regard to focus and its meaning. On the basis of the findings, a different analysis is proposed that it serves as an indicator of the presence of a type of focus which is hosted mainly by the expression it attaches to. Furthermore, it is solely responsible for the additive force, and the seemingly relevant emphatic or concessive import is derivable from an emphatic or concessive illocutionary operator which is associated with the focus indicated by -to.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers Conference
• /
• 2006.09a
• /
• pp.113-116
• /
• 2006