• Journal of Venture Innovation
• /
• v.2 no.1
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2019

The primary goal of this study is to develop proper indicators for evaluating and selecting an organization that contributes product safety in his industry. The indicators of product safety include input, process, and output in the sequences of product safety activities and systems. The indicators are proposed by the side of measurable and unmeasurable index. In detail, the indicators are consist of 3 parts - product safe management, efforts for product safety and the performance of product safety. The indicators are itemized by size of enterprise (large, medium and small size) due to the difference of their system and management capability of product safety. To get the indicators reasonably, the opinions of experts and VOC of the industrial field are considered. And the indicators are also divided by job position and level(an executive vs. worker). The items of indicators are 20 and the score is 200, that are the same whichever the case may be. The indicators are useful tools for selecting a person who serves the development of product safety in his industry.

• Journal of the Society of Disaster Information
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.403-411
• /
• 2016

The objectives of this study is to develop evaluation indicators for the quantitative evaluation of construction safety culture level in order to prevent accidents by evaluating the level of safety culture and each safety culture elements of the construction site and to present the areas that should be focused on improvements. In this study, it was presented assessment indicators of the construction safety culture by analyzing previous studies for safety culture, by categorizing items as an important element of safety culture hierarchically and by reflecting the opinion of the construction site professional personnels using AHP analysis methodology. The assessment indicators of the construction safety culture were structured the details of the leadership, systems, and personal characteristics and derived weighted value by the pairwise comparison to quantify the detail assessment indicators in order to assess the construction safety culture level. This study presents a safety culture assessment indicators for the construction site to suggest directions for improving the construction site safety culture and prevent the accidents of the construction site by derived via a safety culture assessment of construction site.

• Journal of Advanced Navigation Technology
• /
• v.25 no.6
• /
• pp.456-465
• /
• 2021

For predictive aviation safety management, the establishment of safety performance indicators to measure and manage the safety performance of service providers must be preceded. In particular, leading indicators are significant in that they play an important role in identifying and managing the causes of accident/incident in advance. However, the current safety performance indicators of the domestic aviation industry have limitations in that they focus on lagging indicators based on events that have already occurred. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to construct Korean leading indicators for preventive safety management. In addition, we verify the validity and importance of the indicators based on review of the experts and AHP analysis. This study is meaningful in that it can support the proactive safety management of the domestic aviation industry through the development of leading safety indicators, which have been relatively lacking in research.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Safety Conference
• /
• 2003.05a
• /
• pp.102-107
• /
• 2003

원자력발전소의 산업계와 규제기관에서는 원자력발전소의 성능(performance)수준 향상과 대 국민 알권리 충족, 규제업무 효율화를 위하여 정량적인 성능지표를 개발하여 사용해왔다. 국내의 원자력 규제 기관인 한국원자력안전기술원은 WANO (world association of nuclear operators)와 미국 핵규제위원회(NRC)의 발전소 종합성능평가 (reactor oversight process)에서 사용하는 성능지표를 토대로 국내 원자력발전소 성능지표를 개발하여 사용 중이다 ( 1 ). 개발된 국내 원자력발전소의 성능지표는 초기사건, 안전계통 신뢰도, 방사선 안전 등 11개 지표로 이루어졌다. 각 지표별 등급을 4개(녹색, 하늘색, 노랑색, 주황색)로 나누어 알기 쉽게 표시하였다.(중략)

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.323-326
• /
• 2017

본 논문에서는 대학교의 재난안전관리 역량 증진의 필요성을 시사하고, 이를 위한 방법론을 제시하고자 하였다. 대학교는 다량의 화학물질 보유, 출입통제 제한적, 인적 물적 인프라 집중 등의 이유로 재난 및 안전사고 발생 확률이 높으며 동시에 발생 시 피해규모도 클 것이라 예측 가능하다. 하지만 아직까지 대학교 재난안전관리에 대하여 대학실험실안전관리에만 치중되어 있는 경향이 있다. 그러므로 대학교 재난안전관리 역량지표를 개발하고 역량수준을 진단하여 전반적인 대학교 재난안전관리 역량수준을 향상시킬 필요성이 있다. 본 논문에서는 대학교 재난안전관리 역량지표 개발을 위해 선행되어야 할 국내외 재난안전관리 역량분석을 실시하였다. 대학교 재난안전관리 현황분석을 통한 대학교 재난안전관리 업무목록을 바탕으로 국내외 재난안전관리 역량지표를 적용하여 대학교 재난안전관리 역량지표 개발이 가능할 것이다.

• Fire Science and Engineering
• /
• v.29 no.4
• /
• pp.89-94
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to investigate national fire safety consciousness (FSC). A FSC survey would help with proper fire safety policy. Indicators to define and measure efficiently the FSC were broken down into five areas: prevention, alarm, evacuation, extinguishing, and damage expansion prevention. The indicators were developed using Parasuraman's method based on domestic and foreign research materials and meetings with experts. FSC was surveyed using the indicators on Gallup Korea. The results of the survey analysis show that evacuation is lowest, followed by extinguishing, alarm, prevention, and damage expansion prevention.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2012.06a
• /
• pp.165-166
• /
• 2012

국내 선사와 선박의 안전관리시스템을 평가하기 위하여 평가 지표들을 종합적으로 적용할 수 있는 평가기준을 개발하였다. 추정된 비용과 편익을 기초로 순편익현재가치와 편익비용비율을 구하여 안전관리시스템 도입의 타당성을 분석하였다. - 생략

• Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.217-226
• /
• 2015

This study was conducted to establish a standardized process for developing food safety health indicators. With this aim, we proposed a standardized process, accessed the validity of the suggested process by performing simulations, and provided a method to utilize the indicators. Developing process for domestic environmental health indicators was benchmarked to propose a standardized process for developing food safety health indicators, and DPSEEA framework was applied to the development of indicators. The suggested standardized process consists of an exploitation stage and a management stage. In the exploitation stage, a total of 6 procedures (initial indicators suggestion, candidate indicators selection, data availability assessment, feasibility assessment, pilot study, and final indicator selection) are conducted, and the indicators are routinely calculated and officially announced in the management stage. The exploitation stage is operated by an interaction between a task force team who manages the overall process, and an advisory committee (minimum of 4 in academia, 2 in research, 4 in specialists of Ministry of Food and Drug Safety) who reviews and performs evaluations on the indicators. The standardized process was simulated with 45 initial indicators, and total of 4 indicators (17 detailed indicators) were selected: 'Proportion of domestic fruit/vegetable receiving 'acceptable' in the evaluation of pesticide/herbicide residues', 'Food-borne disease outbreaks', 'Food-borne legal infectious disease incidence', 'Salmonellosis incidence'. Synthetic food safety health index was derived by calculating percent difference with the data from 2010 to 2012. Results showed that when comparing the year 2010 to 2011, and 2011 to 2012, the overall food safety status improved by 10.37% and 9.87%, respectively. In addition, the contribution of indicators to the overall food safety status can be determined by looking into the individual indicators, and the synthetic index may be illustrated to enhance the ease of interpretation to the public and policy makers. In overall, food health safety indicators can be useful in many ways and therefore, attention should be drawn to conduct further studies and establish related legislations.

• Journal of Korean Society of Disaster and Security
• /
• v.16 no.2
• /
• pp.1-13
• /
• 2023

As interest in urban safety has increased since COVID-19, various institutions have developed and used indicators that evaluate the safety city model. Yongsan-gu was ranked No. 1 in 2021 by Social Safety Index evaluation and was selected as the safest city in Korea. However, the Itaewon disaster in Yongsan-gu in 2022 caused many casualties. The study of indicators for evaluating cities' safety was necessary. This study aims to examine domestic and foreign safe city models and review the differences between each model and the indicators used to evaluate safe cities. As a result of collecting 11 safe city models and analyzing each evaluation index, safe city models can be classified into program-based safe city models, such as the World Health Organization's International safe community and the UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction's International Safe city. Considering the diversification of threats to safety, it is reasonable to comprehensively consider digital security, health safety, infrastructure safety, personal safety, environmental safety, traffic safety, fire safety, crime safety, life safety, suicide, and infectious diseases when evaluating safe cities as evaluation parameters.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.21 no.6
• /
• pp.696-703
• /
• 2015

This paper is a follow-up research of 'A study on the development of Safety Management Evaluation Index for Shipping Company'. It aims to develop the evaluation items of Safety Management Index(hereafter called as 'SMI') applicable to 'Safety Advantage Point', which is suggested as the sub-index of 'Safety Management Evaluation Index' function in the preceding research and also verify their adequacy. For that purpose, firstly, the 11 evaluation items were developed after collecting the practical opinions from safety management personnels in Korean shipping companies. Secondly, the survey was carried out for the verification of the adequacy of the 11 evaluation items. And lastly, its results was analysed, whether it has statistical meanings of differences in adequacy awareness amongst safety managers grouped depending on business type(coastal, ocean-going) and business capacity(number of owned-operating ships). As a result, there was no relevance between their adequacy awareness and business type of their companies. However, a difference in their adequacy awareness existed depending on their companies' business capacity(small, medium and large sized). In conclusion, when the safety management level of shipping companies is evaluated by SMI, the same indices can be applicable to both coastal and ocean-going shipping companies by a grouping of companies' business capacity.