• Title/Summary/Keyword: 심사절차

Search Result 129, Processing Time 0.024 seconds

Systematic Assessment Standards of Multimedia Educational Data (멀티미디어 교육자료 개발 산출물의 단계별 심사 기준)

  • 구덕회
    • Journal of the Korea Computer Industry Society
    • /
    • v.2 no.10
    • /
    • pp.1285-1290
    • /
    • 2001
  • These days, good-quality multimedia educational data are exceedingly needed for ICT(Information and Communication Technology)-based instruction in elementary and secondary schools. In order to produce high quality multimedia educational data, it is important to design a series of development process and conduct a coherent examination. This paper presents a process of developing multimedia educational data and provides systematic assessment standards with respect to each step in which an evaluation is required. The step-by-step assessment standards may serve as a guideline in managing and monitoring the entire developmental process of multimedia educational data.

  • PDF

축산물 시행규칙 개정령 관계법 조문해설 및 종계등록 절차

  • 대한양계협회
    • KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
    • /
    • v.6 no.12 s.62
    • /
    • pp.36-41
    • /
    • 1974
  • 지난 8월 9일 농수산부는 축산법 시행규칙 개정령을 공포한 바 있다. 이에 다시 농수산부와 각도 양계 담당자 및 대한양계협회의 충분한 토의와 검토를 마친후 11월 8일 종계의 심사기준과 종계등록절차를 고시하였기에 게재하는 바이다. 아울러 관계법 조문에 대한 해설을 소개한다.

  • PDF

Development of the Promoter Selection Procedural Model for Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects (민간투자 사업시행자 선정 절차 모델 개발)

  • Han Hyun-Jong;Choi Eung-Kyoo;Lee Chan-Sik
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.5 no.3 s.19
    • /
    • pp.55-62
    • /
    • 2004
  • The purpose of this study is to suggest a systematic procedural model for selecting competent project promoter. The proposed model was made by comparing domestic regulations and procedures with foreign nations', and through interviews with experts and literatures survey. The summaries of this paper are as follows. The current promoter selection procedure was evaluated by reviewing relevant papers, regulations and existing model. Some obstructions which hinder PPI project activation were identified, those are inadequacy of promoter qualification and negotiation process, lack of communication between parties, etc. Some alternatives which remove major obstructions are embodied in the model. The suggested model is comprised of PQ(prequalification), two phased evaluation for the technical proposals which include alternate, communication meeting, etc. To manage the overall procedure well, an involvement of professional "project promoter selection team" would be highly recommended. They will participate in each evaluation stage with full activities, and provide government with some technical materials for selecting promoter as coordinator.

The Assessment Guideline of the Simplified Test Maturity Model (TMM) for An Assessor (심사원을 위한 경량화 테스트 성숙도 모델을 위한 평가 가이드 연구)

  • Jang, Woo Sung;Kim, Ki Du;Son, Hyun Seung;Park, Bo Kyung;Kim, R. Young Chul
    • KIPS Transactions on Software and Data Engineering
    • /
    • v.6 no.8
    • /
    • pp.379-384
    • /
    • 2017
  • In real software business environment, there are required to validate software quality in diverse usage range of software for many small & medium companies. Software quality means both qualities of production and process. In our situation, we focus on better process quality of a test organization than a whole organization. But even the original test maturity model (TMM) does not enough to apply with our domestic venture/small & medium companies. To solve this problem, we suggest the simplified test maturity model for our companies. We redefine this simplified model with the original TMM and a test process improvement next (TPI next) model. The previous models just have provided each definition of maturity level, goal and activity per each level, which not exists an assessment guideline and a formal assessing procedure. Due to this reasons, an assessor is difficult to assess the test organization without them. this paper suggest an assessment guideline of the simplified TMM and also define the procedure which is included with activities and byproducts. With these assessment guideline, an assessor can work possible to formally assess test organizations of small & medium companies, and with self assessment guideline they can be correctly provision before assessment of their organizations.

EU경쟁법의 개혁논의와 시사점

  • 이봉의
    • Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
    • /
    • no.97
    • /
    • pp.12-25
    • /
    • 2003
  • 공정거래법의 실효적 집행을 위해서는 무엇보다도 공적집행을 개선하는 것이 중요하다. 이를 위하여 무엇보다 합리적이고 투명한 절차운영과 이해관계인의 절차상 권리 강화, 경쟁보호라는 목적에 충실하기 위한 공정위의 독립성과 전문성 확보, 그리고 사법심사를 통한 공정위의 재량권 남용 통제의 강화 등이 이루어질 필요가 있다. 아울러 공정거래법의 실효적 집행은 절차법만의 문제가 아니라, 실체법의 문제이기도 하다는 점을 간과해서는 안 된다. 따라서 집행의 개선논의는 금지기준의 명확성, 타당성 및 목적적합성이라는 실체법적 차원에서도 아울러 접근하여야 한다. 그리고 이러한 실체법의 발전과 합리적인 법 적용이란 공정위의 준 사법 기관성에 걸맞는 경쟁법 전문가의 적극적인 활용에 크게 좌우되는 것임은 물론이다.

  • PDF

Design of Software Process Metrics and Procedures for Software Process Measurement (소프트웨어 프로세스 측정절차와 메트릭스 설계)

  • Hwang, Sun-Myung
    • The KIPS Transactions:PartD
    • /
    • v.10D no.4
    • /
    • pp.719-726
    • /
    • 2003
  • A SPICE (Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination) and CMM (Capability Maturity Model) assessment can be considered as representative software process assessment models since assessors assign ratings to indicators and metrics to measure the capability of software precesses. But ail of process assessment models don't provide a subjective measurement procedure and metrics. In this paper we define basic quality process metrics and propose standard metrics for each process based on SPICE and CMM. This study also proposed a guideline for a subjective measurement procedure and the metrics are effectively use to SPI.

Multi-Criteria Ranking Model in Promotion Screening Systems (진급추천심사에서의 다기준 순위결정 모델)

  • Mun Chi-Ung;Jeong Chan-Seok;Lee Jin;Jo Su-Hyeong;Han Gwan-Sik;Park Seong-Cheol;Yun Yeong-Su;Hwang Heung-Seok
    • Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
    • /
    • 2006.05a
    • /
    • pp.1684-1689
    • /
    • 2006
  • 본 논문에서는 진급추천 문제를 과학적이고 체계적으로 시행하기 위한 방안으로 정량적인 요소들과 불확실하고 모호한 정성적인 요소들을 고려하여 최적의 진급 대상자를 선정하는 다기준 순위결정 모델이 제시되었다. 모델은 평가요소에 대한 중요도 계산과 의사결정자들이 부여한 각 대상자들의 평가치를 통합하여 우선순위를 결정하는 방법을 제공한다. 진급추천 심사는 공정성, 객관성, 투명성의 확보를 통해 신뢰성 있는 심사 결과를 제시할 수 있어야 하며, 이를 위해 본 논문에서는 (가) 인사 관련 전문가들이 평가요소를 결정 (나) Internet을 이용하여 전자식 명목집단법으로 평가요소에 대한 중요도 결정 (다) 심사위원들이 진급 대상자별, 평가요소별로 평가 등급을 부여 (라) 심사위원들의 점수를 통합하여 순위를 결정하는 절차를 제시하였다. 평가등급의 부여는 퍼지이론의 소속함수을 응용하여 나타내었으며, Simulation을 통해 적정수의 심사위원 수를 결정하는 방법도 함께 제시되었다.

  • PDF