• 보일러설비
• /
• s.194
• /
• pp.111-111
• /
• 2010

물품 외상 대금과 같은 경우 친분이나 거래 관계 때문에 "언제간 주겠지..." 하는 식으로 기다리게 되면 어느 순간 법적 보호를 받지 못하고 대금 청구도 할 수 없게 된다. 바로 소멸 시효가 완성되기 때문이다. 민법에는 '소멸시효' 라는 독특한 제도가 있다. 이는 일정한 사실 상태가 계속되면 그 사실 상태가 진실한 권리관계에 합치 하느냐 않느냐를 묻지 않고서 그 사실 상태를 존중하여 법률상 일정효과를 발생시키는 제도로서, 법률상 채권자가 채무자에게 금전채권을 갖고 있으면서도 일정기간(소멸시효 기간)채무자를 상대로 법적 조치를 취하지 않으면 금전채권은 소멸하게 되고, 채권자는 더 이상 권리주장을 하지 못하게 되는 것이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2016.07a
• /
• pp.147-150
• /
• 2016

우리 국민(國民)들의 사적(私的) 생활관계(生活關係)를 규율(規律)하는 가장 기본적(基本的)인 민법(民法)은 그동안 많은 학자(學者)와 실무가(實務家)들의 끊임없는 연구(硏究)와 판례(判例) 등(等)을 통(通)하여 상당(相當)한 발전(發展)을 거듭해 온 것이 사실(事實)이다. 그러나 민법(民法) 제정(制定) 당시(當時)와는 비교(比較)할 수 없을 정도(程度)로 많은 변화(變化)가 있었지만, 2008년(年) 개정(改正) 가족법(家族法)을 대폭(大幅) 수정(修正)하고 일반(一般) 규정(規定)은 특별(特別)한 수정(修正)이나 보완(補完)이 없이 현재(現在)에 이르고 있어 국민(國民)의 기본적(基本的)인 법률관계(法律關係)를 제대로 지원(支援) 규율(規律)하지 못하고 있는 것이 많은 문제점(問題點)으로 대두(擡頭)하고 있음은 부인(否認)할 수 없는 현실(現實)이다. 특(特)히 그 중(中)에서 쟁점(爭點) 사안(事案)마다 다양(多樣)한 논쟁(論爭)이 있던 소멸시효제도(消滅時效制度)는 1958년(年) 2월(月) 22일(日) 법률(法律) 제(第)471호(號)로 제정(制定)된 이후(以後) 몇 차례에 걸쳐 개정작업(改正作業)을 착수(着手)하였으나 국회의결(國會議決)을 통과(通過)하지 못하고 임기만료(任期滿了)로 폐기(廢棄)되었던 사례(事例)도 있었다. 하지만 계속적(繼續的)으로 미루는 것보다는 국제거래(國際去來)가 비약적(飛躍的)으로 증가(增加)하고 있는 현재(現在) 상황(狀況)을 고려(考慮)하고, 세계적(世界的)인 경제상황(經濟狀況)의 변화(變化)에 적절(適切)하게 대응(對應)하기 위(爲)하여 소멸시효체계(消滅時效體系)를 우리 현실(現實)에 맞게 제도적(制度的) 정비(整備)가 시급(時急)히 필요(必要)하다고 본다. 따라서 본(本) 논문(論文)에서는 민법(民法) 중(中)에서 매우 복잡(複雜)한 형태(形態)를 가지고 있고, 많은 문제점(問題點)을 안고 있는 소멸시효(消滅時效) 규정(規定)의 개정(改正)을 위하여 각국(各國)의 입법례(立法例)를 살펴본 후(後), 이를 토대(土臺)로 우리의 현행(現行) 민법(民法) 하(下)에서 국민(國民)의 법(法) 감정(感情)과 정서(情緖)에 맞는 가장 바람직한 입법방안(立法方案)을 제시(提示)하고자 한다.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.44
• /
• pp.343-386
• /
• 2013

"Financial ADR" system in South Korea can be represented by so-called "Financial Dispute Resolution System", in which Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) and Financial Dispute Resolution Committee are the principal actors in operation of the system, and this is discussed as an "Administrative Financial ADR System". The system has over 10-year history since it was introduced in around 1999. Nonetheless, it was not until when financial consumer protection began to be highlighted after the 2008 financial crisis that Financial ADR system actually started to draw attention in Korea. This was because interest has been rising in "Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)" as an institutional measure to protect financial consumers damaged via financial transactions. However, the current discussion on the domestic Financial ADR system shows an aspect that it is confined to who is to be a principal actor for the operation of Financial ADR institution with main regards to reorganization of supervisory system. This article aims to embody these facts in an institutional model by recognizing them as a problem and analyzing the features of the Financial ADR system, thereby clarifying problems of the system and presenting the direction of improvement. The Korean Financial ADR system can be judged as "administrative model integrated model consensual model quasi-judicial model non-prepositive Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) model". However, at the same time, it is confronted with a task to overcome the two problems; the system is not equipped with institutional basis for securing its validity in spite of the adopted quasi-judicial effect model; and a burden of operating an integrated ADR system is considerable. From this perspective, the article suggests improvement plans for security of validity in the current system and for expansion of industry-control ADR system, in particular, a system of prepositive IDR model. Amongst them, it suggests further plans for securing the validity of the system as follows; promotion to expand the number of internal persons and to differentiate mediation procedures and effect; a plan to keep a financial institution from filing a lawsuit before an agreement recommendation or a mediation proposal is advised; and a plan to grant suspension of extinctive prescription as well as that of procedures of the lawsuit.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.2 no.4 s.8
• /
• pp.69-79
• /
• 2001

Characteristics of Contactor's Defect Liability was too many discussed. But it's not clearly defined yet. Because recent Government Construction Projects are very complex and executed through long time, too many conflicts were appeared related to Contactor's Defect Liability. Therefore to analyse and to resolve the conflicts legal aspects of Contactor's Defect Liability stated in Civil Law and Government Contract Act was systematically compared. The result of this research is as follows : (1) Characteristic of Contactor's Defect must be regarded as a breach of Contract and be an incomplete contract implementation. (2) To decide the range of Damage, Characteristic of Defect must be regarded. (3) Contactor's Defect Liability must be effectual from the day of delivery. (4) Retainage must be added to secure the completion during the Contract Period and Defect Repairing Liability must be omitted in the Contract performance Security.

• Korean Journal of Heritage: History & Science
• /
• v.53 no.4
• /
• pp.32-59
• /
• 2020

South Korea's area-based heritage preservation system originates from the "Preservation of Traditional Buildings Act" enacted in 1984. However, this system was abolished in 1996. As there was a need for protection of ancient cities in the 1960s, Japan enacted the Historic City Preservation Act in 1966, and 'Preservation Areas for Historic Landscapes' and 'Special Preservation Districts for Historic Landscapes' were introduced. For the preservation of area-based heritage sites, the 'Important Preservation Districts for Groups of Traditional Buildings' system introduced as part of the revision of the Cultural Heritage Protection Act in 1975 was the beginning. Then, in the early-2000s, discussions on the preservation of area-based heritage sites began in earnest, and the 'Important Cultural Landscape' system was introduced for protection of the space and context between heritage sites. Also, '33 Groups of Modernization Industry Heritage Sites' were designated in 2007, covering various material and immaterial resources related to the modernization of Japan, and '100 Beautiful Historic Landscapes of Japan' were selected for protection of local landscapes with historic value in the same year. In 2015, the "Japanese Heritage" system was established for the integrated preservation and management of tangible and intangible heritage aspects located in specific areas; in 2016, the "Japanese Agricultural Heritage" system was established for the succession and fostering of the disappearing agriculture and fishery industries; and in 2017, "the 20th Century Heritage," was established, representing evidence of modern and contemporary Japanese technologies in the 20th century. As a result, presently (in September 2020), 30 'Historic Landscape Preservation Areas', 60 'Historic Landscape Special Districts,' 120 'Important Preservation Districts for Groups of Traditional Buildings," 65 'Important Cultural Landscapes,' 66 'Groups of Modernization Industry Heritage Sites,' 264 "100 Beautiful Historic Landscapes of Japan,' 104 'Japanese Heritage Sites,' and 15 'Japanese Agricultural Heritage Sites' have been designated. According to this perception of situations, the research process for this study with its basic purpose of extracting the general characteristics of Japan's area-based heritage preservation system, has sequentially spread since 1976 as follows. First, this study investigates Japan's area-based heritage site preservation system and sets the scope of research through discussions of literature and preceding studies. Second, this study investigates the process of the spread of the area-based heritage site preservation system and analyzes the relationship between the systems according to their development, in order to draw upon their characteristics. Third, to concretize content related to relationships and characteristics, this study involves in-depth analysis of three representative examples and sums them up to identify the characteristics of Japan's area-based heritage system. A noticeable characteristic of Japan's area-based heritage site preservation system drawn from this is that new heritage sites are born each year. Consequently, an overlapping phenomenon takes place between heritage sites, and such phenomena occur alongside revitalization of related industries, traditional industry, and cultural tourism and the improvement of localities as well as the preservation of area-based heritage. These characteristics can be applied as suggestions for the revitalization of the 'modern historical and cultural space' system implemented by South Korea.

• Journal of Legislation Research
• /
• no.53
• /
• pp.525-551
• /
• 2017

This Article discusses the current trend of European competition damage actions focused on the recent Damage Directive and its transposition by the United Kingdom and Germany. The relevant Directive was signed into law in November 2014, and it requires the EU Member States to adopt certain measures to support competition damage actions. The required measures and principles by the Directive include right to full compensation, rebuttable presumption of harm, extensive disclosure of evidence, use of pass-on for defense and indirect purchaser suits. Although many Member States did not meet the deadline to transpose the Directive, the end of 2016, it is reported that 23 Member States have now, as of September 2017, made enactments according to the Directive. When we look at the transposition done by the United Kingdom and Germany, the revisions on their competition laws closely follow the contents of the Directive. However, it will take quite a long time before the amended provisions apply to actual cases since most of the new provisions apply to the infringement that take place after the date of the amendment. A similar situation regarding application time may happen in some other Member States. Furthermore, even if the terms of the competition laws of the Member States become similar following the Directive, the interpretations of the laws may differ by the courts of different countries. EU also does not have a tool to coordinate the litigations that are brought in different Member States under the same facts. It is true that the EU made a big step to enhance competition damage actions by enacting Damage Directive. However, it needs to take more time and resources to have settled system of competition private litigation throughout the Member States. Korea has also experienced increase in competition damage actions during the last fifteen years, and there have been some revisions of the relevant fair trade law as well as development of relevant legal principles by court decisions. Although there are some suggestions that Korea should have more enactments similar to the EU Directive, its seems wiser for Korea to take time to observe how EU countries actually operate competition damage actions after they transposed the Directive. Then, it will be able to gain some wisdom to adopt competition action measures that are suitable for Korean legal system and culture.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.147-176
• /
• 2011

China is experiencing rapid economic development and the volume of air passengers and cargo transportation has increased significantly in recent years. To the contray, the regulations on liability of air carrier in china fall behind and are not sufficiently applicable in disputes. Their lack of sufficient protection for air passenger's interests became obstructive factor for further developments of Chinese air transportation industry. The legal system of air carrier's liability mainly consists of the contents as followed. The liability period, the scope of liability, amount of compensation for damage, limitation of liability, liability exemption of air carrier, jurisdiction, limitation of action, applicable law etc. Laws and rules concerning these issues are regulated in Civil Aviation Law and regulations published by Civil Aviation Administration of China. This article described the main contents of air carrier's liability and examined the legislative problems in their applications in real cases. In order to solve the legal problems on the air carrier's liability and disputes between wrongdoers and survivors etc, it is necessary and desirable for china to amend revelvant provisions. One of my proposals is to raise the amount of compensation limitation for damage. And I also would like to suggest that Civil Aviation Law should treat international and domestic transportation equally on the limitation of compensation for air carrier's liability. China has also acceded to the Montreal Convention of 1999 on July 31, 2005. This is an effort to make the law of air carriage unified worldwide through various international conventions to achieve conformity between rules of international air carriage and that of Chinese domestic aircarriage. Furthermore, there should be additional detailed implementation rules for air carrier to assume liability for the losses to passengers, baggage or cargoes caused by delays in the air transport. Significant clarifications are also needed for provisions concerning whether and how air carrier assume liability for moral damage caused by accident.