• Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference
• /
• 2005.05a
• /
• pp.768-772
• /
• 2005

TSP(Traveling Salesman Problem) has been a nagging NP-complete problem to test almost every algorithmic idea in combinatorial optimization in vain. The main bottleneck is how to get the integer results {0,1} and to avoid sub-tours. We suggest simple and practical method in two steps. Firstly for every node, an initial Hamiltonian cycle us produced on the nearest neighbour concept. The node with nearest distance is to be inserted to form a increased feasible cycle. Secondly we improve the initial solution by exchanging 2 cuts of the grand tours. We got practical results within 1 from the optimum in 30 minutes for up to 200 nodes problems. TSP of real world type might be tackled practically in our formulation.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.24 no.11
• /
• pp.119-126
• /
• 2019

The partial inverse optimization problem is an interesting variant of the inverse optimization problem in which the given instance of an optimization problem need to be modified so that a prescribed partial solution can constitute a part of an optimal solution in the modified instance. In this paper, we consider the traveling salesman problem defined on the line (TSP on the line) which has many applications such as item delivery systems, the collection of objects from storage shelves, and so on. It is worth studying the partial inverse TSP on the line, defined as follows. We are given n requests on the line, and a sequence of k requests that need to be served consecutively. Each request has a specific position on the real line and should be served by the server traveling on the line. The task is to modify as little as possible the position vector associated with n requests so that the prescribed sequence can constitute a part of the optimal solution (minimum Hamiltonian cycle) of TSP on the line. In this paper, we show that the partial inverse TSP on the line and its variant can be solved in polynomial time when the sever is equiped with a specific internal algorithm Forward Trip or with a general optimal algorithm.

• Journal of KIISE:Software and Applications
• /
• v.32 no.12
• /
• pp.1217-1228
• /
• 2005

Recently, since DNA computing has been widely studied for various applications, DNA sequence design which is the most basic and important step for DNA computing has been highlighted. In previous works, DNA sequence design has been formulated as a multi-objective optimization task, and solved by elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). However, NSGA-II needed lots of computational time. Therefore, we use an $\varepsilon$- multiobjective evolutionarv algorithm ($\varepsilon$-MOEA) to overcome the drawbacks of NSGA-II in this paper. To compare the performance of two algorithms in detail, we apply both algorithms to the DTLZ2 benchmark function. $\varepsilon$-MOEA outperformed NSGA-II in both convergence and diversity, $70\%$ and $73\%$ respectively. Especially, $\varepsilon$-MOEA finds optimal solutions using small computational time. Based on these results, we redesign the DNA sequences generated by the previous DNA sequence design tools and the DNA sequences for the 7-travelling salesman problem (TSP). The experimental results show that $\varepsilon$-MOEA outperforms the most cases. Especially, for 7-TSP, $\varepsilon$-MOEA achieves the comparative results two tines faster while finding $22\%$ improved diversity and $92\%$ improved convergence in final solutions using the same time.