• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.27 no.4
• /
• pp.639-661
• /
• 2017

This article reviews several classroom observational frameworks and introduces one of them, Teaching for Robust Understanding of Mathematics (TRU Math) framework, in more detail. The TRU Math framework has unique features, especially of which it helps researchers and practitioners analyze lessons with a focus on opportunities to learn and on how students access to the learning opportunities in mathematics classrooms rather than focusing on teacher behaviors. In this article, using this TRU Math framework, a Korean high school mathematics lesson was analyzed. The analysis illustrates the aspects of good mathematics teaching according to the five dimensions that we theorized. It provides implications on how to better use the tool for both research and practice in Korean school culture and teacher professional development contexts.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.61 no.1
• /
• pp.179-198
• /
• 2022

Teaching is delicate, complicated, and demanding work, and especially beginning teachers set forth their difficulties in preparing and implementing mathematics instruction. It is important to ensure the quality of beginning mathematics teachers' instruction above a consistent level because such affirmation justifies the national policy on teacher education as well as the individual efforts of preservice teachers in South Korea. The current study collected mathematics lessons of the two beginning teachers who graduated from the same teacher training institute and worked at the same high school. The findings reported what features their lessons have with regard to the learning environment, engaging students in learning, deepening student learning, and using representations of the edTPA in order to identify what can or cannot be expected in their mathematics instruction. The instruction of the one teacher was assessed middle or more than middle scores throughout the rubrics, but the other one had lower scores. Based on these findings, this study suggested the implications for teacher education in ways of improving the quality of instruction of beginning mathematics teachers.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.8
• /
• pp.257-264
• /
• 1999

대학수학 수업을 효율적으로 진행하면서 수업 성취도를 높일 수 있는 방법을 찾기 위해 3년간의 현장 연구 결과: 1996 학년도 "대학수학 수업 실태의 조사 분석", 1997 학년도 "흥미 및 동기유발을 위한 대학수학 수업 자료와 평가", 1998 학년도 "대학수학 학업성취도에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석" 에 근거하여 새로운 대학수학 교재(1999. 2월 출판)와 실습교재 미분적분학을 위한 Mathematica 연습(1999. 2월 출판)을 만들고, 수업 진행을 협동학습과 수준별 학습에 바탕을 두어 한 학과 40명의 학생들을 5명씩 8개의 그룹으로 나누어 역할을 분담하도록 하여 수준에 맞는 수업을 진행하고 그에 따른 평가방법을 개발하여 시도해보고 이 수업 모델이 학생들에게 효과가 있었는지, 호응을 얻었는지에 대한 비교를 1999학년도 1학기 말에 SPSS/PC+프로그램을 이용하여 조사하려고 한다.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.59 no.3
• /
• pp.237-254
• /
• 2020

The current study investigated the relationships between mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality in instruction in order to gain insight about teacher education for secondary teachers in South Korea. We collected and analyzed twelve high school teachers' scores of the multiple-choice assessment for mathematical knowledge for teaching developed by the Measures of Effective Teaching project. Their instruction was video recorded and analyzed with the mathematical quality in instruction developed by the Learning Mathematics for Teaching project. We also interviewed the teachers about how they planned and assessed their instruction by themselves in order to gain information about their intention and interpretation about instruction. There was a statistically significant and positive association between the levels of mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality in instruction. Among three dimensions of the mathematical quality in instruction, mathematical richness seemed most relevant to mathematical knowledge for teaching because subject matter knowledge plays an important role in mathematical knowledge for teaching. Furthermore, working with students and mathematics as well as students participation were critical to decide the quality of instruction. Based on these findings, the current study discussed offering opportunities to learn mathematical knowledge for teaching and philosophy about how teachers need to consider students in high schools particularly in terms of constructivism.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2008

This study aims to provide answers to two questions regarding the supervision of pre-service mathematics teachers: 'Who should carry out the work of supervision?' and 'How can it most skillfully be done?' The answer to the first question seems to be that, for a variety of reasons, university teachers and mentors appear best suited to do the supervision in a cooperative relationship with pre-service teachers. The assumption that seems to underlie the collaborative supervision is that field-based experiences are necessary and useful components of professional development in pre-service teacher preparation programs. With respect to the second question, it is suggested that a non-judgemental approach should be considered, along with strategies and techniques for judgemental supervision, as a way to make math teacher supervision more meaningful and helpful for the improvement of teaching and long-term professional development. It is hoped that a continued exploration of models of teacher supervision and evaluation of their effectiveness will help pre-service math teachers, supervisors and mentors learn more about teaching and improve their own teaching.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.2
• /
• pp.121-143
• /
• 2010

In this article, I reviewed current state of researches about mathematics instruction in Korea and sought ways and methodologies of future research. I analyzed articles which were published after year 2000 and were targeted to mathematical instruction itself. After collecting articles, I classified them according to research subject, method and analysis framework, purpose and focus, research perspective and keyword. Subsequently, I analyzed tendency of each research and theoretical framework of them. Based on upper results, I drew directivity of mathematics instruction research at two aspects. First, I found and suggested elements with which framework of mathematics instruction analysis should equip. Secondly, I explored main tasks of mathematics instruction research.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.523-545
• /
• 2010

Mathematical communication has been emphasized not only as the process of learning mathematics but also as the objective of mathematics education. However, little studies have been conducted with regard to what to consider and how to implement in the actual classroom for promoting mathematical communication. Given this background, this paper implemented a mathematics instruction in each of 2nd, 4th, and 6th grade classrooms in which specific learning objectives were considered to promote discourse-based mathematical communication. It then analyzed the degree by which such learning objectives were achieved and the linguistic interactions between the teacher and students in each classroom. This paper finally provided issues and suggestions for effective discourse-based instruction in mathematics classroom by analyzing similarities and differences among the three classrooms.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.373-395
• /
• 2010

In this research, I reported the activities of learning community on elementary mathematics which is consist of 1 university researcher 4 elementary teachers. The main activities of learning community are as follows: establishing objectives and contents of learning community, writing the critical essay on elementary mathematics lesson, and reflecting on the activities of learning community. The establishment of objectives and contents of learning community was built through agreement between university researcher and elementary teachers. In addition to, the members of learning community could share the idea and difficulties on elementary mathematics lesson and increase the professional development on elementary mathematics lesson by criticizing the lesson together.

• Education of Primary School Mathematics
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.151-162
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of teacher's mathematical belief and student's mathematical performance, sex on the perception of mathematics classroom quality. And this study also detailed the relation between self-directed learning attitude and perception of mathematics classroom quality. For this purpose, this study used 'Students Perception of Mathematics Classroom Quality(SPOCQ)' as an instrument. This instrument focuses on appeal, challenge, choice, meaningfulness, self-efficacy. The 430 5th and 6th grade elementary school students were included in sample. The results obtained in this research are as follows; First, there was a significant difference in the perception of mathematics classroom quality between positive mathematical belief teacher's group and negative mathematical belief teacher's group. So, teacher's mathematical belief influence on the students' perception of mathematics classroom quality. Second, there was a significant difference according to the student's mathematical performance and sex. The students of high mathematical performance usually had positive perception of mathematics classroom quality and the male students also had higher mean than female students. Third, there was positive correlation between self-directed learning attitude and perception of mathematics classroom quality.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.19 no.1 s.21
• /
• pp.191-213
• /
• 2005

이 연구는 수학교사가 자기수업 관찰을 바탕으로 수업반성의 과정에서 발문을 어떻게 반성하는지, 반성을 통해 수업에서 발문을 어떻게 변화시키며, 교사와 학생 사이의 상호작용에 어떤 변화가 나타나는지를 분석하기 위한 것이다. 두 중학교 수학 교사를 대상으로 일주일에 1회씩 총 5회의 수업관찰과 수업반성의 순환과정을 통해 얻어진 관찰자료, 녹화자료, 면담자료로 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 교사의 수업반성 결과 학생들로 하여금 수업에 더 많이 참여하고 학생 자신의 생각을 표현할 수 있도록 유도하기위한 효과적인 발문을 고안하였고, 교사 자신의 수업을 자발적으로 평가하는 경향을 보였다. 둘째, 발문의 변화 면에서 반성 초기의 수업보다 반성 후기의 수업에서 설명을 요구하는 발문유형의 빈도가 높게 나타났으며, 판단을 요구하는 발문을 하고 나서 그 판단에 대하여 설명하도록 요구하는 발문을 함으로써 학생들로 하여금 자신의 생각과 아이디어를 표현할 수 있도록 하는 것으로 나타났다. 그리고, 문제해결과정에 학생들의 참여의 기회가 늘어나도록 발문을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 상호작용 측면에서 교사와 학생간의 상호작용이 학생과 학생들 간의 상호작용 패턴으로 변화하였고, 교사의 판서가 의사소통을 단절시키던 것에서 교사와 학생의 의사소통의 방향을 안내하는 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다.