• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2007년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2007

The selection of the reasonable project delivery system (PDS) is crucial for a successful performance of a project, which means to achieve project objectives. Furthermore, the project performance has been tightly related to the selection of PDS appropriate to pertinent project characteristics. In this context, the ministry of finance and economy of Korea launched two new project delivery systems called "Best Value Contract (Design-Bid-Build)" and "Bridging Contract (Design-Build)" in October of 2007 by revising enforcement ordinances of "Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party". For efficient operation of the new project delivery systems, this paper suggested a PDS selection model which supports decision making of the reasonable PDS for a pertinent project by assessing characteristics of the public construction projects, both quantitatively and qualitatively. In addition, a PDS performance evaluation model was proposed in order to get feedback on the result of the PDS selection and the operation for the succeeding project. The standard models suggested in this paper might be used as a tool to support the decision making of the public organizations.

• Information and Communications Magazine
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.40-48
• /
• 2007

미들웨어는 다양한 하드웨어환경을 하나의 플랫폼으로 보이게 하고, 이를 이용한 단일 플랫폼 상에서 동일한 디지털 어플리케이션을 구동할 수 있는 환경을 지원하는 소프트웨어 운용환경이다. 이러한 미들웨어는 특히 통신망을 기반으로 한 IPTV에서 그 필요성이 절실하다 하겠다. IP망은 기존의 방송망과 달리, 미디어를 방송 형식으로 소비자에게 전달하기 위해서는 많은 제약을 안고 있었으나 최근 광대역화 고속화의 진화속도에 따라 그러한 제약은 기술적으로 탈피하기 시작하였고, 다양한 사업모델 구축을 위한 통신사업자들은 미디어 사업영역에 그들의 사업을 확장해나가기에 이르렀다. 일반적으로 유료방송 (PayTV)라는 사업모델에서 수신기는 그들의 사업모델을 구현하는 필수적인 것이며, 사업모델의 진화에 따라 수신기 또한 진화를 하게 되어 사실상 현장에는 다양한 하드웨어가 보급되게 되는데, 이러한 사업모델을 지원하기 위한 하드웨어/소프트웨어적인 단일화 플랫폼 기술인 미들웨어의 기술적 지원이 필수적이기도 하다. 본 고에서는 미들웨어(middleware)라 불리우는 일반적인 데이터방송 및 양방향 방송 지원환경의 필요성과 현재의 기술수준, 그리고 표준화 동향에 대해서 간략하게 조사하여 알아보기로 한다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 2018

The aim of this paper is to develop a performance evaluation model for PPP (Public-Private Partnership) projects that appropriately reflects the important traits that are unique to PPP projects. To this end, 1) it defines a set of distinct perspectives involved in the PPP projects and their associated success factors that might differ amongst the perspectives; 2) it identifies the key performance indicators and suggests the performance evaluation criteria for each indicator; and 3) it builds a performance evaluation model by matching the success factors from each perspective with performance measure criteria as well as applies the model to the two selected BTO road projects in Korea. The process of model construction and its application confirms significant differences between the main stakeholder perspectives typically involved in PPP projects, which highlights the need for an evaluation model tailored for PPP projects by taking into account the distinct perspectives. The results from the PPP evaluation model developed in the study is compared against the results from the existing ex-post evaluation model for construction projects in general. The former shows a closer match with the results from the user satisfaction survey conducted. This new evaluation framework and the performance indicators entailed in it permits a balanced evaluation of PPP projects as it takes into account different perspectives involved in PPP projects as well as an understanding of the factors affecting the success of PPP projects. While the construction of the model is based on transport projects, it is applicable to different types of PPP projects through variation with the weight allocation amongst different success factors and/or additions or other adjustments to the performance evaluation criteria as required.

• Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference
• /
• 한국기술혁신학회 2017년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.263-287
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 연구개발의 기술적 성과에 비하여 상대적으로 저조한 경제적 성과를 제고하기 위해 중소기업의 기술사업화를 촉진하는 한국형 기술사업화 모델 및 이를 위한 과학적 연구방법론 제시를 목적으로 하고 있다. 먼저 기술사업화의 성공실패에 관련된 연구 중 하나인 신제품개발에서 경제적 성과에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 요인들을 선행연구를 통해 확인하고 우리나라 중소기업의 기술사업화 추진실태와 과제를 진단한다. 다음으로 세계 R&D 동향과 국내 대기업에서 추진하고 있는 6시그마 연구혁신 모델 및 기술사업화의 경제적 성과를 제고하기 위한 과학적 연구방법론 벤치마킹 분석 등의 결과를 토대로 우리나라 중소기업들이 수행하는 연구개발의 기술적 성과는 물론 경제적 성과도 제고할 수 있는 시장중심 R&D를 위한 한국형 기술사업화 모델과 이를 위한 5가지 과학적 연구 방법론을 제시한다. 1990년대 후반부터 등장하기 시작한 새로운 R&D동향은 사업부나 고객뿐만 아니라 공급자 등 외부 파트너들과의 상호 긴밀한 협력 하에 이들의 명시적인 니즈는 물론 암묵지 형태의 니즈까지도 파악하여 이를 R&D 활동에 반영하기 시작하였다. 특히 기업은 1980년대 정보화 진전, 변화의 가속화에 따라 연구과제의 성공이 바로 기업발전으로 연결되지 않는다는 것을 자각하기 시작했다. 단순히 R&D 활동만을 중시하는 것이 아니라 기술을 어떻게 마케팅과 연계시킬 것인가가 더욱 중요하게 되었다. 신기술을 신시장에 연결시키는 것이 용이하지 않지만, 성공 시에는 높은 가치창출을 기대할 수 있으므로 기업들은 R&D활동 보다 높은 가치를 창출하려는 활동에 관심을 가져야만 한다. 이와 같은 글로벌 환경 변화에 능동적으로 대처하고 제4차 산업혁명시대 중소기업의 연구개발 투자가 경제적 성과로 촉진될 수 있도록 본 연구에서 제시된 시장중심 R&D를 위한 한국형 기술사업화 모델과 5가지 과학적 연구방법론이 크게 기여하기를 기대해 본다.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• 제12권2호
• /
• pp.167-187
• /
• 2010

The governmental R&D projects have put a great emphasis on returns on R&D investment through development of market- and customer-oriented technologies and their commercialization. A successful commercialization of the technology developed from a R&D project relies on development of the technology intriguing customers, establishment of effective commercialization strategies throughout the stages of R&D planning and development, and interactive communication between the technology developer and a private company that will do a business with the technology. The business modeling helps accomplish the requirements for the successful commercialization. The past literature about technology commercialization does not provide a systematic procedure in developing a business model for the governmental R&D project. In this study, we proposed a systematic procedure developing a business model integrating peculiar characteristics of governmental R&D and viewpoints of technology developers and professionals of technology commercialization. It can be a useful guideline for developing a business model for the governmental R&D project.

• Archives of design research
• /
• 제15권1호
• /
• pp.319-326
• /
• 2002

This study is clarifying the relationship between domain and in-house design based on the perspective on organization and task of a design organization. Accordingly, the growth and expansion of organization requires a new strategy in respect of design sector and business domain. It is a guideline for developing advanced business domain and design management in the limited strategic system of design department to analyze relatively the structural model of design, and to seek for any feasibility of strategic application. And this study comes to be basic data for defining the relationship between domain and in-house design. Consequently, both of strategic design management to back up the task of design organization and the module to support the design planning should be flexibly systemized.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 한국정보처리학회 2008년도 춘계학술발표대회
• /
• pp.439-442
• /
• 2008

국가연구개발사업은 국가연구개발사업의 관리 등에 대한 규정 제17조에 의거하여 연구개발결과를 활용하는데 그 목적을 가진다. 그러나, 사실상 최근 국가연구개발사업을 통해 개발된 연구기술들은 특허 등의 라이선스를 획득하고 기술이전을 통해 사업화로 이어지는 사례가 매우 미미하다. 실제로 2005년 산업자원부의 조사에 따르면, 국가연구개발사업의 사업화 성공률은 평균 31.4%로 선진국의 1/2에도 못 미치는 수준이다. 따라서, 본 논문에서는 국가연구개발사업의 예산 대비 기술이전 및 확산을 통한 기술사업화 성공률을 높이기 위한 하나의 방법으로, 연구과제 평가 시 기술의 가치를 평가하여 그 평가결과를 예산배분에 반영 할 수 있도록 기술가치평가방법을 활용한 R&BD(Research &Business Development) 활성화를 위한 평가항목 및 개발될 기술의 사업성을 평가할 수 있는 평가모델을 설계하였다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.153-163
• /
• 2016

Intellectual output, such as research papers and patents, has increased due to the consistent investment of the government R&D budget, however, the economical outcome leaves much to be desired. These unsatisfactory results originate from the lack of information sharing about the technology's business compatibility and enterprise's business capability between technology supplier and technology user. This study aims at investigating the decision making process of technology commercialization by proposing an assessment model of the technology's business compatibility and enterprise's business capability. The assessment model was completed by selecting the key index through a literature survey, field survey and consultation with experts. The technology assessment model can be effectively utilized for technology licensing, technology start-up and technology selection in R&BD projects. However, the assessment indexes required for the basic science are not investigated in this study and some assessment indexes are differently interpreted by the individual appraisers. The assessment model will be improved through field application and additional studies will be conducted to develop the assessment model of basic science.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.458-486
• /
• 2017

This article suggests Living Lab approach as a technology commercialization model of public research and development (R&D) projects. Living Lab is a model for end-users, private companies, research institutes, and public organizations to develop technology in a living space which works as a laboratory. Unlike the dominant technology commercialization model which focuses on private enterprises, a new living lab model discusses end-user centered commercialization. Based on general living lab model, three types of technology commercialization model are suggested. The 'Demand exploring type living lab' and the 'Problem solving type living lab' are project-based living lab. The other type of living lab is 'Living lab platform'. The projectbased living lab can be utilized as modules when promoting R&D projects. On the other hand, the living lab platform is infrastructure to provide living labs services to companies, public institutes and municipalities.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2003년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.469-472
• /
• 2003

A life cycle cost analysis model for public water supply systems should be different from the ones for other civil and architectural facilities as the operation and the maintenance cost of the water supply systems mainly come from the various mechanical systems and the pipeline systems of the collecting/treating/distributing facilities. This paper presents a cost classification scheme and a life cycle cost analysis model for public water supply systems. A value analysis (VA) procedure that is well suited for practical purposes is also presented. The presented life cycle model and the value analysis procedure were applied to a real world project, and this case study is discussed in the paper. The model and the procedure presented in this study can greatly contribute to the value-oriented design alternative selection, the estimation of the maintenance cost, and the allocation of budget for water supply system construction projects.