Browse > Article

Technology Commercialization Model of Public R&D Based on Living Labs  

Song, Wichin (과학기술정책연구원)
Jeong, Seohwa (과학기술정책연구원)
Han, Kyu-young (과학기술정책연구원)
Seong, Jieun (과학기술정책연구원)
Kim, Jongseon (과학기술정책연구원)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society / v.20, no.2, 2017 , pp. 458-486 More about this Journal
Abstract
This article suggests Living Lab approach as a technology commercialization model of public research and development (R&D) projects. Living Lab is a model for end-users, private companies, research institutes, and public organizations to develop technology in a living space which works as a laboratory. Unlike the dominant technology commercialization model which focuses on private enterprises, a new living lab model discusses end-user centered commercialization. Based on general living lab model, three types of technology commercialization model are suggested. The 'Demand exploring type living lab' and the 'Problem solving type living lab' are project-based living lab. The other type of living lab is 'Living lab platform'. The projectbased living lab can be utilized as modules when promoting R&D projects. On the other hand, the living lab platform is infrastructure to provide living labs services to companies, public institutes and municipalities.
Keywords
Living Lab; Technology Commercialization; End-user; Co-creation; Model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 국가과학기술심의회 (2016), 기초.원천 연구성과 확산 촉진방안(안).
2 김병근.조현정.옥주영 (2011), "구조방정식 모형을 이용한 공공연구기관의 기술사업화 프로세스와 성과분석", 기술혁신학회지, 14(3): 552-577.
3 김영배 (2008), 사용자 혁신과 기술혁신시스템, 과학기술정책연구원.
4 김찬호.고창룡.설성수 (2012), "기술사업화 실패 사례연구", 기술혁신학회지, 15(1): 203-223.
5 미래창조과학부 (2014), R&D성과확산을 위한 기술사업화 추진계획.
6 박재수.박정용 (2013), "성공적인 기술사업화를 위한 솔루션 프로세스-정부의 기술개발지원사업 참여기업을 대상으로", 한국정보통신학회논문지, 17(7): 1522-1530.   DOI
7 박종복 (2012), 한국 기술사업화의 실태와 발전과제-공공기술을 중심으로-, 산업연구원.
8 박종복.조윤애.류태규 (2015), 출연(연)의 기술이전 및 사업화 촉진을 위한 플랫폼 구축 방안, 산업연구원.
9 박종복 (2016), "기술사업화의 이론과 동향", 과학기술정책연구원 전문가회의 발표자료.
10 성지은.박인용 (2016), "시스템 전환 실험의 장으로서 리빙랩: 사례분석과 시사점", 기술혁신학회지, 19(1): 1-28.
11 성지은.송위진.김종선.박인용 (2015), ICT 분야의 한국형 리빙랩 구축 방안 연구, 미래창조과학부.
12 성지은.송위진.김종선.정서화.한규영 (2016가), "멘토링을 통해 본 사회문제 해결형 기술개발 사업", STEPI Insight, 191.
13 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2014), "사용자 주도형 혁신모델로서 리빙랩 사례 분석과 적용 가능성 탐색", 기술혁신학회지, 17(2): 309-333.
14 성지은.한규영.박인용 (2016나), "국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제", STEPI Insight, 184.
15 성지은.송위진.김종선.장영재.정서화.한규영 (2016다), 사회문제 해결형 기술개발사업 시민연구멘토단 구성.운영을 위한 전문기관 선정, 미래창조과학부.
16 손상영.안일태.이철남 (2009), 방송.통신 융합 환경에서의 플랫폼 경쟁정책, 정보통신정책연구원.
17 송위진 (2012), "Living Lab: 사용자 주도의 개방형 혁신모델", Issue & Policy, 59: 1-14.
18 송위진 (2016), "사용자 주도형 혁신모델, 리빙랩", 기술과 경영, 395: 40-43.
19 송위진.성지은 (2013), 사회문제 해결을 위한 과학기술혁신정책, 한울.
20 안준모 (2015), "유출-개방형 기술혁신으로서의 기술사업화 정책 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 18(4): 561-589.
21 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2013), "리빙랩의 운영 체계와 사례", STEPI Insight, 127.
22 이윤준.김선우 (2013), "대학.출연(연)의 기술사업화 활성화 방안", STEPI Insight, 123.
23 최정덕 (2009), "시장지향적 R&D 의 피해야할 함정", LG Business Insight, 1.
24 최치호 (2011), "출연(연) 기술이전 및 사업화 촉진 방안", KISTEP ISSUE PAPER.
25 한국전자통신연구원 사업화본부 (2016), "ETRI 기술사업화 혁신사례", ETRI-STEPI 공동 워크샵 발표자료.
26 한정민.박철민.구본철 (2015), "연구개발성과의 기술사업화 활성화를 위한 영향요인 분석 연구", 한국기술혁신학회 추계학술대회 발표문.
27 황혜란.김경근.정형권 (2013), "기술집약형 중소기업의 기술사업화 지원정책 연구-대덕연구개발특구의 사례", 벤처창업연구, 8(3): 39-52.
28 Ballon, P., Pierson, J. and Delaere, S. (2005), "Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation: Examining European practice", Available at SSRN 1331557.
29 Chesbrough, H. (2003), Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
30 Curley, M. and Salmelin, B. (2013), Open Innovation 2.0: A New Paradigm, Luxembourg: European Union.
31 Dell'Era, C. and Landoni, P. (2014), "Living Lab: A Methodology between User-Centred Design and Participatory Design", Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2): 137-154.   DOI
32 D'Hauwers, R., Herregodts, A. L., Georges, A., Coorevits, L., Schuurman, D., Rits, O. and Ballon, P. (2016), "The Potential of Experimentation in Business-to-Business Living Labs", Open Living Lab Days 2016, Research Day Conference Proceedings, 37-49.
33 ENoLL (2015), Living Lab Services for Business Support & Internationalisation, ENoLL.
34 European Commission (2014), Open Innovation Yearbook, Luxembourg: European Union.
35 European Commission (2015), Open Innovation Yearbook, Luxembourg: European Union.
36 European Commission (2016), Open Innovation Yearbook, Luxembourg: European Union.
37 Folstad, A. (2008), "Living Labs for Innovation and AND Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review", The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organization & Networks, 10: 99-131.
38 iMinds (2015), "Living lab Research: What We Do", iMinds, Accessed October 2, 2016: http://www.iminds.be/en/succeed-with-digital-research/go-to-market-testing/proeftuinonderzoek.
39 Jespersen, K. R. (2008), User Driven Product Development: Creating a User-Involving Culture, Samfundslitteratur, Copenhagen.
40 Kleibrink, A. and Schmidt, S. (2015), "Communities of Practice as New Actors: Innovation Labs Inside and Outside Government", Open Innovation Yearbook 2015, European Commission.
41 Pallot, M. (2009), "The Living Lab Approach: A User Centred Open Innovation Ecosystem", Webergence Blog. http://www.cwe-projects.eu/pub/bscw.cgi/715404.
42 Leminen, S., Westerlund, M. and Nyström, A. G. (2012), "Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks", Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(9): 6-11.
43 Lichtenthaler, U. (2009), "Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes", Academy of management journal, 52(4): 822-846.   DOI
44 Meijer, C. R., Nicholson, A. E. and Priester, R. (2016), "Open Innovation 2.0 calls for margnetic oranisations", European Commission (eds), Open Innovation 2.0 yearbook 2016, Luxembourg: European Union, 28-34.
45 Patrycja, G. (2015), "Embedding a Living Lab approach at the University of Edinburgh", The university of Edinburgh.
46 Samlelin, B. (2015), "Open Innovation 2.0 Creations New Innovation Space", in Open Innovation Yearbook 2015, European Commission.
47 Schuurman, D. (2015), "Bridging the gap between Open and User Innovation?: exploring the value of Living Labs as a means to structure user contribution and manage distributed innovation", Doctoral dissertation, Ghent University.
48 Schuurman, D., Marez, L. D. and Ballon, P. (2016), "The Impact of Living Lab Methodology on Open Innovation Contributions and Outcomes", Technology Innovation management Review, 6(1): 7-16.   DOI
49 강지민 (2011), 개방형 혁신 활동이 기술사업화 성과에 미치는 영향-바이오.제약기업 사례를 중심으로-, 과학기술정책연구원.