• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.42
• /
• pp.57-65
• /
• 1999

일본의 공정취인위원회는 지난 1977년부터 일본 경제에서 큰 비중을 차지하고 있는 6대 대규모기업집단에 대한 기업집단 내의 소유지배관계, 자본$\cdot$인적 및 상품에 대한 내부거래 현황, 그리고 대규모사업추진에 따른 상호 협력관계 등 멤버기업간의 결합 실태를 조사하여 왔다. 이 글은 공정취인위원회가 지난 1996년 1월부터 1997년 6월 30일간에 결산기가 도래된 기업을 대상으로 한 제6차 경영행태 조사의 결과를 요약$\cdot$분석하여 일본 공정취인협회가 발간한 $\lceil$공정취인$\rfloor$(1998년 12월호)지에 게재한 것은 전문 번역 게재한 것이다. 우리나라에서도 대규모기업집단의 선단식 경영에 대한 폐해(물론 장점도 있지만)와 공정거래 위원회의 부당한 내부거래의 제재에 대한 논란이 이루어지고 있기 때문에 양국의 재벌급 기업집단의 경영 형태를 비교$\cdot$검토함으로써 정책 운용에 참고가 될 수 있도록 하였다.

• Proceedings of the CALSEC Conference
• /
• 1999.07a
• /
• pp.133-146
• /
• 1999

지식경제사회에서 국가의 경쟁력은 국가의 잠재적 지식자원을 어떻게 유형화하고 부가가치화하느냐에 따라 결정된다. 국가의 지식자원을 각 개별 경제주체가 소유한 지식자원의 총체적 개념으로 정의할 때 이 개별 주체들의 지식자원을 공유하도록 유도하고 공유된 지식을 활용하여 부가가치화 하도록 하는 것이 국가의 지식경쟁력 강화와 직결되는 정부의 역할일 것이다. 이에 본 연구는 개별 경제주체가 소유하고 있는 지식을 국가적 차원에서 공유토록 유도하고 그것을 활용하여 경쟁력을 강화토록 하는 산업지식유통시스템 모형을 제안한다. 정부의 정책적 배려와 지원하에 본 연구의 제안이 현실화된다면, 산업지식유통 시스템은 산업수준의 지식유통 활성화를 통하여 기업의 지식기반 경영능력의 향상에 기여하고 선진국과의 지식네트워크를 통한 선진 지식의 도입 활성화에 기여함으로써 지식경쟁력 강화를 통한 국가 경쟁력 향상에 이바지 할 것이다.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.34 no.3
• /
• pp.295-318
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 단양군 소백산맥 북서사면을 사례지역으로 농업적 토지이용의 수직적 분화를 파악하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이 연구를 통하여 산지가 많은 우리 나라에서 산지사면을 농업적 측면에서 효율적으로 이용하는 방안을 제시할 수 있다. 단양군 소백산맥 북서사면 지역의 수직적 토지이용의 구성에 의한 농업생산지대의 형성 메카니즘을 농업경영 형태와 수직적 농업 토지이용의 면에서 살펴 보면 다음과 같다. 농업 생산기반 요인으로는 자연환경요소인 기후와 토양 및 해발고도, 경지 소유관계로 자가 경지소유, 노동력은 가족 노동력, 농기계화와 모터리제이션, 그리고 농가와 경지와의 거리를 들 수 있다. 그리고 사회.경제적 요인으로는 상전의 토지이용 변화, 인접지역의 재배작물 영향, 인접지역으로부터 전입인구, 교통의 발달정도 등을 들 수 있다. 마지막으로는 농업정책의 요인으로는 특화단지 조성, 협업생산체제와 1군 1명품 사업 등을 들 수 있다.

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.5 no.2
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between the controlling shareholding ratio and the business diversification of savings banks The difference in this study is the analysis of the relationship between the controlling shareholding ratio of the savings bank and the business diversification using panel data. In this study, the semi-annual financial statements for the period 2014-2018 were used on the basis of a sample of 79 saving banks. The research model is analyzed using random effects generalized linear square (GLS) model considering the autocorrelation problem. As a result of the empirical analysis, it is estimated that the relationship between the controlling shareholding ratio of the savings bank and the business diversification is significant (+). This is the result of supporting the hedging hypothesis.

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.3-23
• /
• 2011

Existing studies have argued that, compared to the 1990s, the Japanese foreign direct investment (FDI) in the 2000s became multi-faceted in terms of investment motivation, ownership structure and entry mode, and diversification strategy. We have conducted a cross-sectional analysis and compared our results with the recent findings. We have found that the Japanese FDI in the mid 2000s became globally focused and regionally diversified. Ownership strategy and entry mode of the Japanese FDI in the Asian countries shows a remarkable shift from joint venture to wholly-owned subsidiary. In contrast, the preference of greenfield investments was observed consistently across regions. It seems that, after the Asian financial crisis, the Japanese firms began to re-optimize global FDI strategy and to regionally differentiate investments.

• Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science
• /
• v.61 no.1
• /
• pp.60-68
• /
• 1983

Ever since the day of pre-modernized society where the farming skill had been in the stagnant condition, the common farmwoodlands have been utilized in common (collectivelly) by villagers in order to harvest farmwoodlands and fuelwoods. Later, during the process of modernization, most of the common farmwoodlands were transferred into national or public forests by the administrative enforcement, but there were still various types of village (common) forests such as the common forests owned by joint owners, village block associations, village forest productive societies, Village Forestry Association(V.F.A.), and the national or public forests leased to V.F.A. As Village Forestry Association is organized with a few villages, each of common forests ow nod to the villages is obliged to be diversely controlled by other managers than the chief of V.F.A. Therefore, it is to be desired that the control of common forests should be under Gun Forestry Association Union. While the rate of the use of common forests for fuelwoods and cemetery has been considerably high, villagers wish to promote the timber forest establishment through the collective management by their improved farming skills and economical situations. In these present circumstances the village forest productive societies should be guided to work in closer cooperation with Gun Forestry Association Union. Since the management of common forests is still extensive, it still remains in the semi-management condition under which we can not find any management plan or measure to control forest damage. Especially the small area common forests should have appropriate size for the joint management. This will promote the forest productivity through the lease for reforestation of disposable national forests or public county forests and the contracts for profit sharing. Today owing to increasing forest value, frequent dispute has occurred on the common right telated to the village forests and rationalization of forest management has been disregarded. If a necessary measure were taken to control the dispute such as transferring the registeration right of ownership to the village forest productive society, the confidence of local inhabitants can be regained and the productivity of forests can be naturally increased.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.239-270
• /
• 2017

This paper examines the relationship between ownership structure and the intensity of R&D expenditures of a firm by analyzing the panel data composed of 553 manufacturing firms in KSE(Korea Stock Exchange) and KOSDAQ listed firms for the period of 2007-2014. The major findings are as follows; (1) Regarding the relationship between CEO stockholding and R&D intensity, we find the inverted-U shape relationship in KOSDAQ firms, consistent with the theoretical discussion and empirical studies on U.S. firms. The result suggests that management stockholding reduces agency problem at the R&D margin. On the contrary, the insignificant result in KSE firms seems to be due to the scant stockholding of most 'non-owner' CEOs. (2) Regarding the relationship between the largest shareholder's portion and R&D intensity, KSE firms exhibit negatively significant relationship, suggesting the existence of serious agency problem between the largest shareholder and the minor shareholders. This agency problem seems to be alleviated in KOSDAQ firms mainly because the founders with technology expertise are still in charge of the business. (3) Foreign investors seem to fail in effectively encouraging R&D expenditures in either KSE or KOSDAQ listed firms. This study contributes to the existing literature by showing for the first time that ownership structure affects R&D activities in different ways between KSE and KOSDAQ firms.

• Knowledge Management Research
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.57-72
• /
• 2013

This paper examines the relationships between the Korean government-owned banks and the firm performance. We investigates this empirical analysis using a data set containing virtually all Korean publicly listed firms for the period of 2004-2006. We find the negative relationships between government-owned banks and firm performance. The strong relationships between the Korean government-owned banks and the Korean listed firms may lower firm performance. The Hold up costs may be present in the government-owned bank relationships. The government-owned bank relationships in the Korean listed firms may could shape the negative management decisions and firm performance. On the lines of concerns on the impact of government banks, this paper will provide new evidences on the impact of government-ownership of banks on the Korean Economy. Particularly, empirical analyses in this paper revealed new evidences on the recent firm-bank relationship or government banks researches.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.12 no.7
• /
• pp.3062-3071
• /
• 2011

This study proposed to compare the performance differences between a manufacturing company and a construction company in accordance with the mutual relations and ownership structures with the management performance based on the increase or decrease of the large shareholders' share-holding ratio (insider ownership, foreign share-holding, institutional investors' share-holding) of a KOSPI listed company in Korea during 10 years(1998-2007). To sum up the research work, first, the increase of foreign share-holding supported the results of previous studies which foreign share-holding has a positive effect on the long term performance by having a positive(+) effect on MTB, and the increase of an insider ownership supported the management entrenchment hypothesis of previous studies by having a negative(-) effect on MTB. However, relations between institutional investors's share-holding and MTB could not find out linkages in spite of the results of previous studies where dealt with the active monitoring hypothesis. Also, to examine the linkages of ROA and the ownership structure, though the increases of foreign share-holding and insider ownership had a positive(+) effect on ROA, the increases of institutional investors' share-holding had a negative(-) effect on it. It showed different analysis results from the active monitoring hypothesis of institutional investors. As a result of verifying whether there is "any difference in the management performances between the construction industry and the manufacturing industry according to the equity structure" which is the second hypothesis, nothing of the insider ownership and whether or not there is the construction industry, foreign share-holding and whether or not there is the construction, and the institutional ownership and whether or not there is the construction industry gave a statistical difference to MTB and ROA. Accordingly, it was possible to find out there is no difference in the management performance between the construction industry and the manufacturing industry based on the ownership structure in spite of different characteristics from the manufacturing industry such as the revenue recognition in ordering, production and accounting.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.9 no.5
• /
• pp.1446-1452
• /
• 2008

Recently many Company are investing time and money in the implementation of the Knowledge Management System (KMS). The scales and methodologies of their investment fur KMS has various appearances according to company-size and also level of understanding about KMS systems. The interest in KMS is increased with the P. Druckers assertion that the economic power shifts to the person who can manage the "Knowledge". But there is also mistrust about ROI of KMS related with the management performances. In this paper The level of Codification and Personalization of Practice Types of KMS will be analyzed in order to make an empirical analysis about the Irrelevance between KMS-Investment and corporate performances. To complete this study, correlation- and average analysis will be performed. As the measurement parameters for the corporate performances, we use the 4 categories, Financial, Customer, Process and Education-Growth Aspect, of BSC (Balanced ScoreCard) concept.