• Journal of the Korean Society of Child Welfare
• /
• no.40
• /
• pp.285-322
• /
• 2012

This study was conducted to explore the effect of family centered practice on children's self-efficacy and to verify the mediating effect of family strengths. Multiple regression analysis and Sobel test were conducted using data provided by children who participated in Children's Hope Network and their primary caretakers. The study results are as follows: First, families rated highly on their level of experience regarding family-centered practice, which show that social workers were faithful in performing family-centered practice. Second, the levels of both children's self-efficacy and family strengths increased significantly after project participation when compared to the levels measured before participation. Third, family-centered practice affected children's self-efficacy only indirectly through family strengths indicating that the level of family strengths had a complete mediating effect. Implications of these results were explored in relation to the importance of family-centered practice and measures to improve social work practice.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2006.05a
• /
• pp.575-582
• /
• 2006

정보화 필요성을 느끼고 있는 중소기업을 중심으로 ASP에 대한 수요가 증가하고 있는 반면에, ASP도입을 고려하고 있는 기업들은 이러한 정보시스템을 도입한다고 해서 기업의 성과가 좋아질 것인가라는 의문을 가지고 있다. 이러한 의문은 기존 기업들의 투자 효과를 확인함으로써 신규 도입 의사결정에 있어서 중요한 판단 기준이 될 수 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 IT 투자와 성과 측정의 타당성을 검토하기 위해 재무지표와 비 재무지표 간의 다중 접근을 통해 IT 투자 성과를 평가할 수 있는 ROI분석을 위한 체계를 개발 제안한다. 제안한 ASP 투자성과 평가 방법을 50인 미만의 제조업을 대상으로 적용하여 결과를 도출하고 도입 시 고려해야 할 점을 도출하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.243-261
• /
• 2011

This study aims to investigate a framework for linkage of national research performance evaluation and research information service from the perspective of metadata representation and exchange. Based on results of the functional requirements for metadata of national research performance evaluation are derived, this study suggests strategies for the application of international metadata standards. Also, this study presents an method to implement the metadata of research performance evaluation based on OAI-ORE, which is an international standard that can reuse and exchange the research information on web architecture.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.6 no.5 s.27
• /
• pp.128-138
• /
• 2005

The success of mergers and acquisitions(M&A) have been evaluated by either measuring ex ante expectations for the specified time period(Window) or assessing long term-based post operating performance (ex post operating performance). In this study, utilizing cumulative abnormal return(CAR) method, M&As which are observed in both domestic and U.S. construction industries were analyzed then research outcomes are compared. Analysis results indicate that stockholders of public construction companies did not realize significant economic gains from M&As. In other words, there was no synergistic gains from the construction M&As. Also, no significant performance difference was observed between related and unrelated diversifications.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.83-95
• /
• 2018

The aim of this paper is to develop a performance evaluation model for PPP (Public-Private Partnership) projects that appropriately reflects the important traits that are unique to PPP projects. To this end, 1) it defines a set of distinct perspectives involved in the PPP projects and their associated success factors that might differ amongst the perspectives; 2) it identifies the key performance indicators and suggests the performance evaluation criteria for each indicator; and 3) it builds a performance evaluation model by matching the success factors from each perspective with performance measure criteria as well as applies the model to the two selected BTO road projects in Korea. The process of model construction and its application confirms significant differences between the main stakeholder perspectives typically involved in PPP projects, which highlights the need for an evaluation model tailored for PPP projects by taking into account the distinct perspectives. The results from the PPP evaluation model developed in the study is compared against the results from the existing ex-post evaluation model for construction projects in general. The former shows a closer match with the results from the user satisfaction survey conducted. This new evaluation framework and the performance indicators entailed in it permits a balanced evaluation of PPP projects as it takes into account different perspectives involved in PPP projects as well as an understanding of the factors affecting the success of PPP projects. While the construction of the model is based on transport projects, it is applicable to different types of PPP projects through variation with the weight allocation amongst different success factors and/or additions or other adjustments to the performance evaluation criteria as required.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.783-795
• /
• 2021

This study aims to examine the relationship between performance evaluation systems and managerial effectiveness of responsible administrative agencies. Previous studies mainly emphasize the institutional changes of evaluation system and its impacts. This study articulate important factors in performance evaluation systems like interactive communications the credibility of performance indicators top manager's concern. A survey was conducted by 510 employees of local statistical office agencies and a structural equation modeling was used in order to test hypotheses. Results show that the credibility of performance indicators and top manager's concern about evaluation are positively related to performance results and procedural transparency and to managerial effectiveness. Interactive communication did not show statistically significant on managerial effectiveness. The empirical test results indicated that the interactive communication about the evaluation system of responsible administrative agencies should be considered.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2004.05b
• /
• pp.1082-1085
• /
• 2004

산지 소하천 유역에서 하천결빙이 발생하는 시기의 유량측정은 평상시의 유량측정 방법으로는 정확한 유량측정성과를 기대하기는 어렵다. 하천결빙시의 유량측정 자료의 정확도를 높이기 위해서는 관측방법의 개발과 다양한 관측기기의 현장적용평가가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 관측방법의 새로운 기준 적용과 다양한 관측 기기를 이용하여 유량측정을 수행하고 측정성과를 비교 검토함으로써 현장적용평가를 실시하였으며, 현장평가의 적용을 통해 산지 소하천 유역특성에 적합한 유량측정기술 및 기기의 개발을 이루고자 하였다.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.91-124
• /
• 2007

이 논문은 우리나라의 물리학, 화학, 생물학 분야의 과학자들을 대상으로 한 설문조사를 바탕으로 머튼이 과학자사회의 규범구조로 정식화한 네 가지 규범들-보편성, 공유성, 탈이해관계, 조직화된 회의-과 국가주의 가치관이 실제 과학자사회에서 어느정도 작동하고 있는지를 분석하였다. 전반적으로 응답자들은 한국 과학자사회에서 출신대학과 해외학위라는 귀속적 지위의 영향으로 보편성 규범이 제대로 작동하지 않는 것으로 평가했고, 여성의 경우 성의 영향도 큰 것으로 평가하고 있었다. 공유성과 탈이해관계 규범의 경우 한편으로 공유성과 탈이해관계라는 전통적인 규범이 그리고 다른 한편으로는 비밀주의와 연구주제 선정에 있어서 산업적 응용성과 국가적 필요를 강조하는 국가주의적 가치가 공존하고 있었다. 조직화된 회의 규범의 경우 특히 과학적 증거 이외의 다른 권위들에 대해 회의적인 태도를 견지해야 한다는 규범이 제대로 작동되지 않는다는 평가가 대다수였다. 과학자사회의 규범과 가치에 대한 평가는 각 과학자들의 연구환경에 따라 상이한 모습을 보여주는데 특히 젊은 세대의 과학자들이 보편성과 조직화된 회의 규범의 위반을 더 강도 있게 지적하는 반면 연구 주제의 선정에 있어서 탈이해관계 규범은 부정하는 경향을 보여주고 있다.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.137-164
• /
• 2009

As a means to address the modes of developing institutional evaluation system aimed at improving performances of GRIs, this study looked into the influential relations where institutional evaluation system has an impact on receptivity of evaluation outcomes and performances of institutes optimize their performances. After making analysis, it was confirmed that the National Research Council for Economics, Humanities and Social Sciences' institutional evaluation system for GRIs had a positive (+) influence on performances of research institutes, and receptivity of evaluation outcomes is related to performances of research institutes. In addition, it was also confirmed that institutes with high performances, in general, have high level of receptivity of evaluation outcomes along with positive recognition of institutional evaluation system. However, weaknesses of the Council's institutional evaluation system for GRIs resulted in low level of receptivity amongst GRIs, and thus there is limitation on the government and the Council in the active utilization of evaluation outcomes. Finally, it addressed the limitations and areas for improvement in relation to research outcomes.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.141-158
• /
• 2014

This research is intended to improve the performance of "small and medium companies international marketing program" by screening the performance indicators of the program. The program aims to prepare SMEs to penetrate foreign market and become global companies eventually. This research analyzed the current SMEs international marketing programs based on Logic Model to find the current performance measurement lacks in qualitative indicators and process evaluation with focusing on quantitative indicators and short term result evaluation. Therefore, the measurement indicators should be balanced between process and results including mid-term and long term results.