• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.1-37
• /
• 2018

As is well known, Wittgenstein criticizes Russell's theory of types explicitly in the Tractatus. What, then, is the point of Wittgenstein's criticism of Russell's theory of types? In order to answer this question I will consider the theory of types on its philosophical aspect and its logical aspect. Roughly speaking, in the Tractatus Wittgenstein's logical syntax is the alternative of Russell's theory of types. Logical syntax is the sign rules, in particular, formation rules of notation of the Tractatus. Wittgenstein's distinction of saying-showing is the most fundamental ground of logical syntax. Wittgenstein makes a step forward with his criticism of Russell's theory of types to the view that logical grammar is arbitrary and a priori. His criticism of Russell's theory of types is after all the challenge against Frege-Russell's conception of logic. Logic is not concerned with general truth or features of the world. Tautologies which consist of logic say nothing.

• Proceedings of the Korea Society of Design Studies Conference
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.48-49
• /
• 2000

인류는 현재의 인위적인 환경의 탈피와 문명의 진화를 추구하는 동시에 자연환경의 복귀를 지향하고 있다. 그러나 이러한 상반된 환경 속에서도 인공환경은 자연환경을 압도하고 있다. 이것을 학문적 영역인 심리학적 측면에서 볼 때 인간과 자연은 정신 선험적인 관계를 갖고 있어서 자연의 부재는 인간에게 정신적인 불안감을 생기게 한다. (중략)

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.6 no.7 s.50
• /
• pp.7-10
• /
• 1973

(1)제2연구단지건설배경 1.연구단지(연구학원도시)의 개념 2.제2연구단지건설의 필요성 3.제1연구단지의 선험 4.우리나라 연구단지의 앞으로의 전망 가.수원농업기술 개발 단지 나.홍릉 제1연구단지 다.제2연구단지 5.외국의 사례 (2)제2연구단지건설계획의 경위 (3)제2연구단지건설계획(시안) 1.계획의 기조 2.이전대상기관(1차계획) 3.단지의 구성 4.건물배치 및 설계방향

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.28
• /
• pp.103-131
• /
• 2017

As the establishment of self-identity is based on 'Relationships of Mutual Beneficence,' the formation of 'Relationships of Mutual Beneficence' is the only road to the security and confirmation of self-existence. But given that our ordinary life almost entirely consists of actions objectifying others, the formation of 'Relationships of Mutual Beneficence' is by no means easy. The formation of 'Relationships of Mutual Beneficence' should be based on morality, controlling self-desire, and not objectifying others. Philosophy based on a priori reasoning describes self-control over selfdesire as the domination of the body through a priori reasoning. But this practical philosophy cannot present a self-evidential internal motivation behind moral actions. Due to this, the application of moral order given by a priori reasoning in response to reality is likely to be reinterpreted on basis of self-interest. With regards to this, the 'propensity towards sympathy' is given as new moral norm. The 'propensity towards sympathy' as emotion is direct and consistent given that feeling occurs prior to thinking. The 'propensity towards sympathy' is intuitive in the sense that it is an instinctual response preceeding a reasoned judgment. The 'propensity towards sympathy,' as a natural moral emotion, is self-validating given that all human beings know it and practice it. But previous studies on the 'propensity towards sympathy' have an obvious limitation because they adopt phenomenological approaches to the 'propensity towards sympathy' which eschew the investigation of morality. Though they present the 'propensity towards sympathy' as a natural emotion based on body rather than reason, they do not philosophically explain the 'propensity towards sympathy.' Thus the 'propensity towards sympathy' as a natural moral emotion is likely to be interpreted as a subjective and relative moral norm. This paper philosophically explains that the 'propensity towards sympathy' is a universal moral norm on the basis of Merleau-Ponty's 'flesh.' 'Flesh' is formed as the entanglement between oneself and others and presents the 'propensity towards sympathy' as its philosophical basis. In other words, 'flesh' formed as the mixture or entanglement between oneself and others is the material foundation upon which one can activate the 'propensity towards sympathy.' This paper's approach to the 'propensity of sympathy' can be desribed as a phenomenological approach to the 'propensity towards sympathy' as a universal moral norm.

• Proceedings of the Materials Research Society of Korea Conference
• /
• 2011.05a
• /
• pp.13-13
• /
• 2011

1. 연구계획서 작성시 필수적으로 기술하여야 할 항목 - 연구의 중요성 - 깊이가 있는 명확한 가정 - 연구목표의 달성 개연성: 양질의 선행연구 결과 및 그림 데이터 - 논리적 전개 및 실험 설계: 가정을 뒷받침할 만한 실험결과 - 주어진 기간 내에 제안한 것들을 달성할 수 있는지 여부 : 지나친 욕심이 젊은 과학자가 나쁜 평가를 받을 수 있는 가장 일반적인 실수 2. 연구계획서를 작성하기 전에.. - 정말 연구계획서를 제출할 적기인가? 너무 이른 것이 아닌지? - 타인에 의해 이미 실험된 것이 아닌지? - 충분한 시간을 두고 작성 ? 최소 2~3개월 전 연구계획서를 미리 작성한 후 동료 또는 선배에게 초안을 보여주고 검토를 받는 것이 매우 중요함: 제출하기 전에 혹독한 비판을 감수 3. 연구목표 - 흥미롭고 중요한 문제(issue)를 적절히 강조하고 있는지? - 가정에 근거하고 있는지? - 목표가 win-win 인지?: 즉, 연구성과가 현재 통용되고 있는 일반적인 가정들과 맥을 같이 하는지? 4. 연구배경 - 확실하고 체계적이어야 함 : 부제(subtitle) 사용. 주제의 중요성이 분명하게 시각적으로 드러나야 함. - 연구결과 파생될 기대효과를 현재와 비교하여 분명한 차이점을 기술 - 연구계획서에서 참고한 것들이 기존지식을 갱신한 것이고 최근 연구동향을 반영한 것이라는 것을 분명히 하여야 함. 5. 예비결과 - 과거 연구성과를 가능한한 많이 기술. ? 현재의 연구계획을 도출하게 된 근거를 과거의 연구와 연관시켜 강조하여야 함. ? 최소한 연구계획서에 기술된 연구방법의 개연성을 기술하여야 함. - 성과가 높지 않은 예비결과는 제시않는 것이 효율적임 - 연구계획서에 제시된 연구방법이 선험 연구에 근거한 것임을 강조하여야 함 ? 만일 전문성이나 선험연구결과가 없을 때는, 경험있고 영향력 있는 조언자나 공동연구자를 열거하고, 그들의 공동연구 동의서를 첨부하여야 함. ? 특히, 공동연구자들이 어떤 부분에서 협력할 것인지 구체적으로 기술하여야 함. - 필요한 부분에서 적절하게 구체적 수치와 raw data를 제시

• Journal of Korea Multimedia Society
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.372-382
• /
• 2009

When the range of projection angles is limited, tomographic reconstruction suffers from artifacts caused by incomplete data. One can consider a data completion technique, which estimates projection data at unobserved angles using a prior knowledge or mathematical exploration, but the result is often not improved; the improvement by the data completion often undermined by the artifacts by inaccurate estimation, In this paper, we propose an iterative method, which computes projection data at unobserved angles by using the current estimate on the image, links the computed projection data to the observed ones by using the consistence condition of Radon transform, and reconstruct the next estimate on the image by filtered backprojection. The proposed method does not require a prior knowledge on the image, and has much faster approximation rate than the expectation maximization method. The performance of the proposed method was tested through several simulation studies.

• Proceedings of the Korean Nuclear Society Conference
• /
• 1997.05a
• /
• pp.527-533
• /
• 1997

문헌자료 간의 종속성을 고려한 베이지안(Bayesian) 방법을 개발하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 원자력발전소의 일반 기기 신뢰도 데이타 베이스를 구축하였다. 기존에 개발되어 사용되어 온 3단계 베이지안 자료 분석 코드인 MPRDP (Multi-Purpose Reliability Data Process) [1,2,3]는 기존의 신뢰도 데이타 베이스 계산 코드들과는 달리 문헌자료를 2단계에서 처리한 후 3단계에서 발전소 고유 자료를 처리하여 계산하도록 개발되었다. 그러나 이전에는 일반 자료들간의 종속성을 고려하지 못하고 동일한 자료원을 근거로 만들어진 여러 자료원들을 모두 독립적인 것으로 처리하였다. 본 논문에서는 모수적 선험적 베이지안 방법의 일종인 ML-IIl(Type II Maximum Likelihood) 방법을 이용하여 자료들 간의 종속성을 처리[5]하였다. 솔레노이드 구동밸브를 예로 종속성 처리에 따른 분석 결과의 차이를 보여 주었으며, 또한 일부 기기에 대한 국내 고유 자료를 바탕으로 MPRDP를 통한 기기 신뢰도를 추정하였다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• no.120
• /
• pp.217-250
• /
• 2018

Subjekt oder $Selbstbewu{\ss}tsein$ ist ein grundlegendes Prinzip neuzeitlicher Philosophie. Das $Selbstbewu{\ss}tsein$ ist bei Kant $Selbstbewu{\ss}tsein$(analytische Einheit der Apperzeption als klare Selbstbeziehung) in Objekts $bewu{\ss}tsein$(synthetischer Einheit der Apperzeptuion). Dabei zeigt er ein Reflexionsmodell des $Selbstbewu{\ss}tseins$. Aber er $erkl{\ddot{a}}rt$ nicht systematisch ein $Verh{\ddot{a}}ltnis$ zwischen synthetischer Einheit und analytischer Einheit der Apperzeption, und auch $l{\ddot{o}}st$ er nicht theorienimmanente und formale Schwierigkeiten von Zirkelargument bzw. unendlicher Iteration in der Reflxionsstruktur des $Selbstbewu{\ss}tseins$. Aufgrund der Voraussetzungen seiner eigenen Fundamentalontologie kritisiert der $fr{\ddot{u}}he$ Heidegger, $da{\ss}$ Kants $traditionsabh{\ddot{a}}ngige$ $Subjektivit{\ddot{a}}tstheorie$ Symptome der Seins vergessenheit zeigt, transformiert Kants $Selbstbewu{\ss}tseinstheorie$, interpretiert Kants transformierte Theorie als $subjektivit{\ddot{a}}tstheoretische$ $Begr{\ddot{u}}ndung$ der traditionellen Ontologie von Vorhandenheit, und versteht sie als ersten Schritt und erstes phlosophisches Modell seiner Fundamentalontologie. Durch kritische Interpretation von Kants Lehre von Selbstaffektion und $Selbstbewu{\ss}tsein$ deutet er ein Modell des $Selbstbewu{\ss}tseins$ als des $ph{\ddot{a}}nomenologischen$ $Horizontsbewu{\ss}tseins$ an. In diesem Modell der vorreflexiven und unmittelbaren Selbstbeziehung entstehen Schwierigkeiten von Zirkelargument bzw. unendlicher Iteration nicht. Apel kritisiert Kants $selbstbewu{\ss}te$ Apperzeptionstheorie in dem Sinne, $da{\ss}$ sie solipsistisch sei, und in seiner Transzendentalpragmatik $vervollst{\ddot{a}}ndigt$ er Kants transzendentalphilosophische $G{\ddot{u}}ltigkeit$ in der Dimension von $Intersubjektivit{\ddot{a}}t$ diskurierender Menschen. Hierbei ersetzt die Kommunikationsgemeinschaft Kants Apperzeption oder $Bewu{\ss}tsein$ ${\ddot{u}}berhaupt$. In der transzendentalpragmatischen Sicht, die auf den sprachlichen Bezug des Denkens und Erkennens und die Kommunikationsgemeinschaft geht, beruht das $Selbstbewu{\ss}tsein$ oder die Reflexion des Subjekts wesentlich auf seinem sprachlich vermittelten sozialen Bezug. Also geht es nicht um Zirkelargument und unendliche Iteration in denkender Selbstbeziehung des Subjekts. Ebeling hebt Heideggers Daseinsanalytik auf das Niveau von Apels Transzendentalpragmatik an und entwickelt Fundamatalpragmatik ${\ddot{u}}ber$ $Widerstandsbewu{\ss}tsein$ gegen allgemeinen Tod. Dieser $Widerstandsbewu{\ss}tsein$ ist fundamentalpragmatische Transformation von Kants $Selbstbewu{\ss}tsein$. Der $Widerstandsbewu{\ss}tsein$ der Vernunft bleibt in der solipsistischen Dimension nicht und ist ein $Bewu{\ss}tsein$, das in der Widerstandsgemeinschaft durch Argumentation universalisiert werden kann. Hierbei geht es nicht um Zirkelargument und unendliche Iteration.

• Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration
• /
• v.10 no.4
• /
• pp.314-321
• /
• 2007

Recently, multi-dimensional joint inversion of geophysical data based on fundamentally different physical properties is being actively studied. Joint inversion can provide a way to obtaining much more accurate image of the subsurface structure. Through the joint inversion, furthermore, it is possible to directly estimate non-geophysical material properties from geophysical measurements. In this study, we developed a new algorithm for jointly inverting dc resistivity and seismic traveltime data based on the multiple constraints: (1) structural similarity based on cross-gradient, (2) correlation between two different material properties, and (3) a priori information on the material property distribution. Through the numerical experiments of surface dc resistivity and seismic refraction surveys, the performance of the proposed algorithm was demonstrated and the effects of different regularizations were analyzed. In particular, we showed that the hidden layer problem in the seismic refraction method due to an inter-bedded low velocity layer can be solved by the joint inversion when appropriate constraints are applied.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.129
• /
• pp.141-166
• /
• 2014

Xìng $sh{\grave{a}}n$(性善) theory of Mencius combined xìng(性) that means physical characteristic of human together $sh{\grave{a}}n$(善) that means moral value or moral behavior. Therefore in other to verify the meaning of xìng $sh{\grave{a}}n$(性善) we need to analysis human nature in Psychology and moral norm in Ethics simultaneously. And that necessity justified Moral Psychological approach to xìng $sh{\grave{a}}n$(性善). Mencius combined a priori morality and a priori moral norm and asserted xìng $sh{\grave{a}}n$(性善). And than he presented an example for a basis or a clue of mora norm and explained grounds of moral behavior. But various theory Moral Psychology considered morality as an attachment or derivation of human nature. So another new Moral Psychology is needed to investigate Mencius Xìng $sh{\grave{a}}n$(性善) theory in a viewpoint of Moral Psychology. And than that must managed morality and moral norm as essential problems firstly. That because Mencius considered human as a moral subjectivity and seek the clue or basis morality and moral norm in human nature. And secondly that must managed moral intelligence as a emotional intelligence, because of $li{\acute{a}}ng$ $n{\acute{e}}ng$(良能) $li{\acute{a}}ng$ zhī(良知) of Mencius meaned moral intelligence which was derived from blood tied and moral emotion.