• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.33 no.3 s.370
• /
• pp.25-27
• /
• 2000

과학기술에 대한 일반지식을 모르는 것은 무식꾼이 되는 것이고 때로는 생활의 불편과 불이익을 받을 수도 있다. 국가 경제를 성장시키고 문화와 삶의 질을 향상시키기 위해선 과학기술의 객체들 즉 연구자, 대학, 사회, 국가의 변화가 절실하며 이 객체들이 유형재 이상의 가치가 있는 무형재의 정보기술을 육성하고 응용해 새로운 기술을 창출하는데 총력을 기울여야 하겠다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.10 no.6
• /
• pp.415-428
• /
• 2010

Converging technologies have become a major issue in science policy. This paper describes the current state of scientific collaboration for convergent technologies among researchers in South Korea, by conducting Social Network Analysis (SNA) with the data set of 1,095 researchers who have involved in the development of the convergent technologies. It is found that the researchers in convergent technology are more productive than the researchers in other technology domains. However, the researchers in convergent technologies have small number of collaborators, compared with their productivity. Only a few researchers have a role of the hub in the collaboration networks, meaning that the structure network is closer to than the core than the peripheral. The scientific collaboration network of the convergent technology researchers shows that the members of the network are close to each other, but there is small number of cliques.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.147-161
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study is to identify interdisciplinarity among eight research areas based upon the correlations between researchers' department affiliations and research areas. More specifically, eight research areas and their sub-areas, 153 sub-areas with researchers' department affiliations were analyzed in terms of Pearson correlation analyses. The findings demonstrated that there was interdisciplinarity between Social Science and Multiple Science Areas, Social Science and Medical & Pharmaceutical Area, Natural Science and Medical & Pharmaceutical Area, and Medical & Pharmaceutical Area and Agricultural Science.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2003.08a
• /
• pp.233-244
• /
• 2003

본 연구는 우리나라 디자인학분야 5개 학회(협회)지의 2002년분에 인용된 3,046개 문헌을 인용문헌의 형태별, 발행지별, 발행년도별, 주제별로 분석하여 디자인학분야 연구자의 문헌 이용행태와 문헌의 이용가치 감소현상 즉 반감기를 측정하였다. 연구결과 디자인학분야 연구자들은 단행본(62.5%), 학술잡지기사(21.8%), 논문(10.8%), 보고서(2.9%), 기타(2%)순으로 많이 이용하였으며, 단행본의 인용이 현저히 많은 것으로 자료 형태별 이용에 있어 국내 디자인학분야 연구자의 연구활동이 국내 사회과학, 미술분야와 유사하다고 볼 수 있다. 발행지별로 분석한 결과는 국내 디자인학분야 연구자들이 국내문헌을 해외문헌보다 2.5배정도 많이 이용한 것으로 국내문헌에 많이 의존하는 것으로 분석되었다. 이것은 해외문헌을 국내문헌보다 2배정도 많이 이용한 것으로 분석된 사회과학분야의 선행연구와 비교할 때 디자인학분야에서는 정반대의 현상을 보이는 것이나 4배정도 국내문헌을 많이 이용한 것으로 분석된 미술분야의 선행연구와는 유사한 결과를 나타내는 것이다. 디자인학분야 문헌의 반감기는 5.75년이었으며, 자료형태별 반감기는 단행본(6.64년), 논문(5.97년), 학술잡지기사 (4.55년), 기타(3.73년), 보고서(3.41년) 순으로 분석되었고, 발행지별 반감기는 해외문헌(9.1년), 국내문헌(5.1년)순으로 분석되었다. 또한 타주제와의 관계분석에 있어 경영학, 건축술, 공학 등과 긴밀한 관계를 맺고 있는 것으로 디자인학이 단순히 미를 추구하는 것이 아니라 산업경쟁력 증진의 도구로서 존재한다는 것을 알 수 있다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2016.08a
• /
• pp.49-55
• /
• 2016

본 연구에서는 물리, 생명분야 연구자들의 인구사회학적 특성이 기관리포지터리 수용의도에 미치는 영향을 살펴보았다. 그리고 이를 정보공유와 확산의 장으로 기관리포지터리를 활용할 수 있는 전략 수립의 근거자료로 활용하고자 하였다. 관련 문헌자료 조사, 설문조사와 심층면담을 수행한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기관리포지터리 인지경로는 도서관과 모체기관의 홍보, 동료들의 추천순으로 나타났다. 둘째, 연구자의 학술정보자원 공유는 면대면이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 그다음으로 오픈액세스 기반 기관리포지터리, 연구그룹단위 웹사이트 순이었다. 셋째, 학술정보자원 유형별 공개는 심사후 학술논문이 가장 높게 나타났으며, 실험데이터에 대한 공개의사는 매우 저조한 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 학술정보자원의 공개를 통해 연구자들은 연구성과에 대한 인정, 우선권확보, 연구역량 강화에 대한 기대감, 취업에 대한 기대감, 중복연구 가능성 축소를 기대하고 있었다. 향후 다양한 학문분야별 연구자의 특성과 행태분석을 통해 주제분야별 특성이 반영된 기관리포지터리 개발이 필요할 것으로 보인다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.123
• /
• pp.309-346
• /
• 2012

The trust toward the researchers and their study activities in society has faltered, in the wake of the paper fabrication event of researcher, Hwang Woo-Suk's doctor research team. After the event, researcher community and scientific community have experienced many changes through the self-reflection or the process of insight meditation. Until now, we have experienced that when researcher community leads the way to try to show their efforts to eliminate the raised doubts throughly, the public support toward researcher community and the trust in its study activity have not faltered. Nevertheless, the path for the researchers to go is still far and rough because the opposite cases coping with research misconducts passively are much more. Therefore It's urgent that misconducts in the research and learning should be avoided from unnecessary overinterpretation. To practice it, above all it's important how well researcher or learner should be equipped with a system where decision is made autonomously and reasonably, regardless of the interests from all fields including politic, economic and social etc. It's also required that their systems should be meticulous enough to prevent such irrationality in advance before the misconduct instances are depreciated. In this context, I will investigate the reason why research and development on norms in research ethics and learning ethics is meaningful, not in a posteriori but a priori dimension, as the way to have researcher and learner prepare autonomous self-purification systems. It's essential that for the progress of an obvious argument, first, what research ethics and learning ethics are should be established and defined distinctly(2). Then in the process, it is also examined why research ethics and learning ethics need norms(3). Subsequently I will conclude the paper, arguing the reason why research ethics and learning ethics should be justified(4), if the norms in research ethics and learning ethics can be formulated(5).

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2006.11a
• /
• pp.90-94
• /
• 2006

The research about social network for analyzing human relationship has been steadily worked due to the importance in the social science field. It is also important that analyzing the relationship between researchers in the academic and research fields. Especially, the network by joint research or citation between researchers is useful to evaluating projects or making policy on academic and research fields. This paper describes a method that generates two kinds of researcher networks showing co-authorship and citation relationship between researchers based on national R&D reference information ontology. We infer pair of researchers in co-authorship or citation relationship by SPARQL query from the ontology which is composed of research outcomes and their participating researchers in RDF triples. By postprocessing, we construct researcher network which links researchers in co-authorship and citation relationship.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.6 no.1 s.11
• /
• pp.119-152
• /
• 2006

This paper deals with the historical development of research community in Korea. As the former studies of the korean scientific community show, the government supported institutes played an important role in the formation of research community. Therefore the theme of this study is concerned with the historical development of the government supported institutes and the features of their researcher group. In this paper following questions will be answered: How the social status of these researcher group is changed, what kind of response on social problems or national politics they had, and which characteristic they showed with regards to the identity problem. After the korean liberation the government institutes, such as the Chungang Kongop Yonguso(industrial research center)and the Korean Atomic Energy Research Institute, contributed to the development of the first generation of research group. However this research group could hardly identify themselves as researcher, because they spent much time on testing, evaluation or education. The identity problem is also resulted from the deficiency of authority as research institute. The status of researcher had no difference from that of civil servant. With the establishment of KIST the korean research community came into blossom. The government supported institutes, which were founded after the model of KIST, allowed quantitative and qualitative growth of research community. Thanks to the guarantee of institutional authority and the new reward system, the researcher could get respect and improve its social status. During this period the researcher volunteered to help the government policies. We can find often the nationalistic statements in the research community. During 1990s the research group demonstrated different behaviors and attitude toward the government. The nationalistic ideology disappeared. Instead of that, the research group criticized the government policies and took actions against the government. Those changes are related with the lowered position of government supported institutes.

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.42 no.3
• /
• pp.211-233
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to develop key elements of evaluating research achievements in humanities and social sciences at universities in Korea. Literature reviews and analysis of policies for faculty evaluation in domestic universities were carried to define concepts and types of research achievements. Questionnaire surveys and case studies were performed to find measures, criteria and requirements of research achievements assessment in 26 domestic universities and several foreign universities. As a result, basic principles and key elements of evaluation in research achievements that reflected quantity and quality of research were proposed. The result of this study will stimulate research activities and promote the national research competitiveness with ensuring internal stabilities in universities.

• The Korean Journal of Applied Statistics
• /
• v.12 no.1
• /
• pp.165-173
• /
• 1999

사회과학분야에서 인자분석을 실시하는 경우 제1인자의 사전정의는 연구대상분야에서의 확립된 지식 또는 전제에 의해 나온다. 예컨대 고등학교 학생들을 대상으로 국어, 영어, 수학, 사회, 과학 등의 과목성적을 측정하여 인자분석을 하는 경우 사전적으로 제 1인자를 이 과목들의 단순평균에 의해 생성되는 일반지능으로 정의하는 것이 자연스럽다. 즉 다양한 사회과학분야에서 인지분석을 행함에 있어 선행 연구나 연구자의 사전지식 또는 가설 등에 의해 제1인자를 전제하는 경우 후속되는 나머지 인자를 자료에서 찾아냄으로써 인자분석을 완성하고자 하는 것이 본 연구의 기본 내용이다.