• Title/Summary/Keyword: 사전 위험도 평가

Search Result 289, Processing Time 0.064 seconds

A Study of the Risk Analysis Technique Optimization in the Pre-Project Evaluation Phase of the Development Projects (개발사업 사전평가단계에 적용하는 위험분석기법 최적화 연구)

  • Kim, Han;Kim, Seon-Gyoo
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • 2008.11a
    • /
    • pp.517-520
    • /
    • 2008
  • The city refreshing development projects in the domestic recently have been performed under leading of public institution laying stress on new city and existing urban district. These development projects are still staying in safety control level despite risk factor management at preliminary estimation stage has been more important factor to success and add value creation. Understanding inaccurately about various risk analysis techniques that can analyze risk factors and the insufficient application of step that can analysis technique s could make projects more difficult. Therefore, this research suggests the more effective methods for risk analysis that can control the risks in the pre-project evaluation stage.

  • PDF

제조업종의 위험성 평가적용실태 및 대책방안에 관한 연구

  • 김두환
    • Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Industrial Safety Conference
    • /
    • 1998.05a
    • /
    • pp.285-291
    • /
    • 1998
  • 산업안전보건법 제48조에 의거 사업장의 유해위험시설을 보유하기 위해 신설, 증설, 변경 또는 이전시에 유해위험물질의 누출, 화재, 폭발 등으로 인하여 사업장내 근로자나 인근 주민들에게 피해를 줄 수 있는 사고를 사전에 예방하기 위하여 유해위험방지계획서나 공정안전보고서를 작성하여 노동부장관에게 제출토록 의무화가 되어있다. 각 사업장은 이러한 사전예방에 활용하기 위한 위험성 평가방법을 어떤 기법으로 어떻게 도입하여 적용시키고 있으며, 또 할 예정인가 사내에는 어떤 제도화가 되어 있는가 대책은 어떻게 반영되고 실시에 어떤 문제점이 있는가 등의 사실을 업종별로 파악하여 제조업종의 위험성 평가도입에 따른 문제점과 대책을 제시할 필요가 있다. (중략)

  • PDF

Applicability and Utility of the Precautionary Principle in Developing Measures for CCS Risk Management (탄소 포집 및 저장(CCS) 위험 관리 방안 수립 시 사전예방원칙 적용 필요성과 유용성)

  • Yim, Hyosook
    • Journal of Environmental Policy
    • /
    • v.13 no.1
    • /
    • pp.3-23
    • /
    • 2014
  • TThe CCS, gathering attention as a practical measure against climate change, has various potential risks within itself. Identifying those risks and developing proper countermeasures for each one, therefore, is essential. Failure to take proper measures against such risks may result in significant damages and accidents, causing social anxiety and unwillingness to accept CCS. This study proposes the precautionary principle as a fundamental principle for CCS risk management. While the justifications for the precautionary principle are acceptable, there have been criticisms on its limitations including its impracticality. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to identify detailed application strategies to overcome those limitations. The risk factors related to CCS consist of quantifiable risk domains as well as a number of those with high uncertainty and ambiguity. Thus, there is a need to develop differentiated coping measures, meaning that the precautionary principle should be applied. The risk assessment and management applying the precautionary principle has implication of social appraisal based on wide participation and communication among the interested parties, which may be a useful approach for expanding social applicability.

  • PDF

Risk Assessment and Hazard Information Map Generation of Urban Areas (도시지역 위험도 평가 및 재해정보지도 제작)

  • Park, Ki-Youn;Choi, Woo-Suk;Kim, Weon-Seok;Yoo, Hwan-Hee
    • 한국공간정보시스템학회:학술대회논문집
    • /
    • 2005.05a
    • /
    • pp.363-368
    • /
    • 2005
  • 도시지역의 토지이용의 고도화로 도시재해가 증가하고 있으며 향후에도 증가될 가능성이 매우 높은 실정이다 따라서 본 연구에서는 건물들의 재해특성을 분석하고 위험도를 평가하여 재해가 일어나기 전에 발생 위험성을 사전에 분석하여 위험도를 평가하고 평가 결과를 이용해 재해정보지도를 제작하는 것을 목표로 하여 연구를 수행하였다. 그 결과 위험도항목을 자연조건, 토지이용 및 건축물, 인구, 교통, 위험물취급시설로 구분하여 자료를 구축하고, 항목별 위험도를 설정하여 등급화 하였으며, 침수위험도, 화재위험도, 대피위험도, 건물붕괴 위험도로 구분하여 재해지도를 제작함으로서 해당지역의 지구단위계획을 수립 시 재해요소를 적용할 수 있고, 재해발생시 사전대응 및 대피를 위한 정보를 효과적으로 제공할 수 있었다.

  • PDF

Is the Precautionary Principle Unscientific?: 'Rationality' of the Precautionary Principle and its Conflicts with Risk Analysis Framework (사전주의의 원칙은 비과학적인가?: 위험 분석과의 논쟁을 통해 본 사전주의 원칙의 '합리성')

  • Ha, Dae-Cheong
    • Journal of Science and Technology Studies
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.143-174
    • /
    • 2010
  • How can a regulatory policy to address potential hazards be made legitimate in the face of scientific uncertainty? The precautionary principle has been gradually regarded as the most persuasive answer to this intricate question in Europe since the 1970s and generally recognized as a guiding principle in international environmental law. This principle, however, has often been subject to diverse concerns and criticisms due to its vague definition. This article tries to elaborate the precautionary principle while reviewing both the validity and unreasonableness of these criticisms over this principle. Then, this article explores the policy relevance of this principle by applying this elaborated definition to the concrete case of risk governance such as the risk assesment of food safety. In the end, this paper emphasizes the fact that the precautionary principle can be applied in the field of risk governance, refuting the argument that the precautionary principle is only a moral attitude or a political position.

  • PDF

Risk Governance Models Seen from the STS Perspectives: Risk Analysis Framework and the Precautionary Principles (STS 관점에서 본 위험 거버넌스 모델: 위험분석과 사전주의 원칙을 중심으로)

  • Hyun, Jaehwan;Hong, Sungook
    • Journal of Science and Technology Studies
    • /
    • v.15 no.1
    • /
    • pp.281-325
    • /
    • 2015
  • In this paper, we continue our previous study on the differences, similarities and interfaces between the various models of scientific governance discussed in STS and those in risk governance developed by risk studies. In the previous paper we illuminated that theoretical differences among STS scholars on scientific governance and public participation goes back to the 1970s and 1980s, during which they first laid down the conceptual basis of STS. In this paper we investigate how these divergent positions among STS scholars influenced their evaluations of precautionary principle and the framework of risk analysis (especially the separation between risk assessment and risk management), which are the two main paradigms in the area of risk regulation. By doing that, this paper will show divergent positions of STS scholars on risk analysis and precautionary principle. Further, we will suggest some theoretical and practical interfaces between STS and risk governance models.

A Study on Risk Assessment by Delivery Robot Driving Section (배달로봇 주행 구간별 위험성평가 연구)

  • Lee, Jong-Kuk;Jeon, Jin-Woo;Kim, Hae-Do;Park, Kyo-Shik
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
    • /
    • 2023.11a
    • /
    • pp.271-272
    • /
    • 2023
  • 본 논문에서는 대학 캠퍼스 내 배달로봇 사용 시 환경적 특성에 의한 유해위험요인을 사전에 발굴하고 로봇의 출발지에서 목적지까지 발생할 수 있는 위험을 단계별로 추정·판단하여 위험을 감소에 대한 필요성에 관한 연구를 수행하였다. 캠퍼스 내 주행 구간별 유해위험요인을 파악 및 단계별 위험성 추정을 위하여 배달로봇을 사용하기 전 위험성을 사전에 확인할 수 있는 위험성평가의 필요성을 제시한다. 배달로봇 시장의 확대로 인한 사람과의 접촉 증가에 비하여 안전대책 연구가 미흡한 실정이며, 로봇의 기술적 진보와 사용자들의 정서적 수준에 뒤처지지 않는 적절한 안전대책을 마련해야 한다.

  • PDF

A Study on the Effect of Construction Site Risk Assessment Operation System (건설현장 위험성평가 운영시스템 구축효과에 관한 연구)

  • Lee, Jae-Bung
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Disaster Information Conference
    • /
    • 2022.10a
    • /
    • pp.185-186
    • /
    • 2022
  • 2012년 9월부터 건설현장 위험성평가는 안전관리 업무로 의무화되었으나, 해당 근로자가 사전위험성을 추정하고 대책을 수립하여 재해예방 활동으로 연계되기에는 위험성평가 작성부터 어려움이 있다. 위험성평가 운영시스템 구축을 통해 건설현장 근로자가 해당작업의 위험요인 및 안전대책을 쉽게 파악할 수 있도록, 작업 공종 선택만으로 해당작업의 다양한 위험요인과 안전대책을 제시하고, 해당 공종에서 발생한 재해사례를 보여줌으로써 동종 재해 재발방지 대책수립이 가능하도록 시스템을 구축하였다. 이러한 위험성평가 활동의 효과분석을 위해 H건설사의 운영평가에서, 위험성평가 운영시스템 구축 이후 건설현장 근로자가 위험성평가 활용에 쉽게 접근할 수 있고 해당공정의 위험요인 추정 및 위험예방 대책 수립이 가능하게 되었으며, 평가기간 동안 재해율 감소에도 영향이 있는 것으로 분석되었다.

  • PDF

Analysis of Risk Factors in Ex-Ante Evaluation of Large-Scale Government R&D Programs (대형 R&D사업 사전평가에서의 위험요인에 대한 인식 분석)

  • Lee, Yoon Been;Yoon, Ji Woong
    • Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
    • /
    • v.17 no.2
    • /
    • pp.289-308
    • /
    • 2014
  • We analyze the risk factors identified for ex-ante evaluation regarding government R&D programs. In particular, we empirically examined to what extent each risk factor is perceived to be important by the stage of R&D, technology field, researcher's career and experience. The empirical results show that technology risk is perceive to be less important for basic research, while market risk more perceived to be important in the IT field. Political risk is perceived to be less important for the university faculty, while researchers with government R&D project experience gave more value to legal risk factor.

Radiological Risk Assessment for the Public Under the Loss of Medium and Large Sources Using Bayesian Methodology (베이지안 기법에 의거한 중대형 방사선원의 분실 시 일반인에 대한 방사선 위험도의 평가)

  • Kim, Joo-Yeon;Jang, Han-Ki;Lee, Jai-Ki
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • v.30 no.2
    • /
    • pp.91-97
    • /
    • 2005
  • Bayesian methodology is appropriated for use in PRA because subjective knowledges as well as objective data are applied to assessment. In this study, radiological risk based on Bayesian methodology is assessed for the loss of source in field radiography. The exposure scenario for the lost source presented in U.S. NRC is reconstructed by considering the domestic situation and Bayes theorem is applied to updating of failure probabilities of safety functions. In case of updating of failure probabilities, it shows that 5 % Bayes credible intervals using Jeffreys prior distribution are lower than ones using vague prior distribution. It is noted that Jeffreys prior distribution is appropriated in risk assessment for systems having very low failure probabilities. And, it shows that the mean of the expected annual dose for the public based on Bayesian methodology is higher than the dose based on classical methodology because the means of the updated probabilities are higher than classical probabilities. The database for radiological risk assessment are sparse in domestic. It summarizes that Bayesian methodology can be applied as an useful alternative lot risk assessment and the study on risk assessment will be contributed to risk-informed regulation in the field of radiation safety.