• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.261-262
• /
• 2009

기존의 교과서 평가를 위한 준거에는 Shmidt의 일반적인 교과서 평가 준거, Dover의 교과서 선택 준거, Huetteman의 교과서 평가 준거, Romey의 탐구성에 대한 교과서 분석법 등이 있다. 아울러 2007년 공시된 2007년 개정 교육과정의 정보 교과목은 2010년부터 중학교 1학년에 적용된 뒤, 중등학고 전체로 확대 시행될 예정이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 기존의 교과서 평가 준거를 분석하여 새로운 정보 교과서의 비교분석을 위한 선택준거를 제안한다. 또한 제시된 선택준거와의 비교를 위해 정보 교과서 2종을 Hutteman과 Romey의 분석법을 적용해 평가하였다.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.507-515
• /
• 1999

This study is to develope the performance scoring rubrics for the inquiry-based experiments of general chemistry course in the college of education. Two types of analytic scoring rubrics have been developed for nine different experiments. The first one is to assess scientific process skills from the written experimental reports. These analytic scoring rubrics include seven process skills selected from the Lawson's 'creative and critical thinking skills' and other known process skills. The second one is to assess the individual manipulative skills and experimental attitudes through direct observations by the teacher. The content validity of all scoring rubrics was testified by six science educators. Also the inter-scorer reliability of analytic scoring rubrics administered on the students' experimental reports was examined. The correlation coefficient between the scores obtained from the experiments and those of the written test for theoretical knowledges was found to be r=.663(p <.01). From the variance($r^2$=.440), we would say indirectly that the 56% of this experimental assessment does not overlap with the theoretical knowledges test and assesses students' science process skills, manipulative skills, and attitudes.

• Korean Journal of Forensic Psychology
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.121-149
• /
• 2021

Statement Validity Analysis (SVA) is utilized in criminal investigations and the court to assess the credibility of given statements. During this procedure, the criteria for Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) are used to evaluate whether statements include the characteristics reflecting actual experiences about the event in question. Various studies had been conducted on the efficacy (classification rates) of CBCA criteria, yet the consistency of the findings was not investigated. In the current study, a meta-analysis was conducted with Korean CBCA studies reported from 2004 to 2020 (a total of fourteen studies). As a result, the total score of CBCA was found to successfully discriminate truth and fabrication. A significant positive (+) effect size was found with four criteria (3, 4, 10, and 12), all of which are classified as cognitive criteria. However, contrary to the underlying assumption for CBCA, criterion 18, classified as one of the motivational criteria, showed a significant negative (-) effect size. Meanwhile, moderator analyses were possible for eleven criteria (2~9, 12, 13, 15) and the results showed the significant effects of potential moderator variables such as the gender and status of the participants, study types and designs, number of raters, and publication status. The current results suggests that more careful attention is required to each criterion-especially the cognitive criteria-rather than the total CBCA score as well as the possible moderator effects in order to assess truthfulness of the statements. The implication, limitations, and suggestions for future studies were discussed.

• Korean Journal of Childcare and Education
• /
• v.10 no.1
• /
• pp.95-109
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to provide a reference for analyzing Korean traditional children's songs. A survey of opinions on the analysis criteria was conducted two times with 30 experts involved in early childhood education and its related field as the primary target. The SPSS 12.0 program was used to calculate the standard deviation and average. As a result of the expert opinion survey, 3 main categories (lyrics, music, and acting), 11 sub categories of the subsequent criteria for analysis and 33 sub-sub categories were finalized as items for analysis criteria.

• The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education
• /
• v.12 no.3
• /
• pp.1-10
• /
• 2009

Evaluation criteria of 'Inquiry' for subjects related to information and computer in Vocational Education Section are four and not specified. The purpose of this study is to develope evaluation criteria of 'Inquiry' for subjects related to information and computer in vocational education section. To design evaluation criteria of 'Inquiry', this paper analyzed college entrance tests and performance capabilities of computing graduating. This paper investigated the validity of the contents as judged by a panel of experts. 'Inquiry' was classified 'Analysis', 'Synthesis' and 'Evaluation'. This paper developed three evaluation criteria for 'Analysis', six evaluation criteria for 'Synthesis' and two evaluation criteria for 'Evaluation' with sample evaluation tool.

• The Journal of Information Systems
• /
• v.9 no.1
• /
• pp.189-216
• /
• 2000

오늘날 정보시스템 실패의 많은 원인이 기술적인 문제만을 중시하고 정보시스템과 관련된 조직, 또는 관리적인 요소들을 소홀히 하기 때문이라는 지적이 있다. 여러 MIS 학자들은 정보시스템 개발 시 이러한 기술적인 관점에로의 편중의 원인을 시스템 개발자들이 가진 편협된 준거체계(Frame of reference)에서 찾고 있다. 그러나 이러한 주장들은 아직까지 단순히 이론적인 단계에 그치고 있는데, 본 연구는 이러한 주장에 대한 실증적 근거를 제시하고자 한다. 그 방안으로 본 연구는 시스템 분석가의 준거체계와 시스템 개발 시 분석가가 발견하는 개발시의 문제의 유형간의 관계를 제시하고 있다. 본 연구의 결과 사회-기술적(Socio-technical)이거나 사회적인(Socio) 준거체계를 가진 분석가들이 기술적인(Technical) 준거체계를 가진 분석가들보다 더 조직적인 문제를 많이 발견하고 중시함이 나타났다. 그리고 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았지만, 사회-기술적인 시스템 분석가들이 사회적이거나 기술적인 준거체계를 가진 분석가들 보다 기술과 조직적인 문제 모두에 균형있는 관점을 유지하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이러한 본 연구의 연구결과는 학문적이며 실무적인 시사점을 제시하고 있다. 우선 학문적 시사점을 살펴보면, 시스템 개발 현장에서 조직과 관리적인 관점의 문제가 소홀히 다루어지는 원인을 알아 볼수 있는 이론적 배경을 제공하고 있다는 것이다. 그리고 실무적 시사점은 보다 균형 있는 시각을 가진 시스템 분석가를 만들기 위하여 학교 프로그램에서 어떤 교과과정을 만들어야 하며, 또 기업의 정보시스템 관리자들이 평소에 어떤 문제들을 보다 많이 강조하고 상기시켜야 할 필요가 있는지를 알려 준다는 것이다.

• Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.31-40
• /
• 2009

In the Cyber Home Learning Service (CHLS) for primary and secondary level students, Cyber Teachers are in charge of providing learning assistance and guidance to students through various activities. Thus, improving the Cyber Teachers' satisfaction level could contribute to increased effectiveness of the CHLS. In this study, we developed the evaluation criteria to assess the satisfaction level of teachers participating in the CHLS, and analyzed factors influencing the satisfaction level. We verified the content validity of the evaluation criteria. We also analyzed the evaluation criteria model by conducting an item characteristic analysis and a goodness of fit test using the SPSS and AMOS. Finally, we developed 20 items from five factors based on the analysis results.

• Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics
• /
• v.27 no.1
• /
• pp.113-135
• /
• 2017

The purpose of the research was to develop an analysis framework for Korean mathematics textbooks from a critical mathematics education perspective. For this, we conducted a comprehensive literature review regarding critical theory, critical education, and critical mathematics education. Based on the literature review, we derived a preliminary framework for textbook analysis. To validate the preliminary framework delphi survey was carried out twice with 21 expert panelists in the field of mathematics education and multicultural education. The first delphi survey was conducted with open-ended questions to investigate diverse opinions regarding educational goals, contents, and teaching methods of critical mathematics education. The second delphi survey was conducted with Likert-type scale and it was analyzed using Mean, Contents Validity Ratio, Degree of Consensus. As the result of the whole research procedures, the final analysis framework was developed consisting of four categories: classical knowledge, community knowledge, communicative knowledge, and political knowledge. A development of the analysis framework from a critical mathematics education perspective could give a significant impact on the mathematics curriculum or mathematic teacher education in the Korea and a meaningful initial step for the effort of practicing critical mathematics education. It is expected that this study could not only incite consideration for the better mathematics education but also expand the prospect of research and practice in mathematics education. This study would provide a new paradigm of future mathematics education with which to teach and guide students to become members of world civil society with mathematical power and critical competency.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.8 no.9
• /
• pp.124-132
• /
• 2008

Price is an important marketing issue in current competitive environment characterized by various distribution channels such as economic circumstance and the Internet. Many companies, for their best profits, use a price discrimination strategy such as price discount that reinforces consumer's purchasing behavior and they employ advertising strategy by presenting reference price with information of price discount in advertisements. Accordingly, many research verifies the advertising effects of presented reference price in advertisements, this study tries to expand the existing study area which is limited on reference price of product by examining the its effects on service area. It also aims to verify the effects of reference price advertisements by the level of service reputation. For this experiment, a factorial design with service reputation and presented method of reference pricewas used. The result of this study is that attitude toward price and use intention on presented reference price in service advertisements are higher than not presented it. In the case of high service reputation, advertising effect on presented reference price in service advertisements are greater than presented price discount rates in service advertisements. And in the case of low service reputation, advertising effects can be much greater by just presented reference price in service advertisements. Therefore, in service advertisements, strategic views on presented methods of reference price by the level of service reputation are essentially needed.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.23 no.2
• /
• pp.193-213
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate the evaluation criteria for gifted curriculum in visual arts. For this purpose, a draft of evaluation criteria for gifted curriculum in arts were first developed through literature review and opinions of experts in educational assessment, gifted education, visual art education. Then, the Delphi method was employed to validate the evaluation criteria. Delphi survey was carried out twice with 30 panelists consisting of experts in educational assessment, experts in gifted education, experts in arts(gifted) education and administrators in gifted education. Delphi survey was analyzed using the mean, content validity ratio, and the degree of consensus. Results were as followed. First, 58 evaluation criteria for gifted curriculum in arts were developed through literature review and expert opinions. The evaluation criteria included 12 context evaluation criteria, 25 input evaluation criteria, 12 process evaluation criteria, and 9 product evaluation criteria. Second, through the first and second Delphi survey, 2 evaluation criteria were not validated and finally were removed. The final evaluation criteria included 12 context evaluation criteria, 25 input evaluation criteria, 10 process evaluation criteria, and 9 product evaluation criteria. The evaluation criteria developed by this study can be used as a standard to establish the institution assessment system at the national level and evaluate institutions and programs.