• 건강소식
• /
• v.16 no.7 s.164
• /
• pp.38-41
• /
• 1992

때때로 발생하는 의료사고와 관련하여 의사가 환자에게 치료 전 사고의 위험성을 설명했느냐의 문제에 대해, 그리고 그 "설명"이 의사의 법적의무인가에 대해 알아본다.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.18 no.2
• /
• pp.3-46
• /
• 2017

Physician's Duty of Information is classified into three categories by legal function: 'Duty of Information to Report' to fulfill the patient's right to know; 'Duty of Information to Guide' patient's convalescing and staying healthy; 'Duty of Information to Contribute' to patient's self-determination. We classify the physician's duty of information because the legal effect from the breach of duty varies accordingly. The legal effect is focused on damage compensation responsibility for breach of duty. When a physician violates 'Duty of Information to Report', he subjects himself to liability of compensation for infringing on the patient's 'Right to Know'. When a physician violates 'Duty of Information to Guide', she subjects herself to liability for general medical malpractice. Finally, when a physician violates 'Duty of Information to Contribute', the physician is basically liable for violation of the patient's 'Right to Self- Determination' which refers to infringement on freedom of choice. However, in the case of situation that patient's refusal to the medical treatment would be presumed, the physician bears all liability for the patient's damage which includes both of property and mental damage.

• Journal of Gifted/Talented Education
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.543-568
• /
• 2008

The study attempted to articulate standpoints towards compulsory education system based on schooling age and year in careful considerations with the gifted. For these ends, literatures were reviewed and various education laws, regulations and documents and related law reports and judicial decisions were investigated. Literature review was conducted to develop that ideas of rights to compulsory education for regular students are closely related to those for gifted. Structures of general education laws and gifted education law and regulations were compared. Later, limitations of compulsory education were discussed when it was applied for the gifted. In conclusions, it is inappropriate that the gifted are ruled by compulsory education system based on schooling age. If compulsory education system is designated to provide an effective opportunity for all students, it should be duties and rights to enter elementary schools at schooling age. However, it appeared that the duties and rights to enter elementary schools at certain schooling ages function as inhibitors against the gifted with giftedness and potentials far beyond those of regular students. Therefore, the gifted should be separately ruled under flexible systems of compulsory education if their achievement level is assessed as sufficient to enter elementary schools before schooling age. On the other hand, legal systems of compulsory education are gradually evolved to flexible systems. However, it is necessary to establish social atmosphere and support system of educational administration in order to practice the flexible system of compulsory education for the gifted.

• Korean Security Journal
• /
• no.44
• /
• pp.251-278
• /
• 2015

Registered security guards carry out police duties as civilian police who are in charge of security service, and so they have a two-fold status: a civilian in terms of a social standing and a policeman in the way that they execute the authority of security. The problem caused by this legal position is that their legal rights and obligation can be unclear in the task-action and working relationship. This paper attempts to study their functions, rights, and legal duties through the interpretation of the related positive law so as to reveal the problems that may spring from this ambiguous status of registered security guards. This endeavor illuminates their legal status specified in the positive law in and around the Act on the police assigned for special guard, observing their functions and the legal duties in the pursuit of their tasks, and ending up pointing out the problems of the positive law. As a result of research work, the most significant problems, even if multifarious, are the avoidance of the state reparation in the responsibility for the illegal behavior in connection with their operation; the unconstitutionality of the disciplinary punishment regulation originated from the entrust with full powers; the imperfection of the rules about the cooperative ties with the police; the possibility of human rights abuse caused by the ban on the labor dispute; the equality problems from the dual pay system; and the inadequacy of the codes about the recruitment qualification and method. This research is intended to help achieve the purpose of the security of national critical facilities through the smooth execute of duties as well as the protection of the guards' rights. Besides, the key focuses posed in this paper are worthy of being developed more accurately through the following researches.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.4 no.2
• /
• pp.225-248
• /
• 2003

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.319
• /
• pp.86-90
• /
• 2017

근로계약 체결 시 사용자는 법적 의무를 준수하기 위해 반드시 명시하여야 할 사항은 근로계약서에 기재하고, 기타 개별 근로자와의 특별한 계약내용 및 기업의 인사관리정책상 계약서에 반드시 명시하여야 할 내용이 있다면 계약서에 서면으로 명시하는 것이 계약당사자간 신뢰를 확보하고 분쟁을 예방하는 방안이라 하겠으며 취업규칙에 위임하는 통일적인 근로조건 사항에 대해서는 취업규칙을 열람하게 하는 것이 바람직합니다.

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• s.86
• /
• pp.22-22
• /
• 2005

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.144-177
• /
• 2006

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.235-261
• /
• 2018

The Medical law stipulates regulations about the physician's duty to inform to contribute to patient's self-determination. This law was most recently revised on December 20, 2016, and came into effect on June 21, 2017. There has been much controversy about this, and it has been questioned whether or not it will be effective for physicians to comply with the duty to inform. Therefore, this study investigated perceptions of physicians of whether they observed the duty to inform and their legal judgment about that duty, and analyzed how the revision of the medical law may have affected the legal cognition of physician's duty to inform. This study was conducted through an online questionnaire survey involving 109 physicians over 2 weeks from March 29 to April 12, 2018, and 108 of the collected data were used for analysis. The questionnaire was developed by revising and supplementing the previous research (Lee, 2004). It consisted of 41 items, including 26 items related to the experience of and legal judgment about the duty to inform, 6 items related to awareness of revised medical law, and 9 items on general characteristics. The data were analyzed using SAS 9.4 program and descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Binary logistic regression were performed. The results are as follows. • Out of eight situations, the median number of situations that did not fulfill the duty to inform was 5 (IQR, 4-6). In addition, 12 respondents (11%) answered that they did not fulfill the duty to inform in all eight cases, while only one (1%) responded that he/she performed explanation obligations in all cases. • The median number of the legal judgment score on the duty to inform was 8 out of 13 (IQR, 7-9), and the scores ranged from a minimum of 4 (4 respondents) to a maximum of 11 (3 respondents). • More than half of the respondents (n=26, 52%) were unaware of the revision of the medical law, 27 (25%) were aware of the fact that the medical law had been revised, 20(18%) had a rough knowledge of the contents of the law, and only 5(5%) said they knew the contents of the law in detail. The level of awareness of the revised medical law was statistically significant difference according to respondents' sex (p<.49), age (p<.0001), career (p<.0001), working type (p<.024), and department (p<.049). • There was no statistically significant relationship between the level of awareness of the revised medical law and the level of legal judgment on the duty to inform. These results suggest that efforts to improve the implementation and cognition of physician's duty to inform are needed, and it is difficult to expect a direct positive effect from the legal regulations per se. Considering the distinct characteristics of medical institutions and hierarchical organizational culture of physicians, it is necessary to develop a credible guideline on the duty to inform within the medical system, and to strengthen the education of physicians about their duty to inform and its purpose.

• Review of KIISC
• /
• v.19 no.3
• /
• pp.70-79
• /
• 2009

최근 연이은 정보유출사고로 인해 많은 기업들이 기업 이미지 손실과 같은 무형적 손실을 비롯해 금전적인 배상에 이르는 유형적 손실로 많은 어려움에 처해 있는 상황에서 이런 문제점을 대응하기 위해 기업들은 정보보호를 위한 적절한 주의 의무를 다하면서 체계적으로 보안정책을 기준으로 제한된 리소스를 효과적으로 운영해야 할 필요가 있다. 본 논문에서는 내부정보 유통이 많은 기업 보안환경을 중심으로 다양한 보안인프라를 효과적으로 연계하여 분석하는 검증된 보안정책을 수립하고 적용함으로써 법적 주의 의무를 다하면서도 효과적으로 보안관리업무를 수행할 수 있는 정보유출방지체계를 이행하기 위한 방안을 제시한다.