Browse > Article

Discussion of Education Laws on Compulsory Education and its Limitations for the Gifted  

Park, Chang-Un (Pusan National University)
Seo, Hae-Ae (Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Gifted/Talented Education / v.18, no.3, 2008 , pp. 543-568 More about this Journal
Abstract
The study attempted to articulate standpoints towards compulsory education system based on schooling age and year in careful considerations with the gifted. For these ends, literatures were reviewed and various education laws, regulations and documents and related law reports and judicial decisions were investigated. Literature review was conducted to develop that ideas of rights to compulsory education for regular students are closely related to those for gifted. Structures of general education laws and gifted education law and regulations were compared. Later, limitations of compulsory education were discussed when it was applied for the gifted. In conclusions, it is inappropriate that the gifted are ruled by compulsory education system based on schooling age. If compulsory education system is designated to provide an effective opportunity for all students, it should be duties and rights to enter elementary schools at schooling age. However, it appeared that the duties and rights to enter elementary schools at certain schooling ages function as inhibitors against the gifted with giftedness and potentials far beyond those of regular students. Therefore, the gifted should be separately ruled under flexible systems of compulsory education if their achievement level is assessed as sufficient to enter elementary schools before schooling age. On the other hand, legal systems of compulsory education are gradually evolved to flexible systems. However, it is necessary to establish social atmosphere and support system of educational administration in order to practice the flexible system of compulsory education for the gifted.
Keywords
Gifted child; Rights to receive education; Compulsory education; Educational law;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 강영웅 (1984). 우리나라 의무교육제도. 고시계. 325. 251-252
2 김낙운 (1986). 현행 교육법 해설. 서울: 하서출판사
3 渡辺孝三, 下村哲夫 (1983). 敎育法規の爭點. 東京: 敎育開發硏究所
4 伊藤秀夫, 吉本二郞 (1969). 敎育制度論序說. 東京: 第一法規
5 정현철, 서혜애, 김미숙 (2006). 영재교육진흥법 일부개정법률에 따른 시행령(안) 개발. 기술보고 TR 2006-42. 서울: 한국교육개발원
6 서혜애, 정현철, 손정우, 곽영순, 김주후, 구외철 (2006). 과학고등학교 발전 방안 연구. 수탁연구 CR 2006-17. 서울: 한국교육개발원
7 안기성 (1994). 교육법학연구. 서울: 고려대학교출판부
8 대법원 (1977.7.12). 선고 76누30판결 [졸업인정취소처분취소]
9 성낙인 (2006). 헌법학. 서울: 법문사
10 조석희, 이미순, 박성익, 이현주 (2006). 조기진급 및 조기졸업 활성화 방안. 수탁연구 CR 2006-3. 서울: 한국교육개발원
11 헌법재판소 (1995). 헌법재판소 판례집. 제6권 제1집. 서울: 헌법재판소
12 법제처 홈페이지. http://www.moleg.go.kr(검색일 2008.10.7)
13 권영성 (2004). 헌법학 원론. 서울: 법문사
14 市川昭午 (1975). 敎育行政の理論と構造. 東京: 敎育開發硏究所
15 정재황 (1994). 교육권.교육제도에 관한 헌법재판소 판례의 경향. 세계헌법연구. 1. 363-429
16 교육인적자원부.한국교육개발원 (2001). 영재교육 추진방안 해설. 영재교육 정책자료(II). 2001년 12월 21일자 시.도교육청 영재교육 담당자 협의회 자료
17 교육인적자원부 (2005). 2005년도 시.도별 조기진급 및 조기졸업 대상자 조사 자료
18 윤정일, 송기창, 조동섭, 김병주 (2002). 한국 교육정책의 쟁점. 서울: 교육과학사
19 조선일보 (2005.4.18). 7세에 초등6학년 입학생 법정 승리
20 강인수 (1994). 교육법 연구. 서울: 문음사
21 서울고등법원 (1978.1.17). 선고 77구449 제3특별부판결: 상고 [졸업인정취소처분취소청구사건]
22 有倉遼吉 (1978). 國民の敎育と憲法. 伊藤正己 編. 日本國憲法の考え方(下). 東京: 有斐閣. 187-202
23 신현직 (2003). 교육법과 교육기본권. 서울: 청년사
24 교육개혁위원회 (1996). 세계화.정보화 시대를 주도하는 신교육체제 수립을 위한 교육개혁방안(II)