• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2016.05a
• /
• pp.204-206
• /
• 2016

대한민국은 우수한 기술력을 바탕으로 한 각종 플랜트 산업이 주력업종인 강국이다. 이러한 특성에 맞게 각 산업단지에서는 고중량 대형화물에 대한 운송수요가 꾸준히 발생하고 있는 추세이다. 대형화물의 운송량이 증가할수록 고정결박 불량에 의한 화물 낙하, 이탈로 인한 차량파손, 도로파손 등의 사고가 지속적으로 발생하고 있으며, 이러한 사고의 발생 가능성은 항상 내재하고 있다. 하지만 현행 도로교통법에는 화물적재 및 고정에 대한 구체적 규정이 전무하여 화물운전자가 책임을 부담하고 있는 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 기존 화물적재 규정을 살펴보고 적합한 고정결박 지침을 제정하고 관리하는 절차의 지정을 제안하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2019.11a
• /
• pp.4-8
• /
• 2019

그 동안의 선박교통관제에 대한 법률적 연구는 관제지시를 법률적 효력이 없는 비권력적 행정작용인 행정지도에 불과하여 행정법 측면에 있어 행정행위나 행정처분으로 인정하지 않아왔으며 이에 따라 그 강제력을 부정하여 왔으나, 실무상의 선박교통관제에 있어 관제지시는 선박에 일정한 조치의무를 명령하는 행위로 사용되고 있으며, 관제지시의 상대인 선박에는 실효성을 위하여 관제지시에 따르지 않을 경우 벌금이 부과되도록 규정되어 있는 등 이론과 실제가 불일치하여 관제지시의 행정행위로서 효력과 한계에 대한 분석을 통해 근거 규정의 개선점을 제시해보고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Association of Geographic Inforamtion Studies Conference
• /
• 2004.10a
• /
• pp.111-118
• /
• 2004

비교표준지를 이용하여 개별공시지가를 산정하는 우리나라 제도 하에서 가장 중요한 문제는 개별필지 주변의 표준지 중에서 어떤 표준지를 선택·이용하여 지가를 산정해야 하는가이다. 그러나 지침상에서는 비교표준지 선정시 매우 중요한 요인으로 작용하고 있는 유사가격권에 대하여 수치적인 기준이 아닌 모호한 개념상으로 규정하고 있어 비교표준지 선정에 있어 객관성과 정확성이 결여되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 현행 개념상으로만 규정하고 있는 유사가격권에 대하여 평균 연결법과 K-means 혼합 클러스터링 기법을 이용하여 유사가격권역을 정확하고 객관적으로 설정한다. 그리고 실제 사례지역을 선정하여 적용하여 봄으로써 방법론의 활용가능성과 타당성을 제시하고자 한다.

• 월간 기계설비
• /
• s.281
• /
• pp.45-50
• /
• 2013

기획재정부는 공사의 분할 분리발주 관련규정 등을 정비하고 최저가낙찰제 확대유예 등의 내용을 담은 국가계약법 시행령 개정안을 지난 11월 8일 입법예고 했다. 이 법안은 20일 동안 업계 의견을 수렴한 후 법령안 심사 및 차관 국무회의 등을 거쳐 공포될 예정이다. 이번 국가계약법 시행령 개정안은 그동안 대한설비건설협회가 전사적으로 추진해 온 분리발주 법제화와 최저가낙찰제 연기 방안을 담고 있어 건설업계의 관심이 집중되고 있다. 분할 분리발주 규정은 분리발주가 보다 활성화 될 수 있도록 대상을 구체화했으며, 사업의 계획단계부터 분리발주 가능 여부를 판단토록 개선됐다. 또한 300억 이상에서 100억 이상으로 확대될 예정이던 최저가낙찰제 확대 방안은 오는 2015년까지 2년간 유예되고 최저가낙찰제 대체 방안으로 종합심사제가 제안되는 등 정부의 입 낙찰제도 개선 방향의 가닥이 잡혔다.

• Journal of IKEEE
• /
• v.23 no.1
• /
• pp.342-345
• /
• 2019

In autonomous car, significant progress has been achieved in technical aspects, but it is deadly slow to solve its various legal problems for commercialization of autonomous car. This paper surveys the road driving eligibility, a typical legal issue in autonomous car. Problems on current laws and regulations are analyzed, and some remedies are suggested. Technical development should be performed collaboratively with law and regulation revision, and understanding these legal issues would be very helpful to the engineers who develop autonomous cars.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2021.11a
• /
• pp.508-511
• /
• 2021

관세법에서는 해외직구물품이 일정금액(미화 150불, 단 미국은 미화 200불)이하 또는 자기사용 물품으로 인정되는 경우에 제세를 면제토록 규정하고 있으며 관련규정을 어길시 관세법상 무신고 밀수입죄에 해당된다. 본 논문은 해외직구 리셀러(되팔이)가 증가하고 해당 사항이 사회적 이슈로 대두되기에 해외직구 물품 불법거래에 관한 모니터링시스템을 설계하고 해석하였다. 온라인 중고 사이트(e-commerce)에서 거래되고 있는 거래 내용을 크롤링을 통하여 데이터를 수집·전처리를 통해 구조화하고 데이터 정제, 텍스트 범주화, 텍스트 마이닝 등 관계 예측을 해석하였다.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.23 no.4
• /
• pp.87-107
• /
• 2018

In March 2017, the State of New York became the first state to implement regulation specific to cybersecurity for financial institutions. Unlike previous regulations regarding information security, it has set a minimum requirements to establish cybersecurity program based on risk assessment results, protect Nonpublic Information, designate of CISO, and report to regulatory entity. This paper presents a need for a new cybersecurity policy in Korea by examining newly adopted cybersecurity regulation in the United States. Finally, the paper identify policy suggestions based on the United States's approach as they have successfully implemented the program.

• The Korean Society of Law and Medicine
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.281-313
• /
• 2016

Our Constitution obliges the state to protect the health of the people, and the Medical Law, which embodied Constitution, sets out in detail the matters related to open the medical institution and one of them is to prohibit the operation of multiple medical institutions In the past, there was a provision stipulating the same purpose. But because the Supreme Court interpreted that several medical institutions could be opened if the medical treatment was not made at the additional medical instition which was opened in the another doctor,s license, multiple medical institutions could be opened and operated. However, some health care providers opened the several medical institutions to another doctor's license just by the excuse of the business management and then did illegal medical cares like the unfair luring of patients, overtreatment, and commition treatment for more profits. So, the health rights of the people came to be infringed on. Accordingly, lawmakers amended the Medical Law for medical personnel not to open and to operate more than one medical institution. As the amended medical law prohibited a medical personnel to open multiple medical institution, some medical personnels insisted that the amended medical law is unconstitutional under which they could not be able to open and operate medical institutions on based on free investment and bring out the benefits of network hospitals. But the regulation to prohibit multiple institutions does not apply only to a medical personnel. Many other experts like lawyer and pharmacist can open only one office under such a restriction. If the regulation goes out of force, the procedure that multiple medical institutions should be opened and operated in the capacity as a medical corporation or a non-profit corporation does not have to be followed. And we should keep in mind that the permission for medical personels to open multiple medical institutions could lead virtually to commercial hospital. If in the nation with a very low rate of public medical service, If only a few medical personnels with capital own many medical institutions and operate commercially them, this could cause a falling-off in quality of medical service, ultimately infringe on the health rights and the life right of the people.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.125-147
• /
• 2011

Considering a trend of logistics and transport industry in these days, it can be said that international express courier service is one of the most familiar transport type to the general public. Especially in Korea, due to development of electronic commercial transaction and the popularity of television home shopping, it can easily anticipated that express courier business will continuously grown in the future. However, the legal basis for international express courier is not properly set up so far. The only clause about this can be found on Korean Aviation Law said as 'commercial documents delivery business'. The origin of the commercial documents delivery business in Aviation Law is to make exception from public postal services which has been exclusive status as monopoly based on the Korean Postal Law. Basically, according to this regulation, all the private postal delivery is prohibited except some sort of commercial documents such as consignment notes, packing list, invoice etc. Thus, those documents could be delivered not only by public postal services but also by private courier company according to the Korean Postal Law. This waiver has probably come from under developing condition of Korean postal circumstances, however it should be revised according to the modernized business practice. Reflecting these revisions, the articles of Korean Postal Law adopted 'international express courier document' as the exception of postal service. Therefore, Korean Aviation Law also needs to be revised as Postal Law in due course. In addition to revision of Korean Aviation Law, some sort of new legislation is required to govern the private legal aspects such as legal liabilities, duties and rights of each parties on international express courier. This should be governed by 'law' not by 'terms and conditions' provided by business operators. Furthermore, to support and develop the current domestic logistics companies as international express courier company, it is required to regulate with the separate express courier law.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.26 no.1
• /
• pp.3-30
• /
• 2011

According to the Article 86 of the United Nations on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS) the provisions of high seas apply to all parts of the sea that are not included in the exclusive economic zone, in the territorial sea or in the internal waters of a State, or in the archipelagic waters of an archipelagic State. Article 87 also stipulates the freedom of the high seas. International laws on the flight over the high seas are found as follows; Firstly, as far as the nationality of the aircraft is concerned, its legal status is quite different from the ship where the flags of convenience can be applied practically. There is no flags of convenience of the aircraft. Secondly, according to the Article 95 of UNCLOS warships on the high seas have complete immunity from the jurisdiction of any State other than the flag State. We can suppose that the military(or state) aircraft over the high seas have also complete immunity from the jurisdiction of any State other than the flag State. Thirdly, according to the Article 101 of UNCLOS piracy consists of any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft. We can conclude that piracy can de done by a pirate aircraft as well as a pirate ship. Fourthly, according to the Article 111 (5) of UNCLOS the right of hot pursuit may be exercised only by warships or military aircraft, or other ships or aircraft clearly marked and identifiable as being on government service and authorized to that effect. We can conclude that the right of hot pursuit may be exercised only military aircraft, or aircraft clearly marked and identifiable as being on government service and authorized to that effect. Fifthly, according to the Article 110 of UNCLOS a warship which encounters on the high seas a foreign ship, is not justified in boarding it unless there is reasonable ground for suspecting that: (a) the ship is engaged in piracy, (b) the ship is engaged in the slave trade, (c) the ship is engaged in an authorized broadcasting and the flag State of the warship has jurisdiction under article 109, (d) the ship is without nationality, or (e) though flying a foreign flag or refusing to show its flag, the ship is, in reality, of the same nationality as the warship. These provisions apply mutatis mutandis to military aircraft. Sixthly, according to the Article 1 (5)(dumping), 212(pollution from or through the atmosphere), 222(enforcement with respect to pollution from or through the atmosphere) of UNCLOS aircraft as well as ship is very much related to marine pollution. Seventhly, as far as the crime on board aircraft over the high seas is concerned 1963 Convention on the Offences and Certain Other Acts Committed on Board Aircraft(Tokyo Convention) will be applied, and as for the hijacking over the high seas 1970 Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft(Hague Convention) and as for the sabotage over the high seas 1971 Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Civil Aviation(Montreal Convention) will be applied respectively. These three conventions recognize the flag state jurisdiction over the crimes on board aircraft over the high seas. Eightly, as far as reconnaissance by foreign aircraft in the high seas toward the coastal States is concerned it is not illegal in terms of international law because its act is done in the high seas. Ninthly as for Air Defence Identification Zone(ADIZ) there are no articles dealing with it in the 1944 Chicago Convention. The legal status of the foreign aircraft over this sea zone might be restricted to the regulations of the coastal states whether this zone is legitimate or illegal. Lastly, the Arctic Sea is the frozen ocean. So the flight over that ocean is the same over the high seas. Because of the climate change the Arctic Sea is getting melted. If the coastal states of the Arctic Sea will proclaim the Exclusive Economic Zone(EEZ) as the ocean is getting melted, the freedom of flight over that ocean will also be restricted to the regulations of the coastal states.