• Proceedings of the KSEE Conference
• /
• 2006.10a
• /
• pp.87-95
• /
• 2006

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.21 no.3
• /
• pp.11-16
• /
• 2003

다단 장약 터널 진동제어 발파에 대하여 개별요소법과 유한요소해석법으로 수치해석적으로 검증하였다. 그 결과, 단당 장약량을 줄이고 다단으로 분산시키면 발파로 인한 파쇄도 효과적이고, 진동도 감소할 수 있음을 보여 주었다. 이러한 현상에 대하여 파괴역학적으로도 설명하였다.

• Tunnel and Underground Space
• /
• v.24 no.1
• /
• pp.97-109
• /
• 2014

In order to identify the characteristics of the propagation depending on delay time (20, 25 ms) and priming location (top priming, middle priming, bottom priming), test blasts were carried out a total of 4 times using different spacing, burden, drilling length, charge per delay and was derived the formula to predict blast vibration. This study investigated the characteristics of vibration by analysis of the nomogram and prediction of Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) from delay time and priming location by the formula to predict ground vibration. And it analyzed the trends of vibration increase by standards charge 0.5, 1.6, 5, 15 kg. Standards charge is "Blasting design and construction guidelines to road construction" by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Depending on the charge in favor of vibration control method is proposed. Thus, when the design was to be used as a variable.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.49-58
• /
• 2002

발파공법이 소개된 이후로 계속해서 많은 우수한 발파이론이 발표되어 왔다. 그러한 이론들의 저변에 있는 궁극적인 목표는 효율의 증가와 경제성이다. 이에 본 연구는 Air-Tubes 발파공법을 소개하고 터널에서 일반발파와 비교하여 그 발파효율을 검토해 보았다 연구의 배경이 되는 곳은 산청군 시천면 내대리와 하동관 묵계리를 연결하는 2차선 국도 터널 공사 현장이며 전체 총연장은 2Km이다. 진동측정방법은 하나의 발파진동을 4개의 측정기로 측정하여 데이터분석에 사용하였다. 일반발파와 Air-Tubes의 진동측정을 4개소에서 각각 6회씩 실시하여 총 24개씩의 진동측정 데이타를 얻었고 회귀분석을 실시하여 95% 신뢰도의 발파진동 추정식을 얻었다. 시험발파 및 진동측정에 이어 매 발파마다 광파측량을 실시하여 진행장을 구하였으며 사용한 장약량은 Air-Tubes 발파시 25% 정도 적게 사용하였고 발파진동이 23% 감소하였다. 발파당 굴진장 및 Smooth blasting 발파시의 벽면의 상태는 동일하고 파쇄석의 크기는 Air-Tubes 발파시 더 작게 나타난다.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.31 no.1
• /
• pp.49-54
• /
• 2013

External charges with four different kinds of tamping materials are tested to determine the effect of tamping on the blasting of steel components and concrete blocks. The tamping materials used are tamping cap, urethane foam, sand bag and mud. As a result, the tamping cap, urethane foam, and sand bag show no significant effect of tamping. But the mud tamping shows that the charge amount can be reduced by more than 20% in completely cutting the structural components. In addition, it is found from the test that the standard equation for calculating the proper charge is rather conservative, which means the equation overestimates the necessary charge for the blasting.

• Economic and Environmental Geology
• /
• v.13 no.1
• /
• pp.29-50
• /
• 1980

1. 현장발파(現場發破)에 있어서 오늘날 충분(充分)히 실용(實用)할 수 있는 발파이론(發破理論)이 확립(確立)되어 있지 않다고 본다. 그 이유(理由)는 종래(從來) 사용해오던 Hauoser의 공식(公式)이 실용발파(實用發破)에 전(全)혀 도움을 주지 못하기 때문이다. 즉(卽), i) 장약량수정(裝藥量修正)에 관(關)한 누두함수(漏斗函數) f(n) 발파규모수정항(發破規模修正項) f(W)와의 혼용(混用) ii) 암석항력계수(岩石抗力係數) g와 단위체적당폭약소비량(單位體積當爆藥消費量) $(kg/m^3)$과의 오용(誤用) iii) 폭파계수(爆破係數) C가 egd인가, f(W) egd인가의 부명확성(不明確性) 등이다. 본연구에서의 이와 같은 제문제점(諸問題點)을 명확(明確)히 하고 2. 제발발파이론(齊發發破理論)을 확대적용(擴大適用)하여 bench 발파(發破), smooth blasting 및 소할발파(小割發破)에 있어서는 장약량공식(裝藥量公式)을 유도(誘導)할 수 있음을 증명(證明)하고 3. 갱도굴착단면계수(坑道掘鑿斷面係數) 및 발파규모(發破規模)에 의하여 수정(修正)한 단위체적당장약량(單位體積當裝藥量)$(kg/m^3)$을 구(求)하고 총장약량(總裝藥量)을 산출(算出)하여 발파설계(發破設計)를 할 수 있는 방법(方法)의 예(例)를 들어 보였다.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.27-39
• /
• 2010

Blast design equations based on the concept of scaled distances can be obtained from the statistical analysis on measured peak particle velocity data of ground vibrations. These equations represents the minimum scale distance of various recommendations for safe blasting. Two types of scaled distance widely used in Korea are the square root scaled distance (SRSD) and cube root scaled distance (CRSD). Thus, the design equations have the forms of $D/\sqrt{W}{\geq}30m/kg^{1/2}$ and $D/\sqrt[3]{W}{\geq}60m/kg^{1/3}$ in the cases of SRSD and CRSD, respectively. With these equations and known distance, we can calculate the maximum charge weight per delay that can assure the safety of nearby structures against ground vibrations. The maximum charge weights per delay, however, are in the orders of $W=O(D^2)$ and $W=O(D^3)$ for SRSD and CRSD, respectively. So, compared with SRSD, the maximum charge for CRSD increases without bound especially after the intersection point of these two charge functions despite of the similar goodness of fits. To prevent structural damage that may be caused by the excessive charge in the case of CRSD, we suggest that CRSD be used within a specified distance slightly beyond the intersection point. The exact limit is up to the point, beyond which the charge difference of SRSD and CRSD begins to exceed the maximum difference between the two within the intersection point.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.22 no.3
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2004

There are two major types of underwater blasting at Korea, bridges and harbor construction work. Pier blasting for lay the foundation bridges construction is used dry excavation working (drilling and charging) after pump out water and then fire pump in water that is same as bench blasting. In contrast, underwater blasting for harbor construction and increase of harbor load depth is used to barge with digging equipment that is in oder to drilling on the surface and blasting work(charge, hook-up) under water. Thus, there are need to special concern such as charge method and hook-up method different from tunnel blasting work and bench blasting work. If do not use special concern breaks out dead pressure and mis fire because of there are so many difficult condition such as water pressure, obstruct field of vision. In this study underwater blasting at Busan Harbor Construction have consider with special concern that is plastic pipe charge method used to MegaMITE I and specialized buoy hook- up method make far initial system detonate on the surface used to TLD. The results is designed blast pattern charge per delay effect an inspection of verify between predict velocity and measure velocity. minimized break out mis fire consideration charge method, hook up method. According to result best underwater blasting design is 105mm drilling dia, MeGAMITE II, HiNLL Plus(non electric detonator).

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.29-36
• /
• 2012

In this study, the influence of priming location inside a blast hole on the ground vibration has been studied. In most of the previous studies dealing with the ground vibration, the effect of priming location in a blast hole was usually considered in a limited way. Thus, it seems that the results of the studies can be applicable only to the relevant sites. Considering the fact that the mechanism of ground vibration caused by blasting is quite complex, the priming location can have a considerable effect on the ground vibration in certain situations and be an important parameter in a blasting design. To identify the characteristics of the wave propagation according to priming locations, total 72 test blasts were carried out with different spacing, burden, drilling length, and charge, and prediction equations were derived. The characteristics of ground vibration, which was changed according to the priming location, was analyzed by using the nomogram of peak particle velocity (PPV) record. Attenuation relations, which were also dependent on the priming location, were analyzed. In this case, four different amounts of charge, that is, 0.5, 1.6, 5, and 15 kg, were used for the test. This criterion of charge amount is specified in the "Blasting design and construction guidelines to road construction" by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs of Korea.

• Explosives and Blasting
• /
• v.21 no.2
• /
• pp.15-19
• /
• 2003

터널 및 지하공동 설계에 이용된 16개 지역 23개 구간의 578개의 시추공 진동 data와 일반터널 4개 지역으로부터 221개 data를 이용하여 시추공발파의 진동전달 특성을 분석하였다. 시추공발파와 일반발파의 진동속도 감쇠 경향을 비교분석한 결과 시추공발파의 입지상수들이 크게 나타났다. 환산거리 증가에 따른 두 진동식의 최대 허용장약량은 시추공발파가 적었다. 이러한 결과로부터 시추공발파 자료를 터널발파 설계에 사용할 수는 있으나 조심스러운 통계적 처리가 불가피할 것으로 판단된다.