• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• 제22권5호
• /
• pp.383-392
• /
• 2022

Culture technology is contributing to the creation of new values through convergence with other industries. The government is also actively investing in R&D in this field to secure competitiveness. In this study, the R&D efficiency of culture technology is analyzed by characteristics. Data envelopment analysis and non-parametric tests are performed on 968 national research projects in 2016-2019. As a result, it is confirmed that there are a difference in R&D efficiency according to the characteristics of national research projects in culture technology sector. This suggests that when planning national research projects for culture technology, these characteristics should be taken into consideration and strategically promoted.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute Of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2001년도 학술대회지
• /
• pp.462-467
• /
• 2001

There are growing interests for knowledge-based information to build up competitiveness both in public and in private. Construction industry compared to other industries, shows strong knowledge usages in products and process. R&D investment over the construction industry has been decreased since economic crisis (IMF), so technology status of domestic construction industry has gap of 4.6 years with developed countries. Information infra also lowers in use of information and investment than other industries. In case of knowledge management, usage of information technology and vision establishment show high status but knowledge sharing and evaluation stay in low level. For the administration of knowledge-based information, there are needs of continuous R&D investments, educations for inspiring employees to knowledge share, systems for knowledge estimation and evaluation, and organizational culture.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• 제32권1호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2006

This study investigates key factors affecting the activity of defense technology transfer through the questionnaire survey in Korea. Defense R&D investment has played an important role in promoting the commercial technology development as well as the targeted defense sector through the spin-off mechanism as shown in many countries. Recognizing the importance of effective and efficient investment in defense technology development, the advanced countries in defense technology are trying to establish optimal technology transfer mechanism to maximize the effect of the invested R&D at the national level considering the idiosyncratic features of their own countries. Because the technology transfer mechanisms are very distinct from country to country, it is natural to question "what are the determinants of the effective and efficient technology transfer in Korea?" We tested 19 potential factors and identified 11 factors that are significantly important as the determinants of technology transfer. From the empirical findings, we discuss some policy implications to promote the technology transfer.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• 제19권2호
• /
• pp.215-235
• /
• 2024

As artificial intelligence (AI) technology is recognized as a key technology that will determine future national competitiveness, competition for AI technology and industry promotion policies in major countries is intensifying. This study aims to present implications for domestic policy making by analyzing the policies of major countries on the start-up of AI companies, which are the basis of the AI industry ecosystem. The top four countries and the EU for the number of new investment attraction companies in the 2023 AI Index announced by the HAI Research Institute at Stanford University in the United States were selected, The United States enacted the National AI Initiative Act (NAIIA) in 2021. Through this law, The US Government is promoting continued leadership in the United States in AI R&D, developing reliable AI systems in the public and private sectors, building an AI system ecosystem across society, and strengthening DB management and access to AI policies conducted by all federal agencies. In the 14th Five-Year (2021-2025) Plan and 2035 Long-term Goals held in 2021, China has specified AI as the first of the seven strategic high-tech technologies, and is developing policies aimed at becoming the No. 1 AI global powerhouse by 2030. The UK is investing in innovative R&D companies through the 'Future Fund Breakthrough' in 2021, and is expanding related investments by preparing national strategies to leap forward as AI leaders, such as the implementation plan of the national AI strategy in 2022. Israel is supporting technology investment in start-up companies centered on the Innovation Agency, and the Innovation Agency is leading mid- to long-term investments of 2 to 15 years and regulatory reforms for new technologies. The EU is strengthening its digital innovation hub network and creating the InvestEU (European Strategic Investment Fund) and AI investment fund to support the use of AI by SMEs. This study aims to contribute to analyzing the policies of major foreign countries in making AI company start-up policies and providing a basis for Korea's strategy search. The limitations of the study are the limitations of the countries to be analyzed and the failure to attempt comparative analysis of the policy environments of the countries under the same conditions.

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• 제35권1호
• /
• pp.153-180
• /
• 2020

This study is meaningful in finding out what legal and policy issues need to be improved in order to foster the aircraft industry, which is relatively underdeveloped compared to the fact that some heavy industries, such as the automobile industry and shipbuilding industry, have achieved a high level of production and technology globally. Korea's aircraft industry has been growing at a slower pace than other industries, largely due to the country's economic growth and the lack of a market structure to properly use variables such as the level of development in related industries, aircraft technology and demand for aircraft manufacturing. While most industries are privately led by the market structure of the competition system, heavy industries such as the aircraft industry generally grow under the market structure of the incomplete competition system, because only by securing huge initial investment costs, high technology, and sufficient demand, they can maintain minimum economic feasibility. The Korean aircraft industry was focused on developing and mass-producing military aircraft focusing on military demand, but it sought to turn the tide by signing the BASA (Bileral Aviation Safety Agreement) with the U.S. A preliminary feasibility study was conducted in 2010 to develop next-generation medium-sized aircraft, but was cancelled due to differences in position with Canada's Bombardier, which is subject to the concourse, and Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) is pushing for the production of Bombardier's Q400 license on its own. Compared to the mid-to-large sized civil aircraft that are facing difficulties in development, KAI and KARI are successfully developing technologies to unmanned aerial vehicles and civil helicopters. In addition, the unmanned aerial vehicle sector is not yet suitable for manufacturers that have an exclusive global influence, so we believe that it is necessary to pursue government-led research and development projects with a focus on the areas of commercial helicopters and unmanned aerial vehicles in order to foster the aircraft industry in the future. In addition, since military aircraft such as KT-1 and T-50 are currently being exported smoothly, and it cannot be overlooked that the biggest demand for aircraft manufacturing in the Korea is the military, it is necessary to push forward national R&D projects and defense R&D program simultaneously to enable both civilian-military development. However, there are many differences between the two projects in the way they are implemented, the department in charge and the royalty system. Through this study, we learned about the technology ownership and implementation rights of national R&D projects and defense R&D programs, as well as the royalty system. In addition, problems with the system were identified and improvement measures were derived.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• 제19권5호
• /
• pp.117-121
• /
• 2018

As the paradigm shifts in the era of accelerated technological development and technology convergence, the defense sector is pursuing national defense research and development through selection and concentration, as well as the expansion of investments to develop defense science and technology to the highest possible level. In addition to investing heavily in cutting-edge weapons and core technologies that are consistent with the future, the defense sector is also developing investment strategies within a limited budget. In the private sector, the PD system has been introduced in order to maximize the performance of R&D policy and to improve the professionalism and responsibility of planning & management. In accordance with this trend, in the field of defense, the PD system of defense technology with specialization is being promoted, in order to strengthen the task planning capacity and to promote the utilization of private technology. Considering the need for coherent technical support for the core technology developed by R&D, the improvement of open technology planning systems and expansion of inter-civil & technical linkage, the use of the PD system in the defense field is indispensable. In this study, we review similar cases abroad and at home to examine the introduction and management of the PD system for defense technology. This study is based on the current state of the defense technology PD system that is being pursued.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.79-102
• /
• 2009

This study reviews the issue of public interests of technologies required in industrial technology policy as well as the demand for changes in industrial technology policy as result of the migration from catch-up to post catch-up innovation system. In fact, the importance of public interests which served as the rationale for government intervention in industrial technology policy have gradually faded, which invited controversies over the legitimacy and effectiveness of government intervention in promoting specific technologies or industries. Today, the existing policy framework has to change to correspond to the post catch-up environment which requires creative technology development. In this context, the Korean government needs to reduce direct support for certain companies or technologies, but increase R&D investment in energy, environment and health and welfare to enhance public interests of technology innovation activities.

• Information and Communications Magazine
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.5-11
• /
• 2008

우리 경제의 성장잠재력 저하에 대한 우려가 심화되는 상황에서 국민소득 2만불 시대 견인을 위해 2004년 수립한 IT 산업 발전전략이 IT839이다. 신성장동력 핵심기술 개발 등 IT839전략에 힘입어 세계 최초로 WiBro, DMB 기술개발과 국제표준화에 성공하는 등 IT분야 기술개발을 주도하여, 선진국과의 기술격차가 1년 이상 단축되었으며, 특히, 이동통신 DIV 분야는 미국, 일본 등 선진국 수준으로 경쟁력이 향상되는 성과를 보았다. 한편, 최근 IT를 둘러싸고 있는 환경은 IT를 기반으로한 융복합화 진전, 글로벌화 심화, 인터넷 확산과 웹의 진전이다. 2008년에는 이런 환경변화 속에서 IT산업의 지속적인 성장을 위한 전략을 수립.추진할 계획이다. 무선 융합환경에서 신시장 창출 및 선점, 고부가가치 IT산업의 집중 육성, IT중소기업, 핵심인력 양성 등 경쟁력 향상을 위한 기반 구축도 강화한다. IT R&D 정책은 기초 원천기술분야 R&D 투자비중을 확대하고, IT와 비IT융합 등 융합분야 기술개발 투자도 확대할 것이다. 혁신형 IT 중소기업 육성을 위해 민간 정책협력 네트워크인 IT전문협의회 운영을 개선하고, 중소기업의 원가절감을 위한 공통서비스 확대, 대 중소 기업의 상생협력을 제도화는 등 IT정책 인프라도 고도화한다. 또한, 반도체, 디스플레이 이후의 글로벌 주력품목군으로 IT SoC, u-센서, IT-BT-NT 융합분야 등 3대 핵심분야를 선정하여 집중 육성하고, 부품기업간 협업 활성화를 적극 유도할 것이다. 시장이 원하는 글로벌 수준의 인재양성을 목표로 공학교육인증 확산, IT 융합분야를 중심으로 대학의 R&D 지원도 강화하며, 전공역략을 갖춘 IT 전문인력, 석박사급 핵심 연구개발 인력, IT재직자 교육 등 시장이 원하는 맞춤형 인력양성도 병행 추진한다. 마지막으로 SW산업의 글로벌 경쟁력을 제고하고 신시장 창출을 위해 노력도 강화한다. 조선, 자동차 등 비 IT분야의 SW활용을 확산하기 위한 선도프로젝트를 추진하고, 틈새분야 중 세계적 시장점유율을 갖춘 중소기업 제품에 임베디드SW를 탑재하여 첨단기능을 구현하는 시범사업도 적극 추진할 계획이다.

• The Optical Journal
• /
• 통권149호
• /
• pp.65-72
• /
• 2014

중소기업청이 '2014년도 중소기업 정책자금 운용계획'을 발표했다. 올해 정책자금 예산규모는 3조 8200억 원으로, 지난해의 예산규모(3조 8500억 원) 대비 소폭 줄었다. 중소기업의 투자촉진을 위한 시설투자 자금인 신성장자금이 전년 대비 2000억 원 확대된 8350억 원이 배정됐다. 청년창업활성화를 위한 청년창업전용자금과 재기 중소기업인을 위한 재창업자금 규모도 각각 1500억 원, 500억 원으로 전년 대비 170억 원, 100억 원 늘었다. 일자리 창출기업에 대한 우대금리도 확대했다. 기존에는 지원업체 중 추가 고용 1인당 0.1%포인트씩 최대 1.0%포인트 금리를 인하했지만, 올해는 금리 인하 한도를 2.0%포인트까지 늘렸다. 10명 이상 고용을 창출한 기업은 개별기업 융자한도(45억원)에 예외를 적용해 70억 원까지 대출 가능하다. 창업촉진을 위해 창업자금 지원기업의 업력을 기존 5년에서 7년으로 확대하고, 청년전용 창업자금의 대출기간을 3년에서 5년으로 연장했다. 창업자금의 가산금리 조건부 연대보증 면제 대상 조건도 기존 기업평가등급 4등급 이상에서 5등급 이상으로 완화했다. 또한 중소기업 성장사다리 구축을 위해 기술 사업성 우수기업의 장기 시설투자지원 전용자금을 신설, 중소기업진흥공단의 기업평가 우수기업에게 만기 15년 이내의 장기대출을 지원한다. 글로벌 성장사다리 선정기업에 대해서는 수출금융지원자금 대출 한도를 기존 10억 원에서 30억 원까지 확대한다. 이밖에도 소상공인을 위한 소공인특화자금의 시설자금 대출기간을 5년에서 8년으로 연장하고, 유턴기업의 사업장 신 증설 등을 위한 융자금을 최대 70억원까지 지원한다. 중기청 소관 R&D사업 성공기업을 위한 전용자금을 500억원 규모로 운용해 R&D 기업의 성공률을 제고하기로 했다. 올해 정책자금 금리는 민간 금융권의 저금리 기조를 고려, 1분기 정책자금 기준금리를 전 분기(3.57%) 보다 낮은 3.29%로 운영하기로 했다. 또 중소기업인들이 정책자금 신청 등에 어려움이 있었다는 지적에 따라, 올해부터 매월 1일부터 20일까지 중진공 홈페이지(www.sbc.or.kr)를 통해 온라인으로 신청받기로 했다. 제3자의 도움 없이도 손쉽게 자금을 이용할 수 있도록 신청서류를 간소화하고, 중진공 각 지역본(지부)에 융자신청 도우미를 배치할 방침이다.

• Economic and Environmental Geology
• /
• 제41권5호
• /
• pp.541-549
• /
• 2008

Though the demand of a leading role of resources technology and fosterage of the resources industry has increased in Korea, it is difficult for the existing investment and management of its R&D to lead to be the same level of those in more advanced countries within a short period. Therefore, in order to strengthen the resources technology system it needs to set up systematic plan or strategy, to resolve shortage of professional human forces, and to expand the investment of private technology development. In this study, we suggest the concept redefinition of resources technology and resources development industry, the establishment of expanded R&D investment system, to offer professional human forces and to reestablishment of the infrastructure for creatively improving resources technology.