• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 2004.11a
• /
• pp.149-152
• /
• 2004

물 흡수선량 표준에 토대를 두고 있는 프로토콜에서는 저에너지 전자선의 경우 평행평판형이온함의 사용과 기준 선질 $^{60}$CO 감마선의 물 흡수선량 교정정수를 받은 원통형이온함을 사용하여 고에너지 전자선에서 평행평판형이온함을 교차교정하도록 권고하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 국제원자력기구의 프로토콜(IAEA TRS-398)에서 권고하고 있는 절차에 따라 저에너지 전자선에 대한 원통형이온함의 선질보정정수를 계산하고, 원통형이온함과 평행평판형이온함의 교정방법에 따른 흡수선량을 상호 비교하였다. 그 결과 전자선에너지 10 MeV 이상에서는 두 이온함간의 선량이 잘 일치하였으나 전자선에너지 6, 9 MeV에서 최대 3.3%까지 선량 차이를 보여 저에너지 전자선에서는 반드시 평형판판형이온함의 사용하여 선량측정 할 것을 권고한다. 교정방법 차이에 의한 평행평판형이온함의 선량은 서로 잘 일치하는 것으로 나타나 표준기관에서 직접 교정받은 $^{60}$Co 감마선의 물 흡수선량교정정수를 사용하여 전자선 물 흡수선량을 결정해도 큰 영향은 없을 듯하다. 또한 평행평판형이온함을 교차 교정하기 위한 전자선 에너지에 따른 흡수선량을 상호 비교한 결과 20MeV이외 12, 16 MeV의 전자선 에너지에서도 잘 일치하여 교차교정을 위한 전자선의 기준 선질에 대한 연구가 더 진행되어야 한다고 사료된다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 2003.09a
• /
• pp.66-66
• /
• 2003

목적 : 선량측정의 정확성을 향상시키기 위하여 물 흡수선량 표준에 토대를 두고 있는 표준측정법, AAPM TG-51과 IAEA TRS-398, 이 발표되어 선량측정의 파라다임이 변화하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 이들 대표적인 표준측정법에 대하여 사용자 편의성을 고려하여 웹에 기반한 선량교정 프로그램을 개발하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법 : 미국의학물리학회 AAPM TG-51과 국제원자력기구 IAEA TRS-398 표준측정법에 선량교정 프로그램은 Microsoft IIS 6.0 웹서버와 .NET 플렛폼상에서 Visual Studio. NET 도구를 사용하여 개발하였다. 개발언어로는 C# 언어를 사용하였고 각 표준측정법에 대한 선량교정 작업서는 ASP. NET 페이지로 작성하였다. 웹페이지와 산량 교정 모듈을 분리하여서 개발 후 유지보수가 쉽게 설계하였다. 또한 기준점에서의 선량 계상에 사용하는 모든 물리적인 파라미터와 데이터는 데이터베이스에 저장하였다. 이로써 향후 수식체계의 변화 또는 물리적인 데이터의 변화로 인한 프로그램 수정이 최소화하도록 하였다. 결과 : 이들 표준측정법은 모두 물 흡수선량 교정인수에 토대를 두고 있으나 측정 조건 및 물리적인 자료 에 있어 약간의 차이를 보이고 있다. 그러므로 각 표준측정법간의 유사점 및 차이점을 비교 분석하기가 용이하였다. 그리고 개발된 프로그램을 이용하여 표준측정법에서 제시된 선량교정 작업서에 따라 선량 교정을 수행한 교정 결과 데이터를 XML 파일 형식으로 저장하여 이전의 측정 자료를 관리할 수 있게 하였다. 이 과거 측정 자료를 사용하여 출력 선량 교정의 변화 및 기타 중요한 물리적인 데이터 값의 변화를 분석할 수 있다. 결론 : 두 표준측정법에 대한 선량교정 프로그램은 사용자가 선호하는 표준측정법을 선택할 수 있고, 웹에 토대를 두고 있어 프로그램으로 전국 방사선종양학과의 방사선치료기기의 출력 및 물리적인 변화에 대한 자료를 비교 분석하기 용이하고 수작업으로 인해 발생할 수 있는 실수 및 오차를 줄일 수 있다. 또한 개발된 프로그램의 활용을 통하여 국내 실정에 적합한 물 흡수선량 표준에 기반한 표준측정법 개발에 토대를 마련하는데 있어 기여할 것으로 사료된다.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.175-183
• /
• 2003

Absorbed dose dosimetry protocols of high energy photon and electron beams, which are widely used and based on an air kerma (or exposure) calibration factors, have somewhat complex formalism and limitations for improving dosimetric accuracy due to the uncertainty of the physical parameters used. Recently, the IAEA and the AAPM published the absorbed dose to water-based dosimetry protocols(IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51). The dose calibration programs for these two protocols were developed. This program for high energy photon and electron beams was also developed for users to use in a window environment using the Visual C++ language. The formalism and physical parameters of these two protocols were strictly applied to the program. The tables and graphs of the physical data, and the information of ion chambers were numericalized for their incorporation into a database. This program can be useful in developing new dosimetry protocols in Korea.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.14 no.4
• /
• pp.249-258
• /
• 2003

A few years ago, a proposal was made to change the dosimetry from the air kerma-based reference dosimetry to the absorbed dose-based reference dosimetry for all radiotherapy beams of ionizing radiation to improve the accuracy of dosimetry. Here, we present a dosimetry study in which the two most widespread absorbed dose­based protocols (IAEA TRS­398 and AAPM TG­51) were compared with an air kerma­based protocol (IAEA TRS-277) by measuring the absorbed dose in the same reference depth. Measurements were performed in three clinical electron beam energies using a PTW 30002 cylindrical chamber, and Markus and Roos plane­parallel chambers. $^{60}$ Co calibration factors were obtained from the KFDA. The absorbed dose differences between the air kerma­based and absorbed dose­based protocols were within 2.0% for all chambers in all beams. The results thus show that the obtained absolute dose values will be not significantly altered by changing from the air kerma­based dosimetry to the absorbed dose­based dosimetry. It was also shown that absorbed dose values between the absorbed dose­based protocols agreed by deviations of less than 0.5% for a cylindrical chamber and less than 0.7% for plane­parallel chambers using cross­calibration factors. Although the use of a cylindrical chamber and plane­parallel chambers resulted in a difference of less than 2% for all situations investigated here, to reduce errors, the plane­parallel chambers are recommended for electron energies in which the use of cylindrical chamber is not permitted in each protocol.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.20 no.4
• /
• pp.381-390
• /
• 2002

Purpose : To develop a dose calibration program for the IAEA TRS-277 and AAPM TG-21, based on the air kerma calibration factor (or the cavity-gas calibration factor), as well as for the IAEA TRS-398 and the AAPM TG-51, based on the absorbed dose to water calibration factor, so as to avoid the unwanted error associated with these calculation procedures. Materials and Methods : Currently, the most widely used dosimetry Protocols of high energy photon beams are the air kerma calibration factor based on the IAEA TRS-277 and the AAPM TG-21. However, this has somewhat complex formalism and limitations for the improvement of the accuracy due to uncertainties of the physical quantities. Recently, the IAEA and the AAPM published the absorbed dose to water calibration factor based, on the IAEA TRS-398 and the AAPM TG-51. The formalism and physical parameters were strictly applied to these four dose calibration programs. The tables and graphs of physical data and the information for ion chambers were numericalized for their incorporation into a database. These programs were developed user to be friendly, with the Visual $C^{++}$ language for their ease of use in a Windows environment according to the recommendation of each protocols. Results : The dose calibration programs for the high energy photon beams, developed for the four protocols, allow the input of informations about a dosimetry system, the characteristics of the beam quality, the measurement conditions and dosimetry results, to enable the minimization of any inter-user variations and errors, during the calculation procedure. Also, it was possible to compare the absorbed dose to water data of the four different protocols at a single reference points. Conclusion : Since this program expressed information in numerical and data-based forms for the physical parameter tables, graphs and of the ion chambers, the error associated with the procedures and different user could be solved. It was possible to analyze and compare the major difference for each dosimetry protocol, since the program was designed to be user friendly and to accurately calculate the correction factors and absorbed dose. It is expected that accurate dose calculations in high energy photon beams can be made by the users for selecting and performing the appropriate dosimetry protocol.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.116-124
• /
• 2005

Absorbed dose dosimetry protocols of high energy photon and electron beams, which are widely used and based on an air kerma calibration factors, have somewhat complex formalism and limitations for improving dosimetric accuracy due to uncertainty of the physical parameters used. Recently the IAEA and the AAPM published the absorbed dose to water-based dosimetry protocol. In this work web-based dose calibration program for IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 protocols were developed. This program developed using the Visual C$\#$ language can be used in the internet. User selectable dosimetry protocol on the web allows the absorbed dose to water data of the two protocols at a reference point to be easily compared, and enables to conveniently manage and understand the current status of the dosimetry calibration performed at participating institutions in korea. This program and the resultant database from the web-based calibration can be useful in developing new dosimetry protocols in Korea.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.140-144
• /
• 2013

In this research, the glass dosimeter was calibrated to measure the standard absorbed dose of the Cs-137 irradiator and absorbed dose in a biological sample. Absorbed dose in water for Cs-137 gamma ray was determined by the IAEA TRS-277 protocol. The PTW-TM30013 ion chamber and the PTW-TM41023 water phantom were utilized for measuring absorbed dose and the value was compared with the reading from DoseAce GD-302M glass dosimeter from Asahi Techno Glass Corporation for its calibration. The uncertainty of measurement ($1{\sigma}$) of the calibrated glass dosimeter was 2.7% and this result would be applied to improve the accuracy in measurement of absorbed dose in a biological sample.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Medical Physics Conference
• /
• 2005.04a
• /
• pp.96-99
• /
• 2005

본 연구에서는 식품의약품안전청의 도움을 받아 1998년부터 2003년까지 장기간에 걸친 교정정수의 분석을 통한 원통형이온함의 모델별 안정성을 확인하여 보다 효율적인 이온함의 선택으로 방사선치료기관의 선량측정체계의 정확도 향상에 기여하고자 한다. 방사선치료기관에서 사용하고 있는 Farmer형의 원통형이온함에 대한 에어커마 교정정수(NK)를 분석한 결과 Wellhofer FC65G (IC70)와 PTW 30001, 30013 (30006) 그리고 NE 2571 이온함 모델에 대한 교정정수는 모두 0.3%이내에서 잘 일치하였다. 또한 에어커마 교정정수를 이용하여 계산된 물 흡수선량 교정정수(Cal. ND,W)와 실제 측정에 의해 결정된 물 흡수선량 교정정수(Mea. ND,W)를 비교한 결과는 약 1.0% 정도 측정에 의한 교정정수가 높게 나타났으며 에어커마 교정정수를 분석한 결과와 마찬가지로 위 동일한 모델의 이온함에 대해서 측정의 표준편차가 0.14～0.17%로 나타나 장기적인 안정성이 입증되었다.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.92-98
• /
• 2011

This study is to keep the accuracy and stability of the output dose evaluations for linear accelerator photon beams by using the air ionization chambers (TM31010, 0.125 cc, PTW) through the Task Group 51 protocol. The absorbed dose to water calibration factor $N_{dw}{^{Co-60}}$ was delivered from the air kerma calibration factor $N_k$ which was provided from manufacture through SSDL calibration for determination of output factor. The ionization chamber of TM31010 series was reviewed the calibration factor and other parameters for reduce the uncertainty within ${\pm}2%$ discrepancy and we found the supplied $N_{dw}{^{Co-60}}$ which was derived from Nk has shown a -2.8% uncertainty compare to that of PSDL. The authors provided the program to perform the output dosimetry with TG-51 protocol as it is composed same screen of TG-51 worksheets. The evaluated dose by determination of output factor delivered to postal TLD block for comparison the output dose to that of MDACC (RPC) in postal monitoring program. The results have shown the $1.001{\pm}0.013$ for 6 MV and $0.997{\pm}0.012$ discrepancy for 15 MV X rays for 5 years followed. This study shows the evaluated outputs for linear accelerate photon beams are very close to that of international output monitor with small discrepancy of ${\pm}1.3%$ with high reliability and showing the gradually stability after 2010.

• Progress in Medical Physics
• /
• v.17 no.4
• /
• pp.232-237
• /
• 2006

The aim of this study was to develop the calculation algorithm of source strength of Ir-192 source In terms of the absorbed dose to water instead of an apparent activity (Ci). For this work the Multi Purpose Brachytherapy Phantom(MPBP) was developed, which was designed to locate the source and the chamber precisely at a specific position Inside the water phantom. The reference point of measurement was set at the 5 cm distance along the transverse axis of the source. For a brachytherapy source calibration, the absorbed dose to water calibration factor ($N_{D.W.Q}$) of an lonization chamber were determined and then apply standard protocols of absorbed dose to water. The calibration factor ($N_{D.W.Q}$) of the ion chamber (TM30013, PTW, Germany) was determined using the EGSnrcCPP Monte Carlo Code. The calculated calibration factor ($N_{D.W.Q}$) was 5.28 cGy/nC. The calculated factor was then used to determine the absorbed dose to water from which the air kerma strength for an Ir-192 source can be easily derived at the reference point (5 cm). The calculated air kerma strength showed discrepancies of -0.6% to +1.8% relative to the air kerma strength provided by the vendor, In this work we demonstrated that the air kerma strength ($S_k$) could be determined from the absorbed dose to water calibration factor for Ir-192 source. In audition, this source calibration method could be applied directly to the dose Calculation formalism of AAPM report TG-43.