Browse > Article

Evaluation of the Output Dose of a Linear Accelerator Photon Beams by Using the Ionization Chamber TM31010 Series through TG-51 Protocol to Postal Monitoring Output of RPC for 5 Years  

Choi, Tae-Jin (Department of Medical Engineering and Physics, Keimyung University School of Medicine)
Kim, Ok-Bae (Department of Radiation Oncology, Keimyung University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Progress in Medical Physics / v.22, no.2, 2011 , pp. 92-98 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is to keep the accuracy and stability of the output dose evaluations for linear accelerator photon beams by using the air ionization chambers (TM31010, 0.125 cc, PTW) through the Task Group 51 protocol. The absorbed dose to water calibration factor $N_{dw}{^{Co-60}}$ was delivered from the air kerma calibration factor $N_k$ which was provided from manufacture through SSDL calibration for determination of output factor. The ionization chamber of TM31010 series was reviewed the calibration factor and other parameters for reduce the uncertainty within ${\pm}2%$ discrepancy and we found the supplied $N_{dw}{^{Co-60}}$ which was derived from Nk has shown a -2.8% uncertainty compare to that of PSDL. The authors provided the program to perform the output dosimetry with TG-51 protocol as it is composed same screen of TG-51 worksheets. The evaluated dose by determination of output factor delivered to postal TLD block for comparison the output dose to that of MDACC (RPC) in postal monitoring program. The results have shown the $1.001{\pm}0.013$ for 6 MV and $0.997{\pm}0.012$ discrepancy for 15 MV X rays for 5 years followed. This study shows the evaluated outputs for linear accelerate photon beams are very close to that of international output monitor with small discrepancy of ${\pm}1.3%$ with high reliability and showing the gradually stability after 2010.
Keywords
TG-51; Absorbed dose to water; $N_{dw}{^{Co-60}}$; Output factor; TLD monitor;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Khan FM: The physics of radiation therapy. 4th ed, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. Baltimore. New York. London. Buenos Aires. Sydney. Tokyo, (2009), pp. 375-403
2 Kirby TH, Hanson WF, Gastorf RJ, Chu CH, Shalek RJ: Mailable TLD system for photon and electron therapy beams. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 12:261-265 (1986)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ding GX, Cygler JE, Kwok CB: Clinical reference dosimetry: Com-parison between AAPM TG-21 and TG-51 protocols. Med Phys 27:1217-1225 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Johns HE, Cunningham JR: The Physics of radiology, 4th ed, Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, USA, Charles C (1977), pp. 272-310
5 Task Group 21: A protocol for the determination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 10:741-771 (1983)   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Almond PR, Biggs PJ, Coursey BM, et al: AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams. Med Phys 26:1847-1870 (1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 ICRU Report No.24: Determination of Absorbed Dose in a Patient Irradiated by Beams of X or Gamma Rays in Radiotherapy Procedures. Washington, D.C: ICRU 1-55 (1976)
8 AAPM Report No.86: Quality assurance for clinical trials: a primer for physicists. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing 1-63 (2004)
9 White GA Hr, Gibbs GL: Comments on "A protocol for the deermination of absorbed dose from high-energy photon and electron beams". Med Phys 12:114 (1985)
10 Task Group 142 Report: Quality assurance of medical accelerators Med Phys 36:4197-4212 (2009)   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fletcher GH: Textbook of radiotherapy, 3rd ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia. (1981), pp. 37
12 AAPM Report No.86: Quality assurance for clinical trials. A primer for physicists. Madison: Medical Physics Publishing 1-63 (2004)
13 ICRU Report No.14: Radiation dosimetry: X-Rays and Gamma Rays with Maximum Photon Energies Between 0.6 and 50 MeV. ICRU, Washington, D.C. 1-36 (1969)