• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.35
• /
• pp.87-113
• /
• 2006

This study aims to theoretically examine the validity of argument that market-opening will improve the audience welfare of media and cultural contents. To accomplish its purpose, first of all, this study classifies the spectrum of approaches on cultural market-opening in Korea. Then, it examines, by the concept of public goods, whether market-opening can bring on economic gains for audience as consumer. Finally, this study inspects the profit and loss for audience as citizen which will be brought on by market-opening on the grounds of democratic value. As a result of this study, the improvement of economic efficiency and competence, the expansion of consumer‘s choices, the preservation of cultural value that the positive approach on market-opening is promising cannot be justified theoretically and logically. Therefore, at least in theoretically, the conclusion that market-opening cannot improve the audience welfare is deduced. However, the objection of market-opening cannot be related to the distorted protectionism of nation culture. On the contrary, this study suggests the condition of market-opening debate must be a opportunity to reconsider and reform of cultural diversity in Korea.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.35
• /
• pp.7-35
• /
• 2006

As neoliberal Globalization is reinforced, the debating of international stage about cultural market is heated up. People who insist market opening claim that cultural product has to be handled in condition such as other goods. However, the dissenter of cultural market-opening assert 'cultural exception' in goods trade because culture affects in individual and community consciousness and identity. The dispute encompassing cultural market raise the concept of Global Governance which presents theoretical frame about international society's decision-making and administration. Thus, this article explore international norms which encompass cultural market and its stakeholder through Global Governance frame. Specifically, first, this article review the theory of Global Governance. Second, this article examine international norms such as WTO, GATT, GATS, and also study its opponent who advocate 'cultural diversity'. Consequently, this article argue that the debating and conflict about cultural market should be resolved, not by hegemony state, by Global Governance frame which all stakeholder take part in.

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.104
• /
• pp.17-17
• /
• 1992

출판시장 개방에 대응한 최종적인, 그리고 최선의 대비책은 독자들을 용기있게 앞서 이끌고 가야 할 사명을 방기하고 독자들의 새로운 요구와 문화적 필요를 외면해온 채 그저 게으른 우물안 개구리로 안주해왔던 스스로의 모습에 대한 싸움에 우리 출판인들이 하루빨리 '이를 악물고' 나서는 것이 아니겠는가.

• Korean journal of communication and information
• /
• v.35
• /
• pp.114-146
• /
• 2006

Now, Korea-U.S.A Free Trade Agreement talk is underway in Korea. In FTA talks, the issues on audio-visual sector including screen quota, opening of broadcasting and telecommunication to the U.S.A. are becoming a hot potato. Globalization has been speed up by mass media and telecommunications. Cultures are no longer bounded by specific place but, through the migration of persons and the electronic flows of information, ideas and images, transgress established boundaries. So issues and debates have to be focused on global culture and cultural imperialism. Some would argue global culture is the consequences of capitalist world-system, so dominance by the center should be criticized and vanished. Some would say that global culture would help recipient society's people with cultural diversify and improvement. The issues on culture and communication, particularly at international level call for our attention in light of cultural identity, homogenization and diversity. Although I criticize the cultural imperialism thesis, I suggest critical acceptance of cultural imperialism. That is the observation of complexity between internal and external dynamics. The process of cultural imperialism is not simple and unitary. It rather involves the various forces of internal dynamics along with external forces.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.26 no.2
• /
• pp.37-68
• /
• 2018

This study examines the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and external oriented organizational culture on the firm perfornamance focusing on mediating effects of open innovation. The survey was conducted on Korean manufacturing firms with 100-5,000 employees among listed companies and external auditing companies. The validity of the research model and hypotheses was verified through analysis of structural equation model for 283 valid responses. Empirical results show that entrepreneurial orientation positively affects both open innovation and firm's performance. The external oriented organizational culture of firms appears to be positive effects on open innovation, but the effect between the external oriented organizational culture and firm's performance shows no statistical significance. Open innovation have positive effects on firm performance. In addition, a test for mediation effects of open innovation reveals that a full mediation exists between the external oriented organizational culture and firm's performance, while there is a partial mediation effect between entrepreneurial orientation and firm's performance. This study contribute to the literature by deepening understanding on the open innovation. We propose an integrated model for examining antecedent factors, open innovation and performance.

• Proceedings of the Costume Culture Conference
• /
• 1997.05a
• /
• pp.8-8
• /
• 1997

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.247
• /
• pp.2-3
• /
• 1998

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.103
• /
• pp.4-5
• /
• 1992

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.118
• /
• pp.7-7
• /
• 1992

• Venture DIGEST
• /
• no.12 s.125
• /
• pp.44-45
• /
• 2008

중국경제으 선두 심천. 불과 30여 년 전에는 인구 3만의 조그만 시골이었던 심천은, 1980년 심천이 고향이었던 등소평이 정권을 장악하자마자 가장 처음 '개방구'로 지정하면서 중국 개혁개방의 시발점이 된 곳이다. 경제특구다운 산업 인프라와 긴 역사를 담은 문화유적 및 '세계지창'으로 대변되는 여러 현대적인 관광명소까지 갖춘 매력적인 도시 심천. 중국 경제 발전의 신호탄을 쏜 심천에서 우리 벤처의 새로운 시장도 모색해보면 어떨까?