• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.36 no.4
• /
• pp.199-210
• /
• 2005

This study reviews the research papers which deal with research evaluation in library science and discusses on quantitative and qualitative research methods, and non-empirical research. For the purpose of improving paper production system, encouragement of publishing review paper and review Journal Is recommended.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2015.08a
• /
• pp.23-27
• /
• 2015

한 논문에 대하여 참고문헌의 인용빈도로 원 논문을 평가하는 outgrow index와, 인용논문의 인용빈도로 원 논문을 평가하는 single paper h-index를 비교해보았다. KCI 문헌정보학 분야 논문을 대상으로 시험 적용해본 결과 outgrow index의 값과 single paper h-index의 값이 비례하지 않음을 알 수 있었다. 한 논문을 outgrow index와 single paper h-index로 분석하여 다면적인 논문 평가 도구로 활용될 가능성을 검토해본다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.35 no.3
• /
• pp.35-54
• /
• 2001

The Libraries are face to difficult of academic journal subscription for the increasing price of journal and the increasing number of journal. Bibliographic citation analysis is one of method of evaluating the use of a journal collection. This study is used bibliographic use and scatting of foreign academic journal in Library and Information Science found in doctorial dissertation of graduate students in Seoul city, for serve to complement another method of journal evaluation. Journal selection and cancellation may be done on the basis to dispersion of journal citation to usefulness of journal subscription in the library budget. But the library should not rely on one single evaluation technique, it should take advantage of combination technique.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.53 no.2
• /
• pp.265-284
• /
• 2022

This study applied dynamic topic modeling on titles and abstracts of 55,442 academic papers in 85 SSCI journals from 2001 to 2020 in order to analyze research topic trend in library and information science. The analysis revealed four major themes of library management, informatics, library service, and library system in 10 major topics. The results also showed subtopics in information science and library management topic areas to change over time, while library service remained stable over 20 years to establish itself as a robust topic. In addition, medical information emerged as a significant sub-topic of informatics, thus exemplifying the interdisciplinary characteristics of library and information science field.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.57 no.3
• /
• pp.71-96
• /
• 2023

This study aimed to investigate key research areas in the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) by analyzing trends and identifying emerging topics. To facilitate the research, a collection of 40,897 author keywords from 11,252 papers published in the past 30 years (1993-2022) in five journals was gathered. In addition, keyword analysis, as well as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis were conducted, utilizing variables such as the number of articles, number of authors, ratio of co-authored papers, and cited counts. The findings of the study suggest that two topics are likely to develop as promising research areas in LIS in the future: machine learning/algorithm and research impact. Furthermore, it is anticipated that future research will focus on topics such as social media and big data, natural language processing, research trends, and research assessment, as they are expected to emerge as prominent areas of study.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.165-198
• /
• 2003

This study analyzed authors' use of theory in 654 articles that appeared in two core library and information science journals during last three decades. In order to analyze degree of theory use of LIS, such as, publication productivity, growth and distribution of theory in subfields. name and origin of theory, usability of each theory, subfields and journals, and so on, content analysis of LIS theories was performed through conceptual and empirical study. For the purpose of this study, we suggested a couple of new analytical methods, so called, ‘Subfield Classification Scheme’ within LIS, and ‘5 Degrees of Theory Use’ model for the first time.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.10 no.2
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 1993

L~brary and ~nformat~on sclence has been critic~zed for its dearth of conceptually framed, creative research which has been narrowly faused, fragmented. and desgned to solve s~tuational problems. Durmg recent years. a crit~cal concern of scholars in the l~brary and information proiessions has been a need for creative research. Research is the critical element for developing a theoret~cal base in wh~ch to enhance prxtlce of the profess~on and to gu~de ~ t s future development. The purpose of thls paper are to ( 1 1 delineate various levels of theory with implications for research methods. and (2) analyze research methods and contents of prevlous research publ~shtd In Korea durmg last two decades. and ( 3 ) purpose several d~rections toward theory building in vlew of both theoretical and operat~onal aspects.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.28 no.4
• /
• pp.119-140
• /
• 2011

Effective assessment of faculty research performance should involve considerations of both quality and quantity of faculty research. This study analyzed methods for evaluating faculty research output by comparing the rankings of Library and Information Science(LIS) faculty by publication counts, citation counts, and research performance assessment guidelines employed by Korean universities. The study results indicated that faculty rankings based on publication counts to be significantly different from those based on citation counts. Additionally, faculty rankings measured by university guidelines showed bigger correlations with rankings based on publication counts than rankings by citation counts, while differences in universities guidelines did not significantly affect the faculty rankings. The study findings suggest the need for bibliometric indicators that reflect the quality as well as the quantity of research output.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.45 no.4
• /
• pp.53-76
• /
• 2011

This study assesses research patterns and trends of library and information science(LIS) in Korea by applying bibliometric analysis. For the study, 2,400 peer-reviewed publications from 2001 to 2010(including conference proceedings) published by 159 LIS professors in Korea were analyzed by year, author, affiliation and journal. The study findings showed an increasing trend in collaboration(52.75% of total publications with single authors and 47.25% with multiple authors) among LIS professors in Korea, robust publication patterns of Korean LIS faculty(average 1.51 publications per year), and an increasing number in foreign publications(170 publications). The study results also suggested an internationalization of LIS in Korea. Specifically, the study found a higher rate of Korean LIS faculty with foreign degrees than in previous years as well as a higher publication rate of professors with international degrees. The analysis of publication patterns conducted by the study, which is a first step in our aim to establish a multi-faceted approach for assessing the impact of scholarly work, will be followed up with analysis of references and citations to evaluate the quality of publications.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.39 no.4
• /
• pp.45-69
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this article lies in investigating the problems and limitations of the current LIS education in Korea with an emphasis on the viewpoints of librarians. Also identified are the librarians suggestions for a better LIS educational system, in particular, for the renovation of the current LIS curriculum to upgrade the competencies of future librarians. To this end, 347 librarians from public, academic, special, and school libraries were e-mail surveyed. And the collected data were analyzed and interpreted to find out the specific problems and suggestions based on the types of libraries as well as the overall problems and suggestions.