한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

문헌정보학분야 해외 연구 동향 및 유망 주제 분석 연구

Research on Overseas Trends and Emerging Topics in Field of Library and Information Science

  • 구본진 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 장덕현 (부산대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.07.18
  • 심사 : 2023.08.12
  • 발행 : 2023.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 문헌정보학 분야의 연구 동향 분석을 통해 문헌정보학의 핵심 연구 영역을 파악하고 향후 유망 연구 주제로 부상할 가능성이 있는 주제를 식별하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 문헌정보학 분야의 국외 학술지 5종을 대상으로 지난 30년간 (1993~2022)의 학술논문 11,252건에서 40,897개의 저자 키워드를 수집하였으며, 저자 키워드를 활용한 키워드 분석을 통해 문헌정보학 분야의 핵심 연구 영역을 파악하였다. 이어서 논문수, 저자수, 공저논문 비율, 피인용 수를 활용하여 주성분분석과 상관관계분석을 통해 문헌정보학 분야의 미래 유망 연구 주제를 도출하였다. 분석 결과, 향후 문헌정보학 분야의 유망 연구 주제는 '머신러닝/알고리즘'과 '연구 영향력'이었으며, 이외에도 소셜미디어와 빅데이터분석, 자연어 처리, 연구 트렌드 분석, 연구성과 평가 등이 향후 주요한 연구주제로 성장할 가능성이 있는 것으로 나타났다.

This study aimed to investigate key research areas in the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) by analyzing trends and identifying emerging topics. To facilitate the research, a collection of 40,897 author keywords from 11,252 papers published in the past 30 years (1993-2022) in five journals was gathered. In addition, keyword analysis, as well as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis were conducted, utilizing variables such as the number of articles, number of authors, ratio of co-authored papers, and cited counts. The findings of the study suggest that two topics are likely to develop as promising research areas in LIS in the future: machine learning/algorithm and research impact. Furthermore, it is anticipated that future research will focus on topics such as social media and big data, natural language processing, research trends, and research assessment, as they are expected to emerge as prominent areas of study.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF-2020S1A5B5A17088401).

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, Sejung, Shim, We, Lee, June Young, Kwon, Oh-Jin, & Noh, Kyungran (2012). Trends detection of display research areas by bibliometric analysis. The Journal of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 7(6), 1343-1351. https://doi.org/10.13067/JKIECS.2012.7.6.1343 
  2. Jung, Eui-Seob, Yeo, woon dong, Cho, Dae-yeon, & Suh, Il-Won (2008). Emerging research field selection of construction & transportation sectors using scientometrics. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 8(2), 231-238.  https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2008.8.2.231
  3. Kho, Jaechang, Cho, Keuntae, & Cho, Yoon Ho. (2013). A study on recent research trend in management of technology using keywords network analysis. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 19(2), 101-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.2.101 
  4. Kim, Hyun Jung, Jo, Nam-ok, & Shin, Kyung-Shik (2015). Text mining-based emerging trend analysis for the aviation industry. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 21(1), 65-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2015.21.1.65 
  5. Kim, Seon-Ho, Bae, Deg-hyo, & Lee, Moon Hwan (2016). Estimation and assessment of natural drought index using principal component analysis. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 49(6), 565-577. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.6.565 
  6. Kim, Sung-Ho & Kim, Jipyo (2020). Analysis of the patent competitiveness of major Korean companies using PCA. Journal of Industrial Innovation, 36(4), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.22793/indinn.2020.36.4.009 
  7. Lee, Jae Yun, Kim, Pan Jun, Kang, DaeShin, Kim Hee jung, Yu, So-Young, & Lee, Woo-Hyoung (2011). A bibliometric analysis on LED research. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2011.42.3.001 
  8. Lee, Soosang (2014). A content analysis of journal articles using the language network analysis methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049 
  9. Min, Insik (2018). Web Crawling of KOSIS 100 indicators using Stata. The Korean Journal of Stata, 5(2), 29-38. 
  10. Yang, Kiduk, Kim, SeonWook, & Lee, HeyKyung (2021). Comparison of research performance between domestic and international library and information science scholars. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 365-392. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.365
  11. An, L., Yu, C., & Li, G. (2014). Visual topical analysis of chinese and american library and information science research institutions. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 217-233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.12.002
  12. Ball, R. & Tunger, D. (2006). Bibliometric analysis-a new business area for information professionals in libraries? support for scientific research by perception and trend analysis. Scientometrics, 66, 561-577. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0041-0 
  13. Cano, V. (1999). Bibliometric overview of library and information science research in Spain. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(8), 675-680.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:8<675::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-B
  14. Dai, P. F., Xiong, X., & Zhou, W. X. (2021). A global economic policy uncertainty index from principal component analysis. Finance Research Letters, 40, 101686. 
  15. Guo, H., Weingart, S., & Borner, K. (2011). Mixed-indicators model for identifying emerging research areas. Scientometrics, 89(1), 421-435.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0433-7
  16. Hu, CP., Hu, JM., Deng, SL., & Liu. Y. (2013). A co-word analysis of library and information science in China. Scientometrics 97, 369-382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1076-7 
  17. Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal Component Analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Springer. 
  18. Kontostathis, A., Galitsky, L. M., Pottenger, W. M., Roy, S., & Phelps, D. J. (2004). A survey of emerging trend detection in textual data mining. In Berry, W. Michael eds. Survey of Text Mining. New York: Springer, 185-224. 
  19. Mane, K. K. & Borner, K. (2004). Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. PNAS, 101(1), 5287-5290. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307626100 
  20. Radovanovic, M., Filipovic, S., & Golusin, V. (2018). Geo-economic approach to energy security measurement-principal component analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82, 1691-1700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.072
  21. Takeda, Y. & Kajikawa, Y. (2009). Optics: a bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases. Scientometrics, 78(3), 543-558.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2012-5
  22. Uzun, A. (2002). Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: a brief bibliometric perspective. The International Information and Library Review, 34(1), 21-33.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2002.10762561
  23. Walters, W. H. & Wilder, E. I. (2016). Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1487-1506.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23448
  24. Wang, Q. (2018). A bibliometric model for identifying emerging research topics. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 69(2), 290-304.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23930
  25. Weismayer, C. & Pezenka, I. (2017). Identifying emerging research fields: a longitudinal latent semantic keyword analysis. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1757-1785.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2555-z
  26. Yu, H., Chen, Q., & Pan, Y. (2022). A bibliometric and emerging trend analysis on stress granules from 2011 to 2020: a systematic review and bibliometrics analysis. Medicine 101(29), e29200, July 22, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029200