• School Mathematics
• /
• v.4 no.4
• /
• pp.565-580
• /
• 2002

연구자들은 학생들에게 문제해결 전략을 지도하는 것이 학생들의 문제해결력을 신장시켜 준다는 보고하고 있다. 이와 같은 연구결과를 배경으로 수학 교과서를 통하여 문제해결 전략을 지도하려는 시도들이 미국을 비롯하여 한국에서도 있어 왔다. 본 논문은 문제해결 전략을 교과서에 제시할 수 있는 가능한 세 가지 모델들을 논의하고, 미국과 한국의 수학교과서에서 문제해결 전략을 제시하는 방법을 분석하였다. 한 가지 모델은 문제해결 전략에 한 단원을 할애하는 것이다. 두 번째 모델은 각 수학내용을 지도하는 단원에 문제해결 전략의 지도를 위한 하위단원을 할당하는 것이다. 마지막, 세 번째 모델은 문제해결 전략 지도를 위한 특정 단원이나 하위 단원을 설정하는 것이 아니라 가능한 많은 쪽에 전략을 제시하는 것이다. 위에 언급한 세 가지 가능한 모델을 바탕으로 미국과 한국의 초등학교 수학교과서에서 문제해결 전략을 제시하는 양상을 비교하였다. 이 비교를 위하여 각 학년별로 제시되는 모든 전략들을 교과서와 교사용 지도서를 토대로 추출하였다. 각 교과서에서 전략을 제시한 양식을 비교한 결과 다음과 같은 결론을 얻게 되었다. 한국의 수학교과서는 전형적으로 첫 번째 모델의 양식으로 문제해결전략을 제시하고 있었다. 각 단원마다 별개의 문제해결 전략이 제시되었다. 또한, 학년별 지도 전략을 살펴보면 학년별로 연계성이 있게 전략이 제시 되었다기 보다는 학년별로 다른 다양한 전자의 지도에 중점을 둔 듯하다. 미국의 수학교과서는 두 번째 모델과 세 번째 모델의 중간적인 양식으로 문제해결 전략을 제시하고 있다. 즉, 각 단원마다 문제해결 전략 지도를 위한 하위 단원을 지정하였으며 필요한 경우에는 본 단원의 주 학습요소와 관련된 문제해결 전략은 단원 중에도 제시되고 있었다. 따라서, 차기 수학교과서 개정시기에는 세 번째 모델을 그 모형으로 삼아 문제해결 전략들을 제시하는 방안을 강구해야 할 것으로 기대된다.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.12 no.4
• /
• pp.433-452
• /
• 2009

This study investigated the teaching strategies of two exemplary American teachers regarding word problems and their impact on students' ability to both understanding and solving word problems. The teachers commonly explained the background details of the background of the word problems. The explanation motivated the students' mathematical problem solving, helped students understand the word problems clearly, and helped students use various solving strategies. Emphasizing communication, the teachers also provided comfortable atmosphere for students to discuss mathematical ideas with another. The teachers' continuous questions became the energy for students to plan various problem solving strategies and reflect the solutions. Also, this research suggested a complementary model for Polya's problem solving strategies.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.67-86
• /
• 1997

The purposes of this paper are to show problem-solving strategies and their typical problems to suggest specific ways to teach strategies to promote problem-solving abilities. (1) Problem-solving strategies can be divided into general strategies and specific strategies. General strategies refer to procedural teaching-learning activities based on Polya's 4 step problem-solving. Specific strategies refer to Lenchner's 12 problem solving strategies and their characteristics which are helpful to the substantial solution of specific problems. (2) Concerning to problem-solving strategies teaching, the followings are suggested. First, the sequence of strategy teaching should be from easy to difficult ones, from short to long ones. Second problems for strategy training should be simple and good enough to serve as examples of the strategies. Repetition with similar problems are needed. Third, analysis and comparison of various strategies, and extension and adaptation of the strategies to complicate problems are needed. Fourth, procedures of strategies teaching are the follows: Have students make their own strategies focused on the solution process; Have students solve the problems with expectation of the solving methods; Have students compare and reflect on their solving methods; And assess problem - solving processes.

• Journal of Elementary Mathematics Education in Korea
• /
• v.1 no.1
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 1997

Children should have opportunities to experience problem solving individually with strategies for developing their problem solving abilities. To make an instructional design for individual teaming, problem solving activities were classified into categories like individual activities, individual activities within a group, and team teaching. A flow of teaching and teaming process was designed before, and concrete and semi-concrete materials were used in an experimental teaching, which was analysed in this research.

• Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.419-443
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to analyze the problem solving strategies of ordinary students, gifted students, pre-service teachers, and in-service teachers with the 'chicken and pig problem,' which has multiple strategies to obtain the solution. For this study, 98 students in the 6th grade elementary schools, 96 gifted students in a gifted institution, 72 pre-service teachers, and 60 in-service teachers were selected. The researcher presented the "chicken and pig" problem and requested them the solution strategies as many as possible for 30 minutes in a free atmosphere. As a result of the study, the gifted students used relatively various and efficient strategies compared to the ordinary students, and there was a difference in the most used strategies among the groups. In addition, the percentage of respondents who suggested four or more strategies was 1% for the ordinary students, 54% for the gifted students, 42% for the pre-service teachers, and 43% for the in-service teachers. As suggestions, the researcher asserted that various kinds of high-quality mathematical problems and solving experiences should be provided to students and teachers and have students develop multi-strategy problems. As a follow-up study, the researcher suggested that multi-strategy mathematical problems should be applied to classroom teaching in a collaborative learning environment and reflected them in teacher training program.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.201-233
• /
• 2001

보통 문장제(일량, 거리, 속도 문제, 시계 문제, 농도 문제, 개수 세기, 측도 영역)는 초등학교부터 반복하며 나오며 대학 수학 능력 시험에서는 외적 문제 해결능력으로 측정되기도 한다. 문장제를 해결하는데는 사고가 여러 단계로 이루어져야 한다. 따라서 일반적으로 문장제는 난해하므로, 조직적이고 전문적인 학습지도가 이루어져야 한다. 하지만 입시위주의 교육 등 여러 여건상 잘 이루어지지 않고 있는 것이 현실이다. 본 연구에서는 문장제의 문제 해결에 필요한 해결요소를 발견하고 저해 요인을 없앨 수 있는 지도 방안으로서 소집단 토의학습에 문제해결 전략을 이용하여, 효율적인 문장제 지도 방안을 연구하고 상이한 문제에 접근하는 방법, 문제를 이용하는 방법 등을 토의학습을 통하여 다양한 풀이방법을 해결하면서 이를 통하여 사고력을 신장할 수 있도록 연구한다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.8
• /
• pp.209-229
• /
• 1999

보통 문장제(거리 ${\cdot}$ 속도 문제, 시계 문제, 농도 문제, 개수 세기, 측도 영역)는 초등학교부터 반복하면서 대학수학능력 시험에서는 외적 문제해결력을 측정하는 문장으로 나타난다. 문장제를 해결하는데는 사고가 여러 단계로 이루어져야 한다. 따라서 일반적으로 문장제는 난해하므로 조직적이고 전문적인 학습지도가 이루어져야 한다. 하지만 입시위주의 교육 등 여러 여건상 잘 이루어지지 않고 있는 것이 현실이다. 수학을 잘하는 학생이라도 문장제를 해결하지 못하는 경우가 많다. 본 연구에서는 문장제의 해결의 저해 요인을 완화시킬 수 있는 지도 방안으로서 Polya의 문제해결 전략을 이용하며, 실험반과 비교반의 학습 효과를 비교 분석하여 이를 통하여 효율적인 문장제 지도방안을 연구한다.

• Journal of Engineering Education Research
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.64-83
• /
• 2005

The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlations between technological problem solving strategies and variables related with self-regulation of students in engineering college. The subjects for this study are 120 students from engineering college. After using the problem solving strategy task and self-regulation questionnaire, they were classified into two groups, upper 25% group and bottom 25% group. The data was analyzed using the SPSS 10.0 for windows. The statistical technique used for data analysis was Pearson's correlation coefficient and t-test. The major conclusions of this study are as follows. Frist, there is positive correlation between strategies of design and self-efficacy & planning. Second, there is positive correlation between strategies of trouble shooting and self-monitoring, planning and effort. Third, especially self-efficacy, one of the self-regulation subvariables, directly affects on technological problem solving strategies.

• Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship
• /
• v.13 no.6
• /
• pp.117-127
• /
• 2018

When we face an unexpected challenge, should we stick to the original plan and persevere through the series of challenges? Or shall we pivot and transform our original plan into something new by taking into account the newly acquired information? This perennial question of perseverance versus pivot as two competing problem-solving strategies has puzzled our every day lives. In this study, based on the large-scale, nation-wide survey on entrepreneurship, I found that individual entrepreneurial orientation, which consists of innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness, promotes an individual's tendency to choose new problems to solve. Perseverance strategy was found to positively moderates the relationship between innovativeness and the tendency to choose new problems to solve, whereas the relationship between risk-taking and the tendency to choose new problems to solve was found to be negatively moderated by perseverance strategy. Pivot strategy, on the other hand, was found to be positively moderates the relationship between proactiveness and the tendency to choose new problems to solve. These findings contributes to the stream of individual entrepreneurial orientation research by empirically testing two competing problem-solving strategies of perseverance and pivot to show their interaction effects with entrepreneurial orientation. Also the findings of this study expand the potential outcome of entrepreneurial orientation by adding an individual's tendency to choose new problems to solve rather than what he or she has already experienced before.

• The Mathematical Education
• /
• v.61 no.3
• /
• pp.375-396
• /
• 2022

With the importance for teachers of understanding students' strategies and providing appropriate feedback to their students, the purpose of this study is to analyze how prospective elementary teachers interpret and respond students' strategies for fraction tasks with number lines. The findings from analysis of 64 prospective teachers' responses were as follow. First, the prospective teachers in general could identify the students' understanding and errors based on their strategies, however, some prospective teachers overgeneralized students' mathematical thinking at a superficial level. Second, the prospective teachers could pose diverse tasks or activities for revising the students' errors, while some prospective teachers tried to correct students' errors by using only the area models. Based on these results, this study suggests for prospective teachers to have opportunities to understand elementary students' diverse problem strategies and to consider teaching methods with different fraction models.