• Journal of Korean Medical classics
• /
• v.19 no.4
• /
• pp.212-218
• /
• 2006

당금시대(當今時代), 정진입도동서방문명형성상호간적융합공제(正進入到東西方文明形成相互間的融合共濟), 병탐색착이상생적관계진행발전적전절기(幷探索着以相生的關係進行發展的轉折期). 동양사상통과관찰정체적직관여통합적사유방법(東洋思想通過觀擦整體的直觀與統合的思維方法), 설명료우주변화규율화인간적각종난해지미(設明了宇宙變化規律和人間的各種難解之謎), 종이창조출료위대적음양오행론사상(從而創造出了偉大的陰陽五行論思想). 단시수착 '서세동점' 적조류(但是隨着 '西勢東漸' 的潮流), 신위동양인이교육화사유방법이축보서양화(身爲東洋人而敎育和思維方法已逐步西洋化), 미능계승아문적위대전통(未能繼承我們的偉大傳統), 반피서양적과학문명화물질문명소흡수(反被西洋的科學文明和物質文明所吸收). 연이(然而), 서양적임하일종철학급과학(西洋的任何一種哲學及科學), 몰유일개능구이일종원리래설명우주화인간급만물적변화(沒有一個能구以一種原理來說明宇宙和人間及萬物的變化), 즉몰유일개능여동양적음양오행론상필적적철학화이론(卽沒有一個能與東洋的陰陽五行論相匹敵的哲學和理論). 포괄음양오행론재내(包括陰陽五行論在內), 동양사상이기흔강적설복력, 수착과학진보(隨着科學進步), 기가치개시중신피인식(其價値開始重新被認識). 이전뇌화수자혁명위대표적현대문명(以電腦和數子革命爲代表的現代文明), 역시근거음양론적이진법위기초이창조출래적(亦是根據陰陽論的二進法爲基礎而創造出來的). 애인사탄(愛因사坦), 탕천수수(湯川秀樹), 니극발이(尼克勃이), 가포라등(기布羅等), 균대동양사상적위대성가이인가(均對東洋思想的偉大性加以認可), 병종차득도영감(幷從此得到靈感), 취득위대적과학성과(取得偉大的科學成果). 음양오행론시불가마살적절대진리(陰陽五行論是不可磨殺的絶對眞理). 불관대기이론가치급본질무지적인(不管對其理論價値及本質無知的人), 즘양급여평가, 단시저일이론시일개해석자연화인간본질급설명기변화적이론(但是這一理論是一個解釋自然和人間本質及說明其變化的理論), 결부회상실기진정적가치(決不會喪失其眞正的價値).

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.141-157
• /
• 2003

This study investigated relocations and expansions of DDC for the Korean university libraries using DDC to develop the standard relocations and expansions suitable for Korean situations. Contents of the standard relocations and expansions of DDC suggested by this study are as followed : Table2, Table5 and Table6. Also included are the Generalities class, Oriental philosophies from the Philosophy class, Buddhism and the oriental-origin religions from the Religion class, Public administration for the Social sciences class, the Language class, the Literature class, and the General geography and history class. The major characteristics of this study is that the standard relocations and expansions of DDC is followed by the options in DDC although it is followed by the basic systems in case that the options are not allowed.

• The Korean Publising Journal, Monthly
• /
• s.236
• /
• pp.14-14
• /
• 1998

최근 생태학을 주제로 한 책들은 철학.문학.사회학.경제학 등 인접학문과 접속해 새로운 생태학적 전망을 보여주는 국내 저서가 많아졌다는 점에서 주목할 만하다. 이들 책은 또 동양정신의 가능성을 탐색하고 있어 새로운 성과로 평가된다.

• Journal of Service Research and Studies
• /
• v.7 no.3
• /
• pp.105-118
• /
• 2017

The current research investigates the basic philosophy that would serve as a foundation for the development of the service economy. In particular, the current work suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy fits the philosophy of the service economy because of the relational nature of the Eastern culture (vs. Western culture). Therefore, it is suggested that trough manifestation of the Korean traditional philosophy, the service economy would be invigorated. The yin-yang and the Two Taegeuk do not emphasize the role of human, and thus, a new philosophy incorporating this aspect needs closer attention. Therefore, the Korean traditional philosophy, structured in a Three Taegeuk framework could serve as the foundation for the development of the service economy. The Three Taegeuk framework relates to the harmonization, horizontality, bi-directionality, and relational aspects of the service industries. For example, human serving the agent role in the society resembles the current service economy where service workers and customers serve important roles in value creation. Taken together, the current research suggests that the Korean traditional philosophy serve as an important foundation for the development of the service economy.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.137
• /
• pp.33-56
• /
• 2016

This article criticizes the dichotomous world view in which the East and the West are absolutely divided from each other and asserts that the East and the West should be understood as 'we' who ought to acknowledge each other not only as subjects but also reciprocally as 'others'. If the East is 'I', then the West is 'You' and vice versa and as such, the East differs from the West. Hence, supposing that they both regard themselves as subjects and if they realize that they can also be others against the other subject, they as different subjects should be understood as 'others in us'. Since the 19th Century the East has made efforts to learn and accept Western culture and thought. But it seems that the East has never regarded the West as an 'other in us', but rather as either an 'other outside of us' or as 'the real I that it should develop into'. This shows the self-contradictory perspective of the East. It can be thought that such an attitude was revealed as typical of the Far East in the 19th Century, in which the Opium War broke out and Sinocentrism collapsed. On the other hand, the West has never recognized the Eastasan 'other in us'. Nowadays we pursue the most actual value, that is, 'globalization'. In order to realize that value for the development of the whole human, it is necessary that both the East and West should first recognize each other as the 'other in us'.

• The Journal of Korean Philosophical History
• /
• no.57
• /
• pp.31-55
• /
• 2018

Professor Dowon (道原) Lew, Seung-Kook (柳承國: 1923~2011) was a master of Eastern philosophy in Korea, in the 20th century. 'Confucianism' was the root of his discipline. Nevertheless he studied extensively throughout Eastern philosophy. He was also a pioneer of 'Korean Philosophy', who devoted himself to 'establishing the original form (原型) of Korean thought'. Professor Lew showed a unique view on how Confucian thought was formed. He has done many years of precise comparative analysis of the results of archaeological studies before 1970, particularly the study of bone-and-shell inions, and what was said in previous literature. As a result, he concluded that "we cannot discuss the origins of Confucian thought by separating the relationship with the Dongyi tribe". Confucianism was formed in relation to Dongyi. The purpose of his attention to the Dongyi tribe - RenFang tribe (人方族) was not to examine Dongyi tribe and its culture. His purpose was to examine how Confucian thought was formed and to examine the relevance of Dongyi tribe in this process. This was in conjunction with the task of exploring 'the original form of Korean thought', whether he pretended or not. Professor Lew, Seung-Kook's theory differed not only from the conventional view of the academic world in his time but also from the conventional view up to now. It is a pity that it was not yet discussed it in the academic world. I consider that it is necessary to seriously review Professor Lew and Seung-Kook's theory at this point when China has outlined the Northeast project (東北工程).

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.32
• /
• pp.215-244
• /
• 2008

This article's aim is to criticise ontological physicallism, supervenience, and eliminativism on theory of mind-body relation, and to present Confucian theory of mind-body relation as an alternative. Confucianism on theory of mind-body relation. Ontological physicallism reduce 'the psycho' to 'the physical'. Therefore, Physicallism as theory of mind-body relation reduce mind to physical body. Mind-Body supervenience theory insists property co-variation and dependency of mind-body. Eliminative materialism is to eliminate 'the psycho'. But confucianists believe in reality of the human mind-heart & it's nature. Confucianism is to establish the mina-heart & it's nature as real. Confucianism can be an alternative of physicallism, supervenience, and eliminativism on theory of mind-body relation. And Confucian's opinion differs from theory of the substance and phenomenalism.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.35
• /
• pp.297-327
• /
• 2009

Kant proposed three principles of moral philosophy(Categorical Imperative) and Supreme moral principle in The Fundamental principles of Metaphysics of Ethics : Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law ${\cdots}$ etc. Kant's three principles of moral philosophy(Categorical Imperatives) imply that the idea of universality, freedom, and the kingdom of ends. We contrast Chu Hsi's Moral Philosophy with Kant's three principles of Categorical Imperatives. In conclusion Chu Hsi's moral rules be equal to kantian categorical imperative. These rules implicate principle of universalization, impartiality, and the kingdom of ends. But Chu Hsi believe in reality of the human mind and it's nature. Human mind and it's nature is comprised of benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom. Benevolence, righteousness, propriety and wisdom(四德) is the origin of morality. Chu Hsi's philosophy of LI(理) is metaphysics of Tao-Te(道德) or ontological-metaphysical Ethics. Everyone has created with LI. LI is potentiality of Human beings and the good. Chu Hsi's moral philosophy is distinguished from the traditional theory of the substance and modern scientism(phenomenalism)

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.33
• /
• pp.63-90
• /
• 2019

In pluralistic political realities that have been exposed as antagonistic relationships between self and others, the principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum' in Daesoon Thought emphasizes the complementarity between self and others and presents us with a new form of cognition and attitude which can overcome pluralistic political realities. Though solipsism that objectificates others on the basis of the self, the principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum' presents us a new form of cognition and attitude with which we can approach others. The principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum' is based on the logic that we can secure and extend ourselves only in relation between self and others. Self is not fully formed or perfected without others. Previous discussions on the principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum' as it is exists within Daesoon Thought have been limited to Eastern Philosophy. On one hand, this inclination may be due to a narrow understanding of Western Philosophy. The flow of Modern Western Philosophy can at times be a self-reflective output for solipsism. On the other hand, the understanding of the principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum in context of a dualistic contrast between Eastern Philosophy and Western Philosophy is not concordant with the principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum' which emphasizes the creation of harmony between self and others. This paper aims to investigate avenues to create harmony between Eastern Philosophy and Western Philosophy regarding the principle of 'Coincidentia Oppositorum' in Daesoon Thought. Specifically, attention will be paid to 'flesh' as used by Merleau-Ponty. In his writings, flesh is the matrix which activates the fundamental involvement between self and others. Self is a being of flesh and an ambiguous being which is formed in a double position (seeing and being seen). Flesh can secure and extend the self only through its relationship to an other or multiple others. Restoring the other that has been excluded from modern Western Philosophy, Merleau-Ponty's flesh call for contemplation into the meaning of the other and of otherness.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.55
• /
• pp.9-33
• /
• 2014

이 논문은 중국 남송시대 성리학의 집대성자인 주자(朱子)(1130-1200)가 "중용"을 어떻게 분장절(分章節)하고, 그 구성을 어떻게 이해하였으며, 나아가 "중용"을 어떤 책으로 규정하면서 어떤 입장을 갖고 해석하였는지를 살펴보는 것을 목표로 한다. 주자는 이정(二程)형제가 "중용"을 "공문(孔門)에서 전한 심법(心法)"으로 정의한 입장을 수용하면서, "중용(中庸)"을 표창(表彰)하여 "예기(禮記)"에서 분리 독립시켜 사서(四書)의 하나로 정립하였다. 그는 40세 전후에 "장구" 및 "혹문"의 초고를 완성하고, 20여년 간 수정한 끝에 "중용장구"의 서문을 썼다. 주자는 "중용"이란 글을 최초로 나름의 원칙을 갖고 유기적인 체계속에서 33장으로 분장(分章)하고, 사대절(四大節) 혹은 육대절(六大節)로 그 체계를 나누었다. 그는 이러한 분장절(分章節)을 통해 "중용"이란 책은 중화(中和), 중용(中庸), 군자지도(君子之道)의 비은(費隱), 천도(天道)로서의 성(誠)과 인도(人道)로서의 성지(誠之), 그리고 천인합일의 길을 제시한 책으로 구성되어 있다고 말하였다. 나아가 우리는 주자가 "중용"이란 책을 공자의 손자인 자사(子思)가 도통의 단서를 계승하기 위해서 기술한 책이라고 말하면서, "서경(書經)" "대우모(大禹謨)"의 구절과 "중용"의 내용이 합치된다고 하는 주장을 살폈다. 마지막으로 우리는 주자의 "중용"해석에서 나타난 특징을 살펴보았다. 주자는 나름의 일관된 철학적 형이상학적 입장을 갖고 "중용"을 해석하였는데, 그의 해석에는 이기론(理氣論), 이일분수설(理一分殊說), 성즉리(性卽理), 성발위정론(性發爲情論), 그리고 존양(存養) 성찰(省察)의 수양법 등이 고스란히 반영되어 있다는 것을 살폈다. 그리고 우리는 주자가 이런 "중용" 해석을 통해 유학의 정통성을 정립함과 동시에 도불(道佛)을 위시한 여타 학파를 비판 극복하려고 했다는 점을 살폈다.