• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.142
• /
• pp.323-347
• /
• 2017

In the 1980s, traditional analytic epistemology was abuzz with proposed solutions to the Gettier problem, responses to skepticism, newly minted objections to a variety of internalist and externalist theories of justification, and enthusiastic criticisms of foundationalism and coherentism. Debates over competing analyses of knowledge and justification raged. Since then, virtue epistemology has become a diverse and increasingly well-established field. I think that most researchers in Korea will feel the name "virtue epistemology" itself as strange or unfamiliar. It is primarily because virtue epistemology has a brief history. So, virtue epistemology did not present many opportunities for its introduction to Korean researchers. Another reason is that the name of "virtue epistemology" itself has a strangeness or unfamiliarity. Since the concept of "virtue" has mainly been used in moral or ethical contexts, virtue ethics is very familiar to most people. In contrast, the name of "virtue epistemology", combining "virtue" with "epistemology", is strange to many people. This paper primarily aims to introduce virtue epistemology in our philosophical society. What is it? How is virtue epistemology different from traditional analytic epistemology? What is the nature of virtues in virtue epistemology? What are the advantages, urgent tasks, and prospects of virtue epistemology? Focusing on these questions, I seek to understand the background to the rise of virtue epistemology, the differences and relations between virtue epistemology and traditional epistemology, and the nature of virtue and the main theories in virtue epistemology.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.46
• /
• pp.189-234
• /
• 2023

The most common and prevailing system of virtue ethics is based around the idea of personality rather than external behavior and it grew out of the Aristotelian system of virtue ethics. The purpose of this study is to find out the characteristics of the virtue ethics found within Daesoon Thought through comparison to Aristotelian virtue ethics. This can serve as a basis to establish the virtue ethics of Daesoon Thought in further studies. The systems of virtue ethics posited by the two traditions are similar in that they are both teleological as the virtues they recognize are related to human nature in the context of certain metaphysical assumption and they both exhibit the characteristic tendencies of seeking to realize the highest human good. Therefore, in the Aristotelian context, virtues can be defined as "characteristics needed for the realization of eudaimonia," and for Daesoon Thought, virtues are "characteristics needed for the realization of the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence." The representative virtues examined in this comparative study will be the Aristotelian Golden Mean, and the the concepts of guarding against self-deception and great benevolence and great justice in Daesoon Thought. In comparison to Aristotelian virtues, these differ in three main ways. First, Aristotelian virtue is not an innate aspect of character the way it is assumed to be in Daesoon Thought wherein the original human heart bestowed by Heaven is already virtuous. Second, mental virtue in the Aristotelian context centers the mind upon reason whereas in Daesoon Thought, the heart-mind exhibits both reason and emotional concern for others. Third, eudaimonia is a concept limited to humans and their societies whereas the Resolution of Grievances for Mutual Beneficence is a good that includes all beings including divine beings, animals, plants, and Heaven and Earth. Despite the differences, both require practical reason, continuous education, and effort to succeed in the cultivation of virtues and the proper implementation of virtuous living.

• (The)Study of the Eastern Classic
• /
• no.57
• /
• pp.169-200
• /
• 2014

This paper is aimed at defining the meaning of 'de' in The Book of Document on the basis of it's various example of use and the relation between it and tian(天) ming(命). The conclusion is that 'de' in this book means a special quality of fulfill a ideal role required to a specific being. By the way the role in the case of man is determined by his position. Therefore 'de' is redefined as a special quality of fulfill a ideal role required to a specific position. In short, de can be defined as 'appropriation to a specific being'. The ideal role which is the basis of de is determined first-hand by tianming (天命) and a king's order according to it, and is determined basically by mores. The meaning of 'de' in this book as 'appropriation' defines 'de' monistically and also connotes easily it's various example of use. De in the case of things is interpreted as appropriation to it's nature and in the case of man to his position. And the meaning of 'de' like this gives the basis to interpret 'governing with de'(德治) in the Analects of Confucius as zhenming(正名).

• Monthly Duck's Village
• /
• s.88
• /
• pp.100-101
• /
• 2010

경기도 안성시내 강변공원에서는 '남사당 짱! 바우덕이 짱!'이라는 주제로 '2010안성남사당 바우덕이축제'가 열렸다. 올해 바우덕이 축제는 9월 6일, 전야제인 곰뱅이트기 의식을 시작으로 12일까지 6일간에 거쳐 개최됐다. 축제의 꽃이라 할 수 있는 남사당 6마당놀이와 아이를 동반한 가족이 함께 배울 수 있도록 몸으로 배우는 풍물놀이, 줄타기 체험 및 악기 강습, 살판, 탈놀음 등으로 구성된 멋진 공연은 관객들에게 뜨거운 환호를 받았다. 또한 조선시대 옛날장터를 재현하여 체험, 교육장소로 제공했으며 1,500명 이상의 풍물인이 참여하는 '바우덕이 전국 풍물 경연대회'등 축제기간 내내 200개가 넘는 이벤트가 펼쳐졌다.

• Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology
• /
• v.14 no.1
• /
• pp.80-87
• /
• 2000

구상나무림 보전관리의 기초자료를 마련하고자 지리산 한라산 및 덕유산의 아고산지대에 95개의 조사구를 설치하여 한국특산종 구상나무의 생육현황과 구상나무 서식지의 입지인지를 조사하였다 구상나무는 흉고직경 10-30cm의 범위에 드는 나무들이 주로 고사목으로 나타났으며 고사목의 비율은 전체적으로 총개체수의 11.51%였다 고사목의 비율또한 덕유산에서 18.18%로 가장높게나타났고 한라산 지역이 8.11%로 가장 낮게 나타났다 조사구당 구상나무 개체수 치수의 개체수 구상나무의 수고와 흉고직경 생육현황표에 의한 점수 구상나무의 상대밀도 등은 지역간에 통계적 유의차가 인정되었다 생육중인 구상나무의 활력은 한라산 지리산, 덕유산으로 순으로 좋았다 조사구당 구상나무 치수의 개체수는 한라산에서 6.00개체로 가장 많았으며 덕유산에서는 치수가 없는 것으로 나타났다 구상나무의 상대밀도도 한라산, 지리산, 덕유산 순으로 높게 나타났다. 조사구당 구상나무 개체수는 해발고와 정의 상관, 방위, 낙엽퇴의 두께, 조사구당 교목의 개체수 및 종수, 활엽수 상대밀도와는 부의 상관이 인정되었다. 구상나무 상대밀도는 해발고와는 고도의 정의 상관관계 방위 조사 구당교목의 개체수 및 종수 수관울폐도, 활엽수 상대밀도와는 부의 상관관계가 인정되었다 지리산, 한라산 및 덕유산에 자생하는 구상나무는 해발고가 높으며 볕이 잘들고 낙엽퇴가 얕으며 종구성이 단순하고 활엽수가 적은 지역에 보다 많이 분포한다.

• Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association
• /
• v.19 no.2
• /
• pp.13-34
• /
• 2007

This study approached the concept of practical or praxis in Family and Consumer Science based on the review of the concept of phronesis in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Aristotle divided human soul into rational part and irrational part. A virtue related with rational part is intellectual virtue and a virtue related with irrational part is moral virtue. Rational part is divided into calculative part and scientific part. Phronesis is one of an intellectual virtue in calculative part of soul. Aristotle defines phronesis as a state of soul that issues in praxis. Phronesis in narrow sense is a virtue which leads to praxis and it is differ from either sophia or techne. Phronesis in broad sense it includes both praxis and poiesis. Phronesis is closely related with moral virtue. Because moral virtues are habits according to right reason, hence right reasons should be considered, and this is intellectual virtue. It is called for attention that what the concept of practical or praxis in Family and Consumer Science Education should be for the determination of the relation with Practical Arts and Technology. This study proposed a tentative conceptualization of praxis and phronimos in context of Family and Consumer Science Education.clothing planning and the most categories(83.3%) had connections of repetitions. In the clothing material section, categories evaluated as gaps and developments were 55.6% and 44.4%. The clothing construction.

• KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
• /
• v.50 no.6
• /
• pp.112-114
• /
• 2018

계란 안전성 검사 확대, 난가 하락 등 양계산업이 큰 위기를 맞고 있는 가운데 조합원 수익증대와 대전충남양계농협을 활성화시키기 위한 노력은 오늘도 계속되고 있다. 임상덕 대전충남양계농협조합장은 지난 2015년 조합장에 당선된 후 조합원 확충 및 조합의 지지기반 확대를 위해 노력해 오고 있다. 본고는 임상덕 조합장을 만나 조합 운영방안과 양계산업 발전방안을 들어보았다.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.251-272
• /
• 2012

Recently Professor Lee has suggested the analysis of the indicative conditional based on Sellars-Brandom's inferentialism. In this paper, I raise three questions. First, Professor Lee seems to misunderstand Sellars-Brandom in that he considers only the analytically valid arguments as materially valid inferences. Second, Professor Lee seems to misunderstand Sellars-Brandom in that whereas Sellars-Brandom talks about the common features of all kinds of conditionals including counterfactual conditionals, Professor Lee takes it as the analysis of the indicative conditional only. Third, either Professor Lee's analysis is incompatible with Sellars-Brandom inferentialism or his analysis is too general.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• no.123
• /
• pp.239-264
• /
• 2018

In order to understand the whole picture of virtue epistemology with knowledge-action theory, I will first examine contours between concepts like capacity, character and intellectual virtues in relation to the notion of virtue. At first, my $na{\ddot{i}}ve$ question is why smart people do such bad things without any shame. This question would be either ethical or epistemological because epistemology is viewed as a normative discipline and intellectual agents and communities should be considered as the primary focus of epistemic evaluation. This is the core idea of virtue epistemology. The stance virtue epistemology views virtues as a solution to the justification of knowledge is similar to the knowledge-action theory in the East Asian intellectual tradition. But, their core issues are different from each other. Thus, I will explain how to differ from one another and analyze such concepts as capacity, character, and intellectual virtues in the Analects. I will insist that capacity and character without normative disciplines cannot be intellectual virtues leading to right actions.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.38
• /
• pp.1-46
• /
• 2021

Since ancient times, the word Deok (德, virtue) has been used as a term in ethics. In the east, it originally meant 'to acquire (得),' and during the warring states period, it was used to indicate 'personality' or 'value;' especially for political leaders. Then, in Confucianism, the word Deok developed into an ethical term suggesting that people should acquire Deok in their action so as to achieve human perfection. In Daesoon Thought, Deok originates from the Dao, and the two are close in the same manner that Yin and Yang are close and interrelated. The Dao of Daesoon Thought indicates the Great Dao of Heaven and Earth, which Gucheon Sangje had opened when he performed his Gongbu (holy work) at Daewonsa Temple, is such that the Great Deok was divided into the Deok of Heaven, the Deok of Earth, and the Deok of Humanity. This allows for the realization of Deok in each of the Three Realms. Jo Jeongsan, the successor of Gucheon Sangje, said that he will inherit the Great Deok originated from the Great Dao and enlighten the world to the Dao. The cause of the accumulation of grievances in the Three Realms was due to the failure to sufficiently spread Deok throughout the Three Realms. The Later World is where Deok will be offered in its full extent as it was secured by the Cheonjigongsa (Reordering Works of Heaven and Earth) performed by Gucheon Sangje. However, as the main agent of spreading Deok is the heart-mind, humans need to cultivate their heart-mind in the correct way. When humans finally become Dotong-gunja (beings who are perfectly unified with the Dao) and generously practice Deok in the world, there will be no grievances anywhere in the Three Realms. There are four ways of practicing Deok: Deok by caring for life, Eondeok (Deok of speech), Gongdeok (practicing meritorious Deok), and Podeok (spreading of Deok) to the world. Practicing the Deok by caring for life is to save and protect living beings based on the spirit of Jesaenguise (saving lives and curing the world). Eondeok is practiced when people speak to others in a positive way that fosters widespread goodness based on the spirit of Sangsaeng (mutual beneficence). When people perform Gongdeok they will be rewarded for their actions. Podeok can be realized when the followers of Sangje spread the Great Dao of Heaven and Earth based on the teachings of Daesoon Thought.