• Title/Summary/Keyword: 다기준 의사결정 분석

Search Result 138, Processing Time 0.031 seconds

The Allocation Precedence of the Limited Same Resource to the Concurrent Activities under Multiple Criteria (다기준하 동일 한정 자원의 배당 우선순위 결정)

  • Hwang, Jin-Ha
    • Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • /
    • v.9 no.5
    • /
    • pp.159-167
    • /
    • 2008
  • This study provides a effective approach to the construction management problem with the limited number or amount of available resources using the analytic hierarchy process. Construction management is a series of decision making processes for planning and controling of cost, time and quality as main objectives in construction works. When several activities need the limited same resource at the same time, it is very hard to decide the priority of the activities in the real situations. For that the scientific decision making method and procedure for resource allocation are required. This study solves the resource allocation problem by dealing with the decision making problem which the activities are distributed to multiple projects and under multiple criteria. The analytic hierarchy process is a method devised to solve complex multi-criteria decision problems. The result shows that this study can be effectively used to make decisions in situations involving multiple objectives by evaluating the prioritized ranking and degree of the activity alternatives based on the overall preferences.

Multi-criteria Decision Making Method for Developing Greenhouse Gas Technologies Strategically Considering Scale Efficiency: AHP/DEA CCR-I and BCC-I Integrated model Approach (규모의 경제성을 고려한 전략적 온실가스저감기술 개발을 위한 다기준의사결정기법: AHP/DEA CCR-I 및 BCC-I 혼합모형 적용)

  • Lee, Seong-Kon;Mogi, Gento;Kim, Jong-Wook
    • Transactions of the Korean hydrogen and new energy society
    • /
    • v.19 no.6
    • /
    • pp.552-560
    • /
    • 2008
  • In 1997, Korean government established the National Energy and Resources Plan, which targeted from 1997 to 2005 with strategic energy technology development. At the end of 2005, Korean government built a New National Energy and Resources Plan preparing for upcoming 10 years from 2006 until 2015 based on energy technology trees comparing with the previous plan, which based on the energy R&D projects. In this research, we prioritize the relative preferences and efficiency by an AHP/DEA CCR-I and BCC-I integrated model approach considering scale efficiency for well focused R&D and efficiency of developing Greenhouse Gas technologies as an extended research from a view point of econometrics as an extended research.

(A Study on the Evaluation Method of Source Selection in Case of Weapon System Purchase Project) (무기체계 구매사업시 기종결정 평가방법에 관한 연구)

  • Choi, Jin-Seok;Lyu, Kyu-Yeol
    • Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
    • /
    • v.35 no.1
    • /
    • pp.63-82
    • /
    • 2009
  • The purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of current rules and regulations on the source selection for weapon system in defense acquisition project and suggest several techniques to ensure objectivity and fairness. As an application example, Helicopter source selection was presented. It was analyzed and compared through technique application and strength and weakness analysis of AHP, PROMETHEE and Attribute Transformation. The decision making techniques which make all conditions satisfactory in all situations are nonexistent. Thus, it is estimated that we can maintain the objectivity in the source selection of weapon systems by applying suitable decision making techniques in accordance with the patterns of evaluation item.

The selection of computerized manufacturing control system using MCDM model (다기준의사결정 모형을 이용한 전산화된 제조관리시스템의 선정에 관한 연구)

  • 정상윤;양대용
    • Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
    • /
    • v.6 no.1
    • /
    • pp.113-118
    • /
    • 2001
  • The purpose of this study is the optimal selection for evaluating alternative computerized manufacturing control software packages. The evaluation and analysis of the alternative computerized manufacturing control software packages is based on a model for Multi-Criteria Decision Making(MCDM). The ultimate of MCDM is to take the best choice among the alternatives or to rank them and the procedure depends on the decision maker's subjective judgement. An example is given to illustrate the application of the MCDM model.

  • PDF

Analysis of Ventilation Impact in Multi-Family Residential Building Utilizing TOPSIS Method (다기준 의사결정방법을 이용한 공동주택 내 환기장치 종류별 효과분석)

  • Park, Kyung-Yong;Kim, Gil-Tae;Kim, Tae-Min;Ji, Won-Gil;Kwag, Byung-Chang
    • Land and Housing Review
    • /
    • v.13 no.3
    • /
    • pp.107-113
    • /
    • 2022
  • With increasing airtight building construction aimed at reducing energy consumption, indoor relative humidity is increasing which can lead to condensation and moisture damage in multi-family residential buildings. This has led to increased implementation of mechanical ventilation to control indoor moisture. However mechanical ventilation systems consume additional energy and generate noise. As this leads to occupant discomfort, it is necessary to select a ventilation system that addresses the energy and noise issues. This research measured the ventilation performance, energy consumption, and noise level of mechanical ventilation devices in multi-family residential buildings. TOPSIS, a multi-criteria decision making technique was used to determine appropriate ventilation strategies in addition to occupant ventilation system operation preference.

Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis and GIS to the Coastal Assessment (GIS와 다기준분석법(MCA)을 활용한 연안지역 평가방법 연구)

  • 최희정;윤진숙;황철수
    • Proceedings of the Korean Association of Geographic Inforamtion Studies Conference
    • /
    • 2003.04a
    • /
    • pp.510-516
    • /
    • 2003
  • 연안관리 정책을 결정하기 위해서는 다양한 정보의 수집과 이를 체계적으로 관리하고 분석할 수 있는 기법이 필요하다. 특히, 다양한 이해집단과 목적들이 상충하는 지역의 특성을 파악하기 위해서는 환경, 사회, 경제적인 기준 및 의사결정자의 가치체계가 반영될 수 있어야 하며, 선호도가 반영된 요소를 효율적으로 분석할 수 있어야 한다. 이에, 본 연구에서는 공간자료의 처리 및 분석이 용이한 GIS 환경에 다기준 분석법, 그 중에서도 AHP 모형을 결합하는 방법을 다루어 보았다. 분석과정을 살펴보면, 본 연구에서는 지역에 영향을 미치는 사회ㆍ경제적인 지표, 환경 지표를 정하였고, 이런 지표들의 데이터를 GIS라는 도구를 통하여 분석이 용이하도록 변환시켰다. 한편, 이 지역에 영향을 미치는 각 기준들의 중요성을 파악하여 의사결정자의 의견을 반영할 수 있도록 다기준 분석법의 하나인 AHP를 이용하여 가중치를 산정하였다. 다음으로, 다양한 출처의 자료를 표준화하여 GIS의 래스터 자료로 구축한 후, 가중치를 적용한 개별 레이어를 지도대수와 중첩분석을 이용하여 최종 결과 레이어를 생성하였다. 생성된 최종 결과 레이어 상의 공간의 대안인 각 셀 값을 비교ㆍ분석하였다. 이로 인한 결과는 연안의 유한한 자원과 공간의 다양한 이용상태를 관리하기 위한 해안과 육상의 정보를 제공할 수 있다. GIS와 다기준 분석을 통합함으로써 다양한 출처의 공간정보를 분석하고 연안의 현 상태를 밝힐 수 있다. 또한, 이것은 분석 결과가 단순하고 명확하게 설명되어 정책 결정자에게 유용한 정보를 제공할 뿐만 아니라, 이 정보를 이용하여 실질적인 연안관리계획을 수립하는데 도움이 된다.가능성 0.5이상의 면적은 59%를 차지하였다.퇴적이 우세한 것으로 관측되었다.보체계의 구축사업의 시각이 행정정보화, 생활정보화, 산업정보화 등 다양한 분야와 결합하여 보다 큰 시너지 효과와 사용자 중심의 서비스 개선을 창출할 수 있는 기반을 제공할 것을 기대해 본다.. 이상의 결과를 종합해볼 때, ${\beta}$-glucan은 고용량일 때 직접적으로 또는 $IFN-{\gamma}$ 존재시에는 저용량에서도 복강 큰 포식세로를 활성화시킬 뿐 아니라, 탐식효율도 높임으로써 면역기능을 증진 시키는 것으로 나타났고, 그 효과는 crude ${\beta}$-glucan의 추출조건에 따라 달라지는 것을 알 수 있었다.eveloped. Design concepts and control methods of a new crane will be introduced in this paper.and momentum balance was applied to the fluid field of bundle. while the movement of′ individual material was taken into account. The constitutive model relating the surface force and the deformation of bundle was introduced by considering a representative prodedure that stands for the bundle movement. Then a fundamental equations system could be sim

  • PDF

A Evaluation Model of AHP Results Using Monte Carlo Simulation (Depending on the Case Studies of Road and Rail) (몬테카를로 시뮬레이션을 통한 AHP결과 해석모형개발 (도로 및 철도부문 사례를 중심으로))

  • Sul, You-Jin;Chung, Sung-Bong;Song, Ki-Han;Chon, Kyung-Soo;Rhee, Sung-Mo
    • Journal of Korean Society of Transportation
    • /
    • v.26 no.4
    • /
    • pp.195-204
    • /
    • 2008
  • Multi-Criteria Analysis is one method for optimizing decisions that include numerous characteristics and objective functions. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used as a general Multi-Criteria Analysis considering many critical issues. However, since validation procedures for the decision reliability of AHP valuers had been left off existing methodologies, a new methodology including such validation procedures is required to make more reliable decisions. In this research, idea decision results are derived using Monte Carlo Simulation in cases where AHP valuers do not have expertise in the specific project, and these results are compared with the results derived from experts to develop a new analysis model to make more reliable decisions. Finally, this new analysis is applied to various field case studies of road and rail carried out by the Korea Development Institute (KDI) between 2003 and 2006 to validate the new analysis model. The study found that approximately 20% of decisions resulting from the existing methodology are considered prudent. In future studies, the authors suggest analyzing the correlation between initial weights and final results since final results are enormously influenced by the initial weight.

Development of an Inundation Risk Evaluation Method Based on a Multi Criteria Decision Making (다기준 의사결정기법을 기반으로 하는 침수위험 평가기법의 개발)

  • Park, Moo-Jong;Choi, Sung-Wook
    • Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
    • /
    • v.41 no.4
    • /
    • pp.365-377
    • /
    • 2008
  • In this study, PROMETHEE(Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations) which is one of the multi criteria decision making methods is applied to estimate the relative inundation risk of the urban subcatchment. For this purpose, several factors which have an effect on the inundation risk are selected and used to perform PROMETHEE. Those are elevation average, slope average, density of conduit, population and sediment yields per unit area of each subcatchment. Based on them, PROMETHEE is performed and the relative inundation risk for each subcatchment is estimated. For the validation of the suggested method, the results from the suggested method are compared with the historical inundation records occured on 1998 and the relative inundation risk estimated by the method considering sediment yields per unit area only. From the comparison, it is found that the suggested method may generate better results to estimate the relative inundation risk of each subcatchment than the method considering sediment yields per unit area only. Also, it can be applied to establish a rehabilitation order of subcatchments for mitigating the inundation risk.

A Study on the Development of Optimization Procedure for Radiological Protection (방사선 방어의 최적화 절차론 개발에 관한 연구)

  • Song, Jong-Soon
    • Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
    • /
    • v.19 no.1
    • /
    • pp.1-11
    • /
    • 1994
  • Considering the variety of application and other factors in performing the optimization of radiological protection, it is necessary to use well-structured optimization procedure. In this study, an optimization procedure for design stage of nuclear power plant was proposed, and applied in the selection of alternatives for reducing occupational radiation exposure. As an aiding technique for decision-making, multi-criteria technique was used. As a result, priorities of alternatives are determined, and a problem of applying this result to real situation is reviewed. The developed procedure for optimization can be extended to other areas such as radioactive waste management, medical use of radiation, etc.

  • PDF

Comparative Evaluation of Multipurpose Reservoir Operating Rules Using Multicriterion Decision Analysis Techniques (다기준 의사 분석 기법에 의한 다목적 저수지의 운영율 평가)

  • Go, Seok-Gu;Lee, Gwang-Man;Go, Ik-Hwan
    • Water for future
    • /
    • v.25 no.1
    • /
    • pp.83-92
    • /
    • 1992
  • Selection of the best operation rule among a set of alternatives for a multipurpose reservoir system operation requires to evaluate many minor criteria I n addition to the major objectives assessed to the system, These problems are sufficiently complex and difficult that they are beyond heuristic decision rules and experiences in case several noncommensurable multiple criteria are included in the evaluation. With the assistance of multicriterion decision analysis techniques, it is possible to select the best one among various alternatives by systematically comparing and ranking the alternatives with respect to the criteria of choice. Evaluation criteria for multipurpose reservoir system operating rules were identified and defined, and the multicriterion decision analysis techniques were applied to evaluate the fore developed operating rules of the existing Chungju multipurpose project according to the identified nine multiple criteria. The application result shows that the methodology is very efficient to select the best operation alternative among a finite number of operating rules with many evaluation criteria for a large scale reservoir system operation.

  • PDF