• The Bulletin of The Korean Astronomical Society
• /
• v.36 no.1
• /
• pp.79.1-79.1
• /
• 2011

비형식교육의 장인 과학관은 전시물과 그 전시물을 설명한 판넬 등을 통하여 교육적 기능을 담당한다. 비형식 교육의 중요성 때문에, 과학관 전시는 전시물과 내용이 관람자와 교감하고 상호작용해야 할 뿐만 아니라 관람자에게 설득적으로 구성될 필요가 있으며, 하나의 공간에서 학습과 휴식이 어우러지면서 즐거움을 제공할 수 있어야한다. 이러한 과학관 전시의 요구사항을 충족시키기 위하여 가장 우선적으로 도입할 수 있는 방법이 스토리텔링이다. 스토리텔링은 '이야기하다'로서 관람객들에게 흥미 유발의 기능을 가지며, 그 효과가 단순 나열식보다 훨씬 크다. 하지만 스토리텔링기법에도 지식과 정보량에 있어서는 단점이 있다. 이것을 보완하기 위한 한 방법으로 전시물 설명에 논증 기법의 도입이 대두되고 있다. 즉, 거시적인 관점에서는 스토리텔링을 이용한 하나의 스토리를 도입하는 한편, 미시적인 관점에서는 논증의 구조를 따른 설명문을 이용한다면, 관람객들에게 흥미와 함께 지식과 정보를 모두 줄 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 논증과 스토리텔링의 조화된 결합을 통해 과학관의 전시를 재배열하는 작업을 수행하였다. 거시적인 관점과 미시적인 관점에서의 점검기준으로 영국의 자연사 박물관과 국립과천과학관 자연사관 우주와 지구관의 전시물의 구조를 분석 하였다. 그 결과 영국의 자연사 박물관과는 달리 국립과천과학관의 전시물은 스토리 내용, 설명문의 내용, 체험위주의 전시물이 부족하였다. 따라서 현 과천과학관의 전시물에 대해 스토리텔링과 Booth 등(2008)과 Lawson(2003)의 논증과의 조화를 도입하는 것이 바람직하다.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.116
• /
• pp.133-154
• /
• 2010

Eliminativist about mentality want to throw out propositional attitude. In this respect, according to R. G. Swinburne, Lynne R. Baker, this theory seems to be self refuting. But it is not so clear enough in what sense eliminativism is self refuting. There are several construals of self-refutation argument against eliminativism. Among them, Patricia Churchland's simple version is defended here. For doing this, we need to analyze William Ramsey's reconstruction of self- refutation argument and J. L. Mackie's famous concept of self-refutation. As a result of this analysis, we can understand most self-refutation arguments against eliminativism don't succeed to defeat eliminativism with this argument.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2013.05a
• /
• pp.83-84
• /
• 2013

이 연구는 코엔 형제 영화의 열린 결말이 작품의 주제와 어떻게 연관되는지, 그리고 그러한 열린 방식으로 내러티브를 종결시킬 수 있게 하는 서사 논리가 무엇인지 논의한다. <바톤 핑크>(1991), <노인을 위한 나라는 없다>(2007), <시리어스 맨>(2009) 등 코엔 형제의 열린 결말 영화들은 모두 '불확실성'에 관한 영화이다. 이 불확실성은 부조리하고 아이러니컬한 세상의 불가해성과 그것에 대한 캐릭터의 이해 불능으로 나타난다. 코엔 형제의 영화들은 바로 이러한 세계의 불가해성에 대한 논증의 내러티브이며, 이들의 열린 결말은 플롯과 논증의 중층 구조에서 스토리 문제의 해결이 아니라 논증의 완결을 추구한 결과이다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2002.10d
• /
• pp.382-384
• /
• 2002

본 논문에서는 논리학에서 전통적으로 다루어 온 패턴인 삼단논증의 결론을 DNA 컴퓨팅을 이용해 증명해 내는 방법을 제시한다. 연역 장치로 진리나무 방법의 하나(resolution refutation)를 사용하기 위해서, 삼단논증의 전제들과 결론의 부정을 예화시킨 후 CNF 형태로 바꾸어 준다. 그리고 이것을 이중 가닥의 DNA 분자로 디자인한 후, 해소 반응을 통해 모순, 즉 닐(nil)을 발견하게 되면, 증명은 완료된다.

• Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology
• /
• v.7 no.2 s.17
• /
• pp.57-64
• /
• 2004

A Requirement statement validation process is suggested which was established and applied to the rolling stock development project of the Korean Railway Research Institute. The validation process includes team organization, selection of validation criteria, development of validation template, education of team members, validation, construction of database and management of requirement change. Many defects in the specification of requirement were found to be associated with the problem of non-uniqueness, describing solution instead of problem, ambiguity and redundancy. This paper described detailed activities at each step of the validation process and lessons learned from these activities.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2023.10a
• /
• pp.474-478
• /
• 2023

논증 마이닝이란 비정형의 텍스트 데이터에서 논증 구조와 그 요소들을 식별, 분석, 추출하는 자연어 처리의 한 분야다. 논증 마이닝의 하위 작업인 주장-증거 쌍 추출은 주어진 문서에서 자동으로 주장과 증거 쌍을 추출하는 작업이다. 본 논문에서는 효과적인 주장-증거 쌍 추출을 위해, 문서 단위의 문맥 정보를 이용하고 주장과 증거 간의 종속성을 반영하기 위한 계층적 LAN 방법을 제안한다. 실험을 통해 서로의 정보를 활용하는 종속적인 구조가 독립적인 구조보다 우수함을 입증하였으며, 최종 제안 모델은 Macro F1을 기준으로 13.5%의 성능 향상을 보였다.

• Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society
• /
• v.14 no.11
• /
• pp.5559-5569
• /
• 2013

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the reflection rubric on frequency and content of critical thinking in CSCA. The researcher carried out research during 4 weeks, on 60 students taking the course of 'educational methods and educational technology' in K collage. As the result of this study, The reflection rubric frequency could not be significant difference in critical thinking, but could be significant difference in critical thinking content and collaboration argumentation. The reflection rubric could prevent learner form giving one side reasoning, considered both side opinion and grounds. Also the reflection rubric could trigger learner to construct collaborative knowledge building more strongly. This study showed that the reflection rubric have significant impacts on the argumentation collaboration learning in CSCA.

• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.42 no.1
• /
• pp.12-26
• /
• 2018

This study examined the effects of SSI argumentation program on the preservice biology teachers' decision-making types and communication ability. The SSI argumentation program was developed based on 'Social Decision-Making & Problem-Solving strategy' and Toulmin's argumentation pattern. The preservice teachers had opportunities of SSI argumentation through small group discussions. They were asked to identify the issues regarding SSI, think of solutions, and make a decision along with claims, warrants, data, and rebuttals. The preservice biology teachers experienced four SSI topics of abortion, euthanasia, gene manipulation, artificial intelligence. The results indicated that the preservice biology teachers significantly improved the communication ability after the intervention, but they did not change their types of decision-making. In addition, after the intervention, the Pearson correlation results indicated that 'the logical type' of decision-making significantly relates to the communication ability(p<.01). The preservice biology teachers mentioned that they improved their ability of considering warrants, data, background information, context, and rebuttals. Further, the preserivce biology teachers mentioned that they became take an interest in socioscientific issues and improved their ability of accepting criticism from others as well as caring about others when they argue each other. This study implicated that the SSI argumentation program has effects on improving personality education in school science.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.13 no.3
• /
• pp.238-252
• /
• 2020

In this study, we analyzed the types of rebuttals in the argument structure of learning contents in lesson plans constructed by Earth science preservice teachers, and then we explored examples of how they responded to resolving the rebuttal. As a result of analyzing preservice teachers' assignments, discussions, and interviews collected during a total of 20 hours of classes and group discussions for 5 weeks, all 5 types of rebuttals suggested by Verheij (2005) were identified. Through the data analysis, a total of 18 rebuttal cases derived, and these cases were classified into 3 types according to how preservice teachers solve the rebuttals in class. The conclusions and implications based on the results are as follows: First, this study provided empirical data that the thinking process of validating core elements of argumentation and processes of argumentation is actively taking place in preservice teachers' lesson planning using the argument structure, and expanded the scope of application of argumentation in science education research. Second, the argument structure of learning contents should be used to help teachers to come up with strategies to induce students' curiosity and devotion to learn science contents. Third, preservice teachers should have the opportunity to think about the nature of science, including the variability and uncertainty of scientific knowledge when they discover rebuttals and develop solutions to them. Based on these conclusions, implications and suggestions for science education and further research were suggested.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.259-271
• /
• 2018

This study examined the effect of the SSI argumentation program based on social and emotional learning(SEL). The program consisted of 3 stages: (1) express their own feelings about SSI, identify the issues of SSI, and define a goal; (2) think of many possible solutions and envision results through argumentation; (3) select the best solution and make a decision based on warrants, data, and rebuttals. In each stage, the social-emotional strategies of self-awareness, self-management, social-awareness, relationship-management, and responsible decision making were used. Seventeen preservice biology teachers participated in this study during one semester dealing with four socioscientific issues. The results indicated that the preservice teachers, as time went on, became accustomed to expressing identifiable rebuttals, dispute talk, and asking questions. At the first SSI argumentation, argumentation mainly consisted of cumulative talk with no rebuttals, representing level 2 argumentation. Level 3 argumentation represented rebuttals that were implicit and weak, with cumulative talk. In level 2 and 3 argumentation, the preservice teachers represented understanding of others and compassion for self and others. Level 4 argumentation had rebuttals that were explicit, asking critical questions of the opposite sides. In addition, level 5 argumentation represented more than two controversial points with several instances of dispute talk. In levels 4 and 5, the preservice teachers became actively engaged in communication, inquiry self with others, managing vulnerability and negotiation.