1 |
Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
|
2 |
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908.
DOI
|
3 |
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL) (2012). 2013 CASEL guide: Effective social and emotional learning programs-Preschool and elementary school edition. Chicago: Author.
|
4 |
Elias, M. J., & Tobias, S. E. (1990). Problem Solving/Decision Making for Social and Academic Success. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
|
5 |
Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Frey, K. S.,Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M., et al. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
|
6 |
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
DOI
|
7 |
Evagorou, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Osborne, J. (2012). 'Should we kill the grey squirrels?' A study exploring students' justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401-428.
DOI
|
8 |
Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students' collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237.
DOI
|
9 |
Shin, H. S., & Kim, H. J. (2011). The Gifted Students' View on Argumentation and the Aspects of the Argumentation in Problem-Solving Type Experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(4), 567-586.
|
10 |
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367.
DOI
|
11 |
Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). Building School Success through Social and Emotional Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
|
12 |
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
DOI
|
13 |
Kim, J., Ko, Y., Lee, H. (2016). Effects of socioscientific issues instruction on elementary school students’ character and values as a global citizens. The Journal of Elementary Education, 29(3), 1-25.
|
14 |
Gueldner, B., & Merrell, K. (2011). Evaluation of a social-emotional learning program in conjunction with the exploratory application of performance feedback incorporating motivational interviewing techniques. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 21(1), 1-27.
DOI
|
15 |
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432.
DOI
|
16 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
17 |
Kim, Y., Lee., E., & Chung, Y. (2017). Analysis of high school student’s value judgement and patterns of change in decision-making on socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 21(5), 498-511.
|
18 |
Merrell, K. W., & Gimpel, G. (2014). Social skills of children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, treatment. Psychology Press.
|
19 |
Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2017). Comparison of the effects of socioscientific issues instruction on promoting college students’ character and values: Based on idiocentrism and allocentrism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 395-405.
DOI
|
20 |
Kolsto, S. D., & Ratcliffe, M. (2008). Social aspects of argumentation. In Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (Science & Technology Education Library 35, pp. 114-133). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
|
21 |
Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2008). Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education. Science Education, 92, 473-498.
DOI
|
22 |
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817.
DOI
|
23 |
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
DOI
|
24 |
Bottcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2013). Effects of direct and indirect instruction on fostering decision-making competence in socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 479-506.
DOI
|
25 |
Cavagnetto, A., Hand, B. M., & Norton‐Meier, L. (2010). The nature of elementary student science discourse in the context of the science writing heuristic approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(4), 427-449.
DOI
|
26 |
Park. H. (2017). Exploring the possibility of applying social and emotional learning to science subjects: Analysis of social emotional learning contents in science textbooks. Journal of Science Education, 41(3), 297-317.
DOI
|
27 |
MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology)(2015). 2015 Revised Science Curriculum. Seoul, Republic of Korea: Ministry of education, Science and Technology.
|
28 |
Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
DOI
|
29 |
Oliveira, A. W., Akerson, V. L., & Oldfield, M. (2012). Environmental argumentation as sociocultural activity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 869-897.
DOI
|
30 |
Philibert, C. T. (2016). Every SEL in middle school: Integrating social- emotional learning and mindfulness into your classroom. New York and London:Routledge.
|
31 |
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
DOI
|
32 |
Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio‐scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182.
DOI
|
33 |
Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488-526.
DOI
|
34 |
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
DOI
|
35 |
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55.
DOI
|