• Journal of Science Education
• /
• v.38 no.2
• /
• pp.286-301
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of argumentation for elementary students' scientific writing. Using nine subjects that were comprised of scientific situations and social scientific situations, this study was applied to four 5th grade students utilizing argumentation and scientific writing. The students' scientific writing and argumentation were collected and analyzed based on three domains of scientific writing: scientific thinking, logic, and creativity. The results from this study are as follows. First, the various contents of argumentation positively affected all of the scientific writing domains in post-argumentation scientific writing. Second, the contents of argumentation appeared in the post-argumentation scientific writing as three different forms: 1) Each individual's scientific concepts, claims, and ideas, which were newly mentioned in the process of argumentation, were expressed, 2) Their classmates' claims, grounds and ideas, which were discussed in the process of argumentation, were expressed through internalization, and 3) Expanded ideas, new claims and inferences based on the argumentation were expressed.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.60 no.4
• /
• pp.276-285
• /
• 2016

This study aimed to examine preservice science teachers' modeling ability and how it has changed in argument-based chemistry laboratory investigations. The participants for this study were twenty-one freshman students from teachers’ college and they carried out six topics of argument-based chemistry laboratory investigation. Students’ written modeling samples were collected and analyzed to investigate preservice science teacher's modeling ability and changes in it. The results of this study showed that preservice science teacher's modeling ability has improved and progressed through argument-based chemistry laboratory investigations.

• Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education
• /
• v.31 no.4
• /
• pp.567-586
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to investigate the gifted students' view on argumentation and the aspects of the argumentation in problem-solving type experiment. As a result, very lively argumentation was identified but quality enhancement on argumentation wasn't found over time. Students made frequent use of dialogic argumentation component, and especially, request & response component was highly used. Though usage frequency is low, the component of ground & question on ground was shown in 3rd class, and simple agreement gradually reduced, and reinforcing elaboration & metacognitive question has slightly increased. Also, students' argumentation were closely related to teachers' teaching approaches as some teacher-led steps doesn't appear in students' argumentation. By comparison in steps, 'problem solving activity & result analysis' step included 2 times more argument components than the previous step. We also found that method grouping teams does not almost affect the argumentation of gifted students. By survey results, most students recognized that they experienced free argumentation and this program activate argumentation and 'strange things' or 'difficulty' of program topics are obstacles in vitalization of argumentation. 'Surface growth experiments' was the most lively argumentation topic. The argumentation was lively made in the step of 'finding solution. 'Teachers' scaffolding accelerate the argumentation and help resolve difficulties in argumentation. Thus, students have positive recognition for the argumentation process in the experiments and recognize that argumentation process is needed.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.51 no.3
• /
• pp.455-472
• /
• 2016

This paper aims to theoretically discuss the re-conceptualization of the school geography curriculum towards global citizenship education. To achieve this goal, post-structural global citizenship is introduced as an alternative notion of global citizenship by revealing some limits of the existing postcolonial global citizenship studies for global justice. Based upon Carr's(1996) idea of curriculum typology, three major curriculum perspectives are theoretically evaluated to see if they implicitly or explicitly undermine the citizenship of global 'others' ethically and politically. Post-structuralist ideas are then suggested as an alternative approach. With reference to this standpoint, this paper concludes by providing practical implications for a more just school geography curriculum towards global citizenship.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.12
• /
• pp.527-537
• /
• 2001

중등교사 임용고사는 현실적으로 수요를 초과하는 다수의 교사 자격증 소지자 가운데에서 우수한 교사를 선발하여 공립 중등학교에 임용하기 위한 공개 경쟁 시험제도이지만, 그 영향력은 중등교육의 발전과 사범대학의 교육과정에서 결정적일 뿐 아니라, 사회적으로도 지대하다. 여기서는 “좋은 수학교사”의 양성과 선발이라는 문제를 중심으로 임용고사가 수학교육의 발전에 순기능적 원동력이 될 수 있도록 개선을 위한 몇 가지 드러난 문제점들에 대하여 논의하고, 필연적으로 임용고사의 영향력 아래 놓이게 되는 수학교육과의 교육과정과의 관계에서 상호 보완적 역할을 할 수 있는 방안과 수학교육과의 교육과정에 대하여 개략적으로 논의하였다.

• The Journal of the Korean dental association
• /
• v.41 no.5 s.408
• /
• pp.327-345
• /
• 2003

치협은 치과의사전문의제도 시행을 앞두고 인턴 및 레지던트들이 수련병원에서 최소 필요충분하게 교육받아야 하는 과정을 도출해냈다. 이를 위해 치협은 치의전문의제를 실시하는 10개 분과학회의 대표를 중심으로 치과의사 전공의 수련병원(기관) 수련교육 표준화 작업 연구위원회를 구성하고 몇 차례의 논의 끝에 '치과의사 전공의 연차별 수련 교과과정'보고서를 완성했다. 보고서는 10개 분과학회별로 각 학회에서 논의를 거친 내용으로서 향후 치의전문의제를 실시하는데 있어서 전공의들의 연차별 수련 교과과정을 제시해 준다. 회원들의 이해를 돕기 위해 보고서의 전문을 게재한다.

• Communications of Mathematical Education
• /
• v.11
• /
• pp.291-296
• /
• 2001

근래에 7차 교육과정에 관한 비판적 논의가 활발하다. 이러한 논의는 향후의 교육과정 개발에 많은 시사점을 제공하게 될 것이다. 본 논문에서는 러시아, 미국, 싱가포르, 영국의 사례를 통하여 우리의 수학과 교육과정 내용의 일부를 분석적으로 고찰한다.

• Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.299-302
• /
• 1996

학부제와 관련된 논의가 시작된 이후로 통계학과에 소속된 교수 및 학생들의 가장 큰 관심사는 통폐합 및 학부제 추진 이후의 통계학과의 위상이 어떻게 변할 것인지에 있다고 할 수 있다. 이와 관련하여 현행 학과 중심제도의 여러가지 문제점 및 학부제를 시행해야 하는 당위성 등이 이미 학부제의 도입을 추진하는 많은 사람들에 의해 강조되고 있으며 이번 심포지움에서도 이현청 소장께서는 학부제 도입의 과제에 대하여, 서정화 교수께서는 대학교육 평가와 관련하여 대학개혁의 일환으로서의 유사학과 통폐합 및 학부제의 도입에 대하여, 성내경 교수께서는 통폐합 논의의 현황 및 문제점들을 상세히 지적하여 주셔서 학부제 도입의 필요성 등에 대해 더이상 거론할 필요는 없다고 본다. 오히려 현재 학부제와 관련되어 통계학과의 통폐합이 거론되고 있는 대학들에게 가장 필요한 것이 있다면 학부제가 이미 일부분이라도 시행되고 있는 서울대학교, 경북대학교 등에서의 학부제의 방향 및 실시에 따른 문제점 등을 바탕으로 하여 향후 관련된 학교에서 통폐합 논의가 있을 경우 어떻게 현명하게 대처하는 것이 좋은지에 조금이라도 도움이 될 수 있는 내용이라고 생각한다. 이를 위하여 본 토론에서는 그동안 서울대학교 자연과학대학에서의 학부제를 도입하는 과정에서 있었던 여러가지 문제점 및 나름대로의 해결방안을 통해 타 대학에서의 학부제 논의 과정에 조금이라도 도움이 되었으면 하는 내용과 향후 통계학과가 나아가야할 방향에 대해 간략하게 언급하기로 한다.

• Journal of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.59 no.6
• /
• pp.520-532
• /
• 2015

The purposes of this study were to examine what kinds of educational activities were carried out during the practice teaching based on CoRe and to identify the role of CoRe and its influence on the development of expertise of student teachers. This study was performed as qualitative case study. The subjects of this study were one practice supervisor teacher and two student teachers. Data were collected through recording CoRe discussion process, student teachers' instructional scene, and semi-constructed interview, and analyzed by an inductive method. Student teachers noticed their own misconceptions, and clarified the concepts based on CoRe during the discussion with supervisor teacher. They also supplemented their lack of knowledge and made up new strategies through the process of sharing their ideas. During the discussion, the supervisor teacher conveyed his teaching experience based on his own orientations toward science teaching. In this course, CoRe plays roles as follows. Firstly, CoRe played a role as guiding supervisor teacher's coaching process. Secondly, CoRe helped for the supervisor teacher to recognize their own PCK. Thirdly, CoRe served as a tool of helping their communication. In turn CoRe proved to be a useful frame for teaching student teachers during practice teaching. Student teachers were provided with a useful framework for preparing lessons by developing CoRe for the topic they teach. Developing CoRe with supervisor teacher at the planning stage of lessons enhenced student-teachers' subject matter knowledge and their PCK including knowledge of science curricula and knowledge of student's understanding of science. Also student teachers understood the components of PCK and experienced the positive understanding toward students, teaching activities, and themselves as a science teacher.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1996.11a
• /
• pp.101-115
• /
• 1996