Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.4.276

Analysis of Changes in Preservice Science Teachers’ Modeling Ability in Argument-based General Chemistry Laboratory Investigations  

Kang, Yeo Eun (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Nam, Jeonghee (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Cho, Hey Sook (Department of Chemistry Education, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Chemical Society / v.60, no.4, 2016 , pp. 276-285 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aimed to examine preservice science teachers' modeling ability and how it has changed in argument-based chemistry laboratory investigations. The participants for this study were twenty-one freshman students from teachers’ college and they carried out six topics of argument-based chemistry laboratory investigation. Students’ written modeling samples were collected and analyzed to investigate preservice science teacher's modeling ability and changes in it. The results of this study showed that preservice science teacher's modeling ability has improved and progressed through argument-based chemistry laboratory investigations.
Keywords
Argument-based general chemistry laboratory investigation; Model; Modeling;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, S. Korean Language Education Research 1994, 4, 67.
2 Kim, J. Korean pragmatics; Hyungseul Publication: Seoul, 1982.
3 Gilbert, S. W.; Ireton, S. W. In Understanding models in earth and space science; NSTA Press: Arlington, 2003.
4 Schwarz, C. V.; Reiser, B. J.; Davis, E. A.; Kenyon, L.; Acher, A.; Fortus, D.; Shwartz, Y.; Hug, B.; Krajcik, J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2009, 46, 632.   DOI
5 Gilbert, J. K.; Boulter, C. J.; Rutherford, M. International Journal of Science Education 1998, 20, 83.   DOI
6 Gobert, J. D.; Buckley, B. C. International Journal of Science Education 2000, 22, 891.   DOI
7 Chamizo, J. A. Science & Education 2013, 22, 1613.   DOI
8 Greca, I. M.; Moreira, M. A. Science Education 2002, 85, 106.
9 Buckley, B. C. International Journal of Science Education 2000, 22, 895.   DOI
10 Johnson-Laird, P. N. Mental Models; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1983.
11 Gilbert, J. K.; Boulter, C. J.; Rutherford, M. In Developing Models in Science Education; Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, 2000; p 193.
12 National Research Council [NRC]. National science education standards; National Academic Press: Washington, D.C., 2011.
13 Ha, J.; Lee, H.; Kang, S. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education 2009, 19, 187.
14 Khan, S. Science Education 2007, 91, 877.   DOI
15 Boulter, C. J.; Buckly B. C. In Developing Models in Science Education; Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, 2000; p 41.
16 Justi, R.; Gilbert, J. K. International Journal of Science Education 2002, 24, 369.   DOI
17 Passmore, C. M.; Svoboda, J. International Journal of Science Education 2012, 34, 1535.   DOI
18 Maia, P. F.; Justi, R. International Journal of Science Education 2009, 31, 603.   DOI
19 Saari, H.; Viiri, J. International Journal of Science Education 2003, 25, 1333.   DOI
20 Schwarz, C. V.; White, B. Y. Cognition and Instruction 2005, 23, 165.   DOI
21 Ministry of Education. 2009 Revised National Curriculum. MOE, Notice No. 2011-2361, 2012.
22 Mendonça, P. C.; Justi, R. International Journal of Science Education 2013, 35, 2407.   DOI
23 Lehrer, R.; Schauble, L. In Advances in Instructional Psychology; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, 2000; p 101.
24 Ministry of Education. 2015 Revised National Curriculum. MOE, Notice No. 2015-74, 2015.
25 American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Benchmarks for Science Literacy; Oxford University Press: New York, 1993.
26 National Research Council [NRC]. National Science Education Standards; National Academic Press: Washington, D.C., 2007.
27 Osborne, J.; Dillon, J. Science Education in Europe; The Nuffield Foundation: London, 2008.
28 Lederman, N. G. In Hand Book of Research on Science Education; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: New Jersey, 2007; p 831.
29 Zhang, B.; Liu, X.; Krajcik, J. S. Science Education 2006, 90, 579.   DOI
30 Clement, J. International Journal of Science Education 2000, 22, 1041.   DOI
31 Penner, D. E. Review of Research in Education 2001, 25, 1.
32 Spitulnik, M. W.; Krajcik, J.; Soloway, E. In Modeling and Simulation in Science and Mathematics Education, Wallace, F., Nancy R., Eds.; Springer: New York, 1999; p 70.
33 Cho, H.; Nam, J.; Lee, D. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 2014, 34, 479.   DOI
34 National Research Council [NRC]. National Science Education Standards; National Academic Press: Washington, D.C., 2000.
35 Cho, H.; Nam, J. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 2014, 34, 583.   DOI
36 Oh, P.; Oh, S. International Journal of Science Education 2011, 33, 1109.   DOI
37 Lee, D.; Nam, J.; Cho, H. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 2015, 35, 313.   DOI
38 Heo, E. The Impact of General Chemistry Laboratory using Reading frame-based Science Writing Heuristic Approach on College Students' Reflective Thinking. Ph.D. Thesis, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea, 2011.
39 Keys, C. W.; Hand, B.; Prian, V.; Collins, S. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1999, 36, 1065.   DOI
40 Bamberger, Y. M.; Davis, E. A. International Journal of Science Education 2013, 35, 213.   DOI