• 교육시설 논문지
• /
• 제21권2호
• /
• pp.41-51
• /
• 2014

Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) has been implemented for the realization of sustainable development and resource-saving and eco-friendly buildings from 2002. Studies about the green buildings are made actively and is being developed through constant revision. However, study results of green building have not been fully reflected in the standard. Therefore, this study analyzes the previous studies about G-SEED for school facilities and check the degree of to reflect the problems and improvements suggested in previous studies. This study will be a reference of future revision Substantial problems and requirements are not reflected in revision standard. Proposed improvement requirements are classed as to improve the items(establish specific standards, supplementation), strengthen standards(designate the prerequisite items), propose a new evaluation method, add new items. delete exist items and adjust the score. Therefore, future revision of G-SEED for school facilities should reflect the results of previous studies.

• 교육녹색환경연구
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.16-27
• /
• 2019

본 연구는 장애물 없는 생활환경(BF)인증제도 시행에 따른 학교시설의 BF인증 적용사항에 대한 기본연구로 건축물 BF인증 평가지표를 바탕으로 초등학교 BF 예비인증 자체평가서 분석을 통해 학교시설에 적합한 장애물 없는 생활환경(BF)인증 평가지표의 개선방향을 모색하고자 하였다. 경상권 내 30개교 초등학교를 선정하여 매개시설, 내부시설, 위생시설, 안내시설, 기타시설의 현황과 평가지표를 분석한 결과 학교시설에 반영되는 항목은 배점 기준의 변별력이 다소 미흡하여 배점 기준 등의 개선이 필요한 것을 알 수 있었다. 누구나 이용하기 편리한 학교시설을 위해 중 하위 배점을 획득한 항목에 대해 기준 개선 및 배점 조정으로 질적 향상을 이끌어내야 한다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.23-28
• /
• 2013

Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design(G-SEED) has been used for environmental friendly building certification since 2002. The certification criteria initialed with multi-residential building and now it expands to 10 criteria for new and existing building types. The purpose of this study is to understand current recognition of G-SEED from the survey of multi-complex residences in newtown. From the general question, 75.2% of responders answered the period of living term between 1~3 years, 58.6% lived in $102.48{\sim}132.23m^2$ residential area and 65.2% owned their residences. The 43.2% of respondents recognized that their residences gained G-SEED certification by G-SEED emblem(31.6%). This is the significant meaning to understand public recognition of G-SEED and how to approach the strategy for raising the G-SEED recognition. The responders expected positive influence for economical value from G-SEED and also 75.3% of responders agreed with that G-SEED would be a decision make to buy and rent their residences. Second, residents responded that the consideration issue for green building is energy & prevention of environmental pollution(27.7%) which carries equal concern in G-SEED criteria category. The result of this survey verifies that the current level recognition of G-SEED of the responder's perspectives still is not well-known but it confirmed they have a positive expectation. Therefore, from this result, G-SEED needs to draw road map with detail plans for developing G-SEED with public participation.

• 대한전기학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한전기학회 2011년도 제42회 하계학술대회
• /
• pp.2097-2098
• /
• 2011

한국수자원공사 전북지역본부는 2009년 1월 전북 전주시 여의동에 본부신축공사를 착공하였다. 같은 해 12월 정부는 저탄소 녹색성장을 위해 신축 공공청사 건축물에너지효율 1등급 취득 의무화 제도를 시행하여 2010년 1월부터 신축되는 모든 공공청사는 건물에너지효율 1등급 취득이 의무화 되었다. 전북지역본부와 같이 진행중인 건축물에 대해서는 강제성은 없고 에너지효율 향상을 위한 제반 조치 마련토록 권고하였다. 그러나 전북지역본부는 정부정책과 공사 이미지 제고를 위해 진행중인 공사에 대해 건축물 에너지효율인증등급 향상을 위한 개선 방안을 수립하고 설계변경을 통해 결국 1등급 인증을 획득하였다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.91-99
• /
• 2014

Environmental issues have become gradually important around the globe, which has increased society needs for the environment-friendly construction. In an effort to realize the environmental protection and energy efficiency, the British BREEAM has been developed, which is followed by the USA LEED, Japanese CASBEE and other national certification systems based on their own conditions. In this end, the Republic of Korea has implemented its own certification system named GBCS(Green Building Certification System) in 2002, and now actively promoted the G-SEED(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design) after GBCS modifications and amendments. The purpose of this study is to identify possible problems to be encountered in the process of the G-SEED for office facilities and to provide relevant solutions. In this end, three office facilities have been selected, which had obtained the G-SEED. This study has analyzed reasons of change of assessment scores between the preliminary certification and the main certification phases, has identified problems through in-depth interviews with practicing professionals(design, construction, eco-friendly consulting firm) and then has reached a conclusion for improvements. This study will be possibly used as reference materials for improvements of the green building certification system, and further detailed studies on respective parts will be required for improvements.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2021년도 학술발표회
• /
• pp.158-158
• /
• 2021

도시에 불투수면적이 증가하고, 기후변화가 극심해져감에 따라 홍수 및 열섬현상과 같은 도시의 물 문제가 발생하고 있다. 이를 해결하기 위한 정책의 일환으로 우리나라의 녹색건축인증제도(Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design, G-SEED)에서는 물순환 관리를 평가하고 있다. 하지만, 현재 G-SEED의 평가방법을 살펴보면 빗물관리시설의 설치 정도로 평가하고 있고, 강우 특성 또한 고려되고 있지 않다. 그러므로 본 연구에서는 G-SEED의 빗물관리 및 이용 항목에 대해 수문 모델을 통해 효과를 정량화함으로써 성능에 따라 평가할 수 있는 방법을 제안하였다. 빗물관리 항목에서는 유출저감률을, 빗물이용 항목에서는 빗물이용률을 평가지표로 선정하였고, 각 평가인자를 산출하기 위하여 개념모델을 적용하였다. 빗물이용시설의 경우 초기우수배제장치 용량과 필터 효율에 따른 빗물유입량의 변화와 급수인원에 따른 수요량 변화를 고려한 수문모델을 개발하였고, 수요량과 빗물저장조 용량에 따른 유출저감률과 빗물이용률을 알아보기 위해 MATLAB을 이용하여 모의해보았다. 또한, 옥상녹화의 경우에는 강우, 저류, 증발산, 유출을 고려한 수문흐름모델을 적용하였고, 토층의 두께와 배수(저장) 층의 용량에 따라 모의하여 평가기준을 선정하였다. 제안된 수문모델의 검증을 위하여 서울대학교 기숙사와 35동 옥상녹화의 실측데이터를 비교하였고, 적용성 평가를 위해 RMSE(Root Mean Square Error)와 NSE(Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency)를 이용하였다. 본 연구에서 제안된 방법을 통해 빗물관리시설의 수문학적 성능에 따른 평가가 가능해질 것이며 설계자와 건축가들로 하여금 실질적인 효과를 내는 시설을 설치하게끔 유도할 수 있을 것이다.

• 한국태양에너지학회 논문집
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.75-85
• /
• 2016

This research aims to predict and analyze green building certification market of Korean Peninsula after unification. First, it analyzes prospected unification time period, then it forecasts number of new residential and non-residential buildings to be constructed based on estimated number of residences in short at the time in North Korea. There exists a good chance that North Korea's new building market forms similar to that of South Korea, as unification would thoroughly proceed which would result levels of economic culture social politics in quasi-equal state. Thus, assuming the ratio of residential and non-residential building against population is similar in both Korea's, the number against North Korea's house supplied population can be estimated. Based on the expected numbers in North Korea, number of proceeded Building Energy Conservation Plan, Building Energy Rating Certification, and Green Standard for Energy and Environmental Design (G-SEED) are predicted. The research shows certification market related to green building in united Korean Peninsula to be \660 billion over 10 years. Not only certifications to newly built buildings but also including existing buildings, this market is to grow to a considerable extent. As this would largely influence eco-constructive materials, energy plant/equipment, and other relevant markets as well, it would require to make thorough preparations. In sum, to stabilize green building market even before the unification, the research proposes the necessities of appropriate systems in consideration of North Korea, through in-depth discussions and establishment of technology and policy directions in green building sector, such as building energy management and emission reduction technology.

• 토지주택연구
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.171-180
• /
• 2017

In 1990s, as the extreme weather events according to the global warming climate change are occurred frequently all around the world and the scale of the damage increases, the developed countries are promoting various policies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions setting the goal of greenhouse gas reduction with the level of State and local government. Especially for the greenhouse gas reduction of buildings and the inducement of eco-friendly design, the green certification system is strengthened with the assessment of energy and greenhouse management, and recently, according to the policy change of climate and energy, the certification system expanded from the buildings to the level of city and district is piloted. So this research is to understand the main contents and the assessment system of domestic green building certification system implemented in March 2013 in response to the policy change of climate and energy and to suggest the basic data for the improvement of present domestic greenhouse certification standard through the analysis of actual certification and the main case analysis of international green certification system. Recently in developed countries, in 1990s, for the reduction of building's greenhouse gas emission and the inducement of eco-friendly design, from the building of LEED, BREEAM, DGNB to the level of city and district such as LEED Neighborhood Development, BREEAM Communities, DGNB Stadtquartiere, the system is expanded and piloted. On the contrary, as for the domestic standard of green building certification system, the distribution ratio according to the assessment items in each category consists of the assessment system based on the buildings, and just the simple adjustment of some items and the improvement of weighted value are performed. Actually, as a result of selecting the 30 districts of apartment housing with the most certification performance by use among the 49 buildings certified by Institute of Land & Housing from December 2014 to July 2016 and analyzing the assessment score, the certification level is determined by the sectors of high distribution like indoor environment and energy not by the ineffective sector of external environment with low distribution so this system has a limitation to perform the practical means for the policy change of climate and energy. Thus for the national green building certification standards, the assessment system in the sector of external environment is to complemented and furthermore, reflecting domestic reality, through the introduction of certification system and the assessment system with the level of city and district, this system should be improved to meet the international certification standard.

• 교육녹색환경연구
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.23-31
• /
• 2010

Recently, there are effects such as commercial investment and introducing new technology by introducing a BTL project. As a result, School's conditions are getting better and Numbers of certified schools are increasing, because the Green Building Certification Criteria was created in 2002 and expanded to schools in March, 2005. But the certificated schools just get the minimum score for certificate level 'good' about 65 points and there is no certificated school level 'very good'. The users of school stay in long time in the facility cause of the unique function of school. It means Indoor Environment Quality Criterion of the school is very important than any other criteria. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the indoor environment factor for the plan of the certificated school by green building rating systems. And this study also wants make the basement of a substantial technical application and development of the criteria in the plan for sustainable green school.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제13권6호
• /
• pp.67-75
• /
• 2013

The present duration of 5 years in the Korea Green Building Certification(G-SEED) should be re-set taking into account with the needs for renewal of re-certification criteria. This study methods is to analyze the differences between the characteristics of the certification system of green building of domestic and foreign and to seek the improvement to derive the problem of detailed evaluation items of the examination. The purpose of this study is to identify some problems of re-certification criteria in the G-SEED System and to propose the renewal of certification system. Analysis of the rating criteria with a few re-certified examples of office buildings have been made. Some measures to improve the re-certification have been suggested as follows; (1) it is strongly suggested to establish re-certification rating systems that is not yet made, (2) the new criteria of re-certification bring into focus on whether buildings maintain the environmental performances of the initial status certified, and (3) thus the effective duration of re-certification needs to re-set flexibly in a way to confirm to the initial environmental performances and maintenance conditions certified.