• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.7 no.2
• /
• pp.149-154
• /
• 2002

This study is examined the difference between binocular spherical diopter and astigmatism diopter, spherical diopter, astigmatism diopter, and axis of astigmatism by sex and age with reference to the prescription of refraction for a total of 257 persons, 134 persons (male:78, female: 56)of teen-age and 123 persons of twenty-age who visit optical shop. Spherical correction diopter is mainly distributed to 280 eyes between -0.25D and -4.00D. And in astigmatism correction, for right astigmatism, 48 eyes(49.48%) are prescribed astigmatism diopter for a range of C-0.25~C-0.50D, 29 eyes(29.89%) has C-0.75~C-1.00D, 65 eyes(67.01%) has with the rule astigmatism. For left astigmatism, 43 eyes(42.57%) are prescribed astigmatism diopter of C-0.25~C-0.50D and 37 eyes(36.63%) has C-0.75C~1.00D, 73 eyes(72.27%) are shown with the rule astigmatism. And also each 108 persons(47.16%) and 28 persons(25.00%) are shown no difference between binocular spherical correction diopter and binocular astigmatism correction diopter, 94 eyes(39.49%) of teen-age and 104 eyes(42.27%) of twenty-age, male 119 eyes(41.90%) and female 79 eyes(34.34%) need correcting astigmatism. In pupillary distance, 165 persons mostly have 59~64mm.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.11 no.3
• /
• pp.275-280
• /
• 2006

For this study, we analysed the difference of values between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in primary school children. We classified the elementary school one, two, three grade (8~10age) 79children(158eyes) who did not have strabismus or amblyopia. They were examined by using the Autorefractor in domestic market before and after cycloplegic. Discrepancies beyond 0.50D in spherical and cylindrical power and 20 degree in cylindrical axis were regarded as significant. The percentages of discrepancy were greater in spherical power between noncydoplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction(p<0.05). The percentages of discrepancy were not greater in cylindrical power between noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction. The percentages of discrepancy were greater in cylindrical axis between noncydoplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction(p<0.05). In conclusion, for the primary school children who did not wear glasses, the prediction table of this study will be helpful to reduce the test error in visual acuity and refractive error tests.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.439-446
• /
• 2004

Many studies have reported that retinal defocus cause and increase refractive error specially myopia. Uncorrected astigmatism may be one factor of retinal defocus factors. To understand the relationship between myopia and astigmatism 62 college students were participated in this study. Spherical refractive error and astigmatism were measured using N-vision 5001 autorefractor (Shinnippon). Co-relations between spherical refractive error and astigmatism were high both in the with-the-rule astigmatism group(r=0.53; ANOVA F=32.40, N=87, P<0.05) and oblique astigmatism group (r=0.53ANOVA F=5.14, N=15, P<0.001). However it was very low (r=0.09; ANOVA F=0.18, N=22, P<0.001)in the against-the-rule stigmatism group. In the total group co-relation was also high (r=0.56: ANOVA F=77.80, N=173, P<0.001). Uncorrected astigmatism may cause and increase spherical refractive error.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.63-69
• /
• 2006

Clinical evaluation by Astigmatic Components of autorefractors was performed to examine validity and accuracy compared with subjective refraction. The mean cylindrical powers of Astigmatic Components of Subjective Refraction, Closed-view and Open-view were found to be $-0.689{\pm}0.516D$, $-0.691{\pm}0.530D$, $-0.470{\pm}0.507D$, respectively. The Difference of cylindrical Components between Subjective Refraction and Closed, Open-view were found to be $0.002{\pm}0.191D$, $0.015{\pm}0.137D$, respectively. Approximately 85% of Closed-view and Open-view autorefractor measurements were within ${\pm}20^{\circ}$ range of the difference of cylindrical axis with subjective refraction. The mean $J_0$ Components of Astigmatic Components of subjective refraction, Closed-view and Open-view were found to be $-0.155{\pm}0.332D$, $-0.004{\pm}0.178D$, $-0.001{\pm}0.156D$, respectively. The mean $J_{45}$ Components of Astigmatic Components, Closed-view and Open-view were found to be $-0.023{\pm}0.227D$, $-0.026{\pm}0.172D$, $-0.014{\pm}0.182D$, respectively. Both of the Closed-view and Open-view refractor showed available accuracy in measuring astigmatic components.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.9 no.2
• /
• pp.431-437
• /
• 2004

This research reviewed the objects of 384 persons (male:86, female:298) from 6 to 50 years old visited the S. Optical shop at Mokpo over two times from Mar. 2002 to Feb. 2004. We obtained the following results by analyzing the visual acuity prescription to keeping at S. Optical shop. 1. The abnormal refraction eyes were 191 persons(49.74%) for simple myopia, 2 persons(0.52%) for myopic simple astigmatism, 180 persons(46.88%) for myopic compound astigmatism, and 1 person(0.26%) for simple hyperopia, 2 persons(0.52%) for hyperopic simple astigmatism, 8 persons(2.08%) for hyperopic compound astigmatism, respectively. 2. Classifying of correction power for 373 persons (male:84, female:289) myopia, so that showed 166 persons(male:36, female) between $$0.25D{\leq_-}2.00D$$, 194 persons(male:46, female:148) between $$2.25D{\leq_-}6.00D$$, 13 persons(male:2, female:11) for over 6.250 respectively. 3. According to the kinds of 192 persons astigmatism subjects(male:53, female:148), direct astigmatism was 145 persons(male:32, female:113), oblique astigmatism 33 persons (male:12, female:21), reverse astigmatism 14 persons(male:5, female:9). 4. The variation of spherical power for myopia showed 299 persons(male:71, female:228) between $$0.00D{\leq_-}0.50D$$, 64 persons(male:11, female:53) between $$0.51D{\leq_-}1.00D$$, 9 persons(male:2, female:7) between $$1.01D{\leq_-}1.50D$$, 1 person(male:0, female:1) between $$1.51D{\leq_-}2.00D$$ variation respectively. Hyperopia showed 8 persons(male:1, female:7) between $$0.00D{\leq_-}0.50D$$, 3 persons(male:1, female:2) between $$0.51D{\leq_-}1.00D$$ variation respectively. 5. The variation of astigmatism power showed 181 persons(male:48 female:113) between $$0.00D{\leq_-}0.25D$$, 25 persons(male:9, female:16) between $$0.26D{\leq_-}0.50D$$, 6 persons(male:0, female:6) between $$0.51D{\leq_-}0.75D$$ astigmatism variation respectively.

• Journal of Digital Convergence
• /
• v.13 no.12
• /
• pp.285-290
• /
• 2015

The purpose of this study is to compare the status of eyesight according to the change of astigmatism axis in myopic astigmatism and to minimize errors in making astigmatic glasses based on accurate optometry and prescription. The subjects were 93 males and females(186 eyes) who have myopic astigmatism without any ocular disease or systemic disease. We performed comparative analysis on the status of visual acuity according to the change of astigmatism axis to 5, 10 and 15 degree in corrected eyesight 1.0. The direct astigmatism was the most common astigmatism type among the 186 eyes. After all subjects were perfectly corrected into 1.0, the change of astigmatism axis affected eyesight; The results suggested that the more change was made in astigmatism axis, the worse their eyesight would become. The main astigmatism type was changed from direct astigmatism to inverse astigmatism as age increased. The change of the astigmatism axis resulted in failing of corrected eyesight. Therefore, the convergence of examination and correction for astigmatism strength and axis is necessary when conducting refraction inspection for astigmatism.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.85-89
• /
• 2003

A tear lens formed by between back surface of spherical rigid gas permeable(RGP) contact lens and front surface of cornea shows an excellent correction effect of astigmatism. To study an effects of tear lens power using spherical RGP lens and therefore to utilize them in clinical procedures, we analyze a change of the total astigmatism, the cornea astigmatism, and the residual astigmatism, we derive the following conclusion. 1. Almost all refractive astigmatism below than 2.00D present fully corrected. Thereby resulting good visual acuity. Refractive astigmatism higher than 2.50D show under-corrected and apparent decrease of visual acuity if it is higher than 3.00D. 2. Amount of corneal astigmatism below than 2.50D show acceptable under-corrected while higher than 3.000 present unacceptable visual acuity. 3. An estimated residual astigmatism is not revealed as it is : but it is reduced when it incorporate to refractive astigmatism.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2013

Purpose: To investigate the visual function with prescription swimming goggles. Methods: 15 university students (mean age: $22{\pm}1.54$ years) participated, with a mean distance refractive error of RE: S-1.67 D/C-0.40 D, LE: S-1.70D/C-0.37 D. Inclusion criteria were no ocular pathology, able to wear soft contact lenses to correct their refractive error to emmetropia and able to swim. Participants were fitted with contact lenses to correct all ametropia. Subjective evaluation for satisfaction of visual acuity, asthenopia and balance were also measured using a questionnaire while wearing swimming goggles with cylinder (C+1.50 D, Ax $90^{\circ}$) compared with plano sphere outside the swimming pool area. Visual acuity was assessed using the same ETDRS chart. The prescription swimming goggles powers were assessed in random order and ranged in power from S+3.00 D to S-3.00 D in 0.50 D steps. Results: Subjective evaluation was significantly worse for the swimming goggles with cylinder than for the plano powered goggles for all 3 questions, visual acuity, asthenopia and balance. Visual acuity were significantly affected by the different power of the swimming goggles (p<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the in-air in-clinic and underwater in-swimming pool measures (p=0.173). However, visual acuity measured in the clinic was significantly better than underwater for some swimming goggle powers (+3.00, +1.00, +0.50, 0, -1.00 and -2.00 D). Conclusions: Wearing swimming goggles underwater may degrade the visual acuity compared to within air but as the difference is less than 1 line of Snellen acuity, and it is unlikely to result in significant real-life effects. Having an incorrect cylinder correction was found to be detrimental resulting in lower score of satisfaction. Considering slippery floor of swimming pool area, it can be a potential risk factor. Therefore, it is important to correct any refractive error in addition to astigmatism for swimming goggle.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.87-92
• /
• 1998

Unaided visual acuity was tested by ACP-7 TOPCON chart projector on 376 kindergarteners and objective refraction error was measured by NIDEK ARK-700A auto-refractokeratometer on 554 eyes aged 3 to 5. The results were as follows ; The average unaided visual acuity of children aged 3 was 0.82, aged 4 was 0.90 and aged 5 was 0.92 respectively theerfore children s visual acuity has been gradually developed with their age. The kind of refractive error was 1% for hyperopia, 14% for hyperopic astigmatism, 3% for myopia, 50% for myopic astigmatism, 18% for mixed astigmatism and 14% for emmetropia respectively.

• Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.169-175
• /
• 2003

This research reviewed that 83 male subjects. 89 female subjects of middle and high school visited D Optical shop at the downtown of Daegu more than twice from January, 1999 to January, 2003 and obtained the following results by using the visual acuity prescription of them for which D Optical shop was keeping. 1. The classification of correction power for 190 myopia eyes was examined (87 male eyes, 103 female eyes) showed 89 eyes(46.82%) between $0.25D{\leq}3.00D$, 86 eyes(45.26%) between $3.25D{\leq}6.00D$, 15 eyes(7.89%) for over 6.25D. 2. The kind of 154 astigmatism subjects(79 male eyes, 75 female eyes) was direct astigmatism 83.77%, reverse astigmatism 11.69%, oblique astigmatism 4.55%. The cylindrical correction power for astigmatic eyes was 61 eyes(39.61%) between $0.25D{\leq}0.50D$, 60 eyes(38.96%) between 0.50D<1.00D, 121 eyes(78.57%) for less than 1.06D, 6 eyes(0.65%) for over 3.00D. 3. The variation of spherical power showed 161 eyes(46.80%) between $0.00D{\leq}0.50D$, 109 eyes(31.69%) between $0.51D{\leq}1.00D$, 17 eyes(4.94%) for over 2.01D variation. 4. The variation of astigmatic power showed 92 eyes(59.74%) between $0.00D{\leq}0.50D$, 39 eyes(25.32%) between $0.26D{\leq}0.50D$, 10eyes (6.49%) between $0.51D{\leq}0.75D$, 13 eyes(8.44 %) for over 0.76D astigmatic variation. 5. The variation of equivalent spherical power showed 137 eyes(39.83%) between $0.00D{\leq}0.50D$, 126 eyes(36.63%) between $0.51D{\leq}1.00D$, 40 eyes(11.63%) between $1.01D{\leq}1.50D$, 21 eyes(6.10%) between $1.51D{\leq}2.00D$, 20 eyes(5.81%) for over 2.01D variation.