• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.1-32
• /
• 2018

This study has been motivated by the awareness that studies on science and technology policy do not have an independent academic identity in Korea as of 2017. This research has been analyzed 19 books that have covered science and technology policy published in Korea and explored whether those have a definition of discipline and core research scope which are the key elements forming academic paradigm. As a result, this study concludes provisionally that studies on science and technology policy in Korea are still at a stage that has not yet formed a paradigm. Therefore, this work newly proposes the definition of discipline and research scope necessary to complete the paradigm of studies on science and technology policy based on this conclusion. This paper has firstly defined that studies on science and technology policy are the policy-oriented discipline. It is (1) promoting the development of science and technology itself by studying and analyzing the various phenomena of politics, economy, society, and culture related to science and technology activities as well as science and technology and (2) makes the national and public sector improve problem-solving competence using science and technology. This work also proposes a research scope consisting of four research areas such as (1) policy process of science and technology, (2) public management of science and technology, (3) R&D management and (4) technology innovation. 'Policy process of science and technology' and 'public management of science and technology' among four research areas are the new research ones reflecting the definition of studies on science and technology policy proposed in this paper. Additionally 'R&D management' and 'technology innovation' are the traditional research areas which have also included existing researches regarding science and technology policy.

• Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society
• /
• v.18 no.8
• /
• pp.798-800
• /
• 1997

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.39-73
• /
• 2023

The field of Management of Technology(MOT) emerged in response to the need for research management within U.S. public research institutions during the 1960s. Since its inception, it has proliferated significantly, being practiced in more than 809 institutions globally and over 19 institutions in Korea, encompassing both research and educational endeavors. Particularly noteworthy is the substantial investment of government resources, primarily channeled through the Ministry of Industry since 2007, which has expeditiously established a comprehensive framework for cultivating graduate-level MOT expertise, marked by both quantitative and qualitative advancements. The educational curriculum in the realm of Korean MOT deviates from foreign counterparts through distinctive pathways, exemplified by its emphasis on industry practice-oriented educational programs, standardization and isomorphism across different schools, as well as its interconnectedness with proximate academic disciplines. This research systematically undertakes an analysis of the curriculum in Korean MOT graduate schools, thereby ascertaining its intrinsic identity and distinct attributes. In this endeavor, a comprehensive examination of eleven principal MOT textbooks(three in Korean and eight in English) is conducted to delineate the primary content of the curriculum across seven thematic domains. Moreover, the study deliberates on its differentiation from neighboring academic disciplines and the definitional attributes of MOT. Subsequently, this analysis also encompasses nine Korean MOT graduate programs, projecting the seven thematic domains onto their respective curricula. The findings illuminate that within the context of Korean graduate programs, a substantial proportion of the curriculum, amounting to 62.5%, is dedicated to facets encompassing the operational aspects of technology management within corporate contexts, technology management specific to varying industries and technologies, and collaborative endeavors between academia and industry in the form of projects and seminars. Evidently, the Korean approach to technology management education is notably geared towards the cultivation of adept practitioners capable of executing technology management functions at a mid-tier managerial level, aligned with the exigencies of regional industries. Grounded in the analysis of technology management curricula, this study extrapolates implications for the future trajectory of MOT education in Korea, encompassing a consideration of the stages of industrial development. It underscores the necessity to augment the educational curricula pertaining conceptual foundation of technology and innovation, strategic perspectives of technology and innovation, and the socio-economic context of technology management.

• The Science & Technology
• /
• v.3 no.3 s.11
• /
• pp.53-58
• /
• 1970

1.서 2.한의학의 유래 3.한의학의 원리 4.한의학의 질병관 5.결어

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.11 s.153
• /
• pp.48-55
• /
• 1991

이 글에서는 과학기술이 전쟁에 미치는 영향을 개관하고, 재래식 무기의 기술기반을 확충하면서 첨단 및 핵심 기술을 접목시켜 국가 전체의 과학기술을 균형있게 발전시킬수 있는 민과 군의 상호협력 방안과, 국가의 총체적인 과학기술의 수준을 더 한층 높이고 이를 활용하여 방위력을 증강시킬수 있는 산.학.연.군의 협동방안을 제시하였습니다

• Journal of the KSME
• /
• v.32 no.8
• /
• pp.725-733
• /
• 1992

1. 열공학의 신기술과 핵심현상 1) 배경 2) 주요기술분야 3) cross-cutting technical Issues 4) 주요기술분야 요약 2. 열역학의 새로운 교육방법

• 한국과학기술학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2007.12a
• /
• pp.19-55
• /
• 2007

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.20 no.1
• /
• pp.157-170
• /
• 2020

• Fiber Technology and Industry
• /
• v.8 no.2
• /
• pp.183-191
• /
• 2004

의약품의 원재료인 약물은 사용 목적과 환자에 따라 정(tablet)이나 주사액과 같은 형태를 가지고 이를 제형(dosage form)이라 하고, 이런 형태의 물체를 제제(pharmaceutical preparations)라 한다. 신약이 대거 출현한 1950년대는 새로운 제형을 개발하는 물리약제학(physical pharmacy)이 활발히 연구되었다. 신약들은 당시의 기술로는 생체 내에서의 작용 등에 대한 명확한 자료와 근거 없이 약효가 있을 것으로 추정되었다. 그러나 분석기술과 기기의 발달로 약물의 체내 정량기술이 발달하면서 약물동태 학 (pharmacokinetics)이나 생물 약제학(biopharmaceutics)이 발달하여 약물의 체내 동태를 경시적으로 추적하는 일이 가능해졌다. (중략)

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.5 no.2 s.10
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2005

It has been a point of dispute how to define the disciplinary identity of STS; science and technology studies or science, technology and society? Still, STS is now emerging as an autonomous research discipline with its own agendas and styles of reasoning from a mere collections of various meta disciplines such as philosophy of science, history of science and sociology of science. The paper discusses how philosophy of science in its cross-disciplineary mode can contribute to STS (understood as science and technology studies) research given these recent academic trends. We can start from the observation that there are two distinctive ways of doing cross-disciplinary research: inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary. Then it is shown with concrete examples how philosophy of science can productively participate in both ways of cross-disciplinary researches in STS.