• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.260-278
• /
• 2011

Along with the launch of National R&D Program in 1982, National R&D licensing policy began to operate in order to expand and promote the outputs of R&D. Even though various studies attempted to draw plans to improve the National R&D licensing policy, most of their focus was limited to the collection and allocation structure of royalty. Thus, with the aim of approaching National R&D licensing policy in a whole cyclic perspective [from collection allocation to execution' post control], this study incorporates interviews with specialists and officials in charge of technology licensing fee, Industry-University-Institute surveys as well as literature review. Through this endeavor, suggestions are made in the aspects of (1) National R&D licensing policy reformation, (2) Technology licensing fee collection and allocation structure refinement, (3)Post control system establishment.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.430-456
• /
• 2009

The industrial Technology Development Program enables the recipient to set up technology infrastructure and to facilitate technology diffusion. In return, government charges royalties to the program recipient. However, the current royalty system is not effective form. This study analyzes the various aspects of royalty collection methods applied to the Industrial Technology Development Program and recommends the following: a) to establish a royalty collection system with appropriate charges for both fixed royalties and running royalties, dependent upon type of technology development b) to seek a method to setup different collection periods for industrial categories in consideration of product life cycle c) to review on ownership of intangible property. In addition, in order to manage the entire royalty process effectively, prompt establishment is needed in order for a responsible evaluation institute to create task forces to evaluate technology value, to transfer technology, to support technology commercialization, to collect and manage royalty and expand and report result.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.14 no.3
• /
• pp.622-646
• /
• 2011

This paper analyses the effects of mobile telecommunications market's interconnection charge on consumer welfare between 2000 and 2010 by estimating price elasticity of demand with using log linear model and augmented Alexander et al(2000)'s model. The results show that consumer welfare is about 6 trillion won in 2009 and an upward trend. In the 2nd analysis, the decline in interconnection charge raise consumer welfare but, asymmetric interconnection and current TD-BU LRIC system have negative(-) relation with consumer welfare. Hence we need to revise interconnection policy frame.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.8 s.282
• /
• pp.46-55
• /
• 2002

지난 7월호에서는 COCOMO 모델, 기능점수모델, PRICE-S모델, 일반 COSDES 모델 등의 무기체계 S/W 개발비용 산정모델들을 조사 및 분석하여 제시하였다. 이번 8월호에서는 무기체계 소프트웨어 개발비용산저에 영향을 미치는 요소를 기존의 '한소협' 모델, PRICE-S 모델, 기능점수 모델, COCOMO 모델 등 여러 소프트웨어 개발비용 산정모델을 참고 후 무기체계의 특성을 고려하여 식별하였다. 또한 식별된 요소들을 '한소협' 모델의 절차와 방법에 따라 무기체계 소프트웨어의 스텝 수 산정 영향요소, 환경요인 보정계수 영향요소, 제경비 및 기술료 산정 영향요소들을 식별하여 제시하였다.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.20 no.3
• /
• pp.181-198
• /
• 2012

Gyeonggi-Do launched the 'Achievement Royalty System(ARS)' in 2011 to promote the refund of excess profits from those firms to local system. The purpose of this study aims to analyze the effect of new royalty system in the public R&D program. From the analysis, commercially successful firms appear to have maintained the same level of innovation incentives even after introduction of ARS. It can be explained that they have given a priority in taking part in the next R&D projects as well as a benefit of systematic supports in technology commercialization and marketing. It is, therefore, fully expected that the policy makers can make ARS an additional funding source in the period of decreasing S&T budget, and have a better chance to gather evidences of successful policy practices to the firms. However, the institutional improvements are required to develop the ARS, which include the incentives of ARS payment and the lower total royalty expectation through the reduction of fix-payment ratio and the exemption of ARS.

• Defense and Technology
• /
• no.7 s.281
• /
• pp.38-49
• /
• 2002

이번 호에서는 COCOMO 모델, 기능점수모델, PRICE-S 모델, 일반 COSDES 모델 등의 무기체계 S/W 개발비용 산정모델들을 조사 및 분석하여 제시 하였다. 다음에 계속되는 7, 8월호에서는 무기체계 S/W 개발 비용 산정에 영향을 미치는 요소인 스텝수 산정, 환경요인 보정계수, 제경비 및 기술료를 산정하는데 있어서 각각의 영향요소들을 식별하여 제시하고, 무기체계 S/W 개발비용 산정 개선방안 및 이에 대한 정책적인 발전방향을 제시하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Grassland Science Conference
• /
• 1998.04a
• /
• pp.63-94
• /
• 1998

반추동물에게 조사료는 일정량 이상은 반드시 급여하여야 하나 우리나라에서는 노동력 부족과 기계보급이 저조하여 조사료 생산이 절대적으로 부족한 실정에 있다. 따라서 많은 농가에서는 볏짚과 농후사료 위주의 사양을 하고 있으며 부족한 부분은 도입 조사료에 의존하고 있는 실정이다. 특히 조사료에 비하여 농후사료의 이용비율이 높은 우리의 실정으로 볼 때 IMF의 구제금융 지원에 따른 환율의 급등은 도입사료 곡물가격의 상승으로 우리나라 축산업의 기반을 약화시키고 있다. 소 사육을 위해서는 양질조사료 생산이 필수적이므로 우리의 유휴 농경지를 이용하여 보다 값싼 조사료를 많이 생산하여 경쟁력 있는 축산물을 생산하는 것만이 이 어려운 시기를 극복할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다. 양질 조사료 생산은 그 지역에 가장 적합한 사료작물을 선정하고 가장 합리적인 작부체계를 이용하여 단위 면적 당 생산량을 최대로 높이고 농가의 경영형태에 알맞은 이용계획을 수립하여야 한다.(중략)

• 농업기술회보
• /
• v.49 no.2
• /
• pp.35-36
• /
• 2012

가축용 사료가격 상승에 따른 생산비 증가로 양축농가의 경영상 어려움이 가중되고 있다. 이런 상황에서 초식가축의 사료비 절감을 위해 사료작물의 재배면적 확대와 함께 지역 여건에 적합한 작부체계 적용으로 사료포의 단위당 생산성을 향상시켜 조사료 자급률을 높여야 한다. 봄 파종 사료작물로는 옥수수와 수수류가 주로 재배되고 있는데 이른 봄에 연맥(귀리)과 유채를 단기간재배 이용함으로써 사료포의 이용성을 높일 수도 있다.

• Journal of Technology Innovation
• /
• v.25 no.4
• /
• pp.165-187
• /
• 2017

This study analyzed the effects of TLO's organization size, expertise, and economic compensation on technology transfer performance using the panel data of Government-Funded Research Institutes in 2013-2016. First, the size of TLO personnel and budget have a positive effect on the technology transfer performance. However, in the case of TLO manpower, the statistical significance of the effect on the number of technology transfers was only 90%, and it did not affect royalty. Second, TLO expertise has a strong impact on technology transfer performance. It shows that the number of professional license holders, such as patent attorney or a technology valuer, has a statistically significant effect on the increase of the technology transfer number and the royalty under the 99% confidence level. However, unlike expected, the size of the Ph.D. did not seem to have any effect on technology transfer performance. Finally, the economic compensation for TLO does not affect both the number of technology transfers and the royalty. It does not seem to work as an appropriate incentive system, because the absolute size of the compensation is too small. The results of the above analysis suggest that it is important to secure expertise in order for the TLO organization to play a substantial role, and it is necessary to improve the economic compensation system to attract TLOs to technology transfer.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.11 no.1
• /
• pp.1-22
• /
• 2008

The Korean government has tried to increase the total national R&D investment and, to streamline acts and regulations concerning national R&D activities. Korea's total R&D expenditure in the field of S&T for the year 2006 amounted to about 27.3 trillion won including government R&D of 8.9trillion won. The Korean government enacted several pieces of legislation concerning S&T: the "Technology Transfer Promotion Act (1999)" ; the "Framework Act on Science and Technology (2000)", and the "Presidential Regulation for Managing the Government R&D Programs (2001)." With these efforts the capacity of Korea S&T has made great strides recently. But for years Korea has run a severe deficit of technology trade. The Korea's balance ratio of technology trade is 0.36 (export/import). It means that Korean industry excessively depends on foreign resource in introducing new technologies. The Korean government has put a lot of effort into promoting the commercialization of technologies developed in universities. The public technology transfer policy of the government has improved the infrastructure of technology transfer and commercialization. However, the government has realized that these policies have not been as effective as they were anticipated. In spite of these various efforts, the technologies obtained from the government R&D Programs have not been transferred to the Korean industry properly. Only 13.6% of technologies developed in universities for the year 2005 were transferred to industry. The academic royalty revenues for the year was 0.15% of their total R&D expenditure It shows only a twentieth of the percentage of royalty revenues for the American universities. The reasons of poor commercialization of academic technologies are intermingled with imperfection of technology transfer system, lack of licensing experience, immaturity of socio-economic circumstance and inadequacy of legal system and government policy. In this study we analyzed the problems of legal system and policy in licensing of government R&D outputs and suggested proper alternatives.