• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2021.11a
• /
• pp.148-150
• /
• 2021

어촌은 바다, 섬, 자연경관, 해양레저, 수산자원 등의 다양한 해양 관광자원을 보유하고 있어 성장 잠재력이 풍부하나, 이를 통해 성장할 수 있는 기본적 인프라 및 콘텐츠가 절대적으로 부족한 실정이다. 또한 수산업 침체와 어촌인구 감소 및 고령화로 어촌 공동화 현상이 심화되고 있으며, 정주환경 저하 등 삶의 질 전반에 걸쳐 낙후된 상태이다. 본 연구에서는 어촌마을의 자원활용과 자원 간의 연계를 촉진시킴과 동시에 정주기능, 생산기능의 활성화를 도모할 수 있는 소득증대 방안을 마련하고자 함

• The Journal of the Convergence on Culture Technology
• /
• v.8 no.6
• /
• pp.429-433
• /
• 2022

We analyzed both current local policies and in-depth survey data to find out a way to provide job opportunity and income source to local young people in so-called job guarantee system. The young generation in current Korean society has been experiencing both growth without employment and severe economic inequality at the same time, though they should have taken part actively in social development. Their rights for work and survival have also been threatened and losing hope for the future is an widespread symptom in this generation. Kwangju metropolitan city(KMC) has been supporting certain amount of case income and job experience to young people in Kwangju through a local government policy called Kwangju Young Generation Job Experience Dream Service. In spite of high level of satisfaction from the participants, limitations such as below average job performance level of participants and a barrier in the transition to regular position still remain. This study hopes that a case of Kwangju gives pragmatic insights for a realizable path to expanding universal welfare through assuring job opportunity to the young generation in local area.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.55-88
• /
• 2003

When the definition of income and the equivalence scale was applied just as it was in the LIS (Luxembourg Income Study), the adjusted disposable income inequality calculated by Gini coefficients in Korea was 0.358 for the year 2000. Compare to the 1996 figure of 0.298 the increase of income inequality has skyrocketed. In addition, the adjusted market income inequality increased from 0.302 in 1996 to 0.374 in 2000. The disposable income inequality ranked the third and the market income inequality ranked at the mid level in 2000 among OECD countries. One significant finding in this paper was that the difference between the disposable income inequality and market income inequality in Korea is very small compared to those of other OECD countries. The relative poverty ratio, which is calculated by using 40% of the medium income bracket of the disposable income was calculated at 7.6% in 1996 and 11.5% in 2000. The poverty ratio in 2000 for Korea ranked one of the highest in OECD countries, also.

• Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies
• /
• v.40 no.1
• /
• pp.261-296
• /
• 2009

I constructed the 2003 Korean 'social accounting matrix'(SAM) to analyze the multipliers of total demand for each economic activity. I find that the relative magnitude of the influence of the welfare policy to the national economy measured by input-output production multipliers tends to be underestimated compared to SAM multipliers. This is because the total demand multipliers of SAM include the private sector effects, which is not considered in the input-output model. The result also support that income inflows in public service areas including education, health and social work, generate gains in the relative income of households.

• KDI Journal of Economic Policy
• /
• v.11 no.4
• /
• pp.3-22
• /
• 1989

본(本) 연구(硏究)는 양도소득세제(讓渡所得稅制)의 현황과 문제점을 검토함으로써 양도소득세제(讓渡所得稅制)의 개선방향(改善方向)을 제시하는 것을 기본목적(基本目的)으로 하고 있는바 특히 양도소득세(讓渡所得稅)의 공급동결효과(供給凍結效果)(lock-in effect)에 초점을 맞추고 있다. 부동산처분시(不動産處分時)에 부과되는 양도소득세(讓渡所得稅)는 흔히 공급동결효과를 유발함으로써 부동산거레를 침체시키는 한편 부동산가격(不動産價格)을 높이는 결과를 가져올 수 있다는 지적이 제기되고 있는데 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서는 이를 자료를 통하여 확인하였다. 또한 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서는 양도소득세(讓渡所得稅)의 공급동결효과(供給凍結效果)가 부동산 보유기간의 장기화에 따라 세부담(稅負擔)이 감소하는 데 기인하는 바 큼을 밝히고 양도소득세(讓渡所得稅)의 공급동결효과를 완화하고 더 나아가 세부담의 수평적 수직적 형평을 기한다는 측면에서 보유기간에 관계없이 세부담이 균등화되도록 양도소득세제(讓渡所得稅制)가 개선되어야 한다고 주장하였다. 이 밖에 본(本) 연구(硏究)에서 제시한 양도소득세제(讓渡所得稅制)의 개선방향은 첫째로 양도소득세(讓渡所得稅) 과세대상자산(課稅對象資産)의 범위를 확대하며, 둘째로 비과세(非課稅) 및 감면규정(減免規定)을 축소조정(縮小調整)하고, 셋째로 양도차익산정기(讓渡差益算定基準)을 일원화(一元化) 현실화(現實化)하며, 넷째로 부동산공부(不動産公簿)와 사실(事實)의 일치(一致)를 통해 부동산거래(不動産去來)의 포착률을 제고시키고, 끝으로 평균소득화(平均所得化)(income averaging)를 전제로 양도소득(讓渡所得)을 통상소득에 산입(算入) 종합과세(綜合課稅)하는 것이다.

• 한국사회복지학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 1999.04a
• /
• pp.327-341
• /
• 1999

• KOREAN POULTRY JOURNAL
• /
• v.50 no.1
• /
• pp.200-202
• /
• 2018

본고는 양계인들이 알아야 할 회계나, 법률 등 일반적인 상식을 이해하기 쉽게 풀이해 전달하고자 마련한 코너이다.

• Korean System Dynamics Review
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.51-74
• /
• 2014

Over the past few years Korea has achieved rapid economic growth, while the deepening polarization of income has negatively affected Korea economy and society. It can be the reason of this negative effect on economy that the increased income by the economic growth has not been distributed socially, but overly focused on one part of social class. One of the important and powerful solution of social polarization could be the strengthening of the income distribution. In these circumstances, the social interest and discussion on the universal welfare system and on the basic income as the means of income redistribution have been increasing. In this study, a system dynamic analysis was conducted to find how an universal cash payment as basic income providing cash benefits impacts on the promotion of consumption in private sector, of local jobs and of local economic organizations. Recently, the poor energy consumption ability of energy poverty became one of the social problems. Also it was analysed how an energy payment-in-kind as basic income influences on the energy consumption of the region, the energy production capacity, the promotion of local energy. The universal cash payment and energy payment-in-kind as the basic income policy showed similar and positive effects on the local economy system and on the local energy system respectively.

• 사회경제평론
• /
• v.31 no.3
• /
• pp.1-27
• /
• 2018

We evaluate the income-led growth policies introduced in the first year of 'the Moon Government', and try to find ways to extend policy packages. We emphasize the expansion of fountain effects, reinforcing trickle-down effects, and fiscal expansion. Nevertheless, we still face two deep problems. It is hard to reverse the long-run downward growth trend due to population decline. It is also hard to overcome the chronic inefficiency in resource allocations originated from the Korea-specific monopolistic structure. We still can take advantage of income-led policy, but the growth effect will be limited if our efforts just remain in mild improvement of income distribution. We have to challenge the broader reform agenda if we really aim at great paradigm shift.

• Journal of Labour Economics
• /
• v.30 no.3
• /
• pp.103-138
• /
• 2007

The purpose of this study is: (1) to compare the awareness of inequality concept between Korea and other countries using the survey, (2) to identify whether several inequality measures, which have diverse concepts, are different in empirical aspect, and (3) to suggest the direction for the income distribution policy in Korea. The results of the survey has shown a surprising fact in that the majority of respondents do not agree with the basic assumptions outlined by Gini coefficient, which is the relative inequality measures that had been generally accepted in the past. These results are very similar to those of other countries. However, the major difference with other countries is that the Koreans feel that absolute income inequality-the income gap between the poor and rich, has increased more than relative income inequality, when all incomes of social members are doubled. From the result it is difficult to say that the bi-polarization index is different from Gini coefficient in statistical aspect although it has different theoretical background. The national development strategy should seek to promote "the pro-poor growth" since the change of inequality affect differently on the change of growth and inequality depending on whether the inequality change is relative or absolute.