• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제46권8호
• /
• pp.55-72
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study was to analyze the state of Goryoin housing in Uzbekistan and Korea. Using ethnographic methodologies, it was examined that 20 Goryoin households in Korea in relation to their usage of housing space firstly and also tried 20 Goryoin households in Uzbekistan with the same method. The following conclusion were established; 1). The majority of households in both areas preferred separated kitchen and living room areas. 2). Most households in both areas had a washing machine in bathroom and they regarded bathtub and the drain hole of the bathroom as very necessary. They all preferred separate bathroom and toilet areas in order to allow simultaneous use. 3). Their preferred seating style was chairs on sleeping and eating especially but they treated large family and guest without chairs in both areas. 4). All of them were took their shoes off and wore slippers at home usually and also had a preference for designated shoes space at the entrance to the house. 5) All of households in Uzbekistan and half of them in Korea had a carpet or mat in the bedroom or living room, both for keeping warm and aesthetic reasons. 6). The heating system of apartment in Uzbekistan was radiator and most of private houses had a modified Ondol with radiator but their preferred heating system was modified Ondol in both areas. 7). They all considered the living room as the most important housing space for family and guest in both areas.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제23권2호
• /
• pp.107-125
• /
• 2005

Each ethnic group has a different cultural background and has developed its own culture in the name of a tradition. The interaction between different cultures is ever increasing through the process of acculturation or culture contact The purpose of this study is to provide baseline information about domestic living of Korean immigrants in Australia and Australians for a larger cross-cultural study project. As the first step, the usage of domestic space and seating styles of 52 Korean households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research was conducted, utilizing a questionnaire. The findings of this research are as follows: 1. The most popular type of Living-Dining-Kitchen arrangement was the one which the kitchen is separated from the living and dining area. The level of satisfaction was the highest when the living room, dining room, and kitchen were all separated. 2. A laundry room was indispensable for Koreans in Australia, and they wanted to dry laundry and do ironing in there. Most people were satisfied with the toilet separated from the bathroom A drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not indispensable for most Korean-Australians. 3. Korean-Australians tend to engage in various activities in their individual rooms, and they estimated that the size of most rooms were small. They also wanted to renovate the house to expand the rooms. 4. The seating style of Korean-Australians was mostly chair-seating. Yet, they often made beds on the floor for guests, and made kimchi sitting on the floor. Also, when they were relaxing, they were using both chair-seating and floor-seating. 5. Korean-Australians were not very satisfied with the use of floor carpets because of the dust collected on the carpets, and the difficulty to clean. It may be related to their preferred floor seating style, as well. 6. Almost all Korean-Australians take off their shoes inside of the house for hygienic reasons. They had a shoes cabinet at the entrance inside of the house. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating. The level of satisfaction about this was moderate because hot air contains lots of dust and it makes rooms very dry. Many were using electric blankets and their desired heating system was Ondol (heated floor). 8. Korean-Australians thought that the living room was the most important place for the family, and believed it should be decorated well to entertain guests. They also pointed out that the lighting was not bright enough in general.

• 가정과삶의질연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.159-179
• /
• 2006

Each ethnic group has different cultural backgrounds and each culture has developed with its own traditions. The interaction between different cultures is getting more active through acculturation and cultural contacts. The purpose of this study was to compare domestic living of Korean immigrants with Australians in the form of a Cross-Cultural study. For this, usage of domestic space and seating style of 52 Korean households and 53 Australian households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research with questionnaire was used. The results of the research were as follows. 1. The most popular type of Living-Dining-Kitchen arrangement was L+ K. D for Koreans and L. D . K for Australians. 2. A laundry room was indispensable for both and they all wanted to do ironing in there as well as dry. Both were satisfied with the type which toilet was separated from the bathroom Drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not indispensable for most Koreans and Australians. 3. Koreans and Australians were doing various activities in living area and both were getting together around kitchen(dining) area. The particular thing of Koreans was that they were using the main bedroom with multiple purpose. 4. The seating style of Koreans and Australians belong to chair-seating style generally. But Koreans were using floor seating style in making bed for the guest and making Kimchi. Koreans and Australians were using mixed style of floor seating and chair-seating in relaxing time with watching TV, treating guest or so. 5. Koreans were not satisfied with using carpet cause of dust but Australians were satisfied with the carpet cause of warmness. 6. Most Koreans and Australians were take off shoes inside of the house. Koreans were organize shoes around the front door of the house usually and Australians were organize shoes in bedroom usually. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating for both. The level of satisfaction about ducted heating was low for Koreans because they though that it could contaminate air. Australians were satisfied with ducted heating because they though that this one was fit on the weather of this area. 8. Living room was the most important one for Koreans and Australians and they also thought it should be decorated well for entertaining guests. Most Koreans were estimate that the brightness of the light of the house was not enough but it was estimated to moderate for Australians on the contrary.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제43권9호
• /
• pp.143-162
• /
• 2005

Many ethnic groups have different cultural backgrounds and each culture has developed with its own traditions. The interaction between different cultures is getting more active through acculturation and cultural contact. The purpose of this study was to provide basic data about the domestic living of Australians in order to compare with Korean immigrants in the form of a Cross-Cultural study. For this, usage of domestic space and seating style of 53 Australian households in Melbourne were analyzed. Ethnographic research with questionnaire was used. The results of the research were as follows. 1. The open plan type combining the kitchen, dining and tying areas was the most popular one for Australians and they are very satisfied with that type. 2. The laundry room has been planned traditionally and Australians demand to be able to dry their laundry and do ironing in there additionally. Most of Australians were satisfied with separated toilet and bathroom. h drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not essential for most Australians. 3. Australians were doing various activities in the living areas and they also enjoy gelling together in the kitchen and dining areas. 4. The seating style of Australians was generally the chair-seating style. However, they sometimes made a bed for guests on the floor and watched TV and treated guests with both chair seating style and floor seating style. 5. Australians were satisfied with using carpet presumably for its warmth.6. Many Australians took off their shoes inside of the house for hygienic reason. Most people organized the shoes in the cabinet of the bedroom. 7. The most popular heating system was ducted heating for Australians and they were very satisfied with it because it was suitable for the weather in Melbourne. 8. The living room was the most important one for Australian families and they thought that it should be decorated well for entertaining guests. It was also considered that brightness of the light was enough for most Australians.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제45권9호
• /
• pp.15-26
• /
• 2007

Immigrant workers in Korea who have a multi-cultural background are increasing a need is arising to support them with housing that considers their housing culture. The purpose of this study is to gather information to formulate a plan of ChoSun-Tribe Immigrant Workers in Korea. For this purpose, we investigated to the usage of domestic space and the seating style of ChoSun-Tribe members in China and Korea. Ethnographic research with a questionnaire was used to analyze 16 households in China and 17 in Korea. The study results were as follows. 1. Most of the ChoSun-Tribe members in China and Korea thought that the kitchen had to be separated from other areas and also they wanted to have a large kitchen in which they can work comfortably. 2. ChoSun-Tribe members in China used a bathroom as a laundry normally while and ChoSun-Tribe members in China and Korea didn't think that a bathtub was indispensable in the bathroom. 3. The most uncomfortable feature for ChoSun-Tribe members in Korea was having to use a toilet outside so a toilet should be considered inside of the house. 4. ChoSun-Tribe members in China and Korea were accustomed to sitting on the floor for their living usually and ChoSun-Tribe members in China used the living room as a multi-purpose room for the family. 5. A modified Ondol system using water pipes under the floor was gaining popularity in China and was the most desirable heating system for ChoSun-Tribe members in China and Korea also. 6. ChoSun-Tribe members in China and Korea all took off their shoes inside of the house for hygienic reasons so the space for taking on-off shoes was indispensable. 7. Housing for ChoSun-Tribe immigrant workers in Korea needs to be planned with a good environment lots of sunshine and better ventilation.

• 조형예술학연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.61-86
• /
• 2008

불교와 불교미술은 인도에서 발원하였지만, 그것들은 각 나라에 전파되면서 국제적인 환경을 만들어 냈다. 불교는 각 나라에 일종의 꾸러미의 형식으로 전파되었다. 예를 들면 불경, 불상과 불화의 도상과 양식, 건축과 그 기법, 복잡한 의식, 승려나 여승이 기거하는 사찰에서 건축적 요소와 그 기법들이 함께 소개되었다 불교의 시작은 인도의 아쇼카 왕조시기(reign of King Asoka)로 거슬러 올라가지만, 이후 각 나라의 정치적, 지적, 예술적, 종교적, 사회적, 자연적 환경, 지리적, 지질적 환경에 맞게 전개됐다. 불교미술은 토착화하면서 그 지역민을 닮은 상이 만들어 졌고, 또 지역마다 독특한 특색을 나타내면서 발전하기 시작했다. 스투파(stupa)와 차이챠 홀(chaitya hall)은 수도원의 독특한 분위기를 만들어 내곤 중앙아시아의 대상인들은 인도의 문화가 중국에 전해지는데 공헌했을 뿐만 아니라, 그들이 지나던 교역루트의 자연환경 덕분에 화려한 색채의 벽화들이 제작되고 보존될 수 있었다. 불교와 불교 미술이 중국과 한국, 일본에 전해졌을 때, 불교는 국가 제도와 사회적 조직의 일부가 되었다. 정치적 목적에 의해 거대한 불상들이 산속의 동굴에 만들어 지기도 했다. 중국은 스투파를 사각형의 기둥으로 변형시켰고, 기와를 얹은 지붕 형식의 탑을 만들어 냈다. 한국은 불교미술을 중국에서 일본으로 전파시켰을 뿐만 아니라, 고유한 방식으로 그것을 변형시켰다. 석굴암의 깊은 명상에 잠긴 듯한 보살상들의 이미지가 그 좋은 예이다. 중국에서는 신유교 철학이 국-가의 공식적인 이념이 되면서 선종의 부흥하기도 했으며, 일본의 선승들은 신도들의 명상을 북돋기 위해 선종 형식의 정원을 만들어 냈다. 티벳의 밀교에서도 불교미술의 중요한 발전양상을 확인할 수 있다. 밀교의 미술은 예술적 환경 뿐만 아니라, 지적이고 종교적인 것에도 속한다. 한편 티벳의 신들이 그들의 배우자를 안고 있는 모습은 신과 신자들의 융합을 상징하기도 한다. 불교미술은 독창적인 환경을 만들어 냈고, 여라 나라에 전파되면서, 상당한 변화를 낳았다.

• 대한가정학회지
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.47-61
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this study is to provide information about domestic living of Korean immigrants in Australia and Canada who have the same cultural background for comparative study. For this, usage of domestic space and living style in housing of 52 Korean households in Melbourne of Australia and 32 Korean households in the region of Waterloo of Canada were analyzed. Ethnographic research with questionnaire were used. Results of the research were as follows. 1. Korean immigrants in each countries were living in houses which was built by company of Australia and Canada. 44.2% of Korean immigrants in Australia were using L+D K and 53.1% of Korean immigrants in Canada were using L D K. 2. Laundry was indispensable for Korean immigrants in both countries and they all wanted to use the laundry as a utility room which could dry, ironing and so on. 3. Drain hole on the floor of the bathroom was not indispensable for most Korean immigrants in both countries for hygienic reason. 4. Korean immigrants in both countries were ironing in master bedroom and they all wanted to separate it from there through renovation and extension and so on. 5. Korean immigrants in Canada were more active to use the formal lounge which has been planned as a traditional element of western house. 6. The seating style of Korean immigrants in both countries belong to chair-seating style mostly. But it was clear that they were making Kimchi with floor seating style in both countries. 7. A level of satisfaction about using carpet was not high for Korean immigrants in both countries cause of uneasiness to clean and it was considered to relate to the floor seating style of them. 8. Almost Korean immigrants were took off the shoes inside of the house and they had shoes cabinet beside the entrance or basement usually. 9. The most popular heating system was ducted heating in both countries. The level of satisfaction about this was different for Korean immigrants in Australia and Canada but most desirable heating system was Ondol for them in both countries commonly.

• 농촌의학ㆍ지역보건
• /
• 제34권1호
• /
• pp.24-33
• /
• 2009

2008년 9월 경상북도 영천시 소재 Y 지적장애인 특수학교에서 설사 유행이 신고되었고, 일부 환자의 검체에서 Shigella sonnei가 검출되었다. 이에 Y 학교와 초발 환자 신00이 기거하고 있던 경산시 소재 D 재활원에서 발생한 세균성이질에 관한 역학조사를 실시하였다. Y 학교와 D 재활원은 지적장애인을 위한 학교 및 생활시설로서 모두 직영급식을 하고 있다. 지적장애가 있는 학생과 원생들을 상대로 설문조사는 시행하지 않았고 교사와 직원들을 상대로 면담을 실시하였다. Y 학교와 D 재활원에서 직장 도말 검사를 각각 298건, 361건 실시하고 환경 검체 검사를 각각 60건, 20건을 실시하였다. 학교와 재활원의 환경조사를 실시하였고 음용수와 조리용수, 생활용수의 공급원을 파악하였다. 환자는 격리 치료하고 추가 환자 발생을 일일 능동 모니터링하였다. 환례는 2008년 9월 18일부터 9월 26일까지 Y 학교와 D 재활원의 구성원 중에서 설사(하루 2회 이상의 묽은 변)가 있는 경우 혹은 직장도말 배양검사 결과 Shigella sonnei 양성인 경우로 정의하였다. 환례 정의에 따라 조사 대상 659명 중 환례는 8명으로 1.2%의 발생률을 보였고 이들은 모두 Y 학교 학생이었다. 직장도말 배양검사 결과 Shigella sonnei가 5명의 학생에서 검출되었고, 이들 중 3명에서는 설사 증상이 있었으며 나머지 2명은 무증상이었다. 환례 8명 모두 단체숙식을 하고 있었는데 이들 중 2명은 Y 학교 기숙사 기린방에서 생활하였고, 4명은 D 재활원 온유방, 나머지 2명은 D 재활원의 까치방과 자비방에서 각각 생활하였다. Y 학교와 D 재활원의 환경조사 결과 특이사항이 없었으며, 공통적으로 음용수와 조리 용수는 상수도에서 공급받고 화장실의 생활용수는 하수도에서 공급받고 있었다. D 재활원의 지하수 1건에서 대장균군이 양성이면서 일반세균이 20,000 CFU/mL으로 나왔다. Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis 검사에서 5건 모두 동일한 DNA 절편 양식을 보였다. D 재활원과 Y 학교에서 발생한 세균성이질은 동일한 균주에 의한 유행으로 판단한다. D 재활원의 온유방에서 현성 또는 불현성 감염자인 교사나 자원봉사자와의 직 간접 접촉을 통해 최초로 1명 이상의 원생에게 전파시켰을 가능성이 있다. 그 후 환례들과 직 간접 접촉에 의하여 D 재활원의 온유방 내, 다른 방과 Y 학교 학생에게 전파되었을 가능성이 있다고 추정한다. 단체 시설의 교사와 자원봉사자에 대하여 손씻기의 중요성이 더 강조되어야 하고 전염이 가능한 증상이나 질병이 있을 때에는 접촉이나 봉사 활동을 자제해야 할 것이다.

• 한국전통조경학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.10-20
• /
• 2023

남송 유가와 도교 사상문화의 대표인 주희와 백옥섬은 그 사상문화의 기조에 따라 무이산이라는 동일한 공간을 달리 인식하고 향유하는 양상을 보인다. 이에 본 연구는 주희와 백옥섬이 무이산에서 기거했던 무이정사와 지지암을 통해 그들의 복거 양태를 통해 사상과 경관(공간) 인식을 규명한다. 이를 바탕으로 구곡 관련 경물 음영시문을 근거로 무이구곡 제1곡에서 제9곡에 이르는 '이보음영[移步吟詠]'의 동적인 과정에서 나타난 양자의 경물 인식과 완상 체계를 규명하였다. 그 결과 다음과 같다. 첫째, 동일한 경물이어도 조망자의 문화 사유 양식에 따라 해석되는 경물의 함의와 공간인식이 달리 나타난다. 둘째, 송대 유가와 도가 사상문화가 융화 발전하는 과정에서 상대 사상의 장점을 섭수원용(攝受援用)하여 각자의 사상의 단점을 보완하는 과정에서 비록 유가와 도가에서 공통적으로 사용되는 용어를 사용한다고 할지라도 각 그들의 구경(究竟)의 종지(宗旨)에 따라 각 명제의 함의가 다름을 규명하였다. 셋째, 남송 성리학을 집대성한 유학의 대표, 주희에게 있어 무이정사와 무이구곡은 외물의 경계에 완상하는 것에 그치는 것이 아닌 모든 곳이 일상생활에서 도[理]와 합일되는 '자연합일'을 추구하는 강학처요, 구도처이다. 이는 유가의 학문 목적인 '복기성[復其性]'의 일환이며, 수려한 산수를 통해 '성정함양(性情涵養)'을 목적으로 한다. 넷째, 남송 도교 금단파의 대표, 백옥섬에게 있어 지지암과 무이구곡은 태상원로부터 비롯한 유구한 연원을 가진 도교 도량으로 연단을 통해 성선(成仙)을 추구하는 청정 수행처이다. 이에 무이구곡에 남았는 도교 신화 전설과 관련해 이를 직접 인용하여 신선들의 향연과 신녀, 선태(仙蜕) 등을 등선(登仙)의 일환으로 인식하고 인간세계를 완전히 초탈하여 우화(羽化)를 염원한다. 이에 무이산을 신선화, 선계화(仙界化)하여 그 안에서 자신 역시 신선이 되어 향유하는 의경과 주지로 시문을 관통하고 있다.