• Title/Summary/Keyword: 급성 대동맥박리

Search Result 44, Processing Time 0.022 seconds

Risk Factor Analysis for Operative Death and Brain Injury after Surgery of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (스탠포드 A형 대동맥 박리증 수술 후 수술 사망과 뇌손상의 위험인자 분석)

  • Kim Jae-Hyun;Oh Sam-Sae;Lee Chang-Ha;Baek Man-Jong;Hwang Seong-Wook;Lee Cheul;Lim Hong-Gook;Na Chan-Young
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.39 no.4 s.261
    • /
    • pp.289-297
    • /
    • 2006
  • Background: Surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection shows a high operative mortality rate and frequent postoperative brain injury. This study was designed to find out the risk factors leading to operative mortality and brain injury after surgical repair in patients with type A aortic dissection. Material and Method: One hundred and eleven patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent surgical repair between February, 1995 and January 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 99 acute dissections and 12 chronic dissections. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors of operative mortality and brain injury. Resuit: Hospital mortality occurred in 6 patients (5.4%). Permanent neurologic deficit occurred in 8 patients (7.2%) and transient neurologic deficit in 4 (3.6%). Overall 1, 5, 7 year survival rate was 94.4, 86.3, and 81.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed 4 risk factors to be statistically significant as predictors of mortality: previous chronic type III dissection, emergency operation, intimal tear in aortic arch, and deep hypothemic circulatory arrest (DHCA) for more than 45 minutes. Multivariate analysis revealed previous chronic type III aortic dissection (odds ratio (OR) 52.2), and DHCA for more than 45 minutes (OR 12.0) as risk factors of operative mortality. Pathological obesity (OR 12.9) and total arch replacement (OR 8.5) were statistically significant risk factors of brain injury in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The result of surgical repair for Stanford type A aortic dissection was good when we took into account the mortality rate, the incidence of neurologic injury, and the long-term survival rate. Surgery of type A aortic dissection in patients with a history of chronic type III dissection may increase the risk of operative mortality. Special care should be taken and efforts to reduce the hypothermic circulatory arrest time should alway: be kept in mind. Surgeons who are planning to operate on patients with pathological obesity, or total arch replacement should be seriously consider for there is a higher risk of brain injury.

A Case of Total Aortic Arch Replacement with Root Plasty with Right Coronary Artery Bypass and Distal Open Stent-graft Insertion in Acute Type I Aortic Dissection (급성대동맥박리중에서 전궁치환술 시 근부성형술 및 우관상동맥우회로술과 하행대동맥 내 스텐트인조혈관삽입 동시 시술 증례)

  • Bang Jung Hee;Woo Jong Su;Kim Si Ho;Choi Pil Jo;Cho Kwang Jo
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.38 no.6 s.251
    • /
    • pp.434-437
    • /
    • 2005
  • Since the operative mortality rate of the Acute aortic dissection has been reducing, a more extensive primary repair of the dissected aorta is preferred for acute aortic dissection to reduce the needs of secondary procedures. We performed a total aortic arch replacement with distal stent-grafting in acute type A aortic dissection. The patient was a 50-years old man. He recovered from the operation and was followed up for 7 months. The pseudolumen in the descending aorta was obliterated with the stent.

Surgical Treatment of the Descending Thoracic Aorta ; An analysis of 22 cases (하행 흉부 대동맥류의 외과적 치료; 22예의 분석)

  • 이홍섭;이선훈;윤영철;구본일;김창호
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.32 no.6
    • /
    • pp.532-535
    • /
    • 1999
  • Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and analyze the surgical techniques and postoperative complications in patients undergoing operations for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Material and Method: The data of 22 major operations between March 1987 and August 1997 were retrospectively reviewed. Result: There were 18 men and 4 women with a mean age of 49 years (range 33 years to 82 years). The cause of the aneurysm was aortic dissection in 13 patients, atherosclerosis in 3, mycotic in 3, trauma in 2 and uncertain in 1. The operative techniques were resection and graft replacement in 16, axillofemoral bypass graft in 2, femorofemoral bypass graft in 2, exclusion, aneurysmorrhaphy in 1 and transfemoral stent insertion in 1. During the operation, 16 cases were performed under total aortic clamp. Among the 16 patients, femorofemoral bypass was used in 14 cases and previously made shunt in 2 cases. The mean total aortic clamp time was 91 minutes and the mean extracorporeal circulation time was 116 minutes. One death occurred in an excluded patient on the 52 postoperative day due to a rupture of the aneurysm. Postoperative complications were paraplegia in 1 case, acute renal failure in 1 case and acute respiratory failure in 1 case. Conclusion: Although surgical treatment of the descending thoracic aneurysm has many postoperative complications, good surgical results can be achieved with a proper patient selection and fine surgical techniques.

  • PDF

Influence of Cerebral Protection Methods in Thoracic Aortic Surgery Using Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest (저체온 순환정지를 이용한 흉부 대동맥 수술 시 뇌관류 방법에 따른 수술결과)

  • Kim, Jae-Hyun;Na, Chan-Young;Oh, Sam-Sae
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.41 no.2
    • /
    • pp.229-238
    • /
    • 2008
  • Background: Protection of the brain is a major concern during thoracic aortic surgery using hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). This study compares the surgical outcomes of two different cerebral protection methods in thoracic aortic surgery using HCA: retrograde cerebral protection (RCP) and antegrade cerebral protection (ACP). Material and Method: We retrospectively reviewed data on 146 patients who underwent thoracic aortic surgery from May 1995 to February 2007 using either RCP (114 patients, Group 1) or ACP (32 patients, Group 2) during HCA. There were 104 dissections (94 acute and 10 chronic) and 42 aneurysms (41 true aneurysms and 1 pseudoaneurysm), and all patients underwent ascending aortic replacement. There were 33 cases of hemiarch replacement, 5 of partial arch replacement, and 21 of total arch replacement. Result: The two groups were similar in preoperative and operative characteristics, but Group 2 had more elderly (over 70 years old) patients (34.4% vs. 10.5%), more coronary artery diseases (18.8% vs. 4.4%), more total arch replacements (46.9% vs. 5.3%) and longer HCA time ($50{\pm}24$ minutes vs. $32{\pm}17$ minutes) than Group 1. The operative mortality was 4.4% (5/114) and 3.1% (1/32), the incidence of permanent neurologic deficits was 5.3% (6/114) and 3.1% (1/32), and the incidence of temporary neurologic deficits was 1.8% (2/114) and 9.4% (3/32) in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in operative mortality, postoperative bleeding, or neurologic deficits (permanent and temporary). Conclusion: The early outcomes of aortic surgery using HCA were favorable and showed no statistical difference between RCP and ACP. However, the ACP patients endured longer HCA times and more extended arch surgeries. ACP is the preferred brain protection technique when longer HCA time is expected or extended arch replacement is needed.

Percutaneous Endovascular Stent-graft Treatment for Aortic Disease in High Risk Patients: The Early and Mid-term Results (고위험군의 대동맥류 환자에서 경피적으로 삽입이 가능한 스텐트 그라프트를 이용한 치료: 조기 및 중기성적)

  • Choi, Jin-Ho;Lim, Cheong;Park, Kay-Hyun;Chung, Eui-Suk;Kang, Sung-Gwon;Yoon, Chang-Jin
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.41 no.2
    • /
    • pp.239-246
    • /
    • 2008
  • Background: Aortic surgery for high risk patients has high mortality and morbidity rates, and the necessity of performing aortic surgery in cancer patients is questionable because of their short life expectancy. Endovascular repair of aneurysm repair can be considered for high risk patients and cancer patients because it has relatively lower invasiveness and shorter recovery times than aortic surgery does. Especially, percutaneous endovascular stent graft treatment is more useful for high risk patients because it does not require general anesthesia. Material and Method: From July 2003 to September 2007, twelve patients who had inoperable malignancy or who had a high risk of complication because of their combined diseases during aortic surgery underwent endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. he indications for endovascular repair were abdominal aortic aneurysm in 5 patients, descending thoracic aortic aneurysm in 6 patients and acute type B aortic dissection in one patient. The underlying combined disease of these patients were malignancy in 3 patients, respiratory disease in 6 patients, old age with neurologic disease in 6 patients, Behcet's iseae in one patient and chronic renal failure in one patient. Result: Stent grafts were inserted percutaneously in all cases. There were 4 hospital deaths and there were 3 delayed deaths during the follow-up periods. There were no deaths from aortic disease, except one hospital death. There were several complications: a mild cerebrovascular accident occurred in one patient, acute renal failure occurred in 2 patients and ischemic bowel necrosis occurred in one patient. Mild type I endoleak was observed in 2 patients and type II endoleak was observed in a patient after stent graft implantation. Newly developed type I endoleak was observed in a patient during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Percutaneous endovascular stent graft insertion is relatively safe procedure for high risk patients and cancer patients. Yet it seems that its indications and its long term results need to be further researched.

Aortic Dissection with Aberrant Origin of Single Coronary Artery -Report of 1 case- (단일 관상동맥 기형이 동반된 급성 대동맥박리의 수술치험)

  • Kim, Woong-Han;Ahn, Hyuk
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.27 no.12
    • /
    • pp.1036-1041
    • /
    • 1994
  • Emergency operation was performed in a patient with severe aortic insufficiency caused by type A acute aortic dissection with aberrant high take-off origin of single coronary artery. The single coronary artery was found to arise from an unusual position high in the ascending aorta. Dissection was begun in the aortic root and involved the single coronary ostium. Valve competance was restored by resuspension of the commissures. the false lumen was obliterated with strips of Teflon felt and surgical glue. The aortic tissues were firmly reinforced and sutured. The proximal aortic stump was anatomically reconstructed, and fortunately the aortic valve was preserved and coronary reimplantation avoided. The patient was discharged at postoperative 13 days without specific complications. Postoperative course during the 18 months follow-up was uneventful.

  • PDF

Surgical Treatment of the Aortic Dissection (대동맥박리증의 외과적 치료)

  • Jung, Jong-Pil;Song, Hyun;Cho, You-Won;Kim, Chang-Hoi;Lee, Jay-Won;Song, Meong-Gun
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.29 no.12
    • /
    • pp.1360-1365
    • /
    • 1996
  • From September 1992 to May 1996, 38 patients ranging in age from 23 to 78, were operated for aortic dissection at Asan medical center There were 21 men and 17 women. The underlying aortic pathology were acute aortic dissection in 23, chronic aortic dissection in 15. Eight patients had Martian syndrome. In 34 cases of DeBakey type I, II patients, femoral artery and vein and/or right atrial auricle were used as cannulation site. With deep hypothermic c rculatory arrest (esophageal temperature 12 $\pm$ 2.5$^{\circ}C$) and retrograde cerebral perfusion of cold oxygenated blood through SVC, we replaced the ascending aorta and the part of arch if necessary. The mean duration of the total circulatory arrest time was 25 $\pm$ 1.7 mintstuts. In 4 cases of DeBakey type III patients, we replaced descending thoracic aorta or thoracoabdomlnal aorta without shunt or bypass under normothermia with an average 30: 1.5 minutesaortic cross clamp time. One death(2.6%) occurred on the twenty-second postoperative day owing to asphyxia related to ulcer bleeding. Postoperative complications were myocardial infarction with transient left peroneal palsy in 1 case, transient lower extremity weakness in 1 case and prolonged ventilatory support in 1 case. Two patients required reoperation due to retrograde extended dissection and aortic insufuciency. There was no late death with an average 25 months follow-up period.

  • PDF

Acute Type 1 Aortic Dissection Involving Right Coronary Artery (우관상동맥 침범한 급성 대동맥 박리증 치험 1례)

  • Min, Gyeong-Seok;Lee, Jae-Won;Song, Myeong-Geun
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.28 no.2
    • /
    • pp.188-192
    • /
    • 1995
  • A 50 year old man with acute aortic dissection DeBakey type I, involving right coronary artery and aortic valve, underwent replacement of the ascending aorta and aorto-right coronary bypass grafting. The operative findings showed a large transverse intimal tear was at about 4cm above the aortic valve. The dissection extended out into the proximal right coronary artery. And we found that the right coronary artery originated from the left sinus of Valsalva, run transversally in the aortic wall, with partial rupture. Postoperatively he had no ischemic cardiac symptoms and neurologic complications. He was discharged on postoperative 9th day with good result.

  • PDF

Type A Aortic Dissection with Concomitant Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Tamponade: An Autopsy Case (급성심근경색과 심장압전이 동반된 A형 대동맥 박리: 부검 증례)

  • Noh, Sang Jae;Sim, Myung Seok;Ahn, Ae Ri;Lee, Ho
    • The Korean Journal of Legal Medicine
    • /
    • v.42 no.4
    • /
    • pp.172-175
    • /
    • 2018
  • Aortic dissection is an uncommon, life-threatening medical emergency that is associated with a high mortality rate, and death from aortic dissection is mainly related to secondary complications, namely cardiac tamponade, severe aortic regurgitation, acute myocardial infarction, and abdominal organ vessel obstruction. Hence, prompt and accurate diagnosis followed by proper treatment is important for patient survival. Herein, we present a rare case of sudden death after aortic dissection with concomitant acute myocardial infarction and cardiac tamponade.

The Clinical Experience of the Aortic Arch Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection (급성대동맥박리증에서 궁치환술의 임상 경험)

  • 조광조;우종수;성시찬;김시호;이길수
    • Journal of Chest Surgery
    • /
    • v.36 no.5
    • /
    • pp.335-342
    • /
    • 2003
  • Background: The aortic arch replacement in an acute aortic dissection is technically demanding procedure that has a lot of postoperative morbidity and high mortality The authors have applied several techniques of aortic arch replacement to overcome the risks of the procedure. Therefore we analysed the results of these techniques. Material and Method: From March of 1996 to July of 2002, we performed 31 cases of the aortic arch replacement in the Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. There were 12 male and 19 female patient's with 59.6$\pm$9.4 years of mean age. Among them 18 cases were treated with the hemiarch replacement and 13 cases with the total arch replacement. We approached the aortic arch through median sternotomy in all but 3 cases of Clamshell incision and applied the deep hypothermic circulatory arrest with retrograde cerebral perfusion. The associated procedures were 2 Bentall's procedures, an axillobifemoral bypass, a femorofemoral bypass and a carotid artery bypass. Result: The postoperative morbidities were 8 acute renal failures, 3 CNS complications, 2 low cardiac output syndromes, 2 malpefusion syndromes, and 2 deep wound infections. There were 4 cases of early hospital mortality which were from an acute renal failure a postoperative bleeding, a low cardiac output syndrome, and a reperfusion syndrome. There were 3 cases of late hospital mortality which were from an acute renal failure, and 2 multiorgan failures. So the total mortality rate was 22.5%. There were 4 cases of late mortality after the discharge, which were form 2 cases of distal anastomotic rupture and 2 cases of intracranial hemorrhage. Conclusion: The hemiarch replacement has relatively shorter operative time and lower hospital mortality but higher late mortality than the total arch replacement. The total arch replacement needs more technically demanding procedure.