• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.11D no.2
• /
• pp.407-414
• /
• 2004

The US DoD architecture framework defines architecture Products according to three viewpoints : operational view, system view, and technical view. But, its coarse-grained development process causes leakage of the details In transforming among different views. It also uses different methods for architecture products development, so that the levels of those products are not consistent. So. we propose MND AF(Ministry of National Defense Architecture Framework) for military environment to solve those problems. We propose additional architecture products to achieve consistency, including “architecture disciplines definition description,”“organization-to-activity relationships matrix,” “system definition description,” and “technical reference model,” etc. We also propose the architecture development process in more detail through seven steps. In addition, we propose the applicability of those products to the life cycle processes of the acquisition management. MND AF can provide consistency and traceability of architecture products, provide the basis for sl·stem integration and interoperability. Also, architecture developers can construct architecture in a more effective and efficient way through MND AF.

• Journal of the military operations research society of Korea
• /
• v.34 no.2
• /
• pp.175-191
• /
• 2008

The Korean military is aware that EA(Enterprise Architecture) is an important tool for transforming national defense and building Korean NCW, being developing the Ministry of National Defense Enterprise Architecture(MND-EA). However, unlike the importance of MND-EA, they are building MND-EA without the explicit EA governance system Many researchers have emphasized that it is difficult to develop the useful EA without EA governance. In this study, we present the EA governance framework for implementing the effective MND-EA. Through the investigation of the state of EA development and EA governance of home and abroad public institutions, we recognize the importance of EA governance, identifying the EA governance components. We set up the basic governance model consisted of principle, organization and process, designing the MND-EA governance framework by mapping the model to governance scope and target. The proposed governance framework provides direction for explicit and formal MND-EA governance system.

• 한국IT서비스학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 2005.11a
• /
• pp.551-558
• /
• 2005

최근 정부의 정보기술아키텍처(ITA/EA)에 관한 연구와 사업이 활발히 진행 중이며, 조만간 범정부 정보기술아키텍처가 운용될 예정이다. 국방부 또한 정보체계 개발시 상호운용성 확보, 효율적인 정보자원관리, 투자 우선순위 결정 등의 목적으로 국방 아키텍처프레임워크인 MND-AF를 적용하고 있으나, 국가 대전략(정치, 외교, 경제, 사회, 군사 등) 차원에서의 접근보다는 군사적 차원의 체계별 아키텍처 개발에 적용하고 있다. 특히 정부에서 추진 중인 정보기술아키텍처는 미 연방정부 모델인 FEA와 유사할 것으로 보이며, 상호운용성, 중복투자 방지를 위해 각 기관은 아키텍처 구축시 범정부 참조모델을 기반으로 하여 아키텍처를 구축하고 관련성을 제시하여야 할 것이다. 따라서 국방부 차원에서 이러한 정부 모델과의 연계 및 국가정책과 연계된(대국민 서비스 개선 등이 포함된) 국방 정보기술 아키텍처 프레임워크에 대한 연구가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 국방부분에서 이미 채택하고 있는 MND-AF의 지속적 사용과 정부와의 연계성 문제를 모두 해결할 수 있는 새로운 방안을 모색하고 적용하는 방안을 제시하였다.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.12D no.5 s.101
• /
• pp.729-736
• /
• 2005

MND(Ministry of National Defense) has developed MND AF(Ministry of National Defense Architecture Framework) and CADM(Core Architecture Data Model) to guarantee interoperability among defense information systems. TRM(Technical Reference Model) and SP(Standard Profile) product defined in MND AF is core part of Information Technology Architecture and core element of interoperability guarantee. In this paper, we proposed a method which manages technical service and standard of TRM and SP, and developed TRM and SP management system based on the method. TRM and SP management system provides the basis for interoperability among information systems and a more efficient development and management of TRM and SP product.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2003.10b
• /
• pp.238-240
• /
• 2003

현재 국방부에서는 국방정보체계간의 상호운용성을 보장하기 위해 아키텍처 산출물을 쉽고 일관성 있게 개발할 수 있는 국방 아키텍처 프레임워크를 개발하고 있다. 따라서 개발된 아키텍처 산출물을 저장하여 재사용하고 국방 전반의 아키텍처 정보의 교환, 비교, 통합을 용이하게 하는 핵심아키텍처데이터모델의 개발이 필요하다. 핵심아키텍처데이터모델은 국방 아키텍처 프레임워크에서 도출된 데이터 요구사항을 통해 엔티티를 추출하고 관계를 정의하였으며 실사례를 통해 엔티티를 검증하였다. 이를 통해 전군의 아키텍처에 대한 공통의 데이터 모델을 제공하여 국방정보체계에 대한 통합적인 정보자원관리와 상호운용 및 통합을 향상시킬 수 있다.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.11D no.3
• /
• pp.683-690
• /
• 2004

MND(Ministry of National Defense) has developed .nm AF(Ministry of National Defense Architecture Framework) to guarantee interoperability among defense information systems. Users can easily and consistently develop architecture products through MND AF. There is necessity for development if CADM(Core Architecture Data Model), which facilitate exchange, integration, and comparison for architecture data, to store architecture data from architecture products and reuse them. We developed CADM from defining entities and relationships that satisfy data requirement of each architecture product from MND AF. After we developed architecture products about MIMS(Military Intelligence Management System), and inserted these architecture data to CADM repository. we verified CADM entities and relationships through query. Through CABM which provides common data model for the whole my architectures, interoperability and integration among defense information systems ran be improved, and integrated defense information resources efficiently can be managed.

• The KIPS Transactions:PartD
• /
• v.12D no.6 s.102
• /
• pp.857-862
• /
• 2005

MND(Ministry of National Defense) has developed MND AF(Ministry of National Defense Architecture Framework) and CADM(Core Architecture Data Model to guarantee interoperability among defense information systems. But, it is very difficult to manage architecture product documented through MND AF and CADM. So, there Is necessity for development of modeling tool and repository system which can develop architecture products and manage architecture product informations in common repository In this paper, we developed architecture product management system which supports development and management of meta model and architecture product of MND AF and CADM. Through architecture product management system architect of each agency can construct architecture product in a more effective and efficient way with modeling method and a user can search and refer useful architecture product informations using query function. Also, architecture product management system provides the basis for system integration and interoperability with integration, analysis and comparison of architecture product.

• Proceedings of the Korean Information Science Society Conference
• /
• 2008.06b
• /
• pp.91-95
• /
• 2008

2005년 MND-AF v1.0의 제정으로 시작된 국방 아키텍처 활동은 2007년 범 정부 아키텍처 프레임워크와의 산출물 연계를 위한 v1.2 발표와 함께 새로운 전기를 맞고 있다. 본 논문에서는 국방 아키텍처 활동 소개와 국방 아키텍처 변화에 따른 국방기술품질원의 자체 아키텍팅 활동 정리 그리고 v1.2의 도입과 함께 최근 관심 사항이 되고 있는 ITA/EA 툴의 제품 동향과 도입 사업 추진 시의 평가기준 등을 제시한다.

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• v.19 no.6
• /
• pp.77-85
• /
• 2014

Until now there have been many kinds of enterprise architecture frameworks including the DoDAF in defense domain, the FEAF in administration domain, and the TEAF in finance domain. These EAFs define EA viewpoints for supporting each domain and propose perspectives and models for each viewpoint. These EAFs provide consistent models from different perspectives that interact with each other. However, they have too many perspectives so that their complexities are too high, or they do not define enough models for concrete architecture description. Especially, they neither consider business values, that mean the ultimate purpose of an organization nor execute processes for achieving the business values. This paper thus proposes the VBEAF, business value based enterprise architecture framework that considers and executes business values in organizational business processes.

• Proceedings of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea Conference
• /
• 2005.03a
• /
• pp.128-142
• /
• 2005